No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowview Healthcare And Rehab

825 North Gaskill, Huntsville, AR 72740 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 105 certified beds · (479) 738-2021 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)7 immediate-jeopardy citations$18,446 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $18,446 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-16)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
934 N Gaskill St · (479) 738-5500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
601 N Gaskill St · (479) 738-2620 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
562 N Parrott Dr · (479) 738-6414 · Call to confirm hours
Park
school street · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
812 N Gaskill St · (479) 738-2334

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.3%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%4.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%1.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%21.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.9%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.3%13.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.8%10.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%77.7%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.022.011.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.572.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 64.1 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
40
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and maintain safe hot water temperatures, which were found to be up to 151 degrees Fahrenheit (F), on all residential wings/units of the facility, including the shower rooms. Further, staff failed to implement the system for reporting and acting upon ongoing concerns related to excessively hot water in resident care areas. Specifically, direct care staff with knowledge of excessively hot water temperatures did not record this information on the facility's Maintenance Log sheets as the concerns were identified. In addition, maintenance staff did not implement any additional checks of facility water temperatures to ensure they were within safe ranges after adjusting the mixing valve; and the facility failed to ensure an emergency call system was accessible to residents who used a common bathroom on the entry hall. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents in the facility; and the facility also failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-10-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, document review, and interviews, the administration failed to provide training and oversight to ensure the facility was free from the potential for injury related to identified concerns regarding elevated hot water temperatures. During the survey, the survey team identified hot water temperatures throughout all residential units / wings of the facility. Temperatures were found to be as high as 151 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in resident bathroom sinks, as well as resident shower rooms. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure call light system was effectively working for 200 and 300 halls; and failed to implement an emergency backup system. The facility also failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 1 resident, Resident #21, who was heard yelling out at the contract lab technician to not draw the resident's blood. CNA #1 physically restrained Resident #21 while the resident's blood was drawn. These failures all resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for F600, F689, and F919. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-10-16 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility's Governing Body failed to ensure facility policies were implemented regarding management and operation of the facility. The Governing Body failed to ensure compliance with Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation during Survey. Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was cited at F600 at a S/S of a J. Additionally, Administration, F835 was cited at a S/S of a J; Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement, F867 was cited at a S/S of a J. Resident Call Systems, F919 was cited at a S/S of K. Supervision to Prevent Accidents, F689 was cited at a S/S of K. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.70 - Administration at a scope and severity of L. The Administrator was notified of the IJ on 10/11/2024 11:51 AM. Before ending the survey, the survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-10-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to maintain a program that developed and implemented effective improvement plans to correct identified areas of concern. After identifying Immediate Jeopardy at F600, F689, F835, F837, and F919, the facility's QAPI plan was requested. The Administrator was unable to locate the facility QAPI plan. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.75 - Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement at a scope and severity of L. The Administrator was notified of the IJ on 10/11/2024 at 11:51 AM. Before ending the survey, the survey team offered the facility the opportunity to provide a plan to remove the Immediate Jeopardy and ensure serious harm would not occur or recur. An Immediate Jeopardy removal plan must include all the actions the facility has taken or will take to immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-10-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 1 (Resident #21) resident, who was heard yelling out at the contract lab technician to not draw the resident's blood. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 physically restrained Resident #21 while the resident's blood was drawn. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, §483.12 (Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of K. The IJ began on 10/07/2024 at 1:52 PM, when Resident #21 was heard yelling, crying, and begging, from room [ROOM NUMBER], by the surveyor and facility staff. The surveyor and a facility staff member entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed a contracted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-10-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the call light system was effectively working for 200 and 300 halls; and failed to implement an emergency backup system for 2 of 4 halls. The facility census was 48. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manul, Appendix PP, §483.90 (Physical Environment) at a scope and severity of K. The IJ began on 10/06/2024 at 6:00 AM shift change, when night shift staff notified day shift staff that the call lights were not working. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Administrator /Business Office Manager (BOM) were notified of the IJ on 10/08/2024 at 5:13 PM. A Removal Plan was requested. The Removal Plan was accepted by the State Agency on 10/09/2024 at 1:19 PM. The IJ was removed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident did not exit the facility without staff knowledge for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Residents #1, #2, #3) sampled residents who were at risk for elopement, as evidenced by failure to ensure the locking mechanism on a door was in proper working order allowing Resident #1 to exit the facility. Resident #1 was missing for approximately 30 minutes and was found lying on the ground adjacent to a facility parking lot. The resident sustained a hematoma. The facility failed to ensure all residents were accounted for; no residents were reassessed for risk of elopement; no education was provided to staff; no assessment or monitoring of the remaining facility door locking mechanisms were put in place to prevent lock failures; facility elopement policy lacked clearly defined mechanisms and procedures for assessing or identifying, monitoring, and managing residents at risk for elopement. The failed practice resulted in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were changed as ordered by the Physician, and a resident who was not Care Planned for self-administration was not left unattended while receiving an inhaled medication for one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 03/16/2026 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/16/2026 revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan, initiated on 03/27/2026, revealed that Resident #5 had oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas change. Interventions included monitoring for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, increased heart rate, lethargy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, facility policy review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to facility administration, and subsequently the State Agency, for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A review of a Nursing Progress Note, created by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 11/01/2024 at 11:21 AM, revealed nursing documentation of an allegation of abuse from Resident #2, which read in part, Resident #2 stated someone on night shift with dark hair had kicked the resident in the night, because the resident had made the person mad. During an interview on 06/12/2025 at 1:23 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that on 01/24/2025, the Progress Note documentation dated 11/01/2024, was brought to the Administrator ' s attention by surveyors. At that time, the Administrator initiated an investigation into the allegation made by Resident #2 and reported the allegation to the state agency. A review of a Social Progress Note dated 01/24/2025 at 3:00 PM, after the Administrator had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to answer call bells/lights within a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #36, and Resident #18), and the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain each resident's highest practicability. Findings Include: During the Resident Council Meeting on 10/10/2024 at 2:17 PM, Resident #18 and Resident #36 reported that it takes the Certified Nursing Assistants a long time to answer the call bells that were given to them. Resident #18 reported that especially right now the call bells were not being answered, the staff reports to them they can't hear them. Resident #18 stated they rang the bell for 45 minutes no one responded, so Resident #18 started yelling and was finally able to get help. Resident #36 said it takes a long time for the staff to answer the bells as well, unsure of exact time but it's a long time. On 10/15/2024 at 02:22 PM, during an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain each resident's highest practicability. The findings include: During an interview on 10/10/2024 at 9:34 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #24 stated that the certified nursing assistant competencies were not completed, and the certified nursing assistant staff did not have knowledge while working with dementia residents. Review of the facility provided, undated, Nurse Aides Skills Yearly Review, forms revealed that certified nursing assistants signed off on skills verifying they were competent in the skill set. Several forms were not completed in their entirety, several skills remained unverified, including dementia care and activities of daily living, such as brushing teeth. During an interview on 10/11/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Human Resource Director stated that competencies were reviewed upon hiring and that a skills carnival had been scheduled for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not dispose of garbage or refuse properly. The findings include: An observation on 10/7/2024 at 6:59 PM, showed garbage spilt around facility dumpster behind the facility. An observation on 10/8/2024 at 8:32 AM, showed garbage spilt around the facility dumpster behind the facility. During a telephone interview on 10/10/2024 at 9:34 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #24 stated that garbage often piles up in and around the facility dumpster as the facility often lacks the resources to pay the garbage company to empty the dumpster. During a telephone interview on 10/11/2024 at 1:16 PM, the waste disposable company stated the facilities account had been locked numerous times for failure to pay. The waste management company stated that if an account goes 30 days past due the account would be locked, and the facility dumpster would not be emptied. The waste disposable company stated that the facilities account had been locked approximately 4 times in the past 6 months due to failure to pay. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included pertinent information to assure the necessary care and resources were allocated to meet the needs of the residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The total census was 48 residents. The findings are: Upon request for a Facility Assessment policy on 10/15/2024 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor was informed that the facility did not have a policy. A review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool revealed a typed date at the bottom of the pages of 09/05/2024. The facility-wide assessment did not include the following: -Date of assessment or update -Date of assessment reviewed with QAA/QAPI committee - Name of the administrator - Accurate acuity levels to help the facility understand the potential implications regarding the intensity of care and services needed - Review of staff assignments for coordination and continuity of care - Staffing plan to evaluate the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure available and sufficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to submit required Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) quarterly staffing information for the third quarter of 2024. Findings include: A review of the CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third quarter of 2024, defined as April 1 to June 30, 2024, revealed the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. A review of CMS's Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group Memorandum S&C: 17-45-NH revealed the requirements for participation in Medicare and Medicaid Services were amended to include submission of data related to staffing as staffing significantly affects the care delivered to residents. The memorandum further provides email contact information for questions and provides a link to the policy manual. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 5:05 PM, the Administrator stated the previous Business Office Manager did the PBJ reporting, has not been employed since February, and does not know when the last reporting was done. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene; after touching clothing and meal tray paper and providing food for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #25) residents during dining observation of 1 dining room reviewed for infection control; when going from dirty to clean task during wound care for 1 Resident (Resident #29) for 1 resident reviewed for infection control during wound care; during blood draws for 1 laboratory technician review for infection control; failed to develop a Legionella Water Management Program/Plan; failed to have an effective Antibiotic Stewardship program; and failed to implement infection control practices for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's undated policy titled; Hand Washing Policy & Procedure indicated the facility policy was to ensure all staff are educated/trained on hand washing and hand hygiene upon hire and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility is free of pests and rodents. The findings include: Review of the facility provided Maintenance Log, dated 05/2/2024, reported a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a rat in their room per resident, rat trap in need. Review of facility provided Maintenance Log, dated 05/5/2024, reported a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a mouse in their room. During initial rounds on 10/7/2024 at 12:01 PM, Resident #43 stated that the facility had mice. Resident #23 confirmed that mice had been seen on multiple occasions. During an interview on 10/7/2024 at 5:14 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 stated that mice are seen daily, and the last time she had seen a mouse was on 10/6/2024. During an interview on 10/7/2024 at 5:34 PM, the Environmental Director stated that there was a mouse problem. The Environmental Director stated that live traps and sticky traps had been deployed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to establish a smoking policy in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also takes into account nonsmoking residents. The findings include: Per facility provided list of residents who smoke, undated, two residents within the facility smoke. During an interview on 10/10/2024 at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) denied there was a facility smoking policy. During an interview on 10/10/2024 at 11:30 AM, the Administrator denied there was a smoking policy.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interviews, the facility failed to provide required training to staff members for 1 of 1 facility. The findings are: Upon request of mandatory in-services, the surveyor received an Infection Control in-service and Resident Rights in-service. Upon reviewing the facility assessment there were no required trainings and/or in-services addressed. A review of an undated document titled, Required Annual State Inservices received by the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the in-services that the facility was going to provide were the following: Civil Rights, Disaster Preparedness, Fire Safety, Accident Prevention, Reporting Disaster/Outages, Utility Shut Off Demonstration, Oral and Dental Care, Restorative Nursing, Dignity, Death and Dying, Advanced Directives, Behavior Management, Assessments, Interventions, Medications, Documentation, Infection Control/Wound Management, Universal Precautions, Center of Disease Control, Tuberculosis Prevention, Nosocomial Infections, Treatments, Documentation, Abuse and Neglect, Types of Abuse and Neglect, Incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on document review, and in-service reviews, the facility failed to provide communication training for staff members. Findings include: Upon review the surveyor did not observe a communication training/in-service to staff members. On 10/16/24 at 11:18 AM, during an interview with the Human Resource Director (HRD) she stated she was unsure what communications in-services would be, but she would look for that as well. On 10/16/2024 at 2:00 PM, the HRD brought in in-services, but there were no communication in-services and the HRD revealed that's all she could find. On 10/16/24 at 11:48 AM, during an interview with the Assistant Administrator she reported that there was no communication in-services performed for new hires or existing employees. On 10/16/24 at 11:49 AM, during an interview, the Administrator revealed that a communication in-service would be important to have one so that it would increase communication with staff. On 10/11/2024 at 2:30 PM, during an interview the Administrator reported that the they do not have all the required trainings, and it was 100% his fault.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI ) training upon hire and in services to direct staff for 1 of 1 facility. Findings include: A review of the undated policy titled, Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Policy, revealed that all staff would be educated on the QAPI plan and the role in development and implementation of interventions. Upon record review there was no QAPI trainings or in services for new hire employees or current staff. On 10/11/2024 at 2:30 PM, during an interview with the Administrator, he reported that there was no QAPI training or in-services, for newly hired staff or current staff. The Administrator reported that they did not know that it had to be done. He stated it would be important to do so, because they want the employees to know when and how to report problems and so that the QAPI team could address issues within the facility. The Administrator also reported that they do not have all the required trainings. And…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0946 — widespread
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a compliance/ethics training for staff members. The finds are: Upon observation no compliance/ethics training was observed. Om 10/11/24 at 10:44 AM, during an interview with the Human Resource Director (HRD) it was revealed that the Administrator does all the administrative training, and depending on what the in-service is about depends on who does the in-services. On 10/11/ 2024 at 2:30 PM, during an interview the Administrator reported that they do not have all the required training. And it was 100% his fault. He reported that the training was done, but the Administrator failed to document them. On 10/16/24 at 11:04 AM, during an interview with the HRD it was revealed that the Administrator has the spreadsheet/calendar that keeps up with the in-services and when they are due. The HRD does not keep up with the in-services, the Administrator does. The HRD reported that just recently the in-services were given back to the Administrator and there probably in the Administrator's new office. The HRD reported that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff was trained in behavioral health residents for 1 (Resident #49) of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. Specifically, the facility had no formal dementia training for staff, this had the potential to affect 28 residents identified by the facility with an Alzheimer's/Dementia diagnosis. Findings include: A review of a certification titled, National Council of Certified Dementia Practitioners with a certification period of 08/08/2023 through 08/08/2025 revealed, Administrator had completed certification as a Certified Dementia Practitioner. A review of the facility document titled, Required Annual State Inservices, revealed a Behavior Management category and a Cognitive Impairment category noting assessments, interventions, medications, and documentation. No specific dementia training was identified, and the last dates entered were 09/01/2022 for Behavior Management and 02/02/2022 for Cognitive Impairment A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a continent resident was able to call for toileting assistance to prevent incontinence for 1 (Resident #18) resident of 18 sampled residents; and the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided with similar dinnerware for 2 (Resident #25 and Resident #32) of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, residents requiring assistance with meals were served using (polystyrene foam) bowls. Findings include: A review of a facility document titled, Resident Rights, indicated residents have the right to be treated with dignity, privacy, respect, and to live in a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment. 1. A review of the admission Record, revealed the facility admitted Resident #18 with diagnoses that included blockage of blood flow to the brain, a decline in thinking skills due to condition that blocks blood flow to the [NAME] causing deprivation of oxygen, weakness on one side of the body,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain written authorization from the residents or their legal representatives for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #21) personal funds. Findings include: On 10/14/2024 at 10:55 AM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy for resident funds. A review of the admission Agreement in Resident #9's admission Packet 1 signed by Resident #9's representative on 02/16/2017, revealed a written request for the management of the resident's personal funds was required. For the question, Do you wish the facility to manage your funds, No was circled. A review of Resident #9's Trust Transaction History for the dates 10/01/2023-10/09/2024 revealed a running balance with deposits and withdrawals entered by the facility. The current balance as of 10/09/2024 was $1,645.34. A review of Resident #9's admission Packet Section 2 and electronically signed by the Medical Director on 09/24/2019 revealed Resident #9 had dementia and was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly trust fund statements to the residents or their legal representatives for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #21) and failed to ensure generally accepted accounting practices were followed for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #28) reviewed for personal funds. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:55 AM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy for resident funds. 1. A review of the admission Agreement in Resident #9's admission Packet Section 1, signed by Resident #9's representative on [DATE], revealed the nursing facility agreed to maintain written records of all financial transactions with the resident or legal representative including quarterly statements. A review of Resident #9's Trust Transaction History for the dates of [DATE]-[DATE] revealed a running balance with deposits and withdrawals entered by the facility. All deposits are either from Resident #9's federal benefits or interest paid. All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents who used the shower hallway with a safe, clean, homelike environment. The findings include: Review of facility provided Maintenance Log, dated 03/04/2024 stated outside of the double shower, the floor is leaking. During the initial facility rounding on 10/7/2024 at 11:05 AM, this Surveyor noted a section of the facility hallway that had the flooring removed exposing the concrete foundation with non-skid tracks laying down and three blankets rolled up and pressed to the far-right wall. During an interview on 10/7/2024 at 5:00 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9 stated the flooring had been removed due to a leak from the far-right wall. CNA #9 stated that it was difficult to get residents into the shower room due to the flooring being removed and stated staff had to remain vigilant when transporting residents into the shower rooms due to the holes in the door frames to the shower room. During an interview on 10/7/2024 at 5:30 PM, the Environmental Director stated the flooring was removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure established abuse policies and procedures were implemented after receiving an allegation of abuse for 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #23) of 18 residents sampled for the implementation of abuse prohibition policies and procedures, that resulted in facility and contract staff, involved in allegations of abuse, to remain in the facility and to have continued contact with residents. Findings include: A review of a facility document titled, Employee Handbook, dated 2023, indicated, Grounds for Immediate Dismissal 1. Verbal or physical abuse of anyone while at the facility. A review of a facility policy, included in the employee handbook, titled, Patient Ause/Neglect, with a policy change effective date of 09/25/2017, page 21 indicated the facility will report to state agencies as required by state and federal law within 2 hours and The facility will immediately send home the accused employee. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff involved in abuse allegations had no further contact with residents after the facility received an allegation of abuse for 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #23) of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility allowed Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) #1, CNA #2, CNA #3 and Phlebotomist, involved in the abuse allegations, to remain in the facility and to have continued contact with residents after the allegation of abuse was made. Findings include: A review of a facility document titled, Employee Handbook, dated 2023, indicated, Grounds for Immediate Dismissal 1. Verbal or physical abuse of anyone while at the facility. A review of a facility policy included in the employee handbook, titled, Patient Ause/Neglect, with a policy change effective date of 09/25/2017, page 21 indicated, The facility will immediately send home the accused employee. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were accurately completed for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #10, and Resident #20) of 18 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #1 and Resident #10's use of bed rails and identify that the residents were at high risk for the use of bed rails on the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) and to accurately assess Resident #20's current diagnosis status on the quarterly MDS assessment, which resulted in inaccurate care plans. Findings include: 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 08/11/2020 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis, convulsions, restlessness/agitation, psychosis, and delusional disorder. A review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report revealed, Resident #1 had an order for full bilateral bedrails, to enable repositioning in bed, make sure they are up and tightly secured every shift, dated 05/17/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans accurately reflected the resident's needs and interventions for care of 5 (Residents #10, #20, #21, #23, and #25) of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #10 with diagnoses that included a brain disorder that causes memory loss, language and thinking problems, kidney disease and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/26/2024, revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #10 required substantial to maximal assistance with dressing, showering/bathing, sitting to lying and lying to sitting, from sitting to standing, transferring from chair to bed and bed to chair; required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene and to roll left to right; and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the services provided or arranged by the facility did not meet professional standards of quality for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 sampled resident. The findings include: Review of Resident #23's Medical Diagnosis, reported multiple sclerosis, weakness, other motor neuron disease, a condition that causes sudden and uncontrollable laughing or crying, wheelchair dependence, dementia, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. A review of Resident #23's Order Entry, on 10/9/2024 at 3:00 PM reported, THC Gummies 25mg (milligrams) 1 gummy every 2 hours as needed, not to exceed 5 gummies in 24 hours verbal order per Medical Director dated 9/2/2024. Previous orders included: 15 mg/1000 mg may have 1-2 gummies every 2 hours as needed up to 10 per day on 8/11/24. THC gummies 600mg THC/15 mg [brand] may have two gummies each shift if 25 mg is not available, every 8 hours for pain/anxiety, not to exceed 6 gummies per day on 8/1/24. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/9/2024 at 3:30 PM, THC gummies were observed in Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments, proper bedrail placement and safety precautions for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for bedrails. Specifically, at-risk residents were not properly assessed for risks associated with the use of bedrails, and the facility did not perform or maintain documentation of assessments, measurements, or inspections of entrapment zones. Findings include: 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 08/11/2020 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis, convulsions, restlessness/agitation, psychosis, and delusional disorder. A review of Resident #1 Order Summary Report revealed, Resident #1 had an order for full bedrails, to enable repositioning in bed, make sure they are up and tightly secured every shift, dated 05/17/2023. On 10/15/2024 at 3:12 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy for side rails/bedrails/full rails,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food items as listed on the menu and follow the recipe during food preparation to meet the needs of the residents in 1 kitchen reviewed for food preparation and service. Specifically, the facility ran out of food on the designated menu due to serving staff meals prior to serving the residents; allowing food to cook down on the steam table for two hours and forty-five minutes for lunch on 10/07/2024; not following the menu for lunch on 10/10/2024, and not taking measurements verify serving size. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility menu, Spring/Summer 2024, Week 4, for Monday, 22, the menu indicated the lunch meal was to include ham & beans, squash, cornbread, margarine, sour cream pound cake, chilled peaches, and coffee or tea. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/07/2027 at 10:55 AM, Dishwasher (DW) #21 was serving staff lunch from the steam table line including squash. DW #21 stated the staff lunch was served from 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nutritive value and appearance was maintained for food preparation in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food preparation and services. Specifically, the squash served for lunch on 10/07/2024 was on the steam table for two hours and twelve minutes prior to the start of resident lunch services resulting in overcooked watered-down squash. Findings include: During an observation on 10/07/2024 at 12:58 PM, the Kitchen Manager (KM) was plating the squash with a perforated spoon. In the pan there was mainly yellow water with pieces of limp squash. During an interview on 10/07/2024 at 1:05 PM, the KM stated, five bags of squash was used in preparation for lunch but when it cooks so much it turns to liquid. The KM stated the squash was put on the steam table at 10:15 AM, prior to the staff's lunch being served. It was calculated that the squash had been on the steam table for two hours and twelve minutes prior to the start of the first resident's tray being served. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a way to reduce food borne illnesses and ensure dishes were washed and stored in a sanitary manner with the potential to effect 48 residents served from the 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food preparation and service. Specifically, the facility left uncooked breaded chicken strips uncovered sitting on top of the commercial oven for one hour and fifteen minutes, failed to perform and maintain good hand hygiene during food service and preparation, failed to maintain safe food temperatures for pureed foods during preparation time, did not use soap/detergent to wash utensils during food preparation and allow for proper sanitation time, or store the ice scoop in a clean, dry container. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Self Survey Module revised in September of 2007 stated, the intent was to prevent food borne illnesses and reduce practices that result in food contamination and compromised food safety to all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents or their legal representatives when their personal fund account balances approached limits for Medicaid eligibility for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #21) for personal funds. Findings include: On 10/14/2024 at 10:55 AM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy for resident funds. A review of the admission Agreement in Resident #9's admission Packet Section 1 signed by Resident #9's representative on 02/16/2017, revealed the nursing facility agreed to maintain written records of all financial transactions with the resident or legal representative. A review of Resident #9's Trust Transaction History for the dates 10/01/2023-10/09/2024 revealed, on 11/29/2023, a balance of $1,843.25, and remained above $1,800 until 02/02/2024. On 07/03/2024 a balance of $2,472.02 was posted and remained above $1,800 until 09/30/2024. A review of Resident #9's admission Packet Section 2 and electronically signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the medical provider of a significant change in Resident 14's dental health resulting in pain when dental care was provided. The findings include: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/08/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Surveyor was speaking to Resident #14 in the facility common room. When Resident #14 smiled at the Surveyor, the Surveyor noted what appeared to be blood coming from Resident #14's upper gums. The Surveyor interviewed the Certified Nursing Aid (CNA) #4 who touched Resident #14's lip. Resident #14 pulled away and stated that it hurt. CNA #4 stated it appeared to be blood on Resident #14's gums. During an interview on 10/09/2024 at 10:00 AM, Certified Nursing Aid (CNA) #9 stated Resident #14's gums bleed often, and dental care had become very painful for Resident #14. CNA #9 stated the blood and pain with dental hygiene had been reported to Registered Nurse (RN) #13. During an interview on 10/09/2024 at 10:30 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #12 stated no one had reported a change in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #47). Findings included: After a request for a dignity policy. It was reported that the facility did not have a dignity policy. A review of Resident #47's admission Record, revealed the resident's medical diagnoses included: dementia and generalized anxiety disorder. On 10/11/2024 at 9:00 AM, this surveyor was standing beside the nurses' desk when the residents' main bathroom door was opened by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 asking for the surveyor to get help. Upon opening the door wide, the resident was exposed with pants and brief pulled down standing in front of the toilet in eyesight of this surveyor. The CNA then shut the door. On 10/11/24 at 10:25 AM, during an interview, the Environmental Director revealed that there had been a bell attached to the emergency call light, in the resident's bathroom. The surveyor then observed a bell attached to the string hanging from the call light string. On 10/11/24 at 10:40 AM, during an interview CNA #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from chemical restraint for 1 (Resident #49) of 1 resident reviewed for chemical restraint. Findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing home Resident, indicated nursing homes can't use chemical restraints (like drugs) to discipline you for the staff's own convenience. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #49 with diagnoses that included dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and delusional disorders. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/06/2024, revealed Resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 which indicated the resident was had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #49's care plan initiated on 07/30/2024 and revised on 08/31/2024, revealed the resident was disoriented to place, had impaired safety awareness, wandering behaviors, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23 was free from unnecessary medications. The findings include: A review of Resident #23's care plan dated 07/10/2023, did not report any use of marijuana or THC products. A review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]; Section J reported no documentation of Resident #23's marijuana use. A review of Resident #23's Medical Diagnosis, reported the resident had diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis, weakness, asthma, motor neuron disease, chest pain, dependence on wheelchair, dementia, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. A review of Resident #23's Physician Orders, reported barbiturates, oxygen, muscle relaxers, narcotics, a mixed drink as needed, and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/9/2024 at 3:30 PM, THC gummies were observed in the medicine cart for the 500 Hall. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 stated the THC Gummies belonged to Resident #23 and were brought in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility The findings include: Review of Resident #23 Medical Diagnosis, reported the resident had diagnoses to include: multiple sclerosis, weakness, other motor neuron disease, a condition that causes sudden and uncontrollable laughing or crying, wheelchair dependence, dementia, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. A review of Resident #23's Order Summary Report on 10/9/2024 at 3:00 PM, reported THC Gummies 25mg 1 gummy every 2 hours as needed, not to exceed 5 gummies in 24 hours verbal order per Medical Director order dated 9/2/2024. Previous orders include 15 mg/1000 mg may have 1-2 gummies every 2 hours as needed up to 10 per day on 8/11/24. THC gummies 600mg THC/15 mg delta may have two gummies each shift if 25 mg not available, every 8 hours for pain/anxiety, not to exceed 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were utilized prior to the use by date, stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination, hair coverings were worn when entering the kitchen and hand hygiene was performed to prevent cross contamination. The findings are: During observation on 10/09/23 at12:36 PM, CNA #9 coughed used the gloved right hand to cover her mouth. CNA #9 removed the paper covering from a straw and placed the straw into Resident #25 ' s plastic mug. CNA #9 did not perform hand hygiene. During interview on 10/09/23 12:49 PM, CNA #9 said hand hygiene should be performed before and after resident care, and confirmed she should have not used her gloved hand that covered her mouth to handle the resident ' s straw. The following observations were made on 10/10/23: a. At 11:59 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 served a meal tray from the tray cart to Resident #19. CNA #5 did not perform hand hygiene prior to removing the room tray from the tray cart and did not perform hand hygiene after exiting Resident #19 ' s room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's environment was safe, free of hazards, and promoting a home like environment. The findings are: The following observation were made: On 10-9-23 at 12:12 PM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door protector was loose with a hard plastic cover on the lower half of the door and splinters. During observation on 10/12/23 at 2:03 PM, room [ROOM NUMBER] ' s door had a loose protector gaping open with sharp screws. On 10/09/23 at 12:20 PM, the baseboard approximately 12 inches in length in room [ROOM NUMBER] was pulled away from the wall and protruded outward. A hole approximately 3 inches deep was in the wall with sheet rock and insulation exposed behind the baseboard. On 10/10/23 at 12:17 PM, a hole in the wall of room [ROOM NUMBER] had approximately 12 inches of base board detached from the wall and protruding outward. On 10/12/23 11:48 AM, a hole in the wall approximately 3 inches deep and approximately 12 inches of base board was detached from the wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled appropriately and disposed of past the expiration date when applicable. The findings are: The following observations were made on 10/11/23 at 9:59 AM of the medication cart on 400 hall and 500 hall. a. One box of nasal strips containing 19 strips with no resident ' s name. b. A tube of topical anesthetic with no resident ' s name. c. One tube of eye drops with no resident ' s name. d. Two cups of a white powder with no label with the contents. e. 1 tube of eye ointment with an expiration date of 7/2023. During interview on 10/11/23 at 10:05 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 said, medications should be left on the cart in the original container or box and labeled.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control precautions were followed during wound care for 2 (Resident #25 and #27) residents, failed to ensure that bed pans were stored properly when not in use for Resident #21, and clothing and linens were processed in a manner to minimize cross contamination. The findings are: On 10/11/23 at 1:40 PM, Surveyor observed LPN #2 perform wound care on two of Resident #25 wounds. CNA #2 and CNA #10 assisted LPN #2. LPN #2, CNA #2, and CNA #10 did not perform hand hygiene or change gloves during the wound care process. During observation on 10/11/23 1:54 PM, LPN #2 entered Resident #25's room donned in an isolation gown and gloves. LPN #2 lifted the Resident's heels off the bed and applied a heel protector to each heel. LPN #2 manually raised Resident #25 head of bed up, and pulled the sheets up to the Resident's chest and applied a cream to the Resident's shoulders. LPN #2 did not change gloves. On 10/12/23 at 1:25 PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand over the resident while assisting with meals to promote dignity for 1 (Resident #25) of 1 sampled resident who required assistance with meals; and the facility failed to ensure residents were not referred to as a feeder to promote dignity to residents who required assistance with meals. The findings are: Resident #25 at 12:31PM was sitting up in bed, and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9 was standing next to the bed and gave Resident #25 a drink of tea. At 12:36 PM and 12:34 PM, CNA #9 was standing next to Resident #25 while giving her a drink of tea from a glass using a straw. During interview CNA #9 said she usually sits in a rolling chair if they are a feeder. The Surveyor asked CNA #9 was asked, what is a feeder? CNA #9 stated, Residents that have to be fed. During interview on 10/13/23 10:02 AM, Licensed Practical #3 said a residen's dignity is maintained when assisting them with meal by talking with them and sitting eye level. On 10/13/23 at 10:35 AM, the Surveyor asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that a call light was within reach for one (Resident #4) of one sampled resident who requires a call light for assistance. The findings are: On 10/09/23 at 2:48 PM, Resident #4 was observed lying in bed with the call light in the chair next to the bed out of the resident's reach. In the adjacent bed the call light was hanging over the headboard of the bed, out of reach of the resident. Resident #4 was asked do you ever use the call light for assistance? He nodded his head up and down and looked at each side rail. On 10/09/23 at 2:51 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 confirmed Resident #4 ' s call light was on the chair and out of reach. On 10/12/23 at 1:00 PM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 confirmed Resident #4 had the ability to use his call light.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #2) of one sampled resident had completed an Advance Directive upon entry. The findings are: Review on 10/9/23 at 3:13 PM, of Resident #2's medical record revealed no information concerning an Advance Directive 10/13/23 at 2:05 P.M, the Administrator reported that Resident #2's Advance Directive could not be located and said the document might be located with the Resident's original admission record from 2013 in storage.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was removed in a timely manner to maintain dignity for 2 (Resident #25 and #42) of 2 sampled who required assistance for personal hygiene. The findings are: Review of Resident #25's care plan with a revision date of 8/14/23 showed Resident is totally dependent of 1 staff to provide a bath/shower. Review of the activities of daily living self-care performance bathing task showed Resident #25 was provided a bath/shower on 10/9/23, 10/5/23, and 10/2/23. On 10/10/23 at 8:54 AM, Resident #25 was observed lying in bed with facial hair/whiskers approximately 0.25 in to 0.5 inches in length on/under chin and on neck. On 10/10/23 at 2:49 PM Resident #25 was observed lying in bed with facial hair/whiskers approximately 0.25 inches to 0.5 inches in length on/under chin and neck. On 10/11/23 at 8:38 AM Resident #25 was observed lying in bed with facial hair/whiskers approximately 0.25 inches to 0.5 inches in length on/under chin and neck. During interview on 10/12/23 at 9:39 AM, Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that nebulizer masks were stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination of 1 of 1 (Resident #21) of 3 (Resident #21, #48, and #15) sampled residents. The findings are: Review of Resident #21's Order Summary Report showed a physician order dated 09/17/23 for a nebulizer treatment when necessary. The following observations were on 10/09/23 : a. Resident #21's oxygen tubing was extended out of a drawer of the bedside table. With the Resident's permission the drawer was opened, and a nebulizer mask was in the drawer. b. Resident #21's nebulizer mask was in the drawer and had what appeared to be oil and particles of debris inside the mask. During interview on 10/10/23 at 9:52 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 said the nebulizer mask should be cleaned and stored in a bag to prevent infection. Review on 10/13/23 at 8:48 PM of a facility document titled cleaning the nebulizer showed after cleaning place the nebulizer in a plastic bag at the bedside.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation an interview the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 2 sampled resident's (Resident #27 and #28) who receive a pureed diet. The findings are: During observation on 10/10/23 at 12:30 PM, Resident #28 was served pureed ham, turnip greens, sweet potatoes, and a bowl of pureed cake. Resident #27 received a tray containing the exact foods at 12:31 PM. Review of facility ' s pureed lunch menu for 10/10/23 showed baked ham, sweet potatoes, greens, cornbread, margarine spread, and plain white cake. During interview on 10/10/23 at 12:38 PM, the Dietary Manager confirmed the cornbread was not served to Resident #27 and #28.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-16 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the most recent state survey was posted and accessible for 48 of 48 residents. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 12:00 PM, the Surveyor observed the state survey book at the entrance of the building. The book was in a plastic file holder on the wall, located underneath a bulletin board connected to a chain with the 2021 state survey results inside. Also, a wooden bench on floor beneath the bulletin board was observed, which would prevent a resident in a wheelchair from being able to reach the book. On 10/10/2024 at 2:00 PM, during a Resident Council meeting, it was revealed that the residents present did not know where the state survey book was located. On 10/15/2024 at12:45 PM, during an interview the Administrator revealed that he was unsure if the state survey book was posted. The book was located, and the Administrator verified that inside the survey book was the 2021 state survey results. When asked if the most recent survey should be in the book, he responded that he would assume so.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information, including but not limited to: facility name, the current date, resident census, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: A) registered nurses, B) licensed practical nurses, C) certified nursing assistants. The findings include: A review of the facility Daily Staffing Log, dated 10/10/2024 for the day shift employees, listed 1 registered nurse, and 4 certified nursing assistants. A review of the facility Daily Staffing Log, dated 10/10/2024 for evening shift employees, listed 3 certified nursing assistants. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/11/2024 at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the Daily Staffing Log is how employee staffing is accounted for. The DON denied staffing information being located anywhere else. During an interview on 10/14/2024 at 11:27 AM, the Administrator stated that the staffing is kept at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$18,446 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $11,000 — penalty dated 2024-10-16
  • $7,446 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-14 for 1 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-11 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PYLE, RUBYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/09/2007
BRYANT, TWILLAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/09/2008
EMBRY, TRAVISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/08/2008
NORRIS, CLYDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/09/2008
SHINN, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/08/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045341. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next