Wildflower Court

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 46.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 5.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.39 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.81 to 1.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and maintain food and food-contact sanitation in accordance with food safety standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Sanitizer solutions used for food-contact surfaces were maintained at the manufacturer-recommended concentration; and 2) Food items available for resident use were labeled with required use-by dates and/or removed when expired; and 3) Culinary staff followed hand hygiene and glove-use practices to prevent cross-contamination during food preparation. These failed practices had the potential to cause cross contamination during food preparation and to allow contaminated and/or expired food to be served to 54 residents who received food from the kitchen, out of a total of 55 residents, placing these residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings:.Sanitizer Concentration An observation on 6/10/26 at 10:39 AM, in the main kitchen, revealed two sanitizer buckets available for use. When tested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS-10123, was completed with the required Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) name and toll-free telephone number before issuance for 3 residents (#18, #58, and #62), out of 3 residents who were reviewed for beneficiary notifications; and 2. The Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN), Form CMS-10055, was provided when required for 1 resident (#18), out of 3 residents who were reviewed. Instead, the facility issued an expired Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN), Form CMS-R-131, which was retired from use by CMS on [DATE]. These failed practices had the potential to prevent residents from receiving complete and accurate information regarding their Medicare appeal rights, including the right to request an expedited QIO review before termination of covered services, and could have limited their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and effective use of assistive fall-prevention devices for 2 residents (#17 and #37), out of 4 residents reviewed for fall precautions. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure adequate supervision and effective use of an assistive fall-prevention device for resident #37, who was found on the floor following an unwitnessed fall; and2) Ensure the Smart Caregiver sensor pad monitoring system used for Residents #17 and #37 were functioning properly and set at an audible volume to alert staff. These failures resulted in Resident #37 experiencing an unwitnessed fall and placed both residents at risk for delayed staff response, falls, and fall-related injury. Findings: 1) Adequate Supervision and Effective Use of Device Record review on 6/8-12/26, revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (cognitive decline and memory loss), age-related osteoporosis (brittle bones), history of transient ischemic attack (a temporary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff treated 1 resident (#39), of 14 sampled residents, with dignity and respect by honoring the resident's expressed preference for how staff announced themselves before entering the resident's room. Specifically, staff knocked on Resident #39's door despite the resident's known request that staff ring the mounted doorbell instead of knocking due to knocking being a trigger related to the resident's history of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event). This failed practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm by triggering trauma related symptoms, decreasing the resident's sense of safety, diminishing dignity, and reducing quality of life. Findings: Record review on 6/8-12/26 revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included PTSD and frontal lobe and executive function deficit (impaired cognitive functioning related to the area of the brain responsible for judgment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to complete all sections of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally required nursing assessment for long term care residents) required to accurately make a comprehensive assessment for 1 Resident (#33), of 14 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete Sections D (Mood), and E (Behavior) on both an annual and a quarterly MDS assessment, despite documentation in the medical record identifying mood concerns, refusal behaviors, and resident preferences. This failed practice had the potential to result in an inaccurate assessment of the resident's mood, behavioral, psychosocial, and care needs, placing the resident at risk for inconsistent or unmet care. Findings: Record review on 6/8-12/26, revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a below the knee amputation of the right leg, heart failure, and hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland is underactive). Review of Resident #33's MDS Annual Comprehensive Assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I determination and failed to notify the State of Alaska Division of Senior and Disability Services (SDS) when 1 resident (#61), out of 2 residents reviewed for PASRRs, compliance remained in the facility beyond the time-limited 90-day convalescent stay. This failed practice resulted in Resident #61 remaining in the facility without the required updated PASRR review and/or Level II evaluation to determine whether the resident required specialized services, which had the potential to adversely affect the resident's ability to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Record review on 6/8-12/26 revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included depression, borderline personality disorder (a mental health condition that affects emotional regulation), and chronic pain due to trauma. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (#39) out of 14 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) implement the care-planned fall prevention intervention of placing floor mats at the resident's bedside; and 2) include interventions for multiple high risk medications with fall-related side effects. These failed practices placed Resident #39 at risk for falls and fall-related injury, with the potential to negatively affect the resident's ability to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Record review on 6/8-12/26 revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal cord), neurosarcoidosis (inflammatory disease of the central nervous system), obstructive sleep apnea (repeated interruptions of breathing during sleep), macular degeneration (eye disease that affects and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff have the specific competencies and skills set necessary to care for residents' needs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) 6 Licensed Nurses (LN #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6), out of 15 LN personnel files reviewed, had current training for safe oxygen handling; and 2) 1 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1), out of 3 CNA personnel files reviewed, had a valid Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certificate. This failed practice had the potential to place all residents (based on a census of 53) at risk of not receiving the necessary treatment and care and immediate assistance during an emergency. Findings: Oxygen Safety Education During an interview on [DATE] at 3:35 PM, during a review of personnel files, the Human Resources (HR) Manager stated LN #4 had no training for oxygen handling safety. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:33 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated oxygen safety education was required annually for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) expired food was discarded; and 2) the temperature of cooked potentially hazardous food was recorded after cooking. These failed practices had the potential of causing or spreading foodborne illness to all residents, based on a census of 53, who received food from the affected kitchens. Findings: Main Kitchen Observation on 5/5/25 at 10:55 AM, during the initial main kitchen tour with the Director of Nutrition Services (DNS), revealed: 1) Dry Storage: - One- 12-quart clear plastic container with a blue lid and a handwritten label that said, Brown Sugar 5-1-25 which contained two pieces of brown bread on top of the contents in the container. -Four- gallon size plastic bags which contained single servings of Smucker's Apple Butter not labeled with manufactures expiration or best used by date. -One-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who received opioid pain medications (a class of strong pain-relieving medications that act on the nervous system, with potential for dependence, overdose, and serious side effects) were re-evaluated for pain for 11 residents (#1, #2, #6, #12, #20, #24, #26, #37, #49, #51, and #259), out of 53 residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, the facility failed to re-evaluate the residents' pain level within 30 to 60 minutes following opioid administration. This failed practice had the potential to result in unrelieved pain, delayed identification of medication ineffectiveness, or overmedication. Findings: Resident #1 Record review on 5/5-9/25 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that affect movement and muscle tone), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) and clinical progress notes revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AK