Murfreesboro Rehab And Nursing, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 34.2 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-05-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from exploitation and failed to ensure resident funds were protected from misappropriation for four (Resident #5, #8, #9, and #10) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds.It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to CFR S483.12(Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of K. The IJ began on 07/30/2025, when facility staff opened and deposited a check belonging to Resident #5 into a bank account belonging to the facility without the resident's knowledge or permission, and utilized the funds belonging to Resident #5 for facility purposes. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of IJ on 05/06/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility administration failed to effectively and efficiently manage its resources to ensure all residents who resided in the facility attained and maintained their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Review of a facility document titled, Application for Employment, dated 09/25/2000, indicated the Administrator had experience that included office manager in a nursing facility in Arkansas, was a certified nursing assistant (CNA) in an at home nursing agency, had experience billing Medicaid, filing Medicaid paperwork, handling accounts payable, and doing timecards. The Applicant's Statement certified the responses were true and complete and was signed by the Administrator. Review of a facility document titled Administrator Job Description, with a date of hire 04/01/2006, indicated the purpose of the Administrator was to direct the day-today functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a governing body in place for oversite of the Administrator and operations of the facility, affecting all residents residing within. The findings include: Review of a document titled, Assignment of contract to participate in the Arkansas Medical Assistance Program Administered by the Division of Medical Services Title XIX (Medicaid), dated 08/01/2010, indicated the buyer was [the facility] and was signed by the Administrator, whose titled was listed as, Owner/Administrator. Review of a document titled, Contract to Participate in the Arkansas Nursing Home Program, with a signed date of 07/13/2010, indicated, To comply with all state and/or Federal regulations pertaining to resident personal funds. Review of a document titled, Health Insurance Benefit Agreement, dated 07/29/2010, indicated [the facility] agreed to conform to the provisions of section 1866 of the Social Security Act and applicable provisions in 42 CFR. The document was signed by the Administrator as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to act as a fiduciary (Person or organization legally obligated to manage someone else's property or money) of resident funds by safeguarding and managing Medicaid resident funds for five (Resident #5, #8, #9, #10, and #13) of five residents reviewed. The findings include: A review of Clinical Resident Profile, indicated the facility admitted Resident #5 to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal with pain, weakness in the legs, incomplete spinal cord injury at the 7th cervical vertebrae, and adjustment disorder. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #5's Care Plan Report, initiated on [DATE], revealed the resident was independent for meeting emotional, intellectual, physician and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to provide a complete and separate accounting of each resident's personal funds according to accounting principles, to ensure there was no comingling of resident funds with facility funds or that of other residents, affecting 4 (Resident #5, #8, #9, and #10) of 13 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The findings include: During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 3:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #3 revealed there was a lock box in the medication room containing envelopes of resident owned bingo money and money families can leave with nursing staff for their resident. During an interview on 05/06/2026 at 6:20 AM, LPN #1 stated that envelopes containing resident funds were locked in a metal box in the medication room and contained the $40.00 given to residents monthly, and bingo winnings. LPN #1 revealed a total was documented on the outside of the envelope documenting money being deposited or removed from a resident's envelope. LPN #1 said, if family or staff took money out to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately and thoroughly investigate allegations of misappropriation of resident property for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #6) of 13 residents reviewed for exploitation and misappropriation. The findings include: Review of facility job descriptions for the Administrator, signed 04/01/2026 and the DON, unsigned, indicated that both jobs required reporting and investigating of all allegations of abuse and misappropriation. Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's, Medical Diagnosis Report, included diagnoses of spinal stenosis, insomnia, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 6/13/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 05/01/2026 at 11:55 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #3 reported that Resident #5 had disclosed waiting nearly a year for a Social Security Disability [SSD] payment and learned approximately six to eight weeks earlier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not subjected to abuse or misappropriation of their property and failed to ensure the right for privacy for 1 (Resident #5) of 13 residents reviewed for misappropriation. Specifically, Resident #5's mail was opened, and a check for $56,481.00 was deposited into a facility checking account without the resident's knowledge or consent. The findings include: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's Medical Diagnosis Report, revealed medical diagnoses which included spinal stenosis (narrowing of that causes nerve pain, numbness and weakness of the legs and buttocks), insomnia, and depression. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] 03/18/2026 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 05/01/2026 at 11:55 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #3 reported that the Administrator had taken $56,000.00 from Resident #5 and had paid back $1000.00. Resident #5 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident #5) of 13 residents reviewed for misappropriation. Specifically, the facility did not initiate a reportable for exploitation and misappropriation resulting in noncompliance. The findings include: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's, Medical Diagnosis Report included diagnoses of spinal stenosis (narrowing that causes nerve pain, numbness and weakness of the legs and buttocks), insomnia, and depression. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] 3/18/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan Report, initiated on 06/13/2025 , revealed the resident was independent for meeting their own emotional, intellectual, physician, and social needs. Interventions included notifying resident of preferred activities, conversing with the resident to degree of intellectual functioning, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure written notification was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative of transfer/discharge to the hospital and included all the required information for five (Resident #2, #5, #28, #32, and #36) of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations.The findings include:Resident #2Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/03/2025, indicated Resident #2 had diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline unrelated to Alzheimer's disease), urinary tract infection and diabetes mellitus. The MDS also revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, which indicated Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment.Review of a Hospital Record dated 10/02/2025, indicated Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 10/05/2025 with diagnosis of urinary tract infection.Review of a Hospital Discharge Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to act in good faith as a fiduciary of the resident funds for two (Resident #2 and Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for resident trust fund interest payments. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Trust Fund, effective 2017 indicated, The facility will maintain resident trust accounts for residents who request the facility to manage their personal funds. The facility will act as a fiduciary and shall manage the funds responsibly, ethically, and in compliance with all relevant legal and regulatory requirements. Interest bearing accounts will be used for residents and interest will be credited to their accounts accordingly. The Administrator was to oversee compliance. A review of the resident funds bank statement from 06/01/2024 to 08/3/2025 indicated the interest rate for the resident trust fund pooled account was 0.02%, paid monthly on the account balance. Resident #2 A review of Resident #2's, Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize a generally acceptable accounting system for the resident trust fund to ensure no commingling of the residents' trust fund money with the facility's operational and payroll accounts, and to issue quarterly statements for six (Resident #2, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9) of six residents reviewed for resident trust fund accounting practices. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Trust Fund, effective 2017 indicated, The facility will maintain resident trust accounts for residents who request the facility to manage their personal funds. The facility will act as a fiduciary and shall manage the funds responsibly, ethically, and in compliance with all relevant legal and regulatory requirements. Monthly statements will be provided and the facility shall ensure accurate tracking of all deposits, withdrawals, and balances. The Administrator was to oversee compliance. Resident #2 A review of Resident #2's,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in AR