Cordova Community Med LTC
602 Chase Ave, Cordova, AK 99574 · Government - City/county · 10 certified beds · (907) 424-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.0% | 16.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.7% | 6.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.3% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.1% | 18.8% | 17.1% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an abuse, neglect, and exploitation screening policy accordingly. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure individuals who had direct contact with residents, their medical or financial records, or control over or impact on the financial well-being of residents had a valid criminal history check conducted under 7 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 10.900-10.990. This resulted in 6 employees working at the facility without valid clearance from the Alaska Background Check program. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 8) at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings:Infection Control Nurse (ICN) Review of the State of Alaska background check clearance letter for the ICN, dated 1/6/21, revealed: .The Background Check Program has completed the background check for [ICN] and the individual has been issued an Eligible Determination for association with Cordova Community Medical Center. The determination is valid from 01/06/2021 to 12/30/2025. Review of email correspondence sent from the State of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies, skill sets, and techniques to care for resident's needs. Specifically, nursing staff did not receive Trauma-Informed Care specific training. This failed practice had the potential to 1) exacerbate past trauma for 1 resident (#3), out of 8 residents, and affect the resident's ability to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being; and 2) affect all residents (based on a census of 8) with any newly identified trauma during the course of their residency in the facility. Findings:Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) training Review of the facility's Facility-Wide self assessment, dated [DATE], revealed: .Staff competencies and annual training requirements per regulatory and/or facility policy:. Further review revealed no TIC training listed with their staff competencies and annual training requirements. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) food was stored under proper sanitation practices in the main kitchen; and 2) expired food items were discarded timely. These failed practices had the potential of causing or spreading foodborne illness to 6 out of 8 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: An observation, during the initial main kitchen tour, on 3/9/26 at 3:08 PM, revealed: 1) Dry Storage/Pantry Area: - 1 30-ounce can of [NAME] Mexican Style Hominy, with a best by date of 4/13/25; and- 1 unopened box of microwave popcorn (6 bags in the box), with a best by date of 1/2/26. 2) Large Bin Container Closet: An observation of one metal bin labeled white rice 2 years + [good for more than 2 years] and sugar U.B. [use by] 11/10/26. Further observation revealed this label was not accurate. There were multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally required nursing assessment) assessment accurately represented the residents' status for 2 residents (#'s 1 and 3), out of 8 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care planning and goals which could affect their overall health and wellbeing. Findings:Resident #1 Record review on 3/9-13/26 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, acquired absence of left leg below knee, and history of falling. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/20/25, revealed: [Section] J1800. Has the resident had any falls since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment. whichever is more recent? 0 [No]. Review of Resident#1's ED Note, dated 10/7/25, revealed: [Resident #1] reports [he/she] was in [his/her] wheelchair tonight and leaned forward to pick up something. As [he/she] leaned, [he/she] slipped out of the wheelchair and landed on the floor, striking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (#3), out of 8 sampled residents. Specifically, the resident's identified trauma history was not care planned for to ensure trauma-informed care interventions were implemented. This failed practice had the potential to exacerbate past trauma and affect the resident's ability to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings:Record review on 3/9-13/26 revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in intellectual functioning, including problems with memory, reasoning and thinking) with behavioral disturbance, personality disorder (a mental health condition that involves long lasting, all-encompassing, disruptive patterns of thinking, behavior, mood, and relating to others), and insomnia (difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up too early). Review of Resident #3's SOCIAL HISTORY/ Trauma and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide proof that the Alaska Nurse Aide Abuse Registry was checked before hiring Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). This failed practice placed all residents, based on a census of eight, at potential risk of abuse by individuals who may have had a documented history of misconduct. Findings: Record review on 1/30/25 revealed the facility had 13 CNAs working at the Long-Term Care (LTC). Review of the CNA employee records revealed no documentation that the Alaska Nurse Aide Abuse Registry was checked, prior to the CNAs starting work with residents of the LTC. During the course of this survey, proof was requested that the Alaska Nurse Aide Abuse Registry was checked for all CNAs working at the LTC. Review of the facility-provided form,Nurse Aides Abuse Registry, revealed this form was dated 1/29/16. During an interview on 1/30/25 at 8:30 AM, the facility's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) stated the Human Resources (HR) staff took screenshots of the abuse registry to confirm that an employee was not listed and placed this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy and provide the facility's bed hold form (policy of reserving a resident's bed for a specified period when the resident is temporarily transferred to a hospital or another healthcare setting) for two residents (#'s eight and nine), out of nine residents reviewed, who were transferred to the emergency department (ED) and/or hospital, for medical treatment. This failed practice had the potential for the residents and/or their resident representatives to not be informed of the facility's bed hold policy, placing these residents at risk for losing their beds at the facility due to an extended stay at another healthcare facility. Findings: Resident #8 Record review from 1/27- 31/25 revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sequelae of central nervous system tuberculosis (long-term complications or residual effects that persist after an individual has recovered from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1) ensure expired medical products were removed from the medical supply storage room; and 2) ensure the medication cart drawers were locked when unsupervised. These failed practices placed all residents (based on a census of 9) at risk for: 1) adverse effects or complications from use of expired products; and/or 2) potential loss, diversion, or accidental exposure to medications. Findings: Expired medical products: An observation on [DATE] at 3:27 PM, of the medical supply storage room, revealed the following expired medical supplies: 1- Copan eSWAB collection and preservation swab, expired on [DATE]; 3- BD Vacutainer Serum red top vials, expired on [DATE]; and 1- BD Vacutainer Serum green top vial, expired on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:27 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) #2 stated the night shift LN was responsible to check the medical supply room for expiration dates but was unsure of the frequency it was checked. LN #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) store food under proper sanitary conditions; and 2) regularly maintain the ice machine based on manufacturer's instructions. This failed practice placed 6 residents (#s 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8) out 6 residents who received meals from the kitchen, at risk for foodborne illnesses and communicable disease. Findings: Food Storage An observation, during the initial kitchen tour on 12/11/23 at 4:00 PM, revealed the following spoiled fruits and vegetables in the walk-in cooler: 1 open pack of Kale had yellow leaves; 1 tomato with a dime-sized black spot ; 3 whole cantaloupes containing multiple silver dollar sized black spots and several soft brown spots; and 7 whole cantaloupes containing multiple various sized soft brown spots. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 4:25 PM, Dietary Staff (DS) #1 stated he/she was responsible to check expired and spoiled items in the walk-in cooler. He/she stated the facility's process was to remove the spoiled and expired items from the cooler. For spoiled fruits, he/she stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control protocols were performed during food preparation, medication administration, and enteral feeding (receiving nutrition through a gastrostomy tube [a tube inserted through the stomach]). These failed practices had the potential to affect all residents (based on census of 9) for the development and/or transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings: Food Preparation During an observation on 12/13/23 between 4:30 PM to 5:15 PM, [NAME] #1 prepared dinner menu items such as sausage patties, gravy, waffles, and hot fruit compote. [NAME] #1 wore gloves when he/she started the food preparation. The cook removed the steam table tray lid and dished out one sausage patty. He/she covered the steam table with the lid then took milk from the walk-in cooler. The cook cut the sausage patty into chunks and with the same gloved hands, the cook placed the chunks into a blender. [NAME] #1 returned to the steam table, uncovered the sausage patty tray and measured the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 5 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal and influenza immunizations documentation (administered or declined) were completed for 1 resident (#5), of 5 residents sampled for pneumococcal and influenza immunizations. This failed practice denied the resident or resident representative the opportunity to receive education on the benefits and potential side effects, and to accept or decline the immunizations. Findings: Record review on 12/11-15/23 revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (where a cluster of brain cells do not receive enough blood supply and die), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that cause obstructed airflow in the lungs). Further record review revealed Resident #5 did not have any allergies listed for the pneumococcal and influenza immunizations. Review of Resident #5's immunization record on 12/14/23 at 8:12 AM, revealed the resident was overdue for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccination documentation (administered or declined) was completed for 1 resident (#5), of 5 residents sampled for COVID-19 vaccinations. This failed practice denied the resident or resident representative the opportunity to receive education on the benefits and potential side effects, and to accept or decline the immunizations. Findings: Record review on 12/11-15/23 revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (where a cluster of brain cells do not receive enough blood supply and die), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that cause obstructed airflow in the lungs). Further record review revealed Resident #5 did not have an allergy listed for the COVID-19 vaccine. Review of Resident #5's immunization record on 12/14/23 at 8:12 AM, revealed the resident was overdue for the COVID-19 vaccine. Further review of the immunization record revealed no documentation that the facility: offered the COVID-19 vaccine,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-16 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform residents, in writing, before or at the time of admission, of the services available in the facility and the charges for those services, including services not covered under Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate, for 7 of 8 Medicaid-eligible residents reviewed. This failed practice resulted in residents not receiving required information necessary to understand the cost of care and services, placing them at risk for unexpected financial liability. Findings:Review of the facility's Resident admission Agreement paperwork, undated, revealed: . Our responsibilities. We will provide you with the items and services set forth in Exhibit 'A' to this Agreement which are presently included in our daily rate. If you request any item(s) or service(s) not included in our daily rate, you agree and acknowledge that you will be billed directly for those services. Your responsibilities. You shall pay all fees and charges due under this Agreement. The Responsible Party shall ensure that all fees and charges due under this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address or include the staff competencies and skill sets that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for their resident population in their facility assessment. Specifically, trauma-informed care (TIC) training was not included in their annual facility-wide assessment. This failed practice: 1) placed 1 resident (#3), out of 8 resident's reviewed, at risk of having their past trauma exacerbated which had the potential to affect the resident's ability to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being; and 2) placed all residents (based on a census of 8) at risk of not having newly identified trauma care planned for to mitigate retraumatization. Findings:Review of the facility's Facility-Wide self assessment, dated 11/10/25, revealed .Staff competencies and annual training requirements per regulatory and/or facility policy:. Further review revealed no TIC training listed with their staff competencies and annual training requirements. During an interview on 3/12/26 at 3:50 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-15 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate staffing data for the 3rd quarter of 2023 (April - June 2023) was reported to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ). This failed practice potentially denied residents and/or representatives (based on census of 9), and the public, accurate staffing data when accessing the Nursing Home Compare website. Findings: During an interview on 12/14/23 at 10:22 AM, Accounts Payable and Payroll staff stated the facility used an online service for payroll called ADP (Automatic Data Processing). She stated the facility coded the worked LN (licensed nurse) hours to specific departments (such as Long-Term Care, and other departments, etc.) in the ADP. She further stated all the LTC (Long Term Care) LN hours from ADP were then pulled out and submitted to the CMS PBJ every quarter. She confirmed that the reported PBJ LN hours were less than 24-hours on certain days during the 3rd quarter. Record review on 12/14/23 at 10:32 AM, of the facility's PBJ staffing report revealed the facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in AK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alaska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 025028. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.