Hendrix Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 102.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, the facility's policies for Food Receipt and Storage, Insect and Rodent Control, Hand Sanitation During Dishwashing, and Hand-washing Guidelines, the facility's Pest Elimination Services Agreement, the facility's Pest Elimination Scope of Service, the facility's pest control service reports, and the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code; the facility failed to prevent potential cross contamination by not ensuring: • food was stored a minimum of six inches from the floor and a cut watermelon was covered and dated in the refrigerator, • insects were not present in the kitchen and receiving harbor from cracked/missing tile and pooled water, • an employee washed hands when going from handling dirty dishes to clean dishes, and • an Air Gap existed between the end of the Cook's Preparation Sink drain pipe and the top of the floor drain. This had the potential to affect 101 of 101 residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1.) The facility's policy for Food Receipt and Storage, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the facility's policy for Garbage and Refuse, a waste management invoice for the facility, and the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code; the facility failed to ensure three of three dumpsters were not filled to overflowing with plastic bags of garbage/trash, with the dumpster lids open, and with four plastic bags of garbage/trash on the pavement beside the dumpsters on 09/05/2023 at 4:23 PM. This had the potential to affect 103 of 103 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's policy for Garbage and Refuse dated 02/01/2002, included the following: Purpose: To prevent the spread of bacteria that may cause food borne illnesses. Process: . e. Refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility should have tightly fitting lids and should be kept covered when not being loaded. f. Dumpsters should be emptied according to the facility contract; garbage should not accumulate or be left outside the dumpster. g. The schedule for garbage pick-up should be revised, as needed, based on the volume…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand while feeding Resident Identifier (RI) #8 the breakfast meal on 09/06/2023. This deficient practice had the potential to affect RI #8, one of one resident sampled for dignity. Findings include: RI #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/28/2023 documented RI #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated RI #8 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making; and RI #8 required one person assistance with eating. On 09/06/2023 at 8:51 AM, RI #8 was observed being fed the breakfast meal by Employee Identifier (EI) #10, a Nursing Assistant (NA). EI #10 was standing while feeding RI #8 the breakfast meal. An interview was conducted with EI #10 on 09/06/2023 at 09:15 AM. EI #10 stated, she was standing while she fed RI #8 breakfast and said, she should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and a review of a facility policy titled, Leftover Food Storage and Use, the facility failed to ensure: 1. outdated food was not stored in the walk-in cooler, and 2. food items were labeled with a receive date or use by date prior to storage in the walk-in cooler/walk-in freezer. These failures had the potential to affect 99 residents receiving meals from the kitchen out of 103 total residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility policy titled, Leftover Food Storage and Use, with an effective date of 9/12/19, included . PURPOSE: To assure that food borne illnesses are avoided . Leftover foods should be . labeled and dated . should be used within 72 hours . If not used within 72 hours . foods should be discarded . On 10/27/19 at 10:22 a.m., the surveyor observed food items in the walk-in cooler. There were two clear plastic bags of Pancakes with no received date or use by date, one container of Hamburger Steak Puree Meat prepared on 10/23/19 and labeled with a use by date of 10/25/19, one container of Sliced Tomatoes with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and a facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #1, a Registered Nurse (RN), rinsed with water and dried Resident Identifier (RI) #33's nebulizer facemask and attached reservoir, prior to placing it in a plastic bag on the bedside table. This deficient practice affected RI #33, one of three residents observed during the medication pass, and EI #1, one of three nurses observed during the medication pass. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Respiratory Therapy, with a date of 03/2011, revealed . Nebulizers . C. After completion of therapy: (1) Remove nebulizer container. (2) Rinse container with fresh tap water. (3) Dry appropriately . RI #33 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Shortness of Breath On 10/28/2019 at 12:49 p.m., the surveyor observed EI #1, a RN, during the medication administration pass. During the medication pass, EI #1 removed RI #33's nebulizer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policies titled, Nursing Pantry foods, and Food Storage Temperature Logs, the facility failed to ensure: 1. unit refrigerator temperatures were being monitored and 2. food items brought in from outside of the facility were dated. This effected 2 of 3 unit refrigerators. 1. A review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage Temperature Logs, with an effective date of 04/29/2015, revealed, Purpose: In order to prevent food borne illnesses, foods should be stored at proper temperatures. STANDARD: The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code guidelines should be used for the storage of food items. Temperatures should be monitored and recorded on a food temperature log. Process . Refrigerators 33-40 degrees F . An observation was made on 09/11/18 11:42 AM of the resident refrigerator on Station 2. The temperature of the refrigerator was 54 degrees. The refrigerator had several sandwiches and bottles of liquid thickener. There was a sign on the resident refrigerator that the temperature should be between 33 and 40 degrees. A second…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review and the Resident Assessment Instrument User [NAME] Version 3.0, Chapter 4, the facility flied to ensure RI (Resident Identifier) #77, #29, and #4 attended their care plan meetings so that they were allowed to be involved with making decisions about their care and treatment. This deficient practice affected three of three sample residents whose care plan attendance form was reviewed. Findings Include: A review of a document, Resident Assessment Instrument User [NAME] Version 3.0, revealed: Chapter 4: .CARE PLANNING .4.7 Care Planning .A well developed .care plan, Reflects the resident/resident representative input for goals for health care; .The overall care plan should be oriented towards .Involving resident, resident's family . On 9/11/18 at 8:36 AM, RI #77 reported to the surveyor that he/she had not been to any care plan meeting to the resident's knowledge. RI #77 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL