No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Andalusia Manor

670 Moore Rd, Andalusia, AL 36420 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 154 certified beds · (334) 222-4544 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (334) 222-4544 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
135 Medical Park Dr · (334) 843-8515 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
811 W Bypass · (334) 582-2222 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
550 West Byp · (334) 222-1804 · Call to confirm hours
Park
20201 Brooklyn Rd · (251) 578-4333 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.7%12.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%2.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.2%1.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%12.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.4%24.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.3%12.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%21.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%80.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%24.8%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.1%11.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.691.961.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.801.701.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.8%CMS range 57.8–73.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.5–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting89.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.9–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
37.8%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 93.2 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-01-04)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2019-10-17)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, the facility's document Associate In-Service Record, and the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the walk-in cooler was completely covered, sealed, labeled properly, and outdated food was discarded on 01/02/2024 during the initial kitchen observation. This had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include: A facility in-service record dated 05/08/2023, documented: . Topic: Labeling, Dating, and Expired Foods Procedures Refresh For Already Refrigerated Foods: All Refrigerated Food, assumed as Ready To Eat, must contain the following: Item Description ., In On Date ., Opened On Date ., and Use By Date . Once Deli Meats are opened, they have a 7 (seven) day life span. The day it was opened is counted as Day 1. Food Storage and Retention Guide . Ready-to-Eat/Prepared Foods- Food in a form that is edible without additional preparation to achieve food safety. (Example: leftovers, deli salads, cut produce) Up to 7 (seven) days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, resident record review, and review of a facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #33, one of one resident sampled for Respiratory Care, received oxygen (O2) at two liters per minute (2 l/m) as ordered by physician, on 01/02/2024 and 01/03/2024, two of three days of the survey. Findings include: An undated facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy documented: Policy: Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, . Oxygen is only administered with a Physician's order. RI #33 was admitted to the facility 02/13/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. RI #33's Physician Order List documented an as needed order dated 03/26/2023 for RI #33 to receive oxygen at two liters per minute. On 01/02/2024 at 5:36 PM RI #33 was observed receiving O2 at three liters per minute. On 01/03/2024 at 9:38 AM RI #33 was observed receiving O2 at three liters per minute per nasal cannula. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and a review of a facility policy titled,Manual Warewashing, the facility failed to ensure 10 metal pans were not wet and stacked on a shelf, ready for use. This was observed on 10/16/19, and had the potential to affect 132 of 132 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Manual Warewashing with a revised date of 9/2017, revealed: . Procedures . 3. All serviceware and cookware will be air dried prior to storage . On 10/16/19 at 5:10 PM, the surveyor observed 10 pans stacked on a shelf wet with water. The surveyor, along with Employee Identifier (EI) #4, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), observed the wetness of the pans. EI #4 began to remove the pans that were wet. A total of 10 pans were removed from the shelf. EI #3, Dietary Manager, was asked if the pans that were wet were supposed to be clean. EI #3 replied, yes. On 10/17/19 at 1:50 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #3. EI #3 was asked if the metal pans were ready for use. EI #3 replied, yes. EI #3 was asked, what was the potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and a review of a facility policy titled, OXYGEN THERAPY AEROSOL TREATMENT, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #220's breathing treatment mask was stored in a Ziploc bag and the mask and the tubing was dated. This affected RI #220, one of two residents sampled with respiratory treatments. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, OXYGEN THERAPY AEROSOL TREATMENT with no date, revealed: .7. Store nebulizer sets in plastic bag change weekly and as needed. 8. Change oxygen and nebulizer sets and bags weekly. Date when changed. RI #220 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of physician orders for RI #220, dated 9/12/19, revealed the order for Ipratropium Bromide 0.02% solution 0.5% (Atrovent) inhaled every six hours. On 10/15/19 at 3:29 PM, RI #220 was resting in bed watching TV. A nebulizer machine was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policies titled, Food Preparation, Service Line Checklist and Manual Warewashing, the facility failed to ensure: 1. staff washed hands before putting on a new pair of gloves; 2. the temperatures of all food items on the tray line were taken; and 3. spoons, forks and trays were not wet at the tray line. This was observed on 10/10/2018 and had the potential to affect 128 of 128 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) A review of a facility policy titled, Food Preparation with a revised date of 9/2017 revealed: .Procedures 1. All staff will practice proper hand washing techniques and glove use. On 10/10/2018 at 11:09 a.m., the surveyor observed (Employee Identifier) EI #14, dietary assistant, touch the trash can lid to put her gloves in the trash can. EI #14 then did not wash her hands prior to putting on a clean pair of gloves and started washing dishes in the three compartment sink. On 10/10/2018 at 11:28 a.m., EI #14 came out of dish room and put on clean gloves. EI #14 did not wash her hands. EI #14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 112's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/18, reflected hospice. Findings Include: RI #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Alzheimer's disease with late onset. On 10/11/18 at 1:48 PM a review of RI #112's September 2018 Physician orders revealed, . Admit to . Hospice 8/29/18 . A review of RI #112's Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 9/4/18, did not indicated hospice service checked. On 10/11/18 at 2:00 PM, an interview was conducted Employee Identifier (EI) #10, Registered Nurse MDS/Care Plan Coordinator. EI #10 was asked if RI #112 was receiving hospice services. EI #10 replied, yes. EI #10 was asked when was RI #112 admitted to hospice. EI #10 replied, 8/29/18. EI #10 was asked if a Significant Change MDS was completed. EI #10 replied, yes. EI #10 was asked if hospice was coded on the 9/4/18 MDS. EI #10 replied, no. When asked why not, EI #10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and the review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse did not prepare medication for Resident Identifier (RI) # 73 and then give the medication to a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to give to the resident. This practice resulted in the CNA accidentally giving the medication to another resident, RI # 175. This occurred on 4/26/18 and was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint # AL00035677. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION: revealed .POLICY : Medications are administered only by licensed nursing personnel . PROCEDURES: .11. Give the resident the medication . RI #73 was admitted to facility on 3/17/17 with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease, Dementia with Lewy Bodies, History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Cerebral Infarction. A review of RI #73's April 2018 Physician Orders revealed: .SENOKOT .BID (two times a day) .SINEMET .BID…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy titled, DRESSING CHANGE CLEAN, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff did not: 1. place the wound cleaner bottle on Resident Identifier (RI) #176 and RI #105's bed, then return the bottle to the treatment cart; 2. use the same gloves to clean the wounds and then place the treatment and clean dressing on RI #176 and RI #105 wounds and 3. remove a pen from her uniform pocket with soiled gloves and initial and date the outer dressing, then return the pen to her pocket and remove and use again on another resident. This was observed on 10/10/18 and affected RI #176 and RI #105, two of five residents identified by the facility with pressure ulcers. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, DRESSING CHANGE CLEAN revealed .PROCEDURE: .2. Wash Hands 3. Assemble equipment and take to bedside, cover bedside table with clean towel . 8. Wash hands 9. Open dressing supplies and cleaning solution. Assure that area is clean and free of contaminates. 10. Put on gloves . RI #176 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record reviews and review of facility policy titled, Tube Feedings, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 83's and RI #8's tube feeding were running at the correct rates, as ordered by the physician for the tube feeding and the hourly water flush. This was observed on 10/11/2018 and affected two of two residents sampled who were receiving tube feedings Findings Include: A review of a facility policy, no date, titled, Tube Feedings revealed .POLICY: . A physician order specifying type of solution, amount, and frequency is required. PROCEDURE: . Pump Feeding . 4. set prescribed rate . 1) RI #83 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage and gastrostomy status. A review of RI #83's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/20/18, revealed: RI #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of severe impairment for daily decision making and short/long term memory deficit. Section K -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and review of the facility Job Description and Performance Standards Position Title Charge Nurse and Position Title Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA),the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse did not give prepared medication to a CNA to give to a resident, which in turn was given to the wrong resident. This deficiency is cited as a result of the investigation of complaint # AL00035677, and affected two of two residents. Findings Include: A review of a facility JOB DESCRIPTION AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Charge Nurse revealed .1. Follow established standards of nursing practices and implement facility policies and procedures.18. Administer and document direct resident care, medications and treatments per physicians orders and accurately record all care provided. A review of an undated policy MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION revealed .POLICY: Responsibility of the nursing professional . Medications are administered only by licensed nursing personnel . A review of Job Description for Certified Nursing Assistant revealed .Purpose of this position . is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION, the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff did not remove gloves from her uniform pocket and put them on prior to administering medications by a gastrostomy tube for Resident Identifier (RI) #30. This was observed during medication administration on 10/10/18 and affected one of five nurses observed. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION revealed .PROCEDURES: 1. c. Clean gloves to be worn as appropriate when risk of contact with secretions/excretions blood or body fluids . RI #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Gastrostomy status. A review of RI #20's October 2018 Physician Orders revealed . DEMECLOCYCLINE 300 MG (milligram) GIVE 1 TABLET PER GTUBE (gastrostomy tube) . at . 1200 . On 10/10/18 at 11:15 AM Employee Identifier (EI) #12, Licensed Practical Nurse, was observed preparing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SASSER ENTERPRISES INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2004
SASSER, SHEILAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2004
SASSER, STALLIONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2004
SASSER, STERLINGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2004
SASSER, STETSONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2004
WILLIAMS, SALLEEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2004
EDWARDS, LILLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/17/1987
MAYS, TREECEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2008
SMITH, JOANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
ARMSTEAD, SCOTTYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 10%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,138per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$321per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alabama Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Alabama
$8,334/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,787/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,425/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 015416. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-01-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next