Pine Haven Rehabilitation And Wellness Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 146.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled ABUSE PREVENTION, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse. On 02/08/2023 Resident Identifier (RI) #5's was verbally abused by RI #6. On 02/09/2023 RI #3 was physically abused by RI #2. On 05/21/2024 RI #8 and RI #9 were each verbally abused by the other. The facility further failed to substantiate the occurrences as abuse. These deficient practices affected RI #'s 3, 5, 8 and 9, four of 14 sampled residents. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report numbers AL00043323, AL00043305 and AL00047916. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled ABUSE PREVENTION with a history date of 07/2018, revealed the following: POLICY: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: . other residents .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and a copy of the facility's RESIDENT BILL OF RIGHTS, the facility failed to ensure 26 of 89 residents' rooms were found in a homelike condition. This affected 26 of 89 rooms observed during the survey. Findings Include: A review of the RESIDENT BILL OF RIGHTS with a most recent review date of 11/17, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, . and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life, . A. Facility residents have the right to: . 33. A safe clean, comfortable home like environment. On 10/11/2022 04:33 PM during the initial tour, the following observations were made by the surveyor: 10/11/2022 04:57 PM Area Locator (AL) 21 patchy touched up paint, 10/11/2022 04:58 PM AL 22 wall paint was scraped, 10/11/2022 05:02 PM AL 23 wall by beds were patched and painted different color, 10/11/2022 05:25 PM AL 26 wall paint was scraped, 10/11/2022 05:27 PM AL 25 walls behind bed patched up paint behind door beds, 10/11/2022 05:30 PM AL 24 walls by bed were patched up paint with different…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, interviews and review of facility policies titled, . SMALL VOLUME NEBULIZER THERAPY and . SELF ADMINISTRATION PROTOCOL ., the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse remained with (Resident Identifier) RI #55, a resident not assessed to self-administer his/her nebulizer breathing treatment, when RI #55 received a nebulizer treatment on 10/11/2022. This deficient practice affected RI #55; one of one sampled resident observed receiving a nebulizer breathing treatment. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, . SMALL VOLUME NEBULIZER THERAPY, with a revision date of 8/16, revealed the following: .RESPONSIBILITY: All Licensed Nursing Personnel/Respiratory Therapist . PROCEDURE: . 10. Assist/instruct resident to close lips around the mouthpiece. 11. Instruct to inhale deeply and hold for several seconds before exhaling. 12. Encourage and instruct resident to cough at completion of treatment. A second policy titled, . SELF ADMINISTRATION PROTOCOL . with a revision date of 8/16,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled, NOTIFICATION OF A CHANGE IN A RESIDENT'S STATUS with a revision date of 11/17, the facility failed to provide evidence Resident Identifier (RI) #110's physician and sponsor were notified when RI #110 had ant bites to his/her left arm, left lower abdomen, and under his/her neck. This deficient practice affected RI #110, one of one resident sampled for notification. Findings Include: Facility policy titled, NOTIFICATION OF A CHANGE IN A RESIDENT'S STATUS, documented: . POLICY: The attending physician/physician extender (Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, or Clinical Nurse Specialist) and the resident representative will be notified of a change in a resident's condition, . PROCEDURE: . d. Any accident or incident . The Incident Log documented RI #110 on 10/10/2022 at 7:00 AM . Incident type: Insect Bite . Raised Red Area . Resident room . In-house treatment . On 10/10/2022, RI #110's Resident Incident Report documented: . staff was providing care and noted several ants on the pillow where the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview, record review, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) 55's Minimum Quarterly Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/11/22 was accurately coded to reflect RI #55 was receiving oxygen. This deficient practice affected RI #55, one of three sampled resident's whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed: Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs Intent: The intent of the items in this section is to identify any special treatments, procedures, and programs that the resident received during the specified time periods. O0100: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs Facilities may code treatments, programs and procedures that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #98's medical record including the PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Screening & Results, and documents provided by the facility (the Regulatory Requirements) used as their guidance for the pre-admission screening process, the facility failed to ensure a valid Level 1 PASRR was completed for RI# 98. This affected RI #98, one of five residents whose Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews were reviewed for completion. Findings Include: A facility document dated October 15, 2022, documented: (Name of Facility) does not have a Policy or Procedure regarding PASRR however we follow the federal guidelines. A review of RI #98's . PASRR Level 1 Screening & Results for Mental Illness . Intellectual Disability . Related Condition . with a screening date of 5/20/21, revealed, . MAY REQUIRE A LEVEL II . For compliance with Federal and State PASRR regulations, Admitting NFs (Nursing Facilities) must: Report this admission to the OBRA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed/implemented for the following residents: 1) Resident Identifier (RI) #71's newly identified Pressure Ulcer, 2) RI #81's diabetes and insulin use, and 3) RI #55's use of oxygen. These deficient practices affected RI #'s 71, 81, and 55, three of thirty-one residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: The facility's COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS policy dated 3/18, revealed the following: POLICY: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care . PROCEDURE: . 5. For each problem, need, or strength a resident-centered goal is developed. 1) RI #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Repeated Falls and Adult Failure to Thrive. The Weekly Skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for Resident Identifier (RI) #14 regarding a hand splint that was not in use during the survey. This affected RI #14, one of 31 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, COMPREHENSIVE PERSON CENTERED CARE PLANS, with a last review date of 3/18, revealed, . POLICY: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. 9. Upon a change in condition, the Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan or Baseline Care Plan will be updated . RI #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson's Disease and Persistent Vegetative State. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) dated 10/02/2022 revealed, .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, . SMALL VOLUME NEBULIZER THERAPY, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #55's nebulizer mask was stored in a covering on three of three days of the survey. This deficient practice affected one of one resident sampled for nebulizer administration. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, . SMALL VOLUME NEBULIZER THERAPY, with a revision date of 8/16, revealed the following: . RESPONSBILITY: All Licensed Nursing Personnel/Respiratory Therapist . PROCEDURE: . 15. Store in a labeled plastic bag. RI #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. RI #55's Physician Orders for October 2022 revealed RI #55 had orders for . BUDESONIDE 0.25MG (Milligrams)/2ML (Milliliters) SUSP (Suspension) ONE (1) AMPULE PER NEBULIZER TWICE DAILY . FORMOTEROL 20 MCG (Micrograms)/2 ML NEB (Nebulizer) TWICE DAILY DX (diagnosis): SOB…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, a review of [NAME] and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing, NINTH EDITION, and the Facility's form titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, the facility failed to provide evidence the licensed nurse was consistently documenting on the resident's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) the administration of the resident's insulin. This affected RI #81, one of three residents sampled for Medication Administration. Findings Include: A review of [NAME] and [NAME]'s Fundamentals of Nursing, NINTH EDITION, page 370, revealed the following: . Chapter 26 Documentation and Informatics . Informatics and Information Management in Health Care . A nurse's electronic or handwritten signature on an entry in a record designates accountability for the contents of that entry. Review of facility's form titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines dated 1/15, documented, POLICY: Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL