Dermott City Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 78.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) #1 and #2 demonstrated competency in the care of a resident by moving a resident prior to a nurse assessment following a fall, and by not following the resident's care plan, which indicated the use of a mechanical stand-up lift with two-person assist for transfers, for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for falls. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.35 (Nursing Services) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 12/02/2025 around 10:34 AM, when CNA #1 performed an improper transfer of Resident #1 from the bed to a wheelchair without the use of a mechanical stand-up lift or a second person to assist, which resulted in Resident #1 falling to their knees on the floor. CNA #1 requested CNA #2 assist in moving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview, Record Review and Facility Policy Review; the facility failed to transfer one (Resident #1) of five (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) sampled residents safely and in accordance to the care plan, resulting in a major injury. The findings are: Review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnosis record revealed the resident had diagnoses of renal osteodystrophy (a complication of chronic kidney disease that weakens the bones), cerebral infarction, hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, and osteoporosis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/10/2024 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, (cognitively intact). The MDS revealed Resident #1 had unclear speech but was able to make self-understood and understands, had an impairment of upper and lower extremities on one side and was dependent for transfers and ambulated via wheelchair. Review of Resident #1's care plan with a revision date of 11/10/2022 revealed the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Administrator was hired to oversee the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern nursing facilities for one of one facility reviewed for administrative duties. The findings include: Review of a facility Administrator Job Description, with a revision date of October 2022, indicated that the primary purpose of the position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current, federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the nursing facilities to assure the highest degree of quality care can be provided to residents at all times. Experience indicated as, must have a current unencumbered nursing home Administrator's license or meet the license requirements of the state. Review of a facility policy titled Administrative Management Governing Body with a revision date of January 2025, indicated that the governing body shall be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was consistently implemented for one (Resident #1) of three residents whose care plans were reviewed. The findings include: Review of an admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 10/03/2024 with diagnoses which included scoliosis (lateral deviation of the spine), unsteadiness on feet, and dementia (loss of memory, thinking, and reasoning skills). Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/07/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, chair-/bed-to-chair transfers. The MDS indicated active diagnoses which included fractures and other multiple trauma; falls since admission/entry or reentry or prior assessment; recent surgery requiring active Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) care and surgical procedures for repair of fractures of the pelvis,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the required staffing data was posted daily as evidenced by the daily staffing logs did not display the total number and actual worked hours for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and resident census. The findings are: On 02/24/2025 at 9:38 AM, a review of the nursing schedules posted in the clear glass of the Director of Nursing (DON) office, which was to the right of the nursing station, was dated February 20, 2025, through March 05, 2025. The RN and LPN schedule; 7/3 (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM) shift CNA and [NAME] Clerk schedule; and the 3/11 (3:00 PM to 11:00 PM) and 11/7 (11:00 PM to 7:00 AM) schedule, had an x in some boxes, but the x did not have a number value to indicate the number of hours the x indicated. Some boxes on the RN and LPN schedule had numbers such as 7-3 (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM), 3-7 (3:00 PM to 7:00 PM), 4p-11p (4:00 PM to 11 PM), 3-11 (3:00 PM to 11:00 PM) and 7-11 (7:00 AM to 11:00 PM). The total actual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 2 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 21 residents who received mechanical soft diets from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. The menu for lunch documented residents on pureed diets were to receive a #6 scoop (2/3) cup of pureed chicken and dumplings. a. On 02/24/2025 at 12:49 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #3 was observed using a #8 scoop (1/2) cup to serve a single portion of chicken and dumplings to the residents who required pureed diets, instead of a #8 scoop (2/3) cup. b. On 02/24/2025 at 12:59 PM, DC #3 was interviewed and was asked what scoop she had used to serve pureed chicken and dumplings and how many servings she gave to each resident and if she had looked at the menu before serving. She stated she used a #8 scoop, gave one serving each, and did not look at the menu. 2. On 02/24/2025 at 12:51 PM, the kitchen ran out of cornbread and served…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed their gloves before handling food items; foods stored in the dry storage area, refrigerator, and freezer were covered and sealed; expired food items were promptly removed from stock; 1 of 2 ice machines was maintained in clean and sanitary condition; hot food items were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit on the steam table. The findings are: 1. On 02/24/2025 at 8:11 AM, an ice scoop holder on the wall in the kitchen by the ice machine had a wet black and beige residue on it. The Dietary Manager was interviewed and was asked if she could wipe the area. The black and beige residue easily transferred to the tissue. She stated, It was black and beige residue. The surveyor asked the Dietary Manager who uses the ice from the ice machine and how often she cleans it. She stated she cleaned it every day and the kitchen used it to fill beverages served to the residents at mealtimes. 2. On 02/24/2025 at 8:41 AM, the following observations were made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0917 — isolated
  Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate bedding for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident observed for bedding. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/2024 revealed Resident #1 had short-term and long-term memory problems. A review of the plan of care for Resident #1 (revised on 09/08/2023) revealed Resident #1 required total assistance to turn and reposition in the bed and the resident could use rail with left hand to assist with turning and repositioning. On 02/24/2025 at 09:15 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #1 lying on [pronoun] back in bed without a pillow. Resident #1 was holding [pronoun] head up from the mattress. This surveyor did not see a pillow on or around the bed. On 02/24/2025 at 02:54 PM, this surveyor observed Resident #1 in bed lying on [pronoun] left side without a pillow. Resident #1's head was resting on the left hand folded into a fist. This surveyor did not see a pillow on or around the bed. On 02/25/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to operate under the direction of a licensed Administrator, which had the potential to affect all 45 residents who resided in the facility. The findings are: On 10/21/2024 at 1:50 PM, upon entering the facility and requesting to speak to the Administrator, this surveyor was informed by the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Acting Administrator (the Compliance Coordinator), no administrator was currently employed at the facility. During interview, the Acting Administrator stated the Administrator had been gone since 7/15/2024, and the position had been posted on employment websites. When asked if she held a nursing home administrator's license, the Acting Administrator confirmed she did not. On 10/22/2024 at 10:10 AM, during an interview the Acting Administrator was asked if she could provide any documentation assigning her as Acting Administrator. She produced an undated typed document stating she was Acting Administrator with no name or signature of who assigned this position. On 10/22/2024 at 3:30 PM, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage areas were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; leftover foods were in a manner to maintain food quality; dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential for cross contamination; 1 of 2 ice scoop holders was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential contamination of residents' beverages for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; and the ceiling tiles were free of stains and walls were free of peeling paint. These failed practices had the potential to affect 35 residents who receive meals from the kitchen (total census: 39) as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor. The findings are: 1. On 01/04/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a janitor closet on the 500 Hall containing chemicals remained locked to prevent accidents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 25 residents who were ambulatory or self-propel in a wheelchair as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 01/05/2024 at 09:41 AM. The findings are: 1. On 01/02/2024 at 01:06 PM, a closet door labeled Janitor was noted with a key on a red key chain in the doorknob. 2. On 01/02/2024 at 01:09 PM, a closet door labeled Janitor was noted with a key on a red key chain in the doorknob. Upon observation of the room, the Surveyor noted 2 mop buckets with mops and a blue chemical dispenser with (disinfectant cleaner) in it on the wall on the right side of the room. 3. On 01/02/2024 at 01:13 PM, a closet door labeled Janitor was noted with a key on a red key chain in the doorknob. Upon observation of the room, the Surveyor noted 2 mop buckets with mops and a blue chemical dispenser with (disinfectant cleaner) in it on the wall on the right side of the room. 4.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 4 residents who received pureed diets and 20 residents who received mechanical soft diets from 1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 01/05/2024. The findings are: 1. On 01/04/2024, the menu for the lunch meal documented residents who received mechanical soft diets were to receive #8 scoop (4 ounces) of ground fried chicken. Residents who received pureed diets were to receive (4 ounces) of pureed fried chicken. a. On 01/04/2024 at 12:54 PM, the following observations were made during the lunch meal: b. The Dietary Supervisor used a 2 ounce (orange spoon) which is equivalent to 1/4 cup (2 ounces) to serve a single portion of pureed cut green beans, to the residents who required pureed diets, instead of #8 scoop as specified on the menu. c. The Dietary Supervisor used a 2 ounce spoon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$48,527 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $24,662 — penalty dated 2026-07-08
• $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-12-23
• $8,964 — penalty dated 2024-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR