Plantation Manor Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, CALL LIGHT, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #69's call light was in reach for RI #69 to summon staff as needed. This deficient practice was observed on three of three days of the survey and affected RI #69, one of 22 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, CALL LIGHT, revealed the following: Purpose: To respond to resident's request and needs. RI #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Dementia and Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. Review of RI #69's at risk for falls care plan, with an initiated date of 06/26/2024, had an intervention to keep RI #69's call light in reach and encourage resident to use for assistance. On 02/18/2026 at 8:00 AM, RI #69 was observed lying in bed with the call light on the floor beneath the bed. On 02/19/2026 at 7:56 AM, RI #69 was again observed lying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review and a review of a facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) CARE POLICY PROCEDURE, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #11 a resident dependent on staff for bathing was provided a shower as scheduled for January and February of 2026. This deficient practice affected RI #11; one of two residents sampled for ADL Care. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number 2742518.Findings Include:A review a facility policy titled, ADL CARE POLICY AND PROCEDURE, with no effective date, documented: PURPOSE: Good hygiene and grooming help prevent the spread of infection and promote the resident's feelings of self-worth and dignity.STANDARD: Guidelines for the provision of hygiene and grooming services are: . shower, tub, complete bed bath.PROCESS: II. Essential Pointsa. Resident preferences for time of day, type of bath and frequency of bath should be honored, .RI #11 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care the facility failed to ensure that Resident Identifier (RI) #77's urinary drainage bag from his/her catheter was maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice and in a manner to prevent infection and maintain dignity. Specifically RI #77's urinary drainage bag observed on a floor mat and without a privacy cover. This placed the drainage system at risk for contamination and resident at risk of urinary tract infection. This deficient practice affected one of three residents observed for urinary catheter maintenance and incontinent care.Findings Include:A review of a facility policy titled, Catheter Care with no effective date revealed:Catheter Care Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents . receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity .2. catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times.9. Ensure drainage is located below the level of the bladder to discourage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #23, a resident with a history of weight loss, received his/her frozen treat and Ensure as recommended by the Registered Dietitian (RD). At the lunch meal on 02/18/2026, RI #23 did not receive his/her frozen treat and Ensure, and at the lunch meal on 02/20/2026, RI #23 did not receive his/her Ensure. This deficient practice affected RI #23, one of five residents sampled for nutrition.Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, with a Copyright date of 2025, revealed the following: . Compliance Guidelines: . The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize a resident's nutritional status. This process includes: . c. Developing and consistently implementing approaches. 3. Information gathered from the nutritional assessment and current dietary standards of practice are used to develop an individualized care plan to address…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when staff stored unlabeled and uncovered bath basins and bed pans in a shared bathroom. These practices demonstrated improper storage of resident care items and created the potential for cross-contamination.This had the potential to affect RI #77, 1 of 22 sampled residents.Findings Include:On 02/19/2026 at 8:16 AM, observation of a bathroom revealed six bath basins and two bedpans stored without resident identification and without protective covering. One bedpan was observed on the windowsill with a roll of tissue placed inside of the bedpan.On 02/20/2026, at 11:19 AM an interview was conducted with LPN #15 who said she did not know if bed pans were single use items. LPN #15 said bath basins should be washed, dried with a paper towel, placed in a plastic bag, and labeled for the appropriate resident. When asked whether unlabeled and improperly stored bedpans and bath basins could increase the risk of cross-contamination, LPN #15 responded, yes and acknowledged a need for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2020-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and a review of facility policies titled, Work Attire Guidelines, Hand Washing, and Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine, the facility failed to ensure: 1. staff braids were completely enclosed inside of her hair net while at the tray line; 2. staff changed an apron (personal protective equipment) and washed her hands when going from a dirty task to another task and; 3. resident plates were not placed on wet trays and covered with wet domes. This had the potential to affect 95 of 95 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) A review of a facility guideline titled, Work Attire Guidelines revealed: Hair Restraints Wear a . hair restraint when in a food-prep area. This can keep hair from falling into food and onto food-contact services . On 3/4/2020 at 11:30 a.m., a worker was at the tray line asking staff to put her hair net on the back of her braids. The worker's braids were hanging down her back and not in a hair net at the tray line. On 3/04/2020 at 1:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with (Employee Identifier) EI #5, dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION, the facility failed to ensure that the Licensed Nurse signed off medication given on June 14, 15, 16 and 17, 2019 on the MAR (Medication Administration Record), for (Resident Identifier) RI #200. This affected one (1) of five (5) resident who's MAR was reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION, with no date revealed, . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 17 . Sign MAR after administered . RI #200 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for Encounter for other specified aftercare, Unspecified cirrhosis of the liver, and Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of RI #200's Physicians orders, dated 5/24/2019 revealed . PROPRANOLOL 10 mg (tab) tablet give 1 tab by mouth twice a day . LACTULOSE 10(g) gram/15(ml) milliliter GIVE 45 ml by mouth . three times a day . Furosemide 20(mg) milligram give 1 tablet by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policies titled, Oxygen Concentrator and Oxygen Administration, facility failed to ensure Resident #54's nasal cannula tubing was labeled with a date and the tubing connecting the concentrator with the water bottle were not out of date. This had a potential to affect of one of three residents observed receiving oxygen therapy. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, OXYGEN CONCENTRATOR, with no effective date, revealed: . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 5. Care of the Concentrator . c. i. Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. .iii. If applicable, change nebulizer tubing and delivery devices every seventy-two hours. A review of the facility titled, Oxygen Administration, with no effective date, revealed: . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 5. d. If applicable, change nebulizer tubing and delivery devices every 72 hours and as needed if they become soiled or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL