Elite Nursing And Rehabilitation Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 120.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of the facility investigative file, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), and review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of physical abuse on 09/13/2024 to include determining the time the alleged incident occurred. This citation resulted from the investigation of complaint/report number AL00048805 and had the potential to affect Resident Identifier (RI) #1, one of six residents sampled for abuse. Findings include: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, reviewed 01/2024, documented: . Definitions: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury . Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation . 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. RI #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — widespread
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, interview, facility's policies titled Notification of Changes, and Information and Communication the facility failed to ensure residents' families were notified when the facility was unable to maintain the first floor's residents' right to a safe and homelike environment when the facility's air conditioning system failed to maintain temperatures less than 81 °F (degrees Fahrenheit) in the residents' common areas and residents' rooms on the first floor. Due to the elevated temperatures, the facility initiated an enhanced hydration round program. The facility did not notify residents' families or representatives of the elevated temperatures or the enhanced hydration round program. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 98 residents residing on the first floor of the facility. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report numbers AL00048537 and AL00048538. Findings Include: Cross-Reference F 584. The facility's policy titled Information and Communication with a revised date of 12/23 revealed: Policy: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable temperatures in residents' common areas and residents' rooms on the first floor. The facility failed to ensure temperatures in residents' common areas and residents' rooms were not above 81 degrees from 08/09/2024 through 08/13/2024. The temperatures on the first floor were recorded above 81 °F (degrees Fahrenheit) during all five days of the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 98 residents residing on the first floor of the facility. The deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00047537 and AL00047538. Findings Include: On 08/07/2024, the State Survey Agency received an anonymous complaint alleging the facility had no air conditioning. On 08/08/2024, the State Survey Agency received a complaint alleging the facility had no air conditioning for four days, and it was 83 °F in the complainant's family member's room. A review of a facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and a facility's policy titled Sanitation Inspection, the facility failed to ensure the stove top, knobs, handles, and drip pans were free of a heavy grease build up. This had the potential to affect 129 of 130 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings Include: A review of 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, documented: (A) PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean . A review of policy titled Sanitation Inspection dated 12/23 documented: .It is the policy of this facility, as part of the department's sanitation program, to conduct inspections to ensure food service areas are clean, sanitary .1. All food service areas shall be kept clean, sanitary . On 03/26/2024 at 2:31 PM, the initial kitchen tour was conducted by the Surveyor with the Dietary Manager. During the tour, it was observed that there was a significant accumulation of grease on the stove top, knobs, and handles.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policies titled Hand Hygiene, Standard Precautions Infection Control, Handling Clean Linen, and Water Management Program the facility failed to ensure: 1) Laundry Staff (LS) #7 washed her hands after leaving Resident Identifier (RI) #54 and RI #10's room with contaminated laundry hangers and touching clean clothing for RI #74. 2) LS #9 kept clean sheets off the floor and off her clothing while folding clean laundry on 03/28/24. 3) Clean blankets for the residents were stored in a clean dust free area and ensured the blankets were not touching the wall. 4) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10 washed or sanitized her hands after leaving RI #115's room and before picking up RI #23's meal tray while delivering meals on 3/28/24. 5) Maintenance Director (MD) implemented a water management program to prevent and identify Legionella This affected five of 26 sampled residents and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program the facility failed to ensure the facility employed a certified infection preventionist from 1/5/2022 until 3/29/2024. This deficient practice affected 130 residents in the facility. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program with an implemented date of 12/22, and a reviewed date of 12/2023 revealed: . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines. 1. The designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves a consultant to our staff on infectious diseases. A review of the facility's employment record for the previous certified infection preventionist revealed a hire date of 03/27/2020 and last day of employment as 01/05/2022. A review of TRAIN TRAINING PLAN PROOF OF COMPLETION for ADM/IC revealed: . (ADM/IC) has successfully completed Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course as of 03/29/2024 On 03/29/2024 at 10:52 AM an interview was conducted with Administrator/Infection Control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and a review of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code, the facility failed to ensure 1) Two ovens in the kitchen had exposed electrical wiring and were in working condition 2) The walk-in freezer was free from excessive ice buildup on two fans, the floor, ceiling, and boxes containing food products. This was observed on the initial tour of the kitchen on 03/26/2024. This had the potential to affect 129 of 130 residents receiving meals from the facility kitchen. Findings Include: The 2022 U.S. Food and Drug Administration documents the following: . Maintenance and Operation 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements . On 03/26/2024 at 2:31 PM during the initial kitchen tour, two ovens were observed with exposed wiring at the base of both ovens. The Dietary Manager (DM) was interviewed and asked why the ovens had exposed wiring. The DM stated that the ovens were not working. When asked how long the ovens had not been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of a facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility document titled Plan of correction for torn floors and complaint/report number AL00046076, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #128's room's floor covering was not torn, ceiling tiles were not stained in RI #128's room, and that RI #128's room did not have a urine odor. This affected RI #128. The torn floors had the potential to affect residents in 47 rooms. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy Safe and Homelike Environment with a revised date of 12/2023 documented Policy: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, . A review of a facility document titled Plan of correction for torn floors dated 03/28/2024 documented the floor replacements started on 02/14/2024 and would be completed by 05/01/2024. The plan indicated 52 rooms floors were to be replaced. The plan indicated five of the 52 rooms had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record reviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare & (and) Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, the facility failed to ensure Section N, Medications, of Resident Identifier (RI) #124's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication. This deficient practice affected RI #124 one of twenty-six sampled residents whose MDS was reviewed during the survey. Findings Include: The Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 October 2023 Section N documented: . N0415: High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication .E. Anticoagulant ( . warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin) . Do not code antiplatelet medications such as aspirin . or clopidogrel as N0415E, Anticoagulant. N04151I Check if an antiplatelet medication (e.g., aspirin . clopidogrel) was taken by the resident at any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, the facility failed to submit for a new Level I for Resident Identifier (RI) #14 when a new diagnosis for Psychotic Disorder was given on 07/07/2021. This affected RI #14 one of two residents reviewed for PASARR (Pre-admission Screening Annual Resident Review). Findings Include: Review of a facility policy Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program with a revised date of 12/2023 documented . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions . a. PASARR Level I i. Negative Level I Screening - permits admission to proceed and ends the PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder arises later. 9. any resident who exhibits a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, . or related condition will be referred promptly to the state mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$6,682 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $6,682 — penalty dated 2024-08-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL