Greene County Nursing Home
509 Wilson Ave, Eutaw, AL 35462 · For profit - Corporation · 72 certified beds · (205) 372-4545 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- the CMS record shows $13,635 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 4 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 12.0% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.8% | 1.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 12.1% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.9% | 24.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.7% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.8% | 12.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.5% | 21.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.08 | 1.96 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.12 | 1.70 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · F2022-02-25 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespreadHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, resident group meeting, the facility's document titled RESIDENT'S RIGHTS and CMS (Center for Medicare & (and) Medicaid Services) Memorandum (Memo) QSO-20-39-NH, the facility failed to implement visitation for residents of the facility since 11/12/21. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: An undated facility document titled RESIDENT'S RIGHTS documented: . Right to convenient visits and communications with others. A CMS Memorandum QSO-20-29-NH with a revised date of 11/12/21 documented: .Visitation Guidance: CMS is issuing new guidance for visitation in nursing homes during the COVID-19 PHE (Public Health Emergency), . Visitation is now allowed for all residents at all times . Indoor- Visitation Facilities must allow indoor visitation at all times for all residents as permitted under the regulations. facilities can no longer limit the frequency and length of visits for residents, the number of of visitors , or require advance scheduling of visits. A resident council group meeting was held…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and a facility policy titled Proper Drying and Storage of Tableware the facility failed to ensure pots, pans, and serving utensils were air dried after being washed in the three compartment sink on 2/23/22 during observation of the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: A policy titled Proper Drying and Storage of Tableware, dated November 2018 documented: . All dishes, trays, utensils, . will be air dried. After proper machine and/or pot & (and) pan washing, rinsing, and sanitizing, all dishes, trays . will be air dried. On 2/23/22 at 4:52 PM, an observation was made of pots placed on top of serving utensils in the drain rack, stacked together to dry, by the three compartment sink. On 2/24/22 at 3:59 PM an interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Dietary Manager. EI #3 was asked how pots and serving utensils were to be dried. EI #3 stated, air dried on a rack, after being washed in the three compartment sink. EI 3 was asked if pots should be stored on top of serving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-25 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator - Job Description, and review of the updated CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) QSO (Quality, Safety & [and] Oversight Group) -21-17-NH (Nursing Home) Memo, the facility failed to ensure Comprehensive MDS assessments were completed in a timely manner after CMS ended the Emergency Blanket MDS waiver on 02/10/2021. This deficient practice affected Resident Identifier #'s 53, 54, 55, 56, 153, 155, 101, 102 and 103, nine of 13 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the updated CMS QSO-21-17-NH Memo, with an update of 02/10/2021, revealed the following: . SUBJECT: Updates to Long-Term Care (LTC) Emergency Regulatory Waivers issued in response to COVID-19 . Ending of Select Emergency Blanket Waivers During the COVID-19 PHE (Public Health Emergency) . Emergency Blanket Waiver of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Timeframe Requirements (42 CFR 483.20) CMS waived the MDS timeframe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-25 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator - Job Description, and review of the updated CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) QSO (Quality, Safety & [and] Oversight Group) -21-17-NH (Nursing Home) Memo, the facility failed to ensure Quarterly MDS assessments were completed in a timely manner after CMS ended the Emergency Blanket MDS waiver on 02/10/2021. This deficient practice for Resident Identifier #'s 53, 54, 55, 153, 155, 101, 102, 103, 104 and 105, 10 of 13 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the updated CMS QSO-21-17-NH Memo, with an update of 02/10/2021, revealed the following: . SUBJECT: Updates to Long-Term Care (LTC) Emergency Regulatory Waivers issued in response to COVID-19 . Ending of Select Emergency Blanket Waivers During the COVID-19 PHE (Public Health Emergency) . Emergency Blanket Waiver of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Timeframe Requirements (42 CFR 483.20) CMS waived the MDS timeframe requirement at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, interviews, and a facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans the facility failed to to develop a care plan for RI #105 for the use of anticoagulant (AC) medication since 3/6/21. This affected one of 13 sampled residents for whom care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of a policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan with a revision date of 1/30/18 documented: .Purpose: To provide individualized care for each resident. Goal: To attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . RI #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Hypertension and history of Transient Ischemic Attack/Cerebral Infarction. A review of RI #105's physician orders documented a start date of 3/06/21 for Plavix 75 milligrams (mg) to be given daily for Cerebrovascular Accident. A review of RI #105's care plans did not reveal a care plan for the use of AC medication or Plavix. On 2/24/22 at 4:27 PM an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of the RECORD OF MEDICATION DESTRUCTION Control Drug Destructions forms, and review of a facility policy titled Disposal of Medications, the facility failed to ensure the required signatures were on the Controlled Drug Destruction forms. This affected two of five months, February and October of 2021, reviewed for destruction of controlled medications. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Disposal of Medications, dated 12/2012, revealed the following: . PROCEDURES . 2. b. For the State of Alabama, these controlled substances shall be disposed of by the nursing care center in the presence of appropriately titled professionals . • x Two licensed nurses employed by the nursing care center • x Administrator and licensed nurse employed by the nursing care center • x Others as listed: Pharmacist . On 02/25/2022 at 8:19 AM, the surveyor observed the Controlled Medication Destruction forms for February 2022 (three signatures noted), October 2021 (two signatures noted), September 2021 (three signatures noted), July 2021 (three signatures noted),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, review of a facility policy titled, FOOD STORAGE LABELING and review of the 2017 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Items in a standing refrigerator unit in the kitchen were labeled and dated; and 2) Two frozen turkeys were not thawing in a pan on the floor of the walk in cooler/refrigerator. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) A review of a facility policy with a revised date of 6/2019, titled, FOOD STORAGE LABELING, revealed: POLICY: The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good storage and labeling procedures. PROCEDURE: 1. All food items must be labeled with the date they are received. 2. All food items that are not in their original containers must be labeled with the common food name of the food and the date they are received. 2. Suggested labeling includes: a. Common Name b. Date of preparation or Use By Date c. Example: Food prepared on 2/1 must be used or discarded by 2/7 . On 8/05/19 at 4:10 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and a review of a facility policy titled, Change in Condition-Notification, the facility failed to ensure RI (Resident Identifier) #44's sponsor was notified of the resident's admission (transfer) to the hospital on 6/15/19 and readmission to the facility on 6/28/19. This deficient practice affected RI #44, one of three sampled residents who were reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Change in Condition-Notification, with a reviewed dated of 06/2011 revealed: . The Nursing Home must promptly inform the resident and/or responsible party when there is a change in condition. Change in condition is defined as: . A decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility . Nursing Service Department is responsible for notification of . responsible party . Document as appropriate . RI #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharge(transferred) to the hospital on 6/15/19 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #44's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure RI (Resident Identifier ) #1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed within 14 days of admission. This deficient practice affected one of 14 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Chapter 2: Assessment for the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) documented: .01. admission Assessment The admission Assessment is a comprehensive Assesment for a new resident and, .must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the nursing home as day 1 . RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #1's admission MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/20/19 was listed as open. On 8/8/19 at 9:12 a.m., an interview was conducted with EI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and the facility policies titled, STORAGE OF REFRIGERATED FOOD AND FOOD STORAGE LABELING , the facility failed to ensure: 1. a container of Vanilla Icing had a used by date 2. a box of cabbages and a carton of liquid eggs had an open and use-by-date, 3. a tray of sausage and bacon was labeled and 4. 2 gallons of buttermilk was discarded on 7/9/18. This deficient practice had the potential to affected 45 of 45 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Finding Include: A review of a facility policy titled, STORAGE OF REFRIGERATED FOOD, with revision dates November 2017- March 2018 revealed: .PROCEDURE: .5. All opened foods are labeled with common name of food,date stored and use-by-date. 6 .foods .may be stored for 7 days . A review of a facility policy titled, FOOD STORAGE LABELING, with no effective date, revealed: .POLICY The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good storage and labeling procedures. PROCEDURE: .2 All food items that are not in their original containers must be labled with the common name of the food,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-07-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and a facility policy titled, Mental Grievance Policy,the facility failed to ensure residents in the group meeting held on 07/7/17 at 10:00 a. m. were aware of the grievance process. This affected all 10 residents attending the group meeting. Finding Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Mental Grievance Policy, with a revision date of 01/31/18 documented: RESIDENT GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE GOAL To ensure that the voiced grievances of a resident are made without discrimination or reprisal in a timely manner . On 7/17/18 at 10:00 a.m., a resident council meeting was held. A total of 10 residents attended the meeting. The residents were asked if they knew how to file a grievance. All 10 residents at the meeting stated they did not know how to file a grievance. On 7/17/18 at 3:36 p.m. an interview was conducted with EI (Employee Indentifer) #2, Social Service Designee. EI #2 was asked how are residents made of aware of the how to file a written grievance. EI #2 said when she is at work she completes the form, when she is not at work residents tell the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-07-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review, the facility failed to adequately code RI (Resident Identifiers) #12's and # 37's Yearly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments to reflect tobacco users. This affected 2 out of 5 residents who were identified as smokers in the facility. Finding Include: RI #13 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of RI #13's Resident Smoking assessment dated [DATE] documented resident as a smoker. A review of RI #13's Yearly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date ) of 08/17/2017 revealed Section J 1300 was not coded for tobacco use. RI #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of RI #37's Resident Smoking assessment dated [DATE] documented resident as a smoker. RI #37's Yearly MDS with and ARD of 06/08/2016 revealed Section J1300 was not coded for tobacco use. On 7/17/18 at 6:35 p.m., the Surveyor observed RI #13 and RI #37 smoking in designated smoking area supervised by staff. On 7/19/18 an interview was conducted with EI (Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-07-19 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and a document review titled, CEU's (Continuing Education Units) for CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistant), the facility failed to ensure CNA's, Employee Identifiers (EI) #'s 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 received 12 hours of mandatory annual training. This deficient practice affected 5 out 12 CNA's whose training records were reviewed. A review of a document titled, CEU's for CNA's, documented EI #s 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 did not have the 12 hours of mandatory annual training for the calendar year. On 7/19/2018 at 2:19 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #1, RN (Registered Nurse), Acting DON( Director of Nurses). EI #1 was asked how many CEUs are required for the CNA's per calendar year. EI #1 said 12 CEU's. EI #1 was asked did EI #'s 5, 6, 7, 8 7, 8, and 9 have their 12 CEU's for the calendar year. EI #1 said, No. EI #1 was asked what was the importance of CNA's having CEU's. EI #1 said to learn new things to do their job adequately.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,635 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUGH, MARCIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/04/2017 |
| GREENE COUNTY HOSPITAL & NURSING HOME | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/08/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in AL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alabama Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 015178. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.