Self Skilled Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 95.2 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 5 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy and cleaning schedules, and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Sanitation concerns were identified in all areas of the kitchen and had the potential to affect 47 of 47 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled General Sanitation of Kitchen (dated 2019) revealed food and nutrition services staff would maintain the sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. Procedures included: (1) Cleaning and sanitation tasks for the kitchen would be outlined in a written cleaning schedule. (2) Tasks would be assigned to be the responsibility of specific positions. (3) Frequency of cleaning for each task would be defined. Further review revealed a policy titled Cleaning Instructions: Floors, Tables, and Chairs (dated 2019) specified kitchen floors would be cleaned and sanitized regularly. Procedures included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-03-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances of the resident group regarding food complaints for 15 out of 47 total residents. Interview with the Resident Council on 3/17/21 revealed their food concerns expressed in the 11/6/2020 meeting had not been addressed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances, dated 3/15/21, revealed the Social Services Director has been designated as the Grievance Official who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; issuing written grievance decisions to the resident; and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations .Grievances may be voiced verbally during resident or family council meetings. The Grievance Official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance and those actions, on the grievance form The Grievance Official,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary housekeeping services to maintain a clean environment and maintenance services necessary to maintain good repair of equipment. Observations on 3/16/21, 3/17/21 and 3/18/21 revealed the heating/air-conditioning (AC) unit vents in two (2) rooms (rooms #127 and #135) had buildup of dust/debris. The exhaust vents in six (6) bathrooms (rooms #111, #113, #125, #127, #130 and #135) had buildup of dust/debris on the Hill Hall and Back Door Hall units. In addition, the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to contain a metal trash can that was completely covered with rust. Observations on 3/17/21 and 3/18/21, revealed a thick black buildup on the secured unit floors in three (3) resident rooms (rooms #4, #7, and #9), the bathroom next to room [ROOM NUMBER] and in the sitting room. Findings include: Review of a housekeeping policy titled Housekeeping Job Overview (not dated) revealed housekeeping staff were to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly date and ensure expired medications were removed from the supply in two (2) of four (4) medication carts (medication cart #1 and #2). In addition, the facility failed to ensure expired medical supplies were removed from the supply, properly date medications and dispose of expired medications in two (2) of three (3) medication rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated August 2018, revealed: Procedures. H. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of accordingly to procedures for medication disposal. D. 1) The nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication and enter the date opened and the new date of expiration .The expiration date of the vial or container will be 30 days .E. The nurse will check the expiration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure standard precautions were followed regarding performing hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for eight (8) out of 16 sampled residents (Resident #10, #16, #20, #28, #33, #36, #39 and #198). Observation on 3/16/21 revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #6 did not wash his/her hands after doffing gloves. Observation on 3/17/2021 revealed Housekeeper (HK) #14 walked down the front Hall without wearing the face mask appropriately. Observations on 3/16/21 revealed CNAs #9 and #13 didn't wash their hands or change their gloves between residents when delivering the meal trays during lunch. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hand Washing, dated 11/2016, revealed 6. Additional considerations: b. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing. Wash hands after removing gloves. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident representative a notice in writing of the transfer to an acute care hospital for three (3) out of four (4) sampled residents who were discharged from the facility (Resident #4, Resident #13, and Resident #19). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic Leave, Transfer and Discharge, undated, revealed The facility will provide notice to you and your Resident Representative and, if known, a designated family member, of your transfer or discharge and the reason for it at least (30) thirty days before you are transferred or discharged . Where your health and safety or the health and safety of other individuals in the facility may be endangered, however, or where other good cause or legal reasons exist, notice may be given as soon as practicable before your transfer or discharge. 1. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a bed-hold notice was given to the resident and the resident representative prior to the transfer to an acute care hospital for four (4) of 16 sampled residents (Resident #4, #13, #19, and #46). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Therapeutic Leave, Transfer and Discharge, undated, revealed the facility will provide written information to you and your Resident Representative prior to your discharge that specifies the Facility bed-hold policy and reserve bed payment policy under the State Plan. 1. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and was subsequently admitted with a diagnosis of Respiratory Distress. Resident #4 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a person-centered, comprehensive care plan was implemented for one (1) of 16 sampled residents. Resident #37 was not provided assistance with positioning in bed per the assessment requirement and care planned intervention. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Care Plans (revised 9/28/10) revealed plans of care are developed by the interdisciplinary team, to coordinate and communicate care approaches and goals for the resident. The documented policy Standard states according to federal regulations, the facility develops a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental/psychosocial needs, that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The policy Process for implementation included (1) Assessment and plan of care process. (2) Preparation for Care Plan Committee Meetings. (3)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 16 sampled residents received services in accordance with professional services and the person-centered care plan. Resident #37 did not receive the assessed treatment and care to address positioning needs when in bed. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Turning and Repositioning the Resident (effective 8/13/12) revealed residents who are unable to turn themselves in bed benefit from the staff performing the function. Proper positioning, and regular repositioning, helps to prevent pressure sores, contractures, and stagnation of respiratory secretions. Generally, residents who are unable to reposition themselves should be turned and repositioned every two (2) hours. A physician's order for turning is not necessary unless there is a specific medical contraindication. If the resident is in bed, turn the resident to the desired position, and use pillows or cushions to keep the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the staff labeled and dated the oxygen tubing when changed for one (1) of 16 sampled residents (Resident #33). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, undated, revealed under Process: 11. Cannulas and masks should be changed weekly. However, the policy didn't address the procedure to change the oxygen tubing weekly. Review of Resident #33's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD). Review of Resident #33's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/9/21, revealed the resident received oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #33's Physician's Order, dated 3/1/21, revealed an order for oxygen at two (2) liters (L)/minute (min) per nasal cannula (NC) continuous for COPD. On 03/16/21 at 8:45 a.m., Resident #33 was observed sitting on his/her bed with the NC in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRAYLOR PORTER HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL