No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wesley Place On Honeysuckle

718 Honeysuckle Road, Dothan, AL 36305 · Non profit - Corporation · 166 certified beds · (334) 792-0921 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (334) 792-0921 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$45,544 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $45,544 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
480 Honeysuckle Rd · (334) 836-1212 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3090 Ross Clark Cir · (334) 793-5017 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2938 Ross Clark Cir · (334) 791-8175 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1815 Choctaw St · (440) 237-1017 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
718 Honeysuckle Rd · (334) 792-0921

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.1%12.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.6%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%1.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.1%12.1%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%24.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%12.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.1%21.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.4%80.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%24.8%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.8%11.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.721.961.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.971.701.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 191 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.2%CMS range 54.4–65.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.5–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting88.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.2–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 152.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.03 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-03-23)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2019-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #195's medical records, review of a third-party complaint, and the facility's policies titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered and Perineal Care, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were developed to instruct staff how to safely position RI #195 in bed during incontinent care; including how many staff members were required to safely provide incontinent care for RI #195. The facility further failed to ensure RI #195's care planned interventions for bilateral half side rails for safety during care was implemented by Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) #6. This deficient practice affected RI #195; one of 51 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. On 09/14/2023, CNA #6 was providing incontinent care to RI #195 without the assistance of another staff. CNA #6 repositioned RI #195 to his/her left side, CNA #6 turned around to obtain a wipe, and when she turned back around RI #195 was sliding from the bed. RI #195 fell head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, the facility's investigative file, hospital record review, the facility policy titled, and review of a third-party complaint, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #195's upper side rails were up for safety during the provision of incontinent care; and failed to ensure two staff assisted to reposition RI #195 during the incontinent care. On 09/14/2023, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 was providing incontinent care to RI #195 without a second staff to assist. CNA #6 repositioned RI #195 to the left side, turned around to obtain a wipe, and when she turned back around RI #195 was sliding from the left side of the bed. RI #195 fell head and upper body first from the bed to the floor. According to CNA #6, the left side rail was not in the upright position at the time. RI #195 was sent to the ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation and was found to have two brain bleeds, a right-side mandible fracture, dental fractures, bleeding in the mouth, a right-side scapula…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Manual, and the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #96's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], was accurately coded to reflect Resident Identifier (RI) #96's behavioral symptoms. This deficient practice affected one of 51 sampled residents whose MDS was reviewed. Findings include: RI #96 was admitted on [DATE] and diagnoses that included Dementia, Moderate with Mood Disturbance, Alzheimer's Disease Late Onset. A review of facility policy titled Comprehensive Assessments with a Revised date of 03/2022 documented, Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Comprehensive assessments are conducted in accordance with criteria and timeframes established in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual . Section E0200: Behavioral Symptoms of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Manual which is also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans -Baseline, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #196's and RI #198's baseline care plans addressed the use of their Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machines. This deficient practice affected RI #196 and RI #198, two of six sampled residents whose baseline care plans were reviewed. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans-Baseline, with a revised date of 03/2022, revealed the following: . Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to the following: . b. Physician orders . 4. c. Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility . RI #196 was originally admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of facility policies titled, Crushing Medications, Administering Medications, and Gastrostomy/Jejunostomy Site Care, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Resident Identifier (RI) #3 had a crush order to crush his/her Clonazepam 1 mg (milligram) tablet, and 2) RI #40's PEG (Percutaneous Gastrostomy) site was cleaned with peroxide as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices affected RI #3, one of six residents observed during the medication pass administration; and RI #40, one of one resident whose PEG site care was observed. Finding include: 1) RI #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of Epilepsy and Dysphasia. A facility policy titled, Crushing Medications, with a revised date of 04/2018, included the following: Policy Statement Medications shall be crushed only when it is . consistent with physician orders. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 3. In addition, the following guidelines shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, the facility to ensure: 1) Resident Identifier (RI) #395's vial of 70/30 insulin was labeled correctly; and 2) an expired bottle of Enteric Coated (EC) Aspirin (ASA) was not left on the medication cart on the Rehab unit. These deficient practices affected RI #395, and had the potential to affect all resident with orders for EC ASA on the Rehab unit. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, with a revised date of 02/2023, revealed the following: . Policy Interpretation and Implementation .6. Medications . are labeled accordingly . Medication Labeling . 2. The medication label includes,at a minimum: . 2. d. expiration date, when applicable; e. resident's name . 5. vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g. [for example] needle punctured) are dated and discharged within 28 days . 1) RI #395 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene and Gastrostomy/Jejunostomy Site Care, and review of guidelines from CDC's (Center for Medicare and Medicare) Core Infection and Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare in All Settings, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #19 removed her mask before exiting a resident on Droplet Precautions's room, Resident Identifier (RI) #53, 2) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 changed her gloves and sanitized her hands while performing gastrostomy site care on RI #40; and 3) Registered Nurse (RN) #4 did not use her gloved finger to pack foam into RI #295's wound during wound care. Further RN #4 used her ungloved hands and hand sanitizer to clean RI #295's. These deficient practices affected three of 51 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of undated guidelines for CDC's Core Infection and Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare in All Settings,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2018-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY I. Based on observations, interviews and a review of a facility policy titled, Serving & Storage of Food and a document titled, IN-USE UTENSILS, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Cream of wheat in the dry storage room was sealed; 2) Ham in the refrigerator was labeled and; 3) A scoop was not on laying top of the flour in the flour bin. This had the potential to affect 60 of 60 resident who received meals from the kitchen. II. Based on the facility policies titled, Food Received from the Main Kitchen and Food Preparation, the facility further failed to ensure the facility homemakers serving and plating food for meals on the units: 1. completely contained their hair in hair nets; 2. did not use the same gloves to handle food and non food items; 3. did not use hand sanitizer between glove changes while handling food; 4. did not hold an item removed from the refrigerator against her uniform; 5. did not lay a tong on top of the fries, then with the same gloves on handle non food items and then touched the tongs again…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of a facility policy Quality of Life - Dignity the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #11 received the supper meal on 8/27/18 and was fed the same time the roommate was fed. This was observed on 8/27/18 and affected one of two residents observed for meals. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy Quality of Life -Dignity with a revised date of August 2009 revealed: Policy Statement Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. RI #11 was admitted to the facility 1/22/15 with a diagnosis of Dementia. A review of a Quarterly Minimal Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/31/18 revealed RI #11 was totally dependant for eating. On 8/27/18 at 5:01 PM the surveyor observed the supper meal served to the roommate who required to be fed. On 8/27/18 at 5:40 PM the surveyor observed staff take a tray in to RI #11's room and begin to feed the resident. On 8/28/18 at 4:05 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) #13,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of a facility policy titled, Housekeeping, Cleaning & Laundry, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Resident Identifier(RI) #85's room was clean and free of crumbs, the carpet was not wet and the bathroom was clean and 2) the 600 Hall was free of a urine odor. This was observed on four days of the survey and affected RI #85 and the 600 Hall. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy Housekeeping, Cleaning & Laundry, no date, revealed .II. P.M. Homemaker Duty List The P.M. Homemaker will accomplish daily the following day shift cleaning duties.Clean resident rooms. 1) RI #85 was admitted to the facility 2/17/17 with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. On 8/28/18 at 10:13 AM, during a brief family interview there was concerns voiced about RI #85's room and dirty bathroom. The surveyor observed crumbs on the carpet next to the bed and near the chair. The carpet was also noted wet and stained and the bathroom had trash on the floor. The isolation trash bin was noted full with the lid not completely closed due to trash above the rim. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Perineal Care of Incontinent Residents, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performing incontinent care for RI # 85 did not 1. change gloves without washing her hands before applying clean gloves, and 2. did not remove a soiled pad then with same dirty gloves place a clean bed pad. This was observed on 8/29/18 and affected one of two residents observed for incontinent care. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Perineal Care of Incontinent Residents, no date, revealed .Procedure: .5. Wash your hands .11. Put on clean gloves.15 a.wash . b. rinse .20.put soiled linens in a bag. 21. Remove gloves and discard. PUT ON NEW GLOVES .22. Apply clean undergarments, diaper or underpad. RI #85 was admitted to the facility 2/17/17 with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. A review of a facility lab report revealed: .8/17/18 .Bacteriology .Source : .Urine .Final Report .Confirmed Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) organism . On 8/29/18 at 9:17 AM, Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of a facility policy Security of Medication Cart, the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff did not leave the medication cart unlocked as she walked away from it. This was observed on 8/27/18 and affected one of six nurses observed for medication pass. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Security of Medication Cart, with a revised date of April 2007 revealed, Policy Statement The medication cart shall be secured during medication passes. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .4. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. On 8/27/18 at 4:00 PM, the surveyor observed Employee Identifier (EI) #2, Licensed Practical Nurse passing medication. EI #2 was in the medication cart then left the cart and went to a resident's room. EI #2 did not lock the medication cart. Once EI #2 got to the the resident's room she realized she had forgot something and returned to the medication cart. She then realized she had not locked it before leaving it. On 8/27/18 at 4:40 PM an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of a facility policy titled, Perineal Care of Incontinent Residents, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA) did not place a soiled brief on the floor and did not touch a clean brief and clean clothing with the same soiled gloves she had on during the provision of incontinent care for Resident Identifier (RI) #10. This was observed on 8/28/18 and affected one of two residents observed for incontinent care. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy Perineal Care of Incontinent Residents revealed: .Procedure: .11. Put on clean gloves. 20.put soiled linens in a plastic bag. 21. Remove gloves and discard. PUT ON NEW GLOVES before continuing with care. 22. Apply clean undergarments, diaper or underpad. RI #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. On 8/28/18 at 11:10 AM, Employee Identifier (EI) #5, CNA was observed performing incontinent care for RI #10. EI #5 put on clean gloves and carried out the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and a facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, the facility failed to ensure rooms on one of seven halls were not found in need of repair. This deficient practice affected eight resident's rooms on one hall. Findings Include: A facility policy titled, Homelike Environment, with a revised dated of 02/2021, revealed, Policy Statement Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . the facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible the characteristics of the facility that reflect a . homelike setting . These characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment; . 1. On 03/18/2024 at 5:35 PM the surveyor observed a large amount of wall material missing behind the Resident Identifier (RI) #70's bed. 2. On 03/18/2024 at 5:40 PM the surveyor observed a large amount wall material missing behind the RI #13's bed. 3. On 03/18/2024 at 5:45 PM the surveyor observed a large amount of wall material missing behind RI #43's bed. 4. On 03/18/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2018-08-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and a review of a facility policy titled Food -Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster door on the dumpster was closed. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, with a revised date of April 2006 revealed, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 7. Outside dumpster provided by garbage pick up services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter . On 8/27/18 at 4:07 p.m., the surveyor along with EI #14, the cook observed the dumpster door opened at the side. On 8/30/18 at 10:25 a.m., the surveyor conducted an interview with EI #14. EI #14 was asked what did she observe regarding the dumpster door on 8/27/18. EI #14 replied, the door on the rear was left opened. EI #14 was asked who was responsible for making sure the dumpster doors were closed. EI #14 replied, whoever put the boxes in after every use. EI #14 replied, kitchen should go and check behind staff. EI #14 was asked what did the facility policy say regarding keeping the dumpster doors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$45,544 in federal fines across 11 penalties.

  • $6,606 — penalty dated 2024-03-23
  • $10,468 — penalty dated 2024-03-23
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $1,748 — penalty dated 2023-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MARCH, DANIELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/23/2020
BAXTER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
CARDEN, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/08/2019
CHAPMAN, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/08/2013
CLARK, MARSHAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
GILES, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
HOLLOWAY, MAUDINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
MATHISON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
MCKEE, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
MOUNT, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
PEACOCK, TOMMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/16/2012
ROBERTS, HENRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
RUSSELL, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
SALTER, BETTYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
SANDERS, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
SCALES, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
STEELE, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/11/2016
SUMNER, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/16/2012
TAKACS, TERRYEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
TOMLIN, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
WATERS, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/19/2010
WILLIAMSON, SAMUALIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/22/2010
JACKSON, VICKIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/26/2012
LYLES, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/11/2011
SCHULTZ, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/19/2010
METHODIST HOME FOR THE AGINGOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/22/2010

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 6%Other / private 25%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$308per resident / day
operating cost
$9,373per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$333per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alabama Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Alabama
$8,334/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,787/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,425/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 015175. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next