The Blossoms at Breckenridge Rehab & Nursing Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 84.8 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 (Residents #3 and #5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and #5 were free from emotional and physical abuse. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to the residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, §483.12 (Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 12/30/2024 at 10:40 PM, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 made loud and aggressive statements while standing over Resident #5. At 10:45 PM, LPN # 3 was seen going into Resident #5's room and then coming out, wheeling Resident #5 out of the room in a wheelchair with a blood-soaked towel held to the resident ' s face. LPN #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment was maintained for three (Resident #1, Resident # 37 and Resident #16) of three residents reviewed.The findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 06/30/2021 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, shortness of breath, and abnormal results of liver function studies. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Safety Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 02/16/2026, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was independent of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) but frequently displayed delusions and needed guidance in safe decision making. Review of Resident #1's Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was at risk for elopement was adequately supervised in order to prevent the resident eloping from the secure unit for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The failed practice resulted in past noncompliance at the level of harm, which had the likelihood of causing more than minimal harm to Resident #2, who resided on the secure unit. The Administrator was notified of the past harm situation on 09/12/2025 at 3:50 PM. The findings include: A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/15/2025, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #2 had active diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, and Parkinsonism. A review of Resident #2's Care Plan, with an initiation date of 02/12/2025, had interventions related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to report an alleged violation involving abuse to the proper state agency within the allotted time frame for 1 (Resident #3) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse allegations. The findings are: Review of a facility policy titled Prevention and Prohibition of Abuse indicated The facility administrator or designee shall complete a report to be made to the mandated state agency and may also be made to the local law enforcement agency after corporate approval or immediately if the abuse constitutes an emergency. Administrator or designee will have 5 working days from the initial report of abuse to complete SIMS (Statewide Incident Management System) report. Immediately means as soon as possible, in the absence of a shorter State time frame requirement, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (Resident #5) of one resident reviewed for care plans, specifically that a resident ' s post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis was addressed in the resident ' s care plan. The findings are: Resident #5 had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, nightmare disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. A review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/04/2024, revealed the resident received a score of 1 (severely impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The resident required moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The resident required substantial assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. A review of Resident # 5's care plan, initiated on 02/13/2023, revealed the resident had an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the dry storage areas were covered, sealed and dated; 1 of 2 ice machines were maintained in clean and sanitary condition; the kitchen light fixtures were covered; ceiling tiles and door frames were maintained in good repair and were free of chips, stains and rust; baseboards were secured and were maintained in clean sanitary conditions, and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 11/19/24 at 2:34 PM, the following observations were made in the kitchen: a. An opened box of salt was on the food counter. The box was not covered. b. An opened box of mashed potatoes was on the counter. The box was not fully covered. c. An opened bag of grits was in a basket on the counter. The bag had no opened date on it. 2. On 11/19/24 at 2:38 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #2 pushed a cart toward the counter that contained bowls to be used in portioning dessert to be served to the residents for supper. He picked up gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included pertinent information to assure the necessary care and resources were allocated to meet the needs of the residents in 1 of 1 facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The total census was 81 residents. The findings are: The Facility Assessment 2024, dated as completed 05/15/2024, was reviewed and did not contain the following required information: -The involvement of the medical director, director of nursing and direct care staff (these signatures were missing on the review page dated 08/22/2024). -Staffing plan which addressed staffing needs for each resident unit and each shift. -The facilities resources including all personnel (management, direct care staff and volunteers) which included employees and contracted employees along with their education and competencies. On 11/21/2024 at 1:26 PM, the Administrator was interviewed and stated this was the first facility assessment she had completed. She stated a member of the governing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a bottle of acid reducer liquid medication was properly stored in the refrigerator, per the pharmacy instructions on the bottle, for 1 (Resident #33) of 1 sampled resident whose medication was in the 100-hall medication cart. The findings are: On 11/19/2024 at 3:18 PM, this surveyor reviewed the contents inside the 100-hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) #1. A drawer on the right side of the 100-hall medication cart contained a bottle of acid reducer 2 milligrams per milliliter (mg/ml) liquid for Resident #33 with instructions to give 10 ml (20 mg) by percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (PEG) (a tube inserted through a surgical opening in the abdominal wall leading into the stomach). The bottle of acid reducer had a blue sticker which indicated to refrigerate the medication and contained approximately 210 ml to 240 ml of liquid. The bottle was not cold and did not have any condensation on the outside. Resident #33's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned, written menu to ensure that nutritionally balanced meals were provided for the residents for 1of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 11/19/2024, the menu for the supper meal revealed residents on pureed diets were to receive two #8 scoops (1 cup) of pureed chili. a. On 11/19/24 at 5:13 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #2 used a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) to serve a single portion of pureed chili to all the residents on pureed diets, instead of 2 #8 scoop s (1 cup). b. On 11/19/24 at 5:40 PM, DC #2 was asked, during an interview, what scoop size he had used when serving pureed chili to the residents who required pureed diets. DC #2 stated he used the gray scoop (#8), which was equivalent to 1/2 cup, to give a single serving of pureed chili to each resident. When asked if he had looked at the menu. DC #2 confirmed he had not.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to convey funds within 30 days and send conveyed funds to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for 7 ( Residents #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11) of 7 case mix residents reviewed for personal funds. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. A review of the resident #5'spersonal funds account managed by the facility revealed on [DATE] at 10:27 AM the resident's personal fund had a balance of $6,124.80. Resident #5 is receiving a social security check each month which is deposited into the resident trust fund even thought Resident #5 expired on [DATE]. 2. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. A review of the resident #6's personal funds account managed by the facility revealed on [DATE] at 12:25 PM that the residents' personal fund has a balance of $1,425.87. Resident #5 expired 14 months ago. 3. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the freezer was covered or sealed to prevent potential contamination or freezer burn; 1 of 2 ice machines was maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential contamination of resident beverages; the kitchen wall and door frames were maintained in good repair and were free of chips, paint peeling, stains and rust; baseboards were secured and were maintained in clean sanitary conditions; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 86 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen, (total census of (88), as identified on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 12/15/2023 at 12:01 PM. The findings are. 1. On 12/11/23 at 9:30 AM, the counters in the kitchen had crumbs on them. The floors were dirty and had crumbs on them. The food cart had standing water in it and the outside of it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,654 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,269 — penalty dated 2025-09-12
• $19,385 — penalty dated 2024-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR