Woodruff County Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 84.2 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.18 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free from avoidable accident hazards, and that adequate supervision was provided during transfers for one (Resident #107) of eight residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. Specifically, the facility did not ensure staff followed safe transfer procedures using a mechanical lift, which resulted in injury to the resident. The findings include: A review of Resident #107's Face Sheet revealed Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a fracture of the right femur leg bone, a disease caused from narrowing blood vessels reducing the blood flow to the legs and feet, and dementia. A review of Resident #107's Care Plan, revised 04/28/2025, revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living and was to be transferred using a mechanical lift with two-person assistance. The Closet Care Plan also contained the same intervention. A review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices in accordance with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) requirements for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for infection control, and one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for trach care. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that staff put on appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to residents on EBP. The findings include: Resident #1 A review of an admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident #1 on 05/11/2024, with diagnoses which included impaired brain function caused by metabolic disturbances, end stage kidney disease, and an encounter for attention to a feeding tube placed in the stomach. A review of Resident #1's Care Plan, revised 08/15/2025, revealed Resident #1 was on EBP. The Care Plan included interventions with a start date of 05/23/2024, to require PPE [gown, gloves, etc.] and, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call light was kept within reach for 01 (Resident #23) of 01 sample mix residents. The findings are: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5 Day with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/20/2024 revealed resident #23 had a history of falls. Care Plan for resident #23 dated 09/07/2022 revealed the resident is blind and a risk for safety, and call light at residents' side at all times. The care plan for resident #23 also confirmed the resident's history of falls with fracture. On 05/28/24 at 12:06 PM, the Surveyor interviewed Resident #23. Resident #23 confirmed the call light should be attached on his/her chair. On 05/29/24 at 2:08 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #23 in a wheelchair, with the call light hooked to the bed with a bedside table in between the resident and the bed. On 05/30/24 at 950 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #23 in the resident's room without the call light in reach. It was tethered to the bed, and Resident #23 was across the room near the heat/air unit/window. Resident #23 was going to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #85). The findings are: A review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #85 had a diagnosis of dementia. A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/15/2024 revealed Resident #85 scored a 4 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #85 required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) due to dementia, confusion, and behaviors. On 05/28/2024 at 12:33 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #85 was eating a snack and licking chocolate off of the left index left finger, and both hands had long, thick, yellowing, chipped nails with a dark brown substance under them. The Surveyor asked Resident #85 if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure toenails were kept clean and trimmed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #74). The findings are: A review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #74 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, gout, and peripheral venous insufficiency. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2024 revealed Resident #74 scored a 9 (8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the Physicians Orders revealed an order for Podiatry Consults as Needed. A review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #74 had required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) due to vascular dementia, gout in multiple sites, and osteoporosis. A review of a Foot Observation completed on 05/24/2024 revealed, that Does have thick or ingrown toenails? Yes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that a chemical wasn't left out within the reach of the residents on the 500 Hall. The findings are: A review of the label Micro-Kill One Germicidal Alcohol wipes, stated, Keep Out of Reach of Children Caution. On 05/30/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Surveyor observed on the second shelf of the linen cart a purple top container of Micro-Kill One Germicidal Alcohol Wipes. The Surveyor observed residents and staff members going up and down the hallway, the second shelf was observed to be at waist level of the Surveyor. On 05/30/2024 at 9:30 AM, the Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 if chemicals should be stored on the covered linen cart. CNA #3 stated, No, it should not be stored on here. The Surveyor asked what could happen with chemicals stored on the linen cart. CNA #3 said the residents could get hold of it and mess with it. CNA #3 further said it wouldn't be good, it has alcohol on it and says to keep out of reach of children. On 05/30/2024 at 1:43 PM, the Surveyor asked Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed food was processed to the correct consistency to meet the needs of 4 sampled residents who had a physician's order for a pureed diet. The findings are: On 05/29/2024 at 10:30 AM, Dietary Aide #11 (DA) was observed to place two buttermilk pies into the bowl of the food processor. DA #11 added a large amount of milk into the bowl without measuring. Pie was blended. Upon lifting the lid, DA #11 verbalized the belief that the mixture was too thin. Before DA #11 achieved what was believed to be the correct consistency she had added 2 more whole pies. When asked what consistency she was attempting to achieve she described the mixture as pudding. On 05/29/2024 at 10:42 AM, eleven servings of baked beans were placed into the bowl for processing. The beans were observed to contain a large amount of liquid. After blending for a short time, DA #11 picked up a can of non-stick spray, coated a steam table pan and poured the liquified beans into the pan. On 05/29/2024 at 10:50 AM, DA #11 placed 11 scoops of boiled chicken and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #48) of 1 sample mix resident. The findings are: On 05/28/2024 at 11:06 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #48 sitting up in a specialized chair with a fall alarm attached to the chair and running behind the pillow, behind the resident's head, and attached to the resident's shirt. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/19/2024 documented bed alarm, chair alarm not used. Resident #48's Order History did not reveal a physician's order for a chair alarm. On 05/30/2024 at 9:10 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and she confirmed Resident #48 uses a chair alarm to alert staff when the resident is leaning too far forward in the specialized chair. 05/30/2024 at 9:11 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 and she confirmed Resident #48 uses a chair alarm due to leaning forward in the specialized chair. On 05/30/2024 at 1:15 PM, the Surveyor interviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents individualized plan of care was revised to reflect the current needs of the resident and updated to include a chair alarm for 1 (Resident #48) of 1 sample mix resident. The findings are: On 05/28/2024 at 11:06 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #48 sitting up in a specialized chair with a fall alarm attached to chair and running behind the pillow behind the resident's head attaching to shirt. A review of Resident #48's Care Plan dated 07/31/2023 did not reveal the resident was care planned for a chair alarm. A review of Resident #48's Order History did not reveal an order for a chair alarm. On 05/30/2024 at 09:10 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and she confirmed Resident #48 uses a chair alarm to alert staff when the resident is leaning too far forward in the specialized chair. CNA #1 confirmed the resident was not care planned for a chair alarm. 05/30/2024 09:11 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 and she confirmed Resident #48 uses a chair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a catheter was hanging below the bladder for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #81). The findings are: A review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #81 had diagnoses of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic kidney disease, retention of urine, obstructive and reflex uropathy, and acute kidney failure. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/03/2024 revealed Resident #81 had short term memory problems and long term memory problems on a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS). A review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #81 required an indwelling urinary catheter. Approach: position bag below the bladder. On 05/28/2024 at 12:25 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #81 sitting in the dining room with the catheter bag observed hanging above the bladder on the back of the geriatric chair. The Surveyor observed the tubing come out of the right pant leg, with the tubing running over the arm rest of the geriatric chair. On 05/30/2024 at 10:10 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an open drink was not left within the reach of the residents on the 500 Hall. The findings are: On 05/30/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Surveyor observed a covered linen cart on the 500 Hall. On the top shelf was an open drink in an aluminum can. The Surveyor observed residents and staff going up and down the hall passing by the linen cart. On 05/30/2024 at 9:30 AM, the Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 if an opened drink container should be on the covered linen cart. CNA #3 said it should not be on there, a resident could get hold of it, and that won't be good. The Surveyor observed CNA #3 picking up the opened container to move it and was asked how much was left inside it. CNA #3 said it was about half full. On 05/30/2024 at 1:45 PM, the Surveyor asked the Infection Preventionist if an open drink container should be left on the covered linen cart. The Infection Preventionist said no, that is an infection risk to the residents. A facility policy titled, Policies and Practices-Infection Control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR