Oaks On Parkwood Skilled Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 124.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 5 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, review of a third-party complaint received by the State Agency (SA), and review of the facility's investigative file the facility failed to ensure a process was developed and implemented to ensure the doors leading into the kitchen from the main dining room were locked when the kitchen staff were not present. On 05/18/2025, one of the two doors leading from the main dining room into the kitchen was not locked after dietary staff left for the evening. Resident Identifier (RI #141) entered the kitchen through the unlocked door, secured two knives and stabbed him/herself five times in the chest/abdomen area. A facility staff member heard RI #141 in the kitchen and responded. RI #141 was sent to the hospital and evaluated, RI #141 was found to have five self-inflicted stab wounds located to the right chest, epigastric and left upper quadrant area. RI #141 was taken to the operating room (OR) for exploratory laparotomy (a surgical procedure that involves opening the abdomen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record reviews, review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative files, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical and verbal abuse perpetrated by staff and residents. The facility further failed to supervise combative, agitated residents and wandering residents in a manner to prevent abuse of residents.Specifically:1.) The facility failed to protect Resident Identifier (RI) #137 from verbal abuse perpetrated by Nurse Aide Trainee (NAT) #17. On 05/04/2024 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #16 witnessed RI #137 curse at NAT #17, then NAT #17 responded by calling RI #137 a bitch. Because CNA #16 failed to report the verbal abuse immediately, NAT #17 continued working his assigned schedule on 05/04/2024, 05/05/2024, and 05/06/2024; leaving RI #137 and other residents at risk of abuse. The verbal abuse was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, the facility failed to implement the abuse policy to ensure residents were protected from further abuse when a Nurse Aide Trainee (NAT) #17 continued working in the facility on 05/05/2024 and 05/06/2024 after he was witnessed verbally abusing Resident Identifier (RI) #137 on 05/04/2024. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #16) who witnessed NAT #17 call RI #137 a bitch, failed to report the abuse to anyone until she was questioned about another allegation on 05/07/2024. The facility failed to determine when the verbal abuse had occurred. After surveyor review of timecards and assignments for CNA #16 and NAT #17 it was determined the only shift they worked together and the witnessed verbal abuse of RI #137 was on 05/04/2024.This deficient practice affected RI #137 and created the potential for residents to experience ongoing abuse and placed residents in the facility at risk. This deficient practice was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #16 immediately reported verbal abuse she witnessed on 05/04/2024 when Nurse Aide Trainee (NAT) #17 called Resident Identifier (RI) #137 a bitch. This incident was discovered by the facility during their investigation into an allegation of physical abuse reported on 05/07/2024 affecting RI #137, one of eight residents sampled for abuse. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/intake number 468255.Findings Include: Cross-reference F600 and F607. On 05/07/2024 at 11:45 AM the State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) alleging physical abuse when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 was informed by RI #137 that the night prior a male CNA came into his/her room and poked him/her on the forehead multiple times. A review of a policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation with an effective date of 02/2020…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Behavior Management Program, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the State Agency and review of a facility investigative file, the facility failed manage Resident Identifier (RI) #136's behaviors in a manner to reduce agitation and prevent escalation of behaviors for RI #136 on 09/15/2024 when Registered Nurse (RN) #27 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #37 provided Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care to RI #136, a resident with Dementia with Behavior Disturbance and a history of aggressive and paranoid behavior. RN #27 and CNA #37 failed to implement behavior approaches during ADL care to provide a calm environment, allow RI #136 time alone, promote independence and a sense of control, when RI #136 verbally and physically resisted ADL care.The facility further failed to continue monitoring and review of RI #136's documented behaviors in August and September 2024 leading up to 09/15/2024 and failed to update…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled Medication, Oral/Sublingual Administration, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the Alabama State Survey Agency, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #9, RI #10, RI #11, and RI #13 received their medications on the three to eleven (3-11) PM shift on 01/09/2023 as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to affect four of four residents residing on the secured unit at the facility; which is one of three units at the facility. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Medication, Oral/Sublingual Administration, with an effective date of 05/2014, revealed the following: PURPOSE: To administer oral medications in an organized and safe manner. STANDARD: Medications are administered orally under the orders of the attending physician. The facility submitted an Online Incident Report to the Alabama Department of Public Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2021-05-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's policies titled Food Preparation Principles and Menus, Cycle and Meal Schedule, and review of the facility's Diet Spreadsheet, the facility failed to ensure: 1.) the portion size for fruit juice as documented on the Diet Spreadsheet for Day 4 - Wednesday, dated 5/19/2021, was served to residents at breakfast; 2.) the portion size for Scalloped Potatoes and for Pureed Scalloped Potatoes as documented on the Diet Spreadsheet for Day 4 - Wednesday, dated 5/19/2021, was served to residents at lunch; and 3.) portion sizes were identified for Mixed Vegetables on the Diet Spreadsheet for Day 4 - Wednesday, dated 5/19/2021, for the lunch meal. This had the potential to affect 85 of 85 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings include: During an interview with Resident Identifier (RI) #23 on 5/18/2021 at 11:42 AM, RI #23 reported the facility was serving smaller portion sizes for meals. During an interview with RI #31 on 5/18/2021 at 4:40 PM, RI #31 reported portion sizes for meals had decreased. A review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Food Preparation Principles, the facility failed to ensure residents received hot foods at palatable temperatures. This had the potential to affect 85 of 85 residents receiving meals in the facility. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Food Preparation Principles, effective 6/2018, revealed the following: . STANDARD: . Food . should be served . at proper temperatures. On 5/18/2021 at 5:52 PM, the surveyor observed Resident Identifier (RI) #6's supper meal. RI #6 received a bowl of chicken noodle soup with the meal. As RI #6 began to eat the soup, he/she reported to the surveyor the soup was cold. RI #6 said, Please stick your finger in it. I am not going to eat it. You can see I am telling the truth. The surveyor told RI #6 she would not put her finger in the soup, however, RI #6 could spoon some of the soup into the surveyor's hand. RI #6 did so and the surveyor observed the soup to be cool to touch. On 5/19/2021 at 8:48 AM, the surveyor observed RI #24's breakfast meal. RI #24 received a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of the 2017 United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, the facility failed to consistently maintain the temperature of the final rinse water of the dish machine within recommended levels. This had the potential to affect all 122 residents for whom meals were prepared and served at the time of the survey. Based on observation, the facility also failed to consistently date and label food items, stored in the nursing unit refrigerators, that were provided to residents during activity. This affected one of three nursing unit refrigerators. Findings included: 1) DISHWASHING The 2017 United States Food and Drug Administration Food Code mandates under 4-501.112 Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Hot Water Sanitization Temperatures. (A) .in a mechanical operation, the temperature of the fresh hot water SANITIZING rinse as it enters the manifold may not be more than 194 degrees F . In reference to the above regulation, the Food Code Annex explains, .When the sanitizing rinse temperature exceeds 194 degrees F at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and a review of the Resident Centered Care Plan Meeting facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #90 was invited to participate in his/her care plan meeting. This affected one of 22 sampled, in-house residents. Findings Include: The facility policy titled, . Resident Centered Care Plan Meeting with an effective date of 1/2018 included the following: .2.Resident centered care plan letters, emails and calls to responsible parties by SSD (Social Services Director) or designee should be done at least 2 weeks in advance. .4. The SSD or designee should set the tone of the meeting with the resident's representative and/or resident and advise them of the purpose of the meeting . .8. All IDCP (Interdisciplinary Care Plan) team members in attendance as well as the resident's representative and/or resident should sign the attendance form. RI #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The resident's Brief Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #2's Gender and Ethnicity was coded accurately on RI #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. This affected 1 of 26 sampled residents whose MDS' were reviewed. Findings Include: RI #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of RI #2's admission MDS assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/19, coded RI #2 as being a Female under A0800 Gender. RI #2 was also checked as being Black or African American under A1000C Ethnicity. On 07/18/19 at 3:07 p.m., the surveyor asked RI#2 what was his/her race. RI #2 said white. On 07/18/19 at 3:28 p.m., the surveyor conducted an interview with Employee Identifier (EI) #10, a LPN (licensed Practical Nurse)/MDS Coordinator. The surveyor asked EI #10 what was the race of RI #2. EI #10 said the MDS says African American. When asked what race RI #1 was, EI #10 said she believed RI #2 was white. The surveyor asked EI #10 what was the issue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NOLAND HEALTH — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $447K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL