Quyanna Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. From Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 17 residents (#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18) out of 17 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Specifically: 1) frozen custom foods were labeled incorrectly; 2) spoiled fruits and vegetables were stored in the cooler; and 3) failure to conduct planned manufacturer's required 6 months maintenance on the kitchen's ice machine. These failed practices placed the residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of consuming contaminated food and at risk of contracting foodborne illness .Findings:Food LabelingDuring an initial tour in the facility's main kitchen on 1/12/26 at 11:22 AM, revealed the custom frozen food in the walk-in freezer were labeled as follows:Six small bowls of tomato garlic beans, labeled as USE FIRST FRI [Friday] 12/26/25 6:59 PM;Six small Ziploc (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the dignity and respect of 1 resident (#12) out of 18 residents. Specifically, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) used the resident's clothing protector to wipe the resident's mouth while dining. This failed practice undermined the resident's right to a dignified existence and placing the resident at risk of diminished quality of life .Findings:Record review on 1/12-20/25 revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia with anxiety (a decline in intellectual functioning, including problems with memory, reasoning and thinking), osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease), spinal stenosis of lumbar region at multiple levels (narrowing within the spinal canal), and unable to ambulate.Review of the Resident #12's care plan, last updated 12/16/25 at 6:30 PM revealed: .[Resident #12] needs maximal assistance with meals, snacks and hydration.During an observation on 1/12/26 at 1:20 PM, CNA #3 was observed to be feeding Resident #12. Further observation revealed at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prepare meals by methods that conserve nutritive value and ensure safe and appetizing food temperature for 1 resident (#11) out of 1 resident on a pureed diet. Specifically, 1) the cook did not measure the temperature after pureeing the food, 2) the cook added unmeasured amount of water into the food to be pureed, and 3) the cook did not follow the Simply Thick (a thickening agent) instruction for food and thickener ratio. These failed practices had the potential to compromise or diminish the nutritive value of food and palatability and affect resident's nutritional intake and/or weight loss .Findings:Record review on 1/12-20/26, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior), impaired physical mobility and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of the diet order, dated 9/27/25, revealed: Regular Diet. Further review of the order, revealed on 4/7/25 the diet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete nurse staffing information for each shift was posted to provide accurate information to all residents (based on a census of 18) and representatives. Specifically, the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) per shift. This failed practice provided incomplete information to the residents, families, and other visitors the right to know who were responsible for resident care and the number of residents in their care. Findings: An observation on 10/3/24 at 11:30 AM, of the facility document titled Quyanna Care Center - Nursing Staff, dated 10/3/24, posted on the bulletin board along the entryway of the Long-Term Care (LTC) side, revealed information including, the facility's census (resident census) and the nursing staff (CNA, LPN, RN and other staff) scheduled for the day. Further review of the posting revealed the total number and actual work hours of nursing staff per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store drugs and medical supplies. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) expired medication was removed from 1 medication storage room, out of 1 total medication storage rooms; 2) opened and damaged sterile medical supplies were removed from 1 medication storage room, out of 1 total medication storage rooms; and 3) opened medications were labeled with an expiration date. These failed practices had the potential to place all residents (based on a census of 18) at risk of receiving expired and/or damaged medications and supplies and subsequent adverse effects. Findings: During an interview on 9/30/24 at 2:04 PM, License Nurse (LN) #1 stated nurses were responsible to check the medication expiration before medication administration to the resident. He/she stated expired medications would be disposed of in a disposal bin in the pharmacy. Random observations on 9/30/24-10/4/24 revealed the facility had one medication storage room and one medication cart. During a concurrent interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous foods were stored and labeled accordingly for 17 residents out of 18 residents (total census) who received food from the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) food was labeled and dated and 2) discard expired food. These failed practices had the potential to place residents at risk of or food borne illness. Findings: During an initial tour of the main kitchen, on 9/30/24 at 10:50 AM, food items were stored and labeled as follows: One package of Knorr Hollandaise Sauce Mix, there was no opened date and no expiration date ; One green lid container, containing a brown powder resembling brown sugar; there was no opened date and with no label as to the content; One blue lid container, containing a white powder resembling white sugar; there was no label as to the content; One package of Umami Wing Sauce, there was no opened date; One package of vanilla extract, there was no opened date; One…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a competent nursing staff provided nursing services to 1 resident (#119) out of 12 sampled residents in accordance with the physician's order. Specifically, the nurse failed to notify the provider of Resident's high blood glucose levels. This failed practice placed the diabetic resident at risk for delay in treatment and complications. Findings: Record review on 9/30/24-10/4/24 revealed Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (insulin resistance disorder), Cerebrovascular Accident with involvement of right side of the body (damage to the blood vessels in the brain) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident #119's physician orders, dated 9/30/24, revealed an order for insulin aspart (a fast acting insulin that works by lowering glucose, or sugar levels) with additional instructions to . Notify provider if 2 or more Blood Glucoses are above 200 mg/dl in a 24-hour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) (#7), out of 10 personnel records reviewed, had a valid Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 18) at risk for not receiving timely CPR or emergency care when needed. Findings: Review of the personnel records on [DATE] at 10:18 AM, revealed CNA #7 was hired on [DATE] with a valid CPR certificate [issue date] on [DATE], and due to expire [Renew By] on 7/2024. Review of CNA #7's work schedule revealed the CNA worked at the facility from 7/2024 through [DATE] with an expired CPR license. During an interview with the Human Resources Director (HRD) on [DATE] at 10:18 AM, the HRD stated: Human Resources [HR] reached out to the Air Ambulance [entity responsible for this particular training] and his/her [CNA #7] supervisor and the employee themselves but hadn't heard back. During an interview with the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records were maintained for 1 resident (#14), out of 12 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the medical diagnoses for Resident #14 reflected his/her actual medical status. This failed practice had the potential to affect the achievement of the Resident's plan of care and goals. Findings: Record review from 9/30/24 -10/4/24, revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in intellectual functioning) and pressure ulcer. Record review on 10/1/24 at 12:59 PM, revealed Resident #14's active diagnosis list included pressure ulcer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally required nursing assessment) Quarterly Assessment, dated 8/8/24, revealed in Section M-Skin Conditions, the response was no for unhealed Pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) form 2802 Matrix (used to identify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0915 — isolated
  Ensure each resident room has a window to the outside that meets requirements
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide 2 residents (#s 3 and 10), out of 12 sampled residents a window to the outside within their sleeping room. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for less than optimal living conditions and increased risk for mood changes. Findings: During random observations on 9/30/24-10/4/24, revealed Resident #3 and Resident #10's only window in his/her room were obstructed by the new addition being built onto the facility. Further observation revealed the view outside the window contained a visual of metal studs of opposing new construction wall. During random interviews on 9/30/24-10/3/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the resident's window had been obstructed by the new addition being built onto the facility. The DON stated the obstructed windows occurred after the construction company built a wall that was not in the original building plans. .

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in AK