Dadeville Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 101.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 5 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2021-04-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide services to three of eight residents (Resident Identifier (RI) #67, #11, and #73) reviewed for limitations in range of motion (ROM) in a total sample of 23. The facility failed to assess residents with ROM impairments and provide services to maintain function or prevent declines. In addition, the facility failed to implement established restorative programs for residents with programs in place. Findings include: A policy for the Functional Maintenance Plan (FMP)/Restorative Nursing was requested. The Rehab Nurse, Employee Identifier (EI) #4, brought a policy to the surveyor dated 04/21/21. EI #4 stated she just wrote the policy; there was no policy previously. Review of the policy revealed therapy staff would give the FMP to the restorative nurse who would initiate the plan as recommended on the FMP. The policy read, After approx (approximately) 2 weeks the nurse will forward the FMP to the therapy department…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to keep medications under safe and secure storage with limited access and under direct observation of authorized staff for one of six medication carts observed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials and pens were dated when opened for four of six medication carts observed which affected six of 21 residents identified by the facility as having used insulin. Findings include: 1. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, revealed .Medication carts shall be kept in sight or locked whenever back is turned or away from the cart .No one shall have access to drugs in the medication carts except the licensed nurses for that specific unit . On 04/19/21 at 12:45 PM, an observation of the medication cart on Hall Two Long-Term Care (LTC) was observed unlocked. The licensed nurse was away from the cart and there was no licensed nurse on the hall. During a continuous observation of the medication cart from 12:45 PM to 1:16 PM, the medication cart remained unlocked. During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (Resident Identifier (RI) #28, RI #50 and RI #282) reviewed for oxygen (O2) therapy in a sample of 23 residents received O2 therapy with equipment that was cleaned and stored in a way to prevent possible contamination. The concentrators had dusty filters and the nasal cannulas were not dated to indicated when the tubing had been changed and the nasal cannulas were not placed in a bag when not in use. This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents to receive therapy with equipment that was not stored properly between uses and increased their risk of infection and/or illness. Findings include: Review of undated maintenance instructions revealed on page 25, under 7.3 Cleaning the Cabinet Filter .1. Remove the filter and clean as needed. Environmental conditions that may require more frequent inspection and cleaning of the filter include but are not limited to high dust, air pollutions, etc. 2. Clean the cabinet filter with a vacuum cleaner or wash with a mild liquid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-04-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity in toileting for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident Identifier (RI) #8). The facility staff failed to provide RI #8 with interventions, such as assisting to the bathroom, a bedside commode, or bed pan, to remain continent but instead provided adult briefs for bowel and bladder function. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located in the paper medical chart revealed RI #8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #8 was discharged back to the assisted living and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and on 10/16/20 after receiving care at the hospital for fractures. On 04/19/21 at 3:16 PM, RI #8 was observed lying in bed. This surveyor interviewed RI #8 who stated he/she wore a diaper, so he/she didn't have to get up to go to the bathroom. RI #8 stated, he/she had been continent, and it was awful being incontinent and having to wear an adult incontinence brief, but he/she was used to wearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-04-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of a transfer for one of one resident (Resident Identifier (RI) #31) reviewed for hospital transfers to the resident and the resident representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital; and failed to notify the State office of the Ombudsman of resident transfers. Findings include: Review of RI #31's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/21, located in RI #31's paper medical record, showed a facility admission date of 10/26/20 and a re-admission date of 02/05/21. Review of RI #31's nursing Progress Notes, dated 01/31/21 at 11:45 AM, located in RI #31's paper record under the nurses notes tab, revealed Res [resident] still has had no results from Lactulose on 01/29/21 or MOM [Milk of Magnesia] + senna syrup on 01/30/21 . PC [placed call] to . CRNP [Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner], order received . to send to (local hospital) ER (Emergency Room) for eval [evaluation] of positive ABD [abdominal] x-ray for ileus. Review of RI #31's nursing Progress Notes, dated 01/31/21 at 12:35 PM, located in RI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective system to identify safety risks related to side rails for one of one resident (Resident Identifier (RI) #11) reviewed for side rails. The facility failed to ensure the correct assessed side rail was utilized to prevent potential accidents hazards. Findings include: Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/28/21, Resident Identifier (RI) #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures and a fracture of the left leg. This MDS showed RI #11 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making skills and required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Review of the Care Plans, located in the paper medical chart under the care plan tab, revealed a Risk for Falls care plan, dated 01/21/21, with an approach for side rails up x 2 for turning and repositioning. Review of the Physicians Orders, dated 01/21/21 and located in the paper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-04-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident Identifier (RI)# 47) had a medication regimen free of unnecessary medications. The resident was prescribed as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication without a stop order and without a physician re-evaluation after 14 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's Anti-Psychotic Drugs policy (undated) revealed antipsychotic medication would be used only when it was necessary to treat a specific condition. The only guidance regarding PRN antipsychotic medications was, PRN anti-psychotic drugs should not be used more than five (5) times in any seven (7) day period without a review of the resident's condition by a physician. The requirement for a PRN antipsychotic prescription of no more than 14 days and the requirement for Physician reassessment was not included in the policy. Review of the admission Face Sheet, dated 01/29/21 and located in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and a review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Exploitation, and Injuries of Unknown Source, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse, involving Resident Identifier (RI) #155, was reported to the State Agency (SA). This affected one of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Exploitation, and Injuries of Unknown Source, with an effective date of 11/28/2016, revealed: PURPOSE: To ensure the safety and well-being of each resident, the facility will promote and protect the rights of each resident.VII. REPORTING /RESPONSE A. In response to allegations of abuse . are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made . to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency .). On 08/16/2018 the State Agency received a complaint from a family member of RI #155. The family member reported that she spoke to the owner and ( Employee Identifier #5 ) alleging that RI #155 was mistreated by a male…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-01-04 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of annual Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) competency/performance review documentation, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to assess CNAs performance at least once every twelve months. This affected three of three CNAs reviewed and had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On at 01/03/18 at 11:18 AM Employee Identifier (EI) #4, Director of Nursing Assistant, provided information related to yearly Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) competencies. This documentation included a page from the Facility Assessment indicating the facility would conduct and document annual competency reviews. Also included were QAPI (Quality Assurance Process Improvement)Committee Minutes dated 11/17/2017. These minutes indicated staff would be inserviced on the need for annual training. They also indicated annual skills check-offs would start on 01/01/2018. When asked for annual competencies on EI #s 5, 6, and 7, CNAs, the facility was only able to provide pericare/incontinence care sign-offs for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-01-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, review of the Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10095 and Form Instructions Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN), and review of Resident Indentifer (RI)# 54's beneficiary notifications, the facility failed to ensure Resident #54 and/or the resident representative were issued beneficiary liability notices at least two days prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered days. This affected one of three residents reviewed for liability notices. Findings include: On 01/02/18 at 5:38 PM the facility Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy addressing NOMNC or SNFABNs. Review of the Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10095 revealed the following: When to Deliver the NOMNC A Medicare health provider must give an advance, completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to enrollees receiving skilled nursing .no later than two days before the termination of services . Review of the Form Instructions Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN) revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIME HEALTH CARE ENTERPRISES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL