Pink Bud Home For The Golden Years

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 60.1 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.40 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.16 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility document review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to the appropriate authorities, which include the state agency, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made for two incidents with Resident #12. This failed practice had protentional to affect all residents residing in the facility. It was determined the facility ' s non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was related to State Operation Manual, Appendix PP, 483.12 at a scope and severity of L . The IJ began on 01/07/2025 after review of a record provided by the Administrator regarding Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 being rough with Resident #12. The Administrator presented the two-page record as her investigation into an allegation of a staff member being rough with Resident #12 as the complete…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two allegations of abuse for Resident #12 and failed to prevent potential abuse or maltreatment of all residents by removing the alleged perpetrator during an on-going investigation. Specifically, no evidence of a resident statement, accused statement, assessment of the resident, bedside staff interviews, and a police report were completed for review and the accused was allowed to continue working with residents in the facility immediately following both allegations. It was determined the facility ' s non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was related to State Operation Manual, Appendix PP, 483.12 at a scope and severity of L . The IJ began on 01/07/2025 after review of a record provided by the Administrator regarding Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerated narcotic box was permanently affixed in the North medication room, and failed to ensure expired anti-angina medication was not stored in the North medication room. The findings include: On [DATE] at 7:41 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 was accompanied to the North Hall medication room by this surveyor. LPN #7 was asked to open the narcotic box. This surveyor observed LPN #7 open a small, unlocked white refrigerator. She reached in and pulled out a small locked black box. LPN #7 placed the unaffixed narcotic box on the cabinet and opened it. The box contained three (3) boxes of multidose anti-anxiety medication. LPN #7 revealed the narcotic box had never been affixed in the refrigerator. LPN #7 stated she had no concerns related to storage, because the medication room door and narcotic box were locked, and medications were counted each shift. LPN #7 revealed that night shift would call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed their gloves, before handling food items, in one of one kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Hand Washing, dated 2010, indicated, Clean hands and exposed portions of arms (or surrogate prosthetic devices) immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food. [When to Wash Hands]: After touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of arms. After handling soiled equipment or utensils. During food preparations, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks. After engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands. During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/21/2025 at 11:44 AM, this surveyor observed Dietary Employee (DE) #11 in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #16) of one resident sampled for self-administration of medications did not self-administer nasal spray without the interdisciplinary team determining the practice was clinically appropriate. The findings include: A review of Physician Orders, dated 04/01/2025, revealed Resident #16 had diagnoses which included seizure disorders, depression, and atrial fibrillation. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/20/2024, revealed Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Section B0200/B0300 indicated Resident #16 was moderately hearing impaired and had a hearing aid. A review of Physician Orders, dated 02/24/2025, revealed Resident #16 received nasal spray, two (2) sprays, twice a day, for allergic rhinitis symptoms. A review of a Care Plan, dated 03/10/2025, revealed Resident #16 received nasal spray, two (2) sprays, twice a day, for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Abuse and Neglect policy was implemented to include reporting of abuse allegations for one (Resident #12) of three sampled residents, reviewed for abuse allegations. The findings are: A review of the facility Abuse / Neglect Policy and Procedures revealed, [Facility Name] will follow these written policies and procedures to ensure that incidents, including suspected abuse/neglect of residents, accidents, deaths from violence and unusual occurrences are reported and documented, as required by all applicable state and federal laws and these regulations. Item D, Reporting Suspected Abuse/Neglect part three (3) indicated [Facility] personnel, including but not limited to, licensed nurses, nursing assistants, physicians, social workers, mental health professional and other employees in the facility who have reasonable cause to suspect that a resident has been subjected to conditions or circumstances which have or could have resulted in abuse/neglect are required to immediately notify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (Resident #4) of one resident, with an open wound, observed for EBP. Specifically, staff did not wear a gown during wound care of a stage II, open moisture associated, pressure wound on the coccyx, with a leaking catheter. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/24/2025 indicated Resident #4 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, seizure disorder, and depression, with short and long-term memory problems and moderately impaired cognitive decision making. Section H indicated Resident #4 had a catheter in place. Section M indicated Resident #4 had an unhealed pressure ulcer/injury moisture associated and required a pressure reducing device. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) , dated 04/23/2025, revealed Resident #4 had a stage II pressure ulcer to the buttocks, with orders to: cleanse the wound, apply collagen, and cover. On 04/23/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with privacy bags for indwelling catheter drainage bags; and residents were provided privacy during showers to promote resident rights and dignity for 2 (Residents #5 and # 41). The findings are: 1. Resident #5's Care Plan dated 2/13/2023 listed diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy, Intellectual Disability, Overactive Bladder, Retention of Urine, Indwelling Cather. a. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/17/2023 documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) and had an indwelling catheter. b. The Physicians Orders from 01/01/24 through 02/29/24 noted the resident had an indwelling catheter. Change monthly and as needed if occluded or dislodged. Give routine catheter care every shift as per policy and procedure. Check for patency and drainage every shift. c. On 02/05/24 at 11:02 AM, Resident #5 was lying in bed, a catheter bag was attached to the bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services that was resident centered in accordance with the resident's preferences and goals for care, as evidenced by failure to ensure residents with injuries to skin, received treatment, the family and physician were notified, orders were obtained to prevent further deterioration or possible infection, and to ensure residents received skin treatments according to the physician orders for 2 (Residents #14 and #9) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #14's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #14 with a diagnosis of dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assistance for showering/bathing. Resident #14's Physician Orders dated 2/8/2024, did not document an order for skin treatment to the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters were provided appropriate service and care to prevent potential infection and contamination for 2 (Residents #58, and #161) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. The Care Plan dated 12/15/23 noted Resident #58 had diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 5 and Retention of Urine. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/14/2023 documented the resident scored 10 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and had an indwelling catheter. The Physicians Orders from 01/01/24 through 02/29/24 noted Resident #58 was to receive catheter care every shift and to check for placement, patency, and drainage every shift and catheter care every shift. On 02/05/24 at 2:15 PM, Resident #58 was lying in a low bed, with the indwelling catheter bag lying on the floor. On 02/06/24 at 11:52 AM, Resident #58 was lying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff demonstrated competency with necessary care, treatment, and services required as evidenced by: failure to ensure residents with skin injuries were assessed and treatment obtained; licensed staff knew the resident being cared for and did not leave residents unattended during care; and staff knew about nail care for 3 (Residents #14, #41, and #56) of 3 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #14's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance for showering/bathing. Resident #14's Physician Orders dated 2/8/2024 did not document an order for skin treatment to the left lower leg. Resident #14's Skin Audit dated 2/3/2024 documented skin warm, dry,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sanitary procedures were followed to prevent the spread of germs while serving meals. The findings are: On 02/05/24 at 11:52 AM, in the North Hall Dining Room Dietary Employee (DE) #1 was wearing blue gloves while passing trays to residents. DE #1 kept the same gloves on during the meal service. DE #1 was observed picking up beverages with gloved hands and stabilizing the straw between the fingers of a gloved hand. Observed DE #1 touching the beverage cart, backs of wheelchairs and food cart then continued to pass meal trays all without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. 02/05/24 12:03 PM, observed DE #1 walk to dirty dish window from the dining room, while still wearing the same gloves. He raised the metal window cover and placed drinking cups inside window and then lowered metal divider. DE #1 then proceeded through the door into the kitchen while wearing the same blue gloves and closed the door. On 02/06/24 at 11:43 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,561 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $28,561 — penalty dated 2025-05-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in AR