Methodist Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 126.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.35 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-06-11 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the survey results were readily available for residents and families to easily view, with the potential to affect all 120 residents who resided in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility admission Packet provided by the facility to residents and their representatives at admission did not reference the resident's right to ready access to survey results. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes did not contain any record of the residents' right to survey being provided to the residents. During an observation on 06/11/2026 at 4:26 PM, this surveyor observed that the posted resident rights displayed on the wall of the facility did not include the right to see the results of previous surveys. During an interview while present in a resident council meeting on 06/10/2026 at 2:02 PM, Resident #71 indicated they did not know where the survey results were kept and had not seen it. Resident #61, Resident #86, Resident #88, Resident #92, Resident #106,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #101) of two residents reviewed was free from abuse that had the potential to cause mental anguish and/or physical harm. The findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis Report revealed Resident #101 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia, osteoporosis and epilepsy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 04/27/2026, and a Staff Assessment for Mental Status [SAMS] score of 3, which indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. Review of Resident #101's Care Plan revealed the resident was dependent on staff for intellectual, emotional and social needs related to cognitive impairment with an initiation date of 04/27/2022. The care plan included interventions to encourage Resident #101 to participate in activities: pets, parties, and to be one to one when Resident #101 became non-verbal or confused. Review of Resident #101's reportable with a discovery date of 04/04/2025 at 2:25 AM and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported in a timely manner to ensure accountability, preserve evidence, and prevent further harm for one (Resident #101) of two residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis Report revealed Resident #101 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, osteoporosis and epilepsy. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 04/27/2026, and Staff Assessment for Mental Status [SAMS] score of 3, which indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. Review of Resident #101's Care Plan revealed the resident was dependent on staff for intellectual, emotional, and social needs related to cognitive impairment with an initiation date of 04/27/2022. The care plan also included interventions to encourage Resident #101 to participate in activities: pets, parties. The care plan indicated Resident #101 was one to one (indicating one staff member should be designated to provide care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #67 received the proper assistive device to prevent accidents and safely transfer from bed to wheelchair using a lift. Specifically, staff utilized a bariatric size sling to transfer Resident #67, when the resident required a medium sized sling, resulting in the resident sliding out of the sling and falling to the floor. The findings include: A review of admission Record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, left knee osteoarthritis, severe protein calorie malnutrition and affective mood disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/12/2026 revealed Resident #67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was independent in daily decision making. Further review indicated the resident had impairment of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were covered or sealed in the freezer and or refrigerator; dietary staff thoroughly washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated and dietary staff and visitors wear hair restraints when in the kitchen. The findings: 1. On 10/22/24 at 11:12 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 used a rag to clean the top of the food cart and then pushed it to the clean side of the dish washing machine. Without washing her hands, she picked up plates and bowls to be used in portioning the lunch meal and placed them on the cart, using her fingers inside the bowls and plates. During an interview DA #1 stated she should have washed her hands. 2. On10/22/24 at 11:13 AM, DA #9, who was in the dish washing machine room, had hair on his chin with no beard restraint. 3. On 10/22/24 at 11:16 AM, DA #2 picked up cartons of ice cream from the refrigerator and placed them on the cart near the refrigerator. Without washing his hands, he picked up glasses by their rims and placed them on the cart to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to formulate an advance directive or have an acknowledgement of an advance directive on file for 2 (Resident # 108, Resident #10) of 8 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Review of an Order Summary Report indicated, Resident #108 had a diagnosis of personal history of Transient Ischemic Attack. A review of Resident #108's electronic medical record revealed, there was not an advance directive or an acknowledgement of an advance directive on file. On 10/22/24 at 2:28 PM, the Admissions Director indicated Resident #108 did not have an advance directive, or an acknowledgement of an advance directive on file. He indicated that the advance directive should be formulated or acknowledged upon admission. Review of Resident #10 ' s quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Data 08/29/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 with medical diagnoses of dementia, Alzheimer's disease and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 10/22/24 at 10:38 AM, Resident #10's electronic medical records contained a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 (room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) rooms were clean to maintain a homelike environment. The findings are: 1. On 10/21/24 at 11:30 AM, trash was observed behind the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a white cup, an ice cream lid, peanuts, peanut container, pencils, and paper behind the nightstand. On 10/21/24 at 12:30 PM, trash was observed behind the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a white cup, an ice cream lid, peanuts, peanut container, pencils, and paper behind the nightstand. On 10/21/24 at 2:15 PM, trash was observed behind the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a white cup, an ice cream lid, peanuts, peanut container, pencils, and paper behind the nightstand. On 10/21/24 at 2:18 PM, Housekeeper #11 indicated there was trash, tissue, and other things behind the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Housekeeper #11 indicated that rooms should be cleaned every day, and as needed. On 10/21/24 at 2:19 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. The menu for the lunch meal indicated the residents who received pureed diets were to receive 4 ounces (1/2 cup) of pureed shredded lettuce salad and two #8 scoops (1 cup) of chicken and dumpling. a. On 10/22/24 at 12:48 PM, Dietary Aide (DA) #4 used one #8 scoop (1/2 cup) to serve a single portion of pureed chicken and dumpling to the residents on pureed diets, instead of two #8 scoops which was equivalent to 1 cup. b. There was no pureed salad served to the residents on pureed diets for lunch, instead of 4 ounces (1/2 cup) of pureed salad. c. On 10/22/24 at 5:10 PM, DA #5 stated, a replacement should have been given for the pureed salad. d. On 10/22/24 at 5:23 PM, Food and Beverage Director also stated, something else should have been given to the residents in place of the salad. 2. The menu for the supper meal indicated the residents who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure administration of correct medication to correct resident for 1 (Resident #76) of 1 sample mix residents for medication administration. The findings are: Review of Resident #76's Care Plan with an initiated date of 04/28/2024 noted the resident had an allergy to statin medications. Review of Resident #76's Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated June 2024 noted, the physician ordered the following medications: Amlodipine 5 (milligrams) mg for high blood pressure Fenofibrate 54mg for high cholesterol Aricept 5mg for dementia Melatonin 6mg for insomnia Namenda XR Extended Release (ER) 24- hour (HR) 28mg (memantine) for dementia Fenofibrate 54mg for cholesterol due to the allergy to statins. Review of the Medication Error Report dated June 1, 2024, revealed Certified Medication Assistant (CMA) #13 reported that both Resident #76 and Resident #47's medication were taken to the secured unit dining room where both residents had their dinner trays.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 1 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 10/22/24 at 11:58 AM, the following observations were made on the steam table: a. A pan of pureed, English peas had a soupy consistency and was gritty. b. A pan of gravy was lumpy and was not smooth 2. On 10/23/24 at 1:36 PM, during and interview the Dietary Manager stated the pureed English peas were a little thin, it is gritty because of the skin, it is hard to puree the skin and they should have pureed it a little longer. She further stated the gravy had been chunky. 3. On 10/23/24 at 1:36 PM, the Food and Beverage director stated the pureed English peas were a little thin, it is gritty because of the skin, it is hard to puree the skin and they should have pureed it a little longer.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR