Providence Kodiak Island Med LTC
1915 E Rezanof Drive, Kodiak, AK 99615 · Non profit - Corporation · 22 certified beds · (907) 486-7800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.9% | 16.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 19.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.6% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.4% | 6.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.2% | 18.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.65 | 1.00 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 22 beds and averages 21.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a culture where residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 residents (#'s 6 and 19), out of 13 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Respond appropriately to the toileting needs for Resident #6, which resulted in the resident being forced to defecate the bed; 2) Maintain Resident #6's dignity and privacy by allowing the resident's catheter urine collection bag to remain uncovered and visible to individuals passing by in the hallway; and 3) Ensure Resident #19's privacy, by way of closing the bedroom door, while providing personal care. These failed practices placed the residents at risk for diminished self-esteem and/or self-worth and the potential for a poor quality of life. Findings: Resident #6Toileting Needs Record review on 12/1-5/25 revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a right parietal lobe mass (a brain mass that can affect sensory processing and spatial awareness), cirrhosis of the liver (scarring of the liver), anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate screening was conducted in accordance with the abuse and neglect policy. Specifically, the facility did not reference the State Nurse Aide Abuse & Neglect Registry for potential new Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hires. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 21) at risk for exposure to abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of their property. Findings: Review of the facility's HR Employee Personnel surveyor sheet, where the facility documented personnel credential/training information for a selected sample, revealed there was no documentation for checking the State nurse aide abuse registry prior to hire. During an interview on 12/4/25 at 3:50 PM, when asked if the facility checked the State nurse aide abuse registry prior to hiring CNAs, the Senior Human Resources (HR) Regulatory Assurance Analyst stated the HR department reviewed the State of Alaska Background Check system and checked potential hires to known variances (the process of adjusting or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespreadDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for 6 Residents (#'s 1, 2, 12, 13, 16, and 17), out of 13 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Develop and maintain accurate care plans to meet the current needs of 5 Residents (#'s 1, 2, 13, 16, and 17); and 2) Carry forward previously identified needs, that were care planned for, when the facility initiated the use of a new electronic medical record (EMR) for 2 Residents (#'s 12 and 16). These failed practices placed the residents at risk of not receiving services that enable them to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Care Plan Development Resident #1 Record review on 12/1-5/25 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a condition where decreased blood flow to the brain which may affect cognitive function) and hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness) affecting the left side. Review of Resident #1's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Food items stocked for residents had not expired; 3) Canned foods with damaged rims were removed from inventory; 4) Opened food items were properly labeled and stored; 5) The dishwasher on the Salmonberry unit had achieved proper temperature during the wash cycle; and 6) Safe food temperatures were maintained prior to serving. These failed practices placed all residents (based on a census of 21) at increased risk for foodborne illness. Findings: Expired Food An observation on 12/1/25 at 5:20 PM, inside the main kitchen's walk-in refrigerator, revealed: one 5 lb container of Minor's culinary cream. The lid of the container had a label that read . prepared date 11-9-25. use by 11-30-25. During an interview on 12/1/25 at 5:21 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed that the cream should have been removed from the walk-in refrigerator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure their facility assessment (a mandatory, comprehensive evaluation to understand the specific resident population's needs and match them with necessary staffing, equipment, and resources to meet those needs) was up to date and accurate; and 2) Establish an accurate competency training program for Licensed Nurses (LNs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to ensure all nursing staff had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs as identified in the facility's facility assessment. This failed practice had the potential to place all residents (based on a census of 21) at risk of: 1) not having the necessary care and resources required for day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies; and 2) not receiving services that enable them to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being Findings: Assessment Accuracy Record review on 12/1-5/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement federally required in-service training for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), ensuring continuing competencies of no less than 12 hours per year that included dementia management, cognitive impairment, and resident abuse prevention training. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 21) at risk of not receiving services that enable them to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's HR Employee Personnel surveyor sheet, where the facility documented personnel credential/training information for a selected sample, revealed there was no annual 12-hour CNA training listed for 3 of 3 sampled CNAs (CNA #'s 1, 2 and 5). During an interview on 12/4/25 at 4:00 PM, the LTC Director of Nursing (LTC) stated she was the facility's educator prior to taking the DON role, and there had never been a 12-hour CNA in-service training program for the facility
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have an active restorative program (an exercise program focused on maximizing resident independence and function through individualized plans) for appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve a resident's ability to carry out the activities of daily living (including but not limited to hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining, and/or communication) for 4 Resident (#'s 1, 7, 13, and 16), out of 13 samples residents. This failed practice placed the residents at risk of not receiving services to enable them to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident #1 Record review on 12/1-5/25 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a condition where decreased blood flow to the brain, which may affect cognitive function) and hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness) affecting the left side. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 3:23 PM, Resident #1's resident representative (RR) was concerned that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions (GDRs), or contraindications for GDRs, were clearly documented for 1 Resident (#13) who used psychotropic medications (medications that affect behavior, thoughts, or perception), out of 13 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #13 Record review on 12/1-5/25 revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition marked by a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, like hallucinations and delusions, and a mood disorder, like depression), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD - a disorder that causes unwanted thoughts, fears, and repetitive behaviors that interfere with daily life), and social anxiety (everyday nervousness that includes fear, anxiety, and avoidance that interferes with relationships, daily routines, work, and/or other activities). Medication Review Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure neurological (neuro) checks (assessments to determine if any neurological changes/symptoms arose from a potential head injury) were performed after an unwitnessed fall with head injuries per resident care polices for 1 Resident (#7), out of 13 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for delay in treatment from any potential changes in neuro status. Findings: Record review on 12/1-5/25 revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (CVA, a stroke, when blood flow to a part of the brain is stopped either by a blockage or the rupture of a blood vessel), depression, and epilepsy (seizures). During an interview on 12/02/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident #7 stated he/she had fallen last month, he/she landed on his/her face, and had cuts to his/her forehead and over his/her left eyebrow. When asked, Resident #7 stated he/she did not go to hospital. Review of Resident #7's MORSE Fall scale (a clinical tool used to assess an older adult's risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Long-Term Care (LTC) staff were sufficiently and consistently trained for trauma-informed care. This failed practice placed 2 residents (#'s 3 and 5), out of 13 sampled residents, with documented trauma history, at risk of not receiving appropriate care for trauma-related needs. Findings: Review of the facility's HR Employee Personnel surveyor sheet, where the facility documented personnel credential/training information for a selected sample, revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) #1 had no trauma informed care training. Review of the staffing schedule, dated 12/1-5/25, revealed LN #1 worked dayshift on 12/1/25 and 12/2/25. LN #1 was the only nurse working dayshift on 12/1/25 for all Long-Term Care (LTC) residents. During an interview on 12/4/25 at 3:19 PM, the hospital Director of Nursing (DON) stated trauma-informed care training was not consistently offered to nursing staff of the LTC. The hospital DON further stated this had been identified and the facility was in the process of improving the training's implementation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. Specifically, from 11/13-22/24 there was no full-time DON. This failed practice, of not having a full-time DON to provide oversight of nursing staff, daily management, direction and support, had the potential to place all residents (based on census of 21) at substantial risk for subquality of care. Findings: During an entrance conference on 11/18/24 at 4:20 PM, the Providence Kodiak Island Medical Center (PKIMC) Chief Executive Officer (CEO) stated Licensed Nurse (LN) #2, who was a nursing supervisor, was designated as DON since the DON was on leave. Review of the email from DON, dated 11/13/24, revealed the DON would be out and return on 12/2/24. Further review of the email revealed the points of contact for assistance were: . -First point of contact . [ name of Support Manager (SM)] -Second point of contact . [name of LN #2] - If you need additional support or escalation, please contact . [name of PKIMC Executive Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared, stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards for food safety for all residents (based on a census of 21). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) foods were labeled and dated; 2) expired foods were discarded; 3) proper sanitization of food surfaces; and 4) proper sanitizing of dishes and cookware. These failed practices had the potential of causing or spreading foodborne illness to all residents, who received food from the affected kitchens. Findings: Main Kitchen 1) Dry Storage: An observation, during the initial main kitchen tour on 11/18/24 at 4:30 PM, revealed: -Two- 20-ounce packages of Rana Family Size 5 Cheese Tortellini with a use or freeze by dated 09/09/2024; -One- 1 gallon container of Four [NAME] Wine Vinegar with a best if used by dated [DATE]; -Six- 13-ounce packages of Monarch Classic [NAME] Gravy Mix, dated 101824; -Three- 1-gallon containers of Kraft Mayo Light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency care equipment was maintained. Specifically, the facility failed to complete the Automated External Defibrillator (AED) regular maintenance per manufacturer's recommendation. This failed practice had the potential to place all residents (based on a census of 21) at risk of not receiving emergency care. Findings: Record review of the facility's 2024 [NAME] AED Plus Monthly Inspection Log, dated from 1/2024 to 12/2024, revealed five steps to inspect the AED as: Step 1 press and hold the On/Off button; Step 2 AED Status Indicator Test Red X or [NAME] as check mark; Step 3 Defibrillator unit is clean, no spills, clear of objects on top, & casing intact with response choices of Yes or No; Step 4 Cables and Connectors are secured, and not damaged (cracks, broken wires, etc.) with response choices of Yes or No; and Step 5 AED unit supplies have two pads. One for Adult and Pediatric. Further review of the inspection log revealed: Step 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Informed consent was obtained prior to the use of bed rails for 16 residents (#'s 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 72, 122, and 172), out of 21 residents reviewed; and 2) Assessments for the risk and benefits of the use of bedrails, prior to the use of bedrails, for 5 residents (#'s 4, 13, 16, 18 and 19), out of 21 residents reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to place residents at risk of falls, entrapment, and other preventable accidents. Findings: Random observations on 11/18-22/24 revealed Resident #'s 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 72, 122, and 172 all had raised upper side rails on his/her beds. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 12:15 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) #4 stated nurses completed a weekly nursing summary about bedrails. When asked if any consents or assessments were required with the use of bedrails, LN #4 stated he/she was not aware. LN #4 further stated that LN #7 took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to dignity and respect was honored for three residents (#'s4, 13, and 15), out of 21 residents (total census). Specifically, Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) used a cloth protector to wipe the residents' nose and mouth after dining. Additionally, a CNA transferred a resident in an ARJO lift (transfer lift device) from the resident's room to a chair in the living room. These failed practices placed the residents not being valued as a person with dignity and respect. Findings: Dining Experience: Resident #4 Record review on 11/18-22/24, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement) and dementia (a condition that affects memory and thinking). Review of Resident #4's Care Plan, dated 9/27/24, revealed: .assist me with food/fluid intake to promote adequate nutrition/hydration. During a dining observation on 11/18/24 at 4:57 PM at Salmonberry Unit, Resident #s 2, 4, 7, & 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were properly implemented. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff contained linen during transportation. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents (based on census of 21) for risk of the spread of infectious disease. Findings: During an observation on 11/19/24 at 9:50 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 with gloves on was transporting unbagged linen from Resident #172's room passing through the community area to the dirty linen cart. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:05 AM, CNA #4 stated all linens brought from a resident's room should be placed into a plastic bag before leaving the room and taken to the dirty linen cart in the hall of the community area. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 2:50 PM, Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) stated all linens should be bagged inside the resident's room before transporting. ICP stated no PPE (personal protective equipment) was required when placing bags into the dirty linen cart. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the daily total number and the actual hours worked for all residents (based on census of 21) care per shift worked by the Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Registered Nurses (RNs). This failed practice provided inaccurate information to the all residents and their families. Findings: Random observation from 9/18-22/23 in the Fireweed and Salmonberry units' common area, revealed staff postings displaying the name of the facility, names of staff (RN and CNA) on duty per shift per day, and resident census were written on the whiteboard. Further review of the posting revealed the total number of staff and actual hours worked of nursing staff per shift was not documented. During an interview on 9/22/23 at 10:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the whiteboard had daily nurse staffing information for the residents and family. When asked if the total number and actual hours of nursing staff who provided direct resident care should have been included in the posting, she stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) food was stored under proper sanitary conditions; and 2) concentrations of sanitizing solutions were tested correctly to assure the solutions were maintained within acceptable parameters. These failed practices placed all residents (based on a census of 21) at risk for foodborne illness and/or communicable disease. Findings: Walk-in freezer During the initial tour of the kitchen on 9/18/23 at 9:00 AM, the walk-in freezer was observed. In the middle of the freezer were 4 boxes of frozen food placed on top of a milk crate. Behind these boxes were 2 Sterilite brand plastic containers stacked on top of one another, the bottom container was placed directly on the floor. Inside the container located on the floor were 10 bags of frozen fresh cut green beans. During an interview on 9/21/23 at 12:19 PM, the Food Service Manager (FSM) stated the plastic containers containing food should not have been stored on the floor. The FSM further stated the containers should have been placed 6 inches off the floor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP), a program that monitors antibiotic usage and effectiveness. This failed practice had the potential, for all residents (based on a census of 21), to receive an ineffective and inaccurate implementation of antibiotic protocols for antibiotic use. Findings: Record review on 9/18-22/23 of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included bronchiectasis (a condition in which the airways of the lungs remain permanently damaged and widened due to persistent infection) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review on 9/19/23 at 1:40 PM of Resident #13's electronic medication administration record (eMAR), revealed an order for Azithromycin (antibiotic) 250 MG Tablet (1 tablet/250 mg) to be administered in the morning three times a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for bronchiectasis with an entry date on 10/20/20. An observation on 9/20/23 at 10:15 AM of the medication administration, revealed LN #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a private space for the Resident Council meetings. This failed practice had the potential to affect all resident's choosing to attend the meetings, based on a census of 21, by preventing the group members from expressing their concerns or recommendations affecting their care. Findings: On 9/20/23 at 9:02 AM, the Resident Council meeting commenced in the main dining area on the Fireweed unit with 4 residents in attendance. The table where the residents were seated was in the center of the large room, which was near the open kitchen area, and surrounded by the resident's rooms and the open seating area where the TV was located. During the Resident Council meeting on 9/20/23 at 9:12 AM, when asked if the Council could have met without staff present, Resident #16 stated it bothered him/her that people walked back and forth and could have heard what was said. During the meeting at 9:30 AM, Licensed Nurse #1 approached the table where the meeting was being held and administered several oral medications to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for personal fund accounts to 2 residents (#'s 8 and 13) and/or their Power of Attorneys (POAs), out of 2 sampled residents whose money was held by the facility. This failed practice placed the residents and/or their POAs at risk for not receiving a complete and accurate accounting of their personal funds entrusted to the facility. Findings: During an interview on 9/18/23 at 1:57 PM, Resident #13 stated the facility held his/her money and he/she had not received quarterly statements from the facility. During an interview on 9/19/23 at 1:41 PM, Resident #8's POA stated the facility held the resident's funds. When asked if he/she had received quarterly statements of Resident #8's funds from the facility, the Resident's POA stated he/she was unsure if the statements were sent quarterly. During an interview on 9/22/23 at 9:41 AM, when asked to show quarterly statements that were sent to residents and/or their POAs, the Manager of Support Services (MSS) stated the Patient Navigator (PN) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1) a physician's order for restraint was obtained in a timely manner; and 2) direct care staff (Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Licensed Nurses (LNs) on-going re-evaluation of the restraint use was documented in 1 resident's medical record (#2) out of 1 resident investigated for restraints. This failed practice had the potential to deny the resident's highest practicable wellbeing. Findings: Record review from 9/18-22/23 revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of dementia. An observation of 9/18/23 at 4:07 PM revealed Resident #2 sitting in the common room in his/her wheelchair with a seat belt clipped around his/her waist. During an interview on 9/19/23 at 1:08 PM, Resident #2's family member stated the Resident was wearing the seatbelt to prevent him/her from sliding, and the Resident was unable to remove the seatbelt on his/her own. The family member further stated the facility had planned to order something more comfortable for the Resident. An observation on 9/20/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessment was reported in the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment for all residents of long-term care facility) for 1 resident (#18) out of 13 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to report inaccurate resident's status. Findings: Record review on 9/18-22/23 of the facility's electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included right hip osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease), and hypertension. Record review on 9/18-22/23 of Resident #18's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/17/23, revealed MDS Section N. N0410 Medications received during the last 7 days were antipsychotic (the resident received the medication once) and antibiotic (the Resident received the medication for 6 days). Review of Resident #18's current and discontinued physician's orders from 10/20/22 to 9/22/23, revealed no orders for antipsychotics and/ or antibiotic medications. Review of the electronic medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (#16) out of 13 sampled residents, were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the resident was not provided with the ordered ear drop medication prior to the physician's procedure of ear wax removal. This failed practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for decreased quality of life due to incomplete removal of wax build-up, which potentially affected the resident's hearing. Findings: Record review from 9/18-22/23 revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cancer and chronic kidney disease. The resident had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 9/18/23 at 12:01 PM, when asked about his/her hearing, Resident #16 stated he/she had wax in his/her ears, which was irrigated by Physician #1. The Resident stated the physician removed the earwax about a month or so ago. The Resident further stated he/she was still having trouble hearing and stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for 1 resident (#16), out of 13 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of inadequate nutritional intake and weight loss. Findings: Record review from 9/18-22/23 revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included failure to thrive syndrome (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, and inactivity, often accompanied by dehydration, depressive symptoms, impaired immune function, and low cholesterol) and hand weakness. The resident had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 9/18/23 at 12:01 PM, when asked about the facility's food service, Resident #16 stated he/she had alerted staff on multiple occasions of his/her dislike for peppers. The resident further stated he/she still received peppers and alerted staff again, who assured him/her the kitchen was aware of his/her dislikes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information included the actual hours worked by nursing staff. This failed practice had the potential to provide limited transparency regarding staffing levels, affecting all residents (based on a census of 21) and visitors' ability to evaluate the adequacy of nursing care provided. Findings: Random observations of the facility during the survey on 12/1-5/25, revealed the facility had two resident care units: the Fireweed Unit and the Salmonberry Unit. Each unit displayed a dry erase board listing the names of staff assigned to each shift, as well as a separate board showing the daily meal items. Below the meal board, a paper containing nurse staffing data was posted in a plastic sleeve titled: Daily Assignment Sheets. Review of the facility's Daily Assignment Sheet forms, dated 12/1-5/25, revealed that while staff names, assigned units, and scheduled shift times were documented, the sheets did not clearly reflect the actual hours worked by each category of nursing staff per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in AK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alaska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 025030. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.