Dewitt Nursing Home
1605 South Madison St, De Witt, AR 72042 · Non profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (870) 946-3571 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 9.5% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 4.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.6% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.3% | 1.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.7% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.8% | 10.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.1% | 21.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.8% | 13.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.0% | 10.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.80 | 2.01 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.47 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired over the counter (OTC) medications were removed from active medication storage and disposed of to prevent administration to residents, for one of one OTC medication storage cabinet reviewed. The findings include: During an observation of the medication storage room on 02/19/2026 at 11:50 AM, expiration dates were checked for OTC medications. The following medications were in storage with medications in active rotation to be administered to the residents and found to be expired: - Two unopened cough and congestion elixir bottles, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 01/2026. - Two unopened calcium medication bottles, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 09/2025. - One unopened acid reducer medication bottle, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 01/2026. These medications were removed from the cabinet by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and taken to the Director of Nursing's (DONs) office to be disposed of. The DON and Administrator were notified of the concern when LPN #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included pertinent information to assure the necessary care and resources were allocated to meet the needs of the residents in 1 of 1 facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The total census was 32 residents. The findings are: 1. A review of the Comprehensive Facility Assessment, dated November 2017, was reviewed and did not contain the following required information: a. Documentation of staff involved with developing the assessment, which must include a member of the governing body, the medical director, the administrator, the director of nursing, and direct care staff. b. An initiated and/or revision date of completion to show a minimum of a yearly review c. The resident population including the facility's resident capacity d. The physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant considerations that are necessary to care for this population e. The care required by the resident population, using evidence-based,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 sampled (Resident #21, #31) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. According to Physician's orders, Resident #31 had a diagnosis of transient cerebral ischemic attack. a. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/05/2024 revealed Resident #31 scored 13 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. b. A Care Plan for Resident #31 (problem date: 7/05/2024) revealed Resident #31 was experiencing incontinent episodes of bowel and/or bladder. c. On 09/09/24 at 12:53 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #31 sitting in wheelchair in the room. The Surveyor noted the catheter bag was uncovered and easily visible. d. On 09/09/24 at 1:46 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #31 sitting in wheelchair in the hallway. The Surveyor noted the catheter bag was uncovered and easily visible. e. On 09/09/24 at 1:46 PM, Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide access to resident personal funds during the evening and weekends. The findings are: 1. On 09/11/2024 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor spoke with members of the Resident Council regarding residents being able to gain access to their trust funds during the evening and weekend. Resident #28 indicated that if you don't get your money on Friday, you don't have any money for the weekend. Resident #10 indicated that if you don't get your money during the week, you won't have any for the weekend. 2. On 09/12/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) indicated that as far as she knew the residents didn't get money on the weekend. The BOM indicated the residents get money before the weekend, or they don't get it. a. A policy titled, Management of Resident's Personal Funds, provided by the BOM on 09/12/2024 at 9:45 AM did not address how or when residents can access personal funds.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide quarterly personal funds account statements to residents or legal representatives. 1. On 09/11/2024 at 1:30 PM, during an interview the members of the Resident Council stated they do not receive a statement of their personal funds account. a. On 09/12/2024 at 9:00 AM, during an interview the Business Office Manager (BOM) she does not send out quarterly statements to the resident or their legal representatives, but she will print a statement when a resident asks for one. b. A policy titled, Management of Resident's Personal Funds, provided by the BOM on 09/12/2024 at 9:45 AM, did not address quarterly statements. 2. On 09/12/2024 at 9:00 AM, the BOM indicated the they have a separate petty cash that they use to keep resident's money. The BOM indicated that she did not know how much money could be held in an account without drawing interest for Medicaid residents. a. Review of a list titled, Residents In House Account provided by the BOM on 09/12/2024 at 9:56 AM, revealed twenty-one residents who had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised at least quarterly and/or when the residents care needs changed for 1 (Resident #24) of 12 (Residents #2, #4, #6, #10, #14, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #30 and #31) sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The findings are: Resident #24's, Physician's Orders, dated 09/01/2024 through 09/30/2024, were reviewed and indicated a diagnosis of loss of thinking abilities that interfere with daily life (dementia) and right artificial hip joint. There were two orders dated 03/06/2024 for a pain medication. One order indicated one tablet by mouth, and the second order indicated two tablets by mouth, and both were as needed for pain. An order dated 06/25/2024 indicated a patch for pain apply one patch every 72 hours and cover with a [brand name] clear adhesive. The quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/01/2024, was reviewed and indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, and the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure potential hazardous chemicals were securely locked away. The findings include: 1. On 09/09/24 at 11:04 AM, the Surveyor observed an unlocked closet door titled, Janitor on East Hall. The Surveyor noted cleaning chemicals inside the unlocked closet door. 2. On 09/09/24 at 11:04 AM, the Surveyor observed an unlocked Whirlpool room with cleaning chemicals and aerosol can of degreaser. a. On 09/09/24 at 11:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the Whirlpool room and the Janitor's closet doors should be locked when unattended when not in use. 3. On 09/09/24 at 11:17 AM, the Surveyor observed a closet door unlocked with a sign posted on the door that stated, If you open this door-please latch it back this door needs to be locked latched at all times!!on South Hall. The Surveyor noted several cleaning chemicals and aerosol cans in the unlocked closet. a. On 09/09/24 at 11:18 AM, during an interview Housekeeping #6 stated the door with the signage that states it should be latched at all times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing was posted to include the census and names direct care staff with the total number of hours worked and actual hours worked per shift by licensed and unlicensed staff. The findings include: On 09/11/24 at 9:34 AM, the Surveyor noted a staff log on a table near the entrance. The Surveyor noted there was one name written on the staffing log. On 09/12/24 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was a staff log visible, but it was incomplete. The DON stated the staff log did not have the census listed or all the staff members working at the time. The DON confirmed that the staff logs from previous days were also incomplete and did not have the total number of hours worked and actual hours per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff, and the facility did not have that information required but will from now on. On 09/12/24 at 10:25 AM, the DON provided the Surveyor with documentation that indicated the facility did not have a policy and procedure on staffing.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and/or biologicals were securely locked away. The findings include: On 09/11/24 at 7:30 AM, the Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #3 enter a resident's room and close the door. The Surveyor noted that the medication cart left unattended in the hallway was unlocked. On 09/11/24 at 7:32 AM, RN #3 stated the unattended medication cart was unlocked and stated someone could have gotten in the unlocked medication cart and taken the medications. On 09/12/24 09:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the nurses should lock the medication cart prior to leaving the cart unattended and staff and/or residents could get into the medication cart if left unlocked. A policy titled Storage of Medications indicated, 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored and labeled in the refrigerator and freezer in 1 of 1 kitchen, and failed to ensure the ice machine was properly cleaned in 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: On 09/09/2024, initial kitchen rounds were performed, and the following observations were made: 1. At 11:24 AM, the freezer had clear packages of pancakes with no dates on either side of the wrapper. There was a piece of toast in a clear plastic bag dated 9/3/24, with no indication what the date meant. 2. At 11:34 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) was interviewed, and concurrent observations were made. She was asked to check the ice machine located in the kitchen. With gloved hands, she took a clean, white paper towel, placed the paper towel on the area where the ice falls inside the ice machine, swiped from right to left, and she stopped mid-center. This surveyor and the DM looked at the paper towel, and there was a transfer of yellow residue to the paper towel. The DM took another clean paper towel and started…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 12 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure isolation signage was posted in an area to alert staff, residents and visitors which precautions were required before entering a resident's room who was positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for 1 (Resident #15) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for isolation precautions, and failed to ensure the water management program contained the necessary components and was consistently implemented to monitor for Legionella and other water-borne pathogens in 1 of 1 facility. The findings are: 1. On 09/09/2024 at 11:10 AM, the entrance conference was conducted with the Administrator. She was asked if any residents were on transmission-based precautions, and she stated two residents in the facility were positive for COVID-19. The 3.0 Resident Roster, provided by the Administrator the same morning, was reviewed later in the day and did not indicate any residents had infections. On 09/09/2024 at 1:01 PM, Resident #15 was in the room sitting up in a wheelchair and the door was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure personal and medical information was protected for 1 sampled (Resident #14) resident. The findings include: According to Physician's orders Resident #14 had a diagnoses of sequelae of cerebral infarction and depression A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/21/2024 revealed Resident #14 scored 14 indicating cognitively intact. A Care Plan for Resident #14 (problem date: 8/21/2024) revealed Resident #14 had Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit as evidenced by: left side weakness due to Cerebrovascular accident (CVA). On 09/11/24 at 7:30 AM, the Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #3 enter Resident #14's room and close the door. The Surveyor noted that the Medication Administration Record on the medication cart was open and displayed the resident's personal and medical information. On 09/11/24 at 7:32 AM, RN #3 stated the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was open and the resident's information was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #24) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The findings are: On 09/09/2024, the surveyors entered the facility to investigate an allegation of abuse for Resident #24. On 09/09/2024 at 1:12 PM, Resident #24 was sitting up in a recliner in the resident's room. The resident was asked about the alleged incident and Resident #24 stated the resident barely remembered the incident. The resident stated the staff member was assisting the resident to a chair and the resident had difficulty walking. The resident denied any injuries. Resident #24's Physician's Orders, dated 09/01/2024 through 09/30/2024, were reviewed and indicated the resident had a diagnosis of impaired thinking ability (dementia). A quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/10/2024 was reviewed and indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Resident Plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan of care was updated to include the use of oxygen for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for oxygen use. The findings are: On 09/09/2024 at 12:29 PM, Resident #20 was not in the resident's room and there was an oxygen (O2) concentrator on, and the flow rate was set at 2.5 liters per minute (l/min). At 12:36 PM, the resident was sitting up in a recliner with nasal cannula (NC) prongs in the resident's nose. The oxygen concentrator was on, and the flow rate was set at 2.5 l/min. Resident #20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/09/2024 was reviewed and indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, which indicated moderately cognitively intact and received oxygen therapy. Resident #20's Physician's Orders for 09/01/2024 through 09/30/2024 were reviewed and indicated an order for oxygen at 2 liters/NC as needed for shortness of breath. Resident #20's Resident Plan of Care, with a review date 07/09/2024, was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the physician's ordered flow rate to decrease the potential for respiratory complications for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. The findings are: On 09/09/2024 at 12:36 PM, Resident #20 was sitting up in a recliner with nasal cannula (NC) prongs in the resident's nose. The oxygen concentrator was on, and the flow rate was set at 2.5 liters per minute (l/min). Resident #20's annual Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/09/2024 was reviewed and indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, which indicated moderately cognitively intact and received oxygen therapy. Resident #20's Physician's Orders for 09/01/2024 through 09/30/2024 were reviewed and indicated oxygen 2 liters/NC as needed for shortness of breath. Resident #20's Resident Plan of Care, with a review date 07/09/2024, was reviewed and oxygen use was not indicated. On 09/10/2024 at 3:44 PM, Resident #20 was sitting up in a recliner with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interivew, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, each week. The findings are: On 10/4/23 review of the RN staffing timecards from March 2023 to June 2023 showed, no RN worked at the facility for 3/25/23, 3/26/23, 4/1/23, 4/9/23, 6/4/23, and on 6/11/23 a RN worked only 8:44 AM to 2:54 PM. During interview on 10/4/23 at 4:01 PM, the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed the findings in A.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, failed to ensure dented food cans were promptly removed/ discarded to prevent the growth of bacteria; 2 of 2 ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential contamination of residents' beverages for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed, and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired food items were promptly removed /discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential cross contamination and hot food was maintained at 135 degrees or above to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 32 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of resident records were kept private by closing the paper medication administration record when not in use. The findings are: On 10/04/2023 at 4:39 PM during a medication pass observation Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 walked away from the medication cart with the medication administration record left open visible on the medication cart. During interview on 10/04/2023 at 4:45 PM, LPN #3 said the medication administration record should be closed prior to leaving the cart. During interview on 10/04/2023 at 5:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) said prior to leaving the medication cart the medication administration record should be closed. Record review on 10/05/2023 at 8:08 AM of the facility policy titled, HIPAA [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act] showed all employees are to protect the residents health information such as, closing the MARs [medication administration records] when the medication cart is unattended.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was free of potential accident/hazards for 23 residents who are mobile and who reside in the facility. The findings are: The following observations were made on 10/03/2023: a. At 9:40 AM, a can of disinfectant spray was in Resident #16's bathroom. b. At 11:08 AM, a can of disinfectant spray was in Resident #16's bathroom. c. At 12:36 PM, in south hall, a container of germicidal wipes was sitting on top of an isolation cart. d. At 5:11PM, a can of disinfectant spray was in a Resident #16's bathroom. Review of the germicidal wipes label showed WARNING call a poison control center or the doctor for treatment. Eye damage can occur. Review of the disinfectant spray label showed hazardous to humans, extremely flammable, and harmful if absorbed through skin. During interview on 10/04/23 at 11:31 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 confirmed the back of the disinfectant spray can said it was hazardous to residents and the spray should not have been stored in Resident #16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored properly for 1 medication room and 1 of 2 medication carts. The findings had the potential to affect 32 who reside at the facility. The findings are: The following observations were made on [DATE] at 12:10 PM: a. In the medication room was 1 vial of Ativan 30 ml (milliliters) in the emergency kit, with a prescription number of 6766402, and the resident had expired on [DATE]. b. In medication cart #1, the following was observed: 1. Two opened vials with 15 ml each with no open dates. 2. One vial of tuberculin with an open date of [DATE] and an expiration date of [DATE]. 3. One bottle Novolin R insulin with an open date of [DATE]. 4. One Toujeo pen with an open date of [DATE]. 5. Seven Phenobarbital tablets belonging to a resident who was discharged home on [DATE]. During interview on [DATE] at 12:28 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 2 said after residents are discharged , expire, or the medication has expired or been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: During observation on 10/04/23 at 10:47 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 placed 5 fried catfish into a blender, 4 slices of bread and broth. She pureed the mixture. At 10:54 AM, she poured the pureed fried breaded catfish into a pan on the steam table. The consistency of the pureed fried bread catfish was lumpy, thick, and not smooth with pieces of fish in the mixture. During observation on 10/04/23 at 10:56 AM, DE #1 used a 4-ounce spoon to place 5 servings of squash into a blender to puree. At 10:57 AM she poured the pureed squash into a pan on the steam table. The consistency of the pureed squash was runny and was not formed. During observation on 10/05/23 at 7:59 AM, the pureed pancakes were lumpy and not smooth, and the pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 Residents (Resident #19 and Resident #17) catheters were properly secured to prevent potential complications. The findings are: The following observations were made on 10/02/23 for Resident #17: At 11:52 AM Resident #17 was in bed, catheter at bedside with no device to secure the catheter was in place. At 4:34 PM, Resident #17 was in bed with catheter at bedside. Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) was asked to check for a leg band or catheter stabilization device. The ICP confirmed there was no leg band or catheter stabilization device. The following observations were made on 10/2/23 for Resident #19: At 12:28 PM, Resident #19's catheter drainage bag was hanging from the right bed frame. No device to secure the catheter was in place. At 5:40 PM, observed Resident #19's, catheter drainage bag hanging from the bed frame. No device to secure the catheter was in place. On 10/03/23 at 08:15 AM, observed Resident #19 with catheter drainage bag attached to the side of the wheel chair. No device to secure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COTTEN, BRANDON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/28/2016 |
| COX, JANET | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/28/2002 |
| BURLESON, STANLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/28/2002 |
| JENNINGS, WARREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2014 |
| JESSUP, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/28/2002 |
| WATTS, HOWARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2016 |
| DUFFIELD, RICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/01/2017 |
| DEWITT HOSPITAL & NURSING HOME INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/16/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in AR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045365. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.