Health Care INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, review of the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a review of facility policies titled, Hand Washing, Bare Hand Contact with Food and Use of Plastic Gloves and Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #2 washed their hands and changed their gloves after handling dirty dishes and before handling clean dishes. This had the potential to affect 46 of residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . 2-301.14 When to Wash. FOOD EMPLOYEES shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms . immediately before engaging in FOOD preparation including working with . clean EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, . and: . (E) After handling soiled EQUIPMENT or UTENSILS; . 3-304.15 Gloves, Use Limitation. (A) If used, SINGLE-USE gloves shall be used for only one task . used for no other purpose, and discarded when damaged or soiled, or when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans Health Care Inc, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed/implemented for: 1) Resident Identifier (RI) #131's use of a Foley Catheter; and 2) RI #7's hearing aide usage. These deficient practices affected RI #'s 7 and 131, two of 14 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled,Comprehensive Care Plans Health Care Inc., with a revised/reviewed date of 01/2022, revealed the following: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with . measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . 1) RI #131 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Foley Catheter and Multiple Decubitus Ulcers. RI #131's August 2022 Physicians's Orders documented:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled Documentation of Wound Treatments Health Care Inc., the facility failed to ensure licensed staff consistently documented treatment was provided to the surgical incision on Resident Identifier (RI) #181's nose. This deficient practice affected RI #181, one of one residents sampled for documentation of treatment being provided to a resident's surgical incision. Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Documentation of Wound Treatments Health Care Inc. revealed the following: Policy: The facility completes accurate documentation of wound assessments and treatments, including response to treatment, change in condition, and changes in treatment. 2. a. Type of wound (pressure injury, surgical, etc.) . 3. Wound treatments are documented at the time of each treatment. RI #181 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Bipolar Affective Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. A review of RI #181's Surgery Site…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies titled, Food Safety and Sanitation and Employee Sanitary Practices, the facility failed to ensure: 1) open food items were covered and labeled with a use by date prior to storage in the reach-in refrigerator, and 2) a dietary manager and dietary aide wore a hair net to completely cover all hair on their head while serving residents' food for the supper meal on the tray line in the kitchen area. This had a potential to affect 44 of 45 residents in the facility receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) A review of a facility policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, with no date, revealed . 4. All leftovers are labeled, covered, and dated when stored . On 08/05/19 at 03:04 p.m., during the tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed the following food items in the reach-in refrigerator with no use by dates and no covering over the food items: 1. one container of stewed tomatoes, 2. one container of mixed salad with diced tomatoes, and 3. 40 small clear cups of watermelon. On 08/05/19 at 03:13 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and a review of a facility document titled Resident Assessment Instrument User Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for the use of an anticoagulant. This affected one of two sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed for coding of an anticoagulant. Findings Include: RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of History of Deep Vein Thrombosis Left Lower Extremity. A review of a facility document titled Resident Assessment Instrument User Manual, Version 3.0, revised October/November 2012, revealed .Steps for Assessment 1. Review the resident's medical record for documentation that any of these medications were received by the resident during the 7-day look-back period . ND410E Anticoagulant . Record the number of days an anticoagulant medication was received by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period . A review of RI #1's Physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure For Hand-Washing, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #1, a Licensed Practical Nurse, washed her hands during a medication pass for Resident Identifier (RI) #26: EI #1 did not wash hands after she cleaned the top of the medication cart with her ungloved hands, and prior to putting on her gloves to pick up RI #26's cup of oral medications. Further, EI #1 touched the top of RI #26's right and left foot with both of her gloved hands, then gave oral medications without first washing her hands. After administering the oral medications, EI #1 changed gloves without washing hands to administer RI #26's eye drops, and again changed gloves without washing hands to administer inhalation medication. After administering all of RI #26's medications, EI #1 removed gloves and returned to the medication cart to document without washing her hands. This affected one of two licensed nurses observed during medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

What families pay in AL