No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ozark Health Nursing And Rehab Center

2500 Highway 65 South, Clinton, AR 72031 · Non profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (501) 745-7000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (501) 745-7000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
933 Highway 65 N · (501) 745-2713 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
129 Bone St · (501) 745-8133 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Archey Fork Rd · (501) 745-8110 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%4.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection9.2%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%1.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.1%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%13.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.4%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.9%24.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%12.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.022.011.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.372.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.7%CMS range 50.2–69.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.3–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.5–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
31.9%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 91.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-17)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the Office of Long-Term Care (OLTC), an allegation of sexual abuse of one (Resident #46) by another (Resident #34) resident within two hours of the allegation being made. The findings are: 1. A review of an admission Record indicated Resident #34 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: congestive heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/15/2025, revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment for daily decision making. Section E - Behaviors, indicated: Resident #34 did not have verbal, physical, or other behaviors symptoms directed toward others. Review of Resident #34's Care Plan initiated 08/25/2022, and revised on 01/16/2024, revealed the resident had a behavior problem related to being sexual with others. Interventions included: Resident currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure evidence of an investigation for an allegation of sexual abuse was maintained after the investigation was conducted and failed to report to the Office of Long Term Care (OLTC) the results of the investigation to enable the state agency to provide the necessary oversight of the facility's efforts to investigate for two (Resident #34 and Resident #46) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The findings are: 1. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #34 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident # 34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment for their daily decision making. In Section E - Behaviors, indicated: Resident #34 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene, don proper personal protective equipment (PPE), and follow standard infection control procedures for one (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The findings are: A review of the admission Record noted Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for diagnoses which included aftercare following joint replacement surgery. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/2025 revealed Resident #74 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (13-15 suggest cognitively intact). A review of the Physician Order Summary revealed Resident #74 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), due to the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in their right arm and an order to receive antibiotics intravenously, via PICC line for a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (infection in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, interview, the facility failed to ensure that hands were washed between clean and dirty task to prevent food borne illness. The failed practice had the ability to affect 35 residents who receive their meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: A. On 01/08/24 at 12:20 PM, Dietary Aide #1 was observed to be wearing black gloves while serving trays from the steam table in the main dining room. Dietary Aide #1 was observed touching utensils, trays, plates, the counter, and a large clear trash bag of refuse during lunch service. Dietary Aide #1 continued to use contaminated gloves while using a scoop to serve homestyle French Fries. Dietary Aide #1 scooped up the french fries to serve and touched them with their right thumb to hold them into the scoop. Dietary Aide #1 continued to serve trays in the main dining room, did not switch gloves or wash hands between tasks. Dietary Aide #2, while wearing black gloves was observed putting trash in a large clear trash bag on the counter behind the serving line. Dietary Aide #1 reached into a stainless-steel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 Residents (#5 and #35) of 13 sampled residents who required assistance with hand hygiene, were assisted with hand hygiene prior to feeding self during meal to prevent contamination and illness. The findings are: Resident #5 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/11/2023 documented the Resident scored 09 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required partial/moderate assistance with her Activity of Daily Living (ADL's.) The Comprehensive Plan of care included the need for assistance with ADLS with an intervention revision on: 01/23/2017 stating Resident #5 requires partial to moderate assistance of one person for personal hygiene; an intervention dated 4/25/23 indicates the resident wants staff to provide all care at times with staff to encourage and assist as needed to ensure daily needs are being met. On 01/08/24 at 9:03 AM Resident #5 was observed sitting in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%, to prevent potential complications for 2 (Resident #13 and #61) of 25 residents that could potentially receive medication observed during the medication pass. This failed practice has the potential to inhibit maximum therapeutic outcomes. The medication error rate was 8.00%, based on observations of 25 medications administered. The findings are: a. On 01/09/24 at 3:22 PM, the Surveyor observed the 4:00 PM medication pass with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. The LPN #1 administered Nystatin 100000 suspension 5 ml being given by mouth four times a day X 7, order written 1/4/2023. The LPN #1 failed to shake the bottle before administration as listed on the bottle, to Shake Well. b. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) documented Resident #13 was to receive Nystatin Suspension 100000 UNIT/ML Give 5 ml by mouth four times a day for 7 Days swish and swallow. c. 01/10/24 03:07 PM, in an interview with LPN #1, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure accommodation of needs were met by not ensuring the call light was within reach for one (Resident #8) of 16 residents (Resident #2, #3, #5, #8, #15, #16, #22, #24, #33, #35, #40 #42, #45, #49, and #62) sampled residents. The findings are: Resident #8 has a diagnosis of TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH DIABETIC NEUROPATHY and ACQUIRED ABSENCE OF LEFT LEG ABOVE KNEE. On the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/29/23, the Resident received a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On the annual MDS with an ARD of 7/05/23 the resident is an extensive assist with bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfer, dressing, and toilet use. A. On 01/08/24 at 11:39 AM, Resident #8 was observed to be lying in bed. The call light was observed to be in the top drawer of nightstand and appeared to be out of reach of the resident. The Surveyor asked Resident if he could reach the call light. Resident #8 responded that he could not reach the call light. B. On 01/08/24 at 11:45 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident's catheter bag was secured and off the floor to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 1 sampled Resident #40 who have has a physician's order for an indwelling catheter according. The findings are: Resident #40 has a diagnosis of OBSTRUCTIVE AND REFLUX UROPATHY. On the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] the resident received a score of 15 on the brief interview for mental status. On the discharge/return anticipated MDS the resident was noted to be dependent for Chair-bed transfer, sit to stand, lying to sitting and sit to lying. On 1/8/24 at 11:28 AM, the Resident #40 was observed to be sitting in his recliner. Resident's catheter bag was observed to be lying on the floor in front of the recliner, next to the Resident ' s foot. On 1/08/24 at 3:06 PM, Resident #40 ' s catheter bag was observed to be lying on the floor, just to the left side of the recliner. Resident's feet are elevated by the chair's footrest On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents had ready and reasonable access to funds managed by the facility for 1 (Resident #49) of 17 (#1, #5, #8, #11, #12, #17, #23, #25, #27, #31, #36, #39, #44, #47, #49, #98, and #153) sampled residents who had a trust fund managed by the facility as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 10/18/22 at 8:10 AM. The findings are: Resident #49 had a diagnosis of RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. On the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/3/22 the resident received a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A score of 13-15 implies that the resident is cognitively intact. a. On 10/18/22 at 9:13 AM, Resident #49 stated, I am unable to obtain money for a family birthday. I was told that I had to have a receipt. b. On 10/19/22 at 8:05 AM, The Surveyor asked the [NAME] Coordinator, Can Resident #49 access her money? She answered, She is known to ask for large sums of money .maybe $100 or $200, that is a large sum to me. She wants to gift cash to family members. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the resident care plan to meet the residents' needs for 2 (Resident # 23 and #8) of 16 (Residents #28, 54, 48, 44, 12, 14, 23, 39, 27, 8, 49, 54, 17, 24, 36, 153) sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Findings are: 1. Resident #23 had a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/19/22 documented a score of 10 (8-12 indicates moderately impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). She received oxygen, care of a PICC (Peripheral inserted central catheter) line and antibiotics while a resident. a. On 10/17/22 at 11:38AM Resident #23 was in bed with oxygen in use at 1.5 liter per minute (via nasal cannula) dated 10/17/22. A portable oxygen cylinder was on the back of her wheelchair. The PICC line was in place. An IV (intravenous) pole was at the bedside. b. On 10/18/22 at 08:15 AM, Resident #23 was in bed with Oxygen in use. PICC Line in left arm and IV pole at bedside. c. On 10/18/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen signage was displayed in accordance with professional standards of practice when oxygen is in use for 5 (#14, #23, #36, #44, #49)of 9 (5, #8, #14, #23, #31, #36, #39, #44, #47, #49) sampled residents who had a Physician's Order for Oxygen, as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on10/20/22 at 9:40 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident # 23 had a diagnosis of Shortness of Breath. The Quarterly Minimum DATA SET (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/19/22 documented a score of 10 (00 - 07 indicates) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). She received oxygen. A Physician's Order dated 10/17/22 documented, May have O2 (oxygen) @ (at) 1-4 LPM (liters per minute) via (by way of) N/C (nasal cannula) PRN (as needed for) SOB (shortness of breath) . a. On 10/17/22 at 11:38 AM, Resident # 23 was in bed with O2 [oxygen] on via N/C [Nasal Canula] @ [at] 1.5 liter per minute dated 10/17/22. There was no Oxygen in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident funds were refunded promptly after discharge/death for 11 (#104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114) sampled residents who had trust funds, as documented on a list provided by the [NAME] Coordinator on [DATE] at 8:19 AM. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 8:05 AM, The Surveyor asked the [NAME] Coordinator, Why are there 65 residents listed with trust accounts and only 54 residents in the facility? She answered, Some of the residents have been discharged and had received an interest payment after the account was closed out. One resident who was on the books when I took this position. Some of the residents had a balance of as little as a penny and, the people who write the checks downstairs don't know where to send it. Some of the residents had no family or representatives with whom to leave the money. 2. On [DATE] at 8:19 AM, The [NAME] Coordinator highlighted 11 residents on the list of trust account holders who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident and resident's representative were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language they could understand for 2 (Resident #14 and #28) of 6 sample selected Residents who were hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/05/2022. This failed practice had the potential to affect 26 Residents who were transferred/discharged to hospitals since 07/02/2022 according to a list provided by the Administrator on 10/20/2022 at 11:49 am. The findings are: 1. Resident #14 had diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease, Dementia, and Diabetes Mellitus Type I. The Minimum Data Set [MDS] with as Assessment Reference Date [ARD] 07/29/22 documented a Brief Interview Mental Status [BIMS] of 12 (Indicated Cognition Intact), required extensive assistance with activities of daily living self-performance skills with one-to-two-person physical assist. A Notice of Unplanned Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold documented. On this date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SCHOETTLE, STEVEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2008
BEAVERS, JAMIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/27/2012
CORLEY, ROBINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2023
IOUP, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/25/2019
KING, KRISTIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2013
LESTER, MIKEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/30/2019
MORGAN, MELVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/23/2007
RAGLAND, CHERYLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/23/2017
SUTTERFIELD, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2013
WILLIAMS, SHIRLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/30/2019
DEATON, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2012
COWARD, KEITHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045414. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next