No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cumberland Health And Rehab

47065 Al Highway 277, Bridgeport, AL 35740 · Non profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (256) 437-7260 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0741)6 immediate-jeopardy citations$238,745 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $238,745 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-03)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
520 E 12th St · (423) 837-7144 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
602 Alabama Ave · (256) 495-8060 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
IGA0.5 mi
50468 Al Highway 277 · (256) 495-2828 · Call to confirm hours
Park
301 Bleeker St · (203) 576-7233 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
805 Broadway Ave · (256) 495-2257

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.5%12.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.9%12.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%24.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%12.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.8%21.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%80.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.5%24.8%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.3%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.721.961.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.991.701.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.6%CMS range 34.9–51.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 9.3–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 2.9–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
35.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-03)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2019-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-06-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, the facility policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI committee developed interventions, including training to systemically address protective measures following an incident of a visitor to resident sexual abuse that occurred on 12/21/2023. Further the facility failed to ensure QAPI Committee identified all causal factors and developed and implemented corrective action plan to systemically address factors related to Resident Identifier (RI) #286 keeping vape devices in his/her room. The QAPI Committee did not identity that the facility did not have a policy and procedures in place to address resident vaping including where vaping was prohibited, safe storage of vape devices, and safe charging of the vape devices. On 12/21/2023 a (Certified Nursing Assistant) CNA #20 went into RI #27's room and witnessed a male visitor with his hand down RI #27's shirt. CNA #20 said the visitor was founding RI #27's breast. The facility did not have a policy or procedure for screening visitors or providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Exploitation and Neglect Prevention, Investigation and Reporting, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the Alabama State Survey Agency, review of the facility's investigative file, a review of the Incident/Offense Report, and the facility policy titled Medication Administration the facility failed to: 1) protect Resident Identifier (RI) #27 right to be free from sexual abuse perpetrator by a visitor. In late November or early December 2023 RI #27's daughter called the facility and informed them that a male visitor was upsetting RI #27 when he came to visit. RI #27's daughter said she did not want the male visitor visiting RI #27. The staff member advised the daughter she needed to come to the facility to complete paperwork. In early December 2023 the male visitor returned and visited with RI #27 at the nurses' desk. The facility notified RI #27's daughter and advised her to come to speak with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the Alabama Department of Public Health, the U.S. (United States) Food and Drug Administration's article titled Tips to Help Avoid Vape Battery or Fire Explosions, the facility's form titled Safe Smoking Evaluation, and a facility policy titled Smoking Policy the facility failed to ensure: 1) a system was in place to ensure residents' safety while smoking 2) a system was developed and implemented to ensure electronic cigarettes or vape devices were stored and charged safely. RI #286 was admitted on [DATE], upon admission, RI #286's hospital discharge papers indicated that he/she was a daily smoker. The facility's activity log indicated that RI #286 went out to smoke at the facility beginning on 10/28/2023. The facility did not assess RI #286 to be a smoker and did not complete an assessment to determine that RI #286 was safe to smoke. Further on 03/04/2024 staff found multiple vape devices in RI #286's room. Staff also reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-03 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and a facility policy titled Smoking Policy the facility failed to develop and implement a smoking policy that defined vapes, storage of vapes, charging of vapes, where vapes were permitted, addressed noncompliance of vapes, provided instructions for the use of the facility's Smoking Safety Evaluation tool, and the development of person-centered care plans for residents with the desire to vape. This failure affected Resident Identifier (RI) #286, one of one resident sampled for vaping, and RI #25, RI #34, RI #48, and RI #80 who did not have care planned interventions to ensure their safety while smoking as indicated by their Smoking Safety Evaluation tool. These failures had the potential to affect all residents with a desire to vape or smoke in the facility. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.90 Establish Smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, review of the Job Description of the Administrator, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were developed and implemented for residents who vape, to address safe storage, safe charging, and where vaping was permitted. On 03/04/2024 staff found multiple vapes devices in RI #286's room. Upon investigation, it was revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) had found a vape in RI #286's room on two separate occasions weeks prior to 03/04/2023. Further staff revealed that RI #286 was found with vapes in his/her rooms on multiple other occasion and no actions were taken. Multiple staff indicated RI #286 would sleep with a vape device on his/her chest and would charge the devices at bedside. The staff indicate RI #286 used his/her cell phone charger to charge the vape devices. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had cause, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-03 · tag F0837 — isolated
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review and the job description of the Director of Operations (Care Center), the Governing Body failed to provide oversite to ensure policies and procedures were developed and implemented for residents who vape, to address safe storage and safe charging. On 03/04/2024 staff found multiple vapes devices in RI #286's room. Upon investigation, it was revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) had found a vape in RI #286's room on two separate occasions weeks prior to 03/04/2023. Further staff revealed that RI #286 was found with vapes in his/her rooms on multiple other occasion and no actions were taken. Multiple staff indicated RI #286 would sleep with a vape device on his/her chest and would charge the devices at bedside. The staff indicate RI #286 used his/her cell phone charger to charge the vape devices. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had cause, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policies titled Behavioral Health Services and Comprehensive Care Plans the facility failed to ensure a behavioral health care plan was developed with person centered interventions for Resident Identifier (RI) #286 a resident with documented substance abuse and noncompliance of care. This affected RI #286 one of seven residents sampled for behaviors. These deficient practices were cited as a result of the investigation of a Facility Reported Incident AL00047176. Findings Include: Cross reference F741. The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans with an effective date of 04/06/2015 and a last revised date of 02/09/2024 documented: . The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and a review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], the facility failed to ensure substance abuse training was provided to staff. This deficient practice affected Resident Identifier (RI) #286 one of seven residents sampled for behaviors. Findings include: Cross Reference F740 RI #286 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #286 had diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Muscle weakness, and Stimulant Dependence. RI #286 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed by MDS #6, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 15 of 15 which indicated he/she was cognitively intact. A nurses note dated 10/27/2024 at 05:21 PM entered by a Registered Nurse indicated that in report from the transferring hospital RI #286 had tested positive for methamphetamines, amphetamines, and meth. Further the hospital reported RI #286 had visitors bring illegal drugs to the hospital. On 05/31/2024 at 11:01 AM an interview was conducted with the SSD who indicated that she was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and a review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessed addressed substance abuse, smoking and vaping. The facility's most current Facility assessment dated [DATE] did not identify the need for staff competencies regarding substance abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 86 of 86 residents. These deficient practices were cited as a result of the investigation of a Facility Reported Incident AL00047176. Findings include: RI #286 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #286 had diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Muscle weakness, and Stimulant Dependence. RI #286 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed by MDS #6, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 15. RI #286's medical records included Highlands Medical Center Hospitalist H&P with an admission date of 09/30/2023. The past medical history included a social history of current everyday smoker and smoked ten cigarettes per day. The level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, residents' medical records, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manuals, the facility failed to ensure Section J of Resident Identifier (RI) #80 and RI #286's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded to reflect tobacco use during the assessment period. This had the potential to affect two of 20 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1 October 2019 Section J documented Section J1300: Current Tobacco Use . Coding Instructions . Code 1, yes if the resident has used tobacco since the last assessment . RI #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Difficulty in Walking, Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of RI #80's Smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and a facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #67's nebulizer mask was stored in a covered plastic bag on 05/29/2024 and 05/30/2024. This deficient practice affected RI #67 one resident sampled for respiratory care. Finding Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration with an effective date of 05/2024 revealed: Policy: Oxygen is administered to resident who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 5 .d. Keep .devices covered in plastic bag when not in use . RI #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. RI #67's Physician Orders for May 2024 revealed: IPRAT-ALBUT (Ipratropium-Albuterol) 0.5-3(2.5) MG (milgrams)/3 ML (milliliters) GIVE 1 VIAL PER NEB( nebublizer) EVERY 6 HOURS AS NEEDED FOR SOB (shortness of breath)/COUGH . On 05/29/2024 at 9:02 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration, FDA Drug Safety Communication, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #19 did not administer her personal prescription of Klonopin 0.5 milligram (mg) to Resident Identifier (RI) #286. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of a Facility Reported Incident AL00047176. Findings include: On 03/06/2024 the State Survey Agency received a Facility Reported Incident which alleged CNA #18 was aware and did not report CNA #19 administered a Klonopin 0.5mg to RI #286. A review of the U.S. FDA FDA Drug Safety Communication dated 09/23/2020 revealed: . To address the serious risks of abuse, addiction, physical dependence, and withdrawal reactions, the U.S. FDA is requiring the Boxed Warning be updated for all benzodiazepine medicines. Benzodiazepines are widely used to treat many conditions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, a review of the 2017 FOOD CODE, and the facility policy titled: Low Temperature Dishmachine, the facility failed to ensure the water temperatures reached a minimum required wash water temperature of 120 to 125 degrees F during ten of eleven cycles observed. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents for whom food was prepared and served at the time of this survey. Findings Included: The 2017 Food and Drug Administration Food Code, regulation 4-501.110(B) Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Wash Solution Temperature mandates the following: The temperature of the wash solution in spray-type warewashers that use chemicals to SANITIZE may not be less than . 120 degrees F (Fahrenheit). The facility policy titled: Low Temperature Dishmachine (undated) states: Dishes, glassware, cups, utensils, and other dishware are washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use. The dish machine for ware washing will be checked prior to each meal period to ensure that it is functioning properly. All dishware will be washed and sanitized after every use. The procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff cleaned front to back while providing perineal care to Resident Identifier (RI) #24. This affected one of one sampled resident observed during incontinence care. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care with a Review/Revision Date of 5/10/18 revealed; . PURPOSE: To maintain cleanliness, promote comfort, prevent infections and skin breakdown . I. Policy Perineal care will be provided daily and as indicated. III. Procedure for female: . K. Using a washcloth with perineal cleanser or soap and water, separate labia using one hand and bathe with the other hand using gentle downward swipes from front to back. RI #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Intellectual Disabilities and Brain Damage due to Birth Injury. On 8/29/19 at 8:30 a.m., EI #1, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was observed wiping back to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review. and a review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed her hands; 1. Before and after touching the resident, 2. before putting on and taking off gloves, 3. before leaving the resident's room to get more supplies, 4. after cleaning the perineum and before touching clean items and items in the resident's room while performing incontinence care on Resident Identifier (RI) #24. This affected one of one resident's observed for incontinence care. A review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, with a Revision Date of 03/2018, revealed: . PURPOSE: Proper hand hygiene will improve the health of healthcare workers, patients, volunteers and visitors by decreasing the transmission of infectious agents. POLICY: . 3. Perform hand hygiene: a. before and after direct contact with patients; b. after removing gloves; . d. after contact with body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to: 1. assure the facility followed correct manual dishwashing procedures per chemical distributors technical data sheet (i.e. chemical concentration in the manual dishwashing was effective by testing/documenting the water temperature in the final rinse sink when using the chemical Quaternary Ammonia). 2. assure hot foods were maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above when served from the tray line as evidenced by documentation. 3. assure food (ice cream) received frozen, was maintained frozen during storage, 4. assure the PM [NAME] practiced proper handwashing/glove change when going from touching potentially contaminated objects such as (soiled cloth hot pad, equipment (lid cover of hot plate storage, on/off dial of range top and lid covers from dry storage). 5. The facility further failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not touch the end of Resident Identifier (RI) #13 and RI # 54's straws when setting up trays in the dining room on 07/24/18. This affected RI #13 and RI #54, two residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-07-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse checked placement of Resident Identifier (RI) #11's gastrostomy tube prior to medication administration. This affected RI #11, one of one residents observed for medication administration observation via gastrostomy tube. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration with a Last Revised date of 03/2016, revealed: .7. MEDICATION GIVEN THROUGH FEEDING TUBE A. Licensed nurses will administer per gastric tube as ordered by physician .vii. Check for proper tube placement . RI #11 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy and Diaphragmatic Hernia Without Obstruction or Gangrene. On 07/25/18 at 4:00 p.m., Employee Identifier (EI) #4, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed during medication pass administration for RI #11. EI #4 was observed not to check placement of RI #11's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse did not place a bag containing a soiled brief and gloves and a bag containing soiled linens on a fall mat beside Resident Identifier (RI) #59's bed. This affected RI #59, one of one residents observed for incontinence care. Findings Include: RI #59 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Unspecified Quadriplegia. On 07/26/18 at 8:48 a.m., during incontinence care observation, Employee Identifier (EI) #4, Registered Nurse (RN), was observed placing a bag containing soiled linen and a bag containing a soiled brief, wipes and gloves on the fall mat beside RI #59's bed. On 07/26/18 at 12:44 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #2, RN/Staff Development/Infection Control Coordinator. EI #2 was asked, should garbage bags containing soiled linen and soiled briefs and gloves be placed on the fall mat beside the bed on the floor. EI #2 said, no. EI #2 was asked what was the concern with those items being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$238,745 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $238,745 — penalty dated 2024-06-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2021
ANDERSON, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2021
CARRIER, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2021
SAMZ, JEFFREYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
BENTLEY, PHILIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
CARTER, CLINTONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
MATTHEWS JR, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$16K
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 14%Other / private 15%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $16K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,050per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alabama Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Alabama
$8,334/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,787/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,425/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 015420. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next