Walker Rehabilitation Center, INC
350 Northeast 4th Street, Carbon Hill, AL 35549 · For profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (205) 924-4404 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Nov 2024
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $235,127 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-30)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 12.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.1% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.5% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 1.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.0% | 12.1% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 24.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.1% | 12.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 50.5% | 21.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.7% | 80.3% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.4% | 24.8% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.5% | 11.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.81 | 1.96 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.51 | 1.70 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.7%CMS range 34.8–62.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.7–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 5.3–15.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 46.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
18 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-11-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, review of the Administrator Job Description, and review of the facility's Abuse Policy, the facility's former Administrator, ADM #5, failed to provide oversight to ensure the facility's abuse policies were implemented and failed to conduct thorough investigations of abuse allegations to identify contributing factors and take corrective action to prevent further abuse. The Administrator's failure to ensure that the facility's abuse policies were implemented, and that allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated to ensure the appropriate corrective actions were taken, was likely to result in further abuse and serious harm, serious injury, impairment, or death. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or serious psychosocial harm to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was cited in reference to 483.70 Administration at F 835-Administration. On 11/27/2024 at 5:12 PM, the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-11-30 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and review of the Director of Operations Job Description, the Governing Body failed to provide oversite to ensure the facility's Abuse Coordinators, including Administrator (ADM) #5, were provided training on how to conduct a thorough investigation, identify contributing factors, and take corrective action to prevent further abuse. The Governing Body further failed to ensure the facility developed its Abuse Policy to include the process for coordination with the QAPI program to ensure the Abuse Policy was fully implemented for all allegations of abuse and thoroughly investigated to ensure the appropriate corrective actions were taken to prevent further abuse. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was cited in reference to 483.70 Administration at F 837- Governing Body. On 11/27/2024 at 5:12 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were provided a copy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-11-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance and Leadership the facility's QAPI committee, failed to thoroughly review all allegations of abuse that occurred on 07/08/2023, 07/09/2023, 09/06/2023, 05/10/2024 of incidents to identify all causal factors and to take appropriate action to prevent reoccurrences. These incidents are related to Resident Identifiers (RI) #5, RI #20, RI #98, and RI #99's Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs). The facility failed to ensure its Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Program developed and implemented process to analyze and review all adverse events including substantiated allegations of abuse. The QAA committee did not review incidents of abuse that occurred to ensure the Abuse Policy was fully implemented for all allegations of abuse including staff's identifying, stopping (protecting the resident from further abuse), and reporting abuse. The QAA committee did not review the incidents to ensure the allegations were thoroughly investigated to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, reviews of residents' medical records, review of a facility policy titled ABUSE PREVENTION, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative files, the facility failed to protect the rights of residents to be free from abuse perpetrated by employees of the facility and by other residents of the facility. Specifically: 1) On 07/08/2023 Resident Identifier (RI) #5 was verbally abused by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 when CNA #8 yelled and cursed Damn you . at RI #5 and slammed the bathroom door with RI #5 in the bathroom. RI #5 cried while explaining to staff what happened. On 07/09/2023 RI #98 was verbally and mentally abused by CNA #8 when CNA #8 withheld and refused to provide RI #98 a lunch tray for disciplinary reasons. CNA #8 ensured that RI #98 was served last while others around RI #98 were eating already. CNA #9, CNA #26, and Dietary Manager (DM) #15 witnessed CNA #8 refusing to serve RI #98's meal and failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record reviews, review of a facility policy titled ABUSE PREVENTION, and review of the facility investigative file, the facility failed to ensure policies and protocols were implemented to immediately intervene to protect residents and stop abuse, and immediately report the abuse. 1.) Specifically, on 07/09/2023 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9 and CNA #26 witnessed CNA #8 intentionally withholding RI #98's meal tray in the dining room for disciplinary reasons. CNA #8 told CNA #9 to not serve RI #98. The facility further failed to ensure staff who witnessed the abuse, CNA #9 and CNA #26, intervened to protect RI #98, stop the abuse, and report the abuse immediately to Administration. The abuse was not reported or acted on until 07/10/2023. Residents in the facility were not protected from CNA #8 who continued to work in the facility that day on 07/09/2023. 2.) On 09/06/2023 CNA #22 witnessed CNA #9 hit RI #99 with a package of wipes and hold RI #99's arm down between her legs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled ABUSE PREVENTION, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative files, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the occurrence of abuse of residents perpetrated by employees of the facility to include when the incident occurred, and failed to obtain statements from all those present to identify contributing factors to be able to determine appropriate interventions and actions to prevent further abuse. 1.) the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted on 07/10/2023 after receiving reports that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 verbally and mentally abused Resident Identifier (RI) #5 on 07/08/2023 when she yelled and cursed Damn you . at RI #5, slammed the bathroom door with RI #5 in the bathroom, and RI #5 cried when explaining to staff what happened; also, RI #98 was verbally and mentally abused by CNA #8 the next day, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, interviews, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs), and review of a facility policy titled ABUSE PREVENTION, the facility failed to ensure facility staff reported abuse immediately to the Administrator for allegations of abuse to be reported to the State Agency within two hours after abuse occurred when: 1. Resident Identifier (RI) #98 was verbally and mentally abused on 07/09/2023 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8. This was witnessed by CNA #9, CNA #26, and previous Dietary Manager (DM) #15. This was not reported to Administrator until 07/10/2023. 2. RI #99 was verbally and physically abused by CNA #9 on 09/06/2023. CNA #22 witnessed the abuse and failed to report the abuse to anyone in the facility until the next day on 09/07/2023. Serious harm is likely to result when the facility's staff fail to report the incidents to the Administrator so corrective actions can be taken, including protecting residents from further potential abuse. It was determined the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and facility policies titled Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine and Resource: Taking Accurate Temperatures, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Plate domes/covers and trays were not wet nesting and; 2) The temperatures on the tray line were taken and recorded. This had the potential to affect 40 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1.) A facility policy titled Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine dated 2017 documented the following: . Procedure . 9. Dishes should be air dried on the dish racks. Do not dry with towels. 11. Dishes should not be nested unless they are completely dry. On 11/06/2024 at 09:28 AM during an observation of dishwashing, clean trays and domes were staked on top of each other as they came out of the dishwasher. Kitchen staff were observed transporting the trays and domes out of the dish room onto a cart and they were stacked on top of each other. On 11/06/2024 at 11:18 AM the surveyor observed seven trays with water in them, four domes with a small amount of water in the top of the dome, and one dome with a large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of the job responsibilities of the Certified Medication Aide (CMA), the facility failed to ensure subcutaneous insulin injections were not administered to residents by CMA/MAC (Medication Assistant, Certified) #10, #11, #12 and #13 from May 2023 through October 2023. This affected RI #6, #10, #18, #28, #31, #32 and #98 seven of 16 sampled residents receiving medications in the facility. This deficient practice affected four of five Med Techs who administered insulin to residents. This deficient practice was cited as a result of investigation of complaint/report number AL00046139. Findings include: Review of the facility's CMA, Job Title, with an effective date of 04/15/2021, revealed the following: PURPOSE OF THE JOB: . The CMA will adhere to the scope of practice with regard to the Medication Aide Act and facility rules, regulations, policies and procedures applicable in the performance of duties to enhance and safeguard resident(s). ACCOUNTABILITY . A MAC may perform limited medication administration tasks delegated to the MAC by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy titled, Homelike Environment the facility failed to ensure: 1) Screens were on the windows for Resident Identifier (RI) #8, RI #10, RI #11, RI #12, RI #19, and RI #44. 2) Holes were not in the glass windowpanes of RI #10, RI #11, and RI #44's room. 3) Paint was not peeling off of the ceiling in RI #10, RI #11, and RI #44's room. 4) The bathroom floor was not stained yellow under the sink and around the toilet in the shared bathroom for RI #8, RI #10, RI #11, RI #12, RI #19, and RI #44. 5) Wires for the call light were not intertwined with plumbing for the sink in the shared bathroom of RI #8, RI #10, RI #11, RI #12, RI #19, and RI #44. 6) Open gaps were not between the glass windowpanes and the wall in RI #10, RI #11, and RI #44's room. 7) Baseboards were not missing in RI #10, RI #11, RI #44's room. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Homelike Environment with a revised date of February 2021, revealed: Policy Statement Residents are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and a facility policy titled, POSITIONING THE RESIDENT, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #25 was turned and repositioned every two hours. This affected one of two residents observed for a pressure ulcer. Findings include: A facility policy titled, POSITIONING THE RESIDENT, revised 10/1/19, revealed, . II. Policy Residents who are bed bound will be turned and repositioned every 2 hours. RI #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. RI #25 had a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. The resident's care plan revealed, . Problem Start Date 12/26/2019 . pressure ulcer stage IV to coccyx . Approach . Turn and reposition every 2 hrs and prn (as needed). On 02/06/20 at 8:20 a.m., the resident was observed on his/her back. The wedges were on the floor. On 02/06/20 at 10:31 a.m., the resident was observed on his/her back. The wedges were observed on the floor beside bed. On 02/06/20 at 11:16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of POTTER AND [NAME], FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING, NINTH EDITION, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse cleaned Resident Identifier (RI) #7's nasal spray container after contact with the resident's nares before recapping the container and returning it to the medication cart. Findings Include: A review of POTTER AND [NAME], FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING, NINTH EDITION, CHAPTER 32, Medication Administration, BOX 32-16 PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES, Administering Nasal Medications, documented: 16. Administer nasal spray: .18. Wipe tip of bottle with clean, dry tissue and replace the cap, . RI #7 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A diagnosis included allergic rhinitis. On 02/06/20 at 8:07 a.m., Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was observed administering RI #7's nasal spray to each nare. EI #3 was then observed recapping RI #7's nasal spray without wiping off the tip of the container and returning the container to the medication cart. On 02/06/20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, review of a facility policy titled Dietary Policy - Food Storage, the facility failed to ensure: 1. expired foods were not stored in kitchen refrigerators, 2. there was no rust present on kitchen food preparation tables and on clean dish storage shelving, and there was no chipping paint on the clean dish storage area above food serving hot bar, among other issues identified in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect 46 of 50 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled Proper Food Storage - Refrigerated, no date, included: .13 .Leftover food is used within 3 days or discarded .14 . f . All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods will be .consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen . or discarded . 1. On 11/18/18 at 08:47 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, with Employee Identifier (EI) #1, Dietary Manager, observations were made of the refrigerators. Observed was a plastic ziploc bag of cornbread pieces dated 11/8/18, with a use by date of 11/11/18; two bags of baby…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2018-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, Facility Environment Policy & Procedure and a facility document titled, Director of Maintenance Job Description, the facility failed to ensure Room Locators (RL)'s #1-23 were free of scuffed and chipped paint, torn veneer on doors with sharp edges, exposed commode bolts, cracked commode lid and peeling commode seat, doorframes free of rust, missing baseboards and tiles. This was observed three of three days of the survey and affected 23 rooms on all three wings of the facility. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Facility Environment Policy & Procedure, no date, revealed: . Residents are provided with a safe, clean .homelike environment . A review of a facility document titled, Director of Maintenance Job Description, no date, revealed: . C. Safety . Functions Duties: . regularly inspect equipment, building . to ensure a safe and comfortable environment; . During the initial tour of the facility on 11/18/2018 the following observations were made: 1) RL #1: Doorframe with chipped paint,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies titled, Hand Hygiene/Glove Use Policy and Blood Glucose Testing, the facility failed to ensure: 1.) a Licensed Nurse cleaned Resident Identifier (RI) #38's personal glucometer before storing it in the medication cart and washed her hands after touching potentially contaminated objects before applying gloves to administer RI #38's insulin injection; 2.) a Licensed Nurse did not place a syringe filled with insulin for RI #39 on top of the medication cart without a barrier; 3.) a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not manipulate the paper towel dispenser with her bare hands after washing her hands and washed her hands after removing gloves during catheter care for RI #17, and 4.) a CNA removed her gloves after touching RI #15's colostomy bag during catheter care. These deficient practices affected two of nine residents observed during medication administration with two of four nurses and further affected two of two residents with two of two CNAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of Potter and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing, Ninth Edition, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for Resident Identifier (RI) #44, RI #7 and RI #251. This affected RI #44, RI #7 and RI #251, three of 15 residents whose physician's orders were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of Potter and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing, Ninth Edition, Chapter 23, Legal Implications in Nursing Practice, page 311, revealed: .Health Care Providers' Orders .Nurses follow health care providers' orders unless they believe that the orders are in error . 1.) RI #44 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, Pseudobulbar Palsy, Contractures Hips, Knees, Elbows and Other Paralytic Syndromes. A review of RI #44's physician's orders revealed: .General 01/17/2017 .TRANSFER X (times) 2 ASSIST PER HOYER LIFT Every Shift . On 11/18/18 at 9:22 a.m., RI #44 stated he/she was being transferred by a staff member with a Hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #44's medical record and a facility document titled, INCIDENT/ACCIDENT REPORT - RESIDENT, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #8, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), obtained assistance of another staff member before transferring RI #44 using a Hoyer lift, as determined by RI #44's assessment and plan of care, during a transfer on 10/06/18. During the 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift on 10/06/18, EI #8 failed to follow RI #44's plan of care when she transferred the resident by herself using the Hoyer lift causing RI #44's gerichair to turn over and RI #44, a resident on antiplatelet medication and at increased risk for bleeding, to sustain a raised area to the back of his/her head and skin tear to the right forearm. Resident complained of head pain and dizziness and was transferred to a local hospital after the fall. This deficient practice affected RI #44, one of two residents investigated for falls. Findings Include: RI #44 was readmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-30 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and review of a facility policy titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, the facility failed to ensure the required data was on the staff posting form, to include census and the number of staff working and actual hours worked for all nursing staff on four of five days of the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, with a revised date of July 2016 documented: . Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses . and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNA's) directly responsible for resident care will be posted . 3. Shift staffing information shall be recorded on the Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care form for each shift. The information recorded on the form shall include the following: a. The name of the facility. b. The date for which the information is posted. c. The resident census at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$235,127 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $235,127 — penalty dated 2024-11-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHURCH, CLYDE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 07/01/2010 |
| HARRISON, BOYDE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| POTTS, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| SCOTT, CHARLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in AL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alabama Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 015408. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.