Monette Manor, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 81.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control before taking the position. The failed practice had the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facilities Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) states the facility must designate one or more individuals who are responsible for the facility IPCP who have the specialized training in infection prevention and control. During an interview on 04/22/2026 at 12:39 PM the Director of Nurses (DON) indicated she had not completed specialized training beyond her initial professional training as a nurse, nor received a completion certificate for infection prevention and control. The DON stated I have not completed a full module of the necessary training as of yet for the Infection Preventionist.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that included an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) ) this failed practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The findings include: Review of an undated facility Antibiotic Stewardship Manual revealed that the Infection Preventionist (IP) will track antibiotic use and monitor adherence to evidence-based criteria and compile reports related to monitoring antibiotic usage and resistance data. Review of a facility Antibiotic Stewardship Tracking and Trending document revealed no documentation for the months of March and April of 2026. Last documentation for tracking/trending was February. Documentation in February showed antibiotic use, with a resident's name, s/s were documented, but the tracking/trending of the different halls for the month of February were not completed. During an interview on 04/22/2026 at 12:36 PM, the Director of Nursing indicated they were responsible for the Antibiotic Stewardship Tracking and Trending as the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for one (Resident #36) of five residents reviewed that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, needs that were identified in the Comprehensive Assessment Specifically, Resident #36's Care Plan did not address or focus on an active diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, nor include interventions to guide staff in monitoring for complications. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #36 on 12/29/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes with elevated blood sugars, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's, high blood pressure, cognitive communication deficits, depression, insomnia and anxiety. Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/05/2026, revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that antibiotic medications were administered promptly and as ordered, and that the accuracy of orders entered into a resident's electronic health record was verified for one (Resident #76) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure ordered antibiotics were not left in the medication room's overflow box for seven days prior to initiating administration, and to ensure the duration of the antibiotics were entered as ordered. The findings include: Review of Resident #76's Medical Diagnosis report revealed, the facility admitted Resident #76 with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [damage to the airways causing inflammation and other problems that block airflow and make it hard to breath]; urinary tract infection (UTI) [infection in any part of the urinary system]. Review of an Order Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #83) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the person-centered care plan interventions for Resident #83, resulting in an accident. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #83 on 08/15/2025 with diagnoses that included brain cancer, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gate and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, infection following a procedure at surgical cite, repeated falls, syncope and collapse, and fracture to left femur. Review of a discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/25/2025, revealed Resident #83 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates and with appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for one (Resident #36) of three residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed that the facility admitted Resident #36 on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes with elevated blood sugars, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's, high blood pressure, and cognitive communication deficits. Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE], revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was independent for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident #36 used a wheelchair for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that facility staff failed to wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing direct care to a resident that had an indwelling catheter in place and was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for Infection Control. The findings include: Review of Resident #11's Medical Diagnosis revealed the facility admitted Resident #11 with diagnosis that included Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) [bacteria in urinary tract] Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/26/2026, revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's Care Plan initiated on 04/17/2026, revealed Resident #11 had EBP in place due to indwelling catheter. Care Plan interventions included appropriate PPE to be worn by staff. Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident #11 had an order for EBP in place related to indwelling catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, facility document review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were placed in a person-centered care plan following falls for five (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #9) of seven residents reviewed for fall interventions in a person-centered care plan. The findings include: Resident #4: A review of Resident #4's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 02/13/2024 with diagnoses which included a nondisplaced fracture of coracoid process, right shoulder (broken part of the shoulder blade), multiple rib fractures to the right side, and a wedge compression fracture of the T7-T8 vertebra (fracture to the middle of the spine). A review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/26/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #4's MDS also revealed the resident required partial/moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report 3 of 3 incidents of resident-to-resident abuse reviewed, failed to report an unwitnessed fall with serious injury, and failed to complete a thorough investigation of the incidents. The findings are: 1. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident # 46 with diagnosis Dementia, Severe with other Behavioral disturbance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date 6/27/2024 revealed Resident # 46 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 (0-7 suggest severe cognitive impairment). In Section E0200. Behavioral Symptoms revealed Physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and B. Verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others. A review of nursing Health Status Note dated 8/16/2024 at 8:04 revealed Resident was aggressive and combative toward another resident. Resident being sent to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility document review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required time frame of 14 days to provide accurate and up-to-date information for quality measures for 6 (Residents #1, #2, #26, #34, #41, and #44) sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The findings are: On 09/26/2024 the following observations were made in resident health records: Resident #1 had an admission assessment with an ARD of 11/08/2023 exported but not accepted. Resident #2 had a Significant Change assessment with an ARD 1/28/2024 that was export ready. Resident #26 had an admission assessment with an ARD 11/5/2023 that was exported but not accepted. Resident #34 had an admission assessment with an ARD 11/13/2024 that was exported but not accepted. Resident #41 had an admission assessment with an ARD 3/12/2024 that was exported but not accepted. Resident #44 had an admission assessment with an ARD of 2/07/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,309 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

• $4,178 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $3,798 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $9,116 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $2,279 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $1,764 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in AR