Tlc Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 91.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled, Controlled Substances, Identifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Administering Medications, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the State Agency (SA) and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 did not misappropriate resident property when she failed to follow facility procedures related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled substances designed to prevent drug diversion and protect resident safety. Specifically, LPN #4 fabricated other nurses' signatures on Controlled Drug Records of Resident Identifier (RI) #99, #104 and #105, indicating they had observed her dispose of dropped controlled medications, when in fact they did not witness or co-sign controlled medication destruction. On 09/10/2025, LPN #4 forged Registered Nurse (RN) #3's signature on RI #99's Tramadol Controlled Drug Record.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the State Agency (SA) on 10/01/2025 at 1:19 PM, the facility's Administrator (ADM) failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of resident property was reported to the SA in the required timeframe of 24 hours, when he was made aware on 09/11/2025 that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 was falsifying residents' Controlled Drug Records (CDR) and failing to follow facility procedures related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled substances designed to prevent drug diversion and protect resident safety. LPN #4 forged other nurses' signatures as witnesses of dropped medication disposal on Controlled Drug Records and LPN #4 signed out controlled medications on a Controlled Drug Record and failed to document them as administered on Medication Administration Records, per facility policy for evidence of administration.The facility failed to timely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #81's hospital records, and review of a facility policy titled Medication Therapy, the facility failed to provide RI #81 care and treatment based on RI #81's hospital discharge orders, plan of care, and medications necessary to treat existing conditions and address significant risk. During record review surveyors discovered that on 02/20/2026 RI #81 was discharged from the hospital to the facility with discharge medications to include aspirin, 81 milligrams (mg) to be administered twice a day, recommended upon discharge for six weeks per orthopedic surgical consult following right femoral neck fracture and hemiarthroplasty (partial hip replacement). There was not any evidence that RI #81 received the aspirin as recommended. When RI #81 was readmitted to the facility, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 notified the Medical Director (MD) who was RI #81's attending physician of RI #81's allergy to aspirin. The MD informed the nurse to discontinue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of facility policies titled Medical Director and Medication Therapy, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #81's attending physician/MD (Medical Director) provided orders to meet RI #81's medical needs upon discharge from the hospital post arthroplasty with partial hip replacement. On 02/20/2026, the facility's attending physician was notified that RI #81 was allergic to aspirin which had been ordered by the Orthopedic surgeon. The attending physician failed to provide an order for RI #81 to receive alternate anticoagulant therapy or follow-up to ensure the prescribing surgeon was notified of RI #81's allergy to aspirin and the need for alternate therapy. Because of this failure RI #81 did not receive aspirin or anticoagulant therapy for 20 days after readmission, from 02/20/2026 until 03/12/2026 during the survey. This deficient practice affected RI #81, one of three residents reviewed for anticoagulant therapy. Failure of the attending physician to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of facility policies titled, Discontinued Medication and Charting and Documentation, the facility failed to maintain Resident Identifier (RI) #81's medical records in a manner to ensure the record was complete and accurately reflected RI #81's condition and consultation of RI #81's attending physician. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 failed to document in RI #81's medical record when she notified the attending physician of RI #81's allergy to aspirin after RI #81 was readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital with an order for aspirin to be administered for six weeks. The facility failed to identify in RI #81's medical record what would be provided in place of the aspirin. This deficient practice affected RI #81, one of 18 residents for whom records were reviewed. LPN #9's failure to document in RI #81's medical records that RI #9's aspirin had been discontinued by RI #81's attending physician placed RI #81 at risk of not receiving continuity of care.Findings Include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the 2017 Food Code, the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine, and a review of the Low Temp (temperature) Dish Machine Temp, log, the facility failed to: 1. prevent potential cross-contamination by staff during dishwashing (staff going from the dirty side to the clean side without washing hands) and by not ensuring the dishwashing sanitizer was checked before washing breakfast dishes on 9/11/18; 2. ensure accurate documentation on the dishwasher sanitizer log for breakfast dishwashing during September 2018; 3. prevent potential cross-contamination by not ensuring air gaps existed between the floor drains and the drain pipes for the pot and pan sinks, the dishmachine, and the food preparation sinks and 4. prevent potential cross-contamination by allowing a build-up of dust on the ceiling and fan unit of the walk-in cooler. This had the potential to affect all 94 of 94 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1. The facility's policy titled, Cleaning Dishes/Dishmachine, with a date of 2013, included: . Policy: All…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-09-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and a review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, the facility failed to ensure the business office staff did not open a letter addressed to RI (Resident Identifier) #35. This affected RI #35, one of one sampled resident whose mail was received opened by the facility. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Resident Rights revealed: 7. Information and communication. .i. The resident has the right to .receive mail, and to receive letters .including the right to: i. Privacy of such communications . RI #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Femur Fracture, Wheezing and Restless Leg Syndrome. RI #35's most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/03/18, revealed RI #35 had a BIMS (Brief Interview For Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated RI #35 was cognitively intact. On 09/11/18 at 3:47 PM, during an interview, RI #35 told the surveyor he/she cashed in his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-09-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and the facility's menu, the facility failed to ensure the pork chops served to residents for lunch on 9/11/18, were not hard and dry. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #65, RI #241, and RI #35, three of 94 residents receiving lunch meal trays from the Dietary department on 9/11/18. Findings Include: The facility's lunch menu for Tuesday on Week #2 indicated a 3-ounce Pork Cutlet was to be served on the Regular diet trays. 1) RI #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety and Malignant Carcinoid Tumor. On the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], RI #65's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, which indicated RI #65 was cognitively intact. RI #65's Physician Orders for September 2018, included: . 5/02/18 . DIET: REGULAR, CCD (Consistent Carbohydrate Diet) . On 9/11/18 at 12:40 PM, RI #65 stated he/she did not eat lunch because the pork chop was hard and dry. RI #65 further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY MANAGEMENT, INC. — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL