Harris Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 63.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure exit doors were secured and functioned properly to prevent elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 (Quality of Care) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 03/23/2025 at 3:01 am, when Resident #1 was able to exit the facility without staff knowledge. The Administrator was informed of the IJ on 05/13/2025 at 3:58 pm, and notified it was considered to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The findings include: Per review of an Office of Long Term Care (OLTC) Incident and Accident (I&A) form with a submitted date of 3/23/2025, a facility video was reviewed and revealed a nurse came back in from her break. Resident #1 was sitting at a table in the dining area. The nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, facility document review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident rights were maintained for one (Resident #71) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: A review of Resident #71’s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 05/28/2025, with diagnoses which included late onset Alzheimer’s disease. A review of Resident #71’s admission Minimum Data Set, with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/06/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, which indicated Resident #71 had moderately impaired cognition. A review of Resident #71’s Care Plan, revised 06/09/2025, revealed the resident was resistant to care such as showering and bathing. Further review of Resident #71’s Care Plan revealed interventions that directed staff to try different approaches such as another staff member attempting care, postponing care, attempting again at a later time, and/or notifying the nurse of the situation. A review of Resident #71’s Progress Note, revealed on 06/01/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident ' s fingernails were kept clean for 1 (Residents #45) of 1 sample mix residents; and ensured residents were shaved to promote good personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #24) of 2 sample mix resident; ensure residents have oral care provided for 1 (Resident #45) of 2 sample mix residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #45's care plan dated 03/30/2023 documented, .ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) resident has left sided hemiplegia r/t (related to) hx (history) of stroke .Personal hygiene/oral care: The resident requires dependent assist x 1 for personal hygiene/oral care .Bathing/ showering: Check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Report any changes to the nurse. a. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/05/2024 documented a score of 10 (indicating moderately cognitively impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), and that Resident #45 is dependent for oral care and is substantial/ maximal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activity program was designed to meet the individual activity needs, interests and abilities for Residents who reside on the 600 Hall secure unit, and to ensure that activities were provided on the weekend for all 57 residents in the facility. The findings are: 1. On 04/15/2024 at 02:25 PM, there were no activities being provided on the secure unit, 600 Hall, nor was there an activity calendar posted anywhere on the unit. a. On 04/16/2024 at 10:49 AM, there were no activities being provided on the secure unit. b. On 04/16/2024 at 02:44 PM, there were no activities being provided on the secure unit. c. On 04/17/2024 at 10:55 AM, there were no activities being provided on the secure unit. d. On 04/16/2024 at 02:50 PM, the Activity Director (AD) was asked, Do you provide activities in the secure unit? The AD stated, Yes, I do one on one with them The AD was asked, What do you with them? AD confirmed, I walk the hall with them. The AD was asked, Do you have a calendar in the secure unit? The AD stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there was a Certified Activity Director. The findings are: 1. On 04/16/2024 at 03:05 PM, the Surveyor asked the Administrator to provide the Certification for the Activity Director. The Administrator reported the employee currently serving in the role as Activity Director did not hold a certification. The Surveyor asked the Administrator how long this employee had been in charge of activities. The Administrator reported that she had been in charge of activities for 2 years. 2. On 04/17/2024 at 01:30 PM, the Activity Director reported that she was unaware that she needed a certification to fulfill the role of Activity Director and that the Administrator had told her that there was a possibility of her attending a certification class in June 2024. 3. On 04/17/2024 at 03:40 PM, the Surveyor reviewed the Activities Director personnel file and confirmed there was no evidence of any training in activities and related record keeping. 4. On 04/18/2024 at 09:22 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand rolls were applied to prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM) for 01 Resident #45 of 01 sample mix residents. The findings are: Resident #45's care plan dated 03/30/2023 showed no documentation of a contracture, it documented, .limited physical mobility (weakness) r/t hemiplegia affecting left side. he has weakness to left hand, 4th and 5th digit . A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) documented a score of 10 (indicates moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and that the resident has an upper extremity impairment on one side. On 04/15/2024 at 11:40 AM, Resident #45 ' s left hand appeared to be contracted with no device present to prevent injury or decline in ROM. On 04/16/2024 at 09:33 AM, Resident #45's left hand appeared to be contracted with no device present to prevent injury or decline in ROM. Resident #45 confirmed staff do not put a device in his/her hand. On 04/16/2024 at 03:01 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified when residents were transferred to the hospital. This had the potential to affect 57 residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on [DATE], then returned to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 1 was transferred out again on 09/10/2024 and returned on 09/12/2024. 2. On 04/16/2024 at 11:40 AM, the Surveyor was unable to locate documentation indicating the Ombudsman had been notified of the resident ' s transfers to the hospital. 3. On 04/16/2024 at 11:39 AM, the Administrator was asked to provide documentation indicating the Ombudsman had been notified of transfers to the hospital. 4. On 04/17/2024 at 01:40 PM, the Administrator and Business Office Consultant stated that the Ombudsman had not been notified of the transfers. 4. On 04/18/2024 at 08:57 AM, the Administrator stated, We have no policy on transfers because it's a state not a federal.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents individualize plan of care was revised to reflect the current needs of the resident and updated to include contractures for 01 (Resident #45) sample mix resident of 01 sample mix resident. The findings are: Facility policy titled, 'Comprehensive Assessments' Revised October 2023 documented, Comprehensive MDS assessments are conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans. Policy interpretation and Implementation 1. The facility conducts comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessments of each resident's functional capacity using the Resident Assessment Instrument specified by CMS . 8. A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease- related clinical interventions. The decline is not considered self-limiting . c. requires interdisciplinary review and/ or revision of the care plan . A review of Resident #45's care plan dated 03/30/2023 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residual was checked per physicians' orders from a Gastrostomy tube prior to medication administration for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Dysphagia following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. 2. On 04/17/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was observed administering medications by tube feeding. LPN #1 failed to aspirate for residual contents per physician ' s orders. 3. A Physicians order dated 03/25/2021 documented every shift for Gastrostomy Tube Placement [Enteral] Verify placement via aspirate (removing gastric contents via the gastrostomy tube) & auscultation (instilling air into the feeding tube with a syringe while using a stethoscope placed over the stomach to listen for rushing air) before medication administration/feeding/flushes. If more than 150 ml (milliliter), wait 1 hour and recheck. 4. A Care Plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures, including handwashing, avoidance of cross contamination, and proper disposal of soiled dressings were implemented during a dressing change to prevent potential infection for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 who had orders for dressing changes. The findings are: 1. On 04/15/2024 at 11:02 AM, During initial rounds, the Surveyor observed Resident #1's left lower leg was wrapped in a bandage. Resident #1 stated Its broken out on it and swelling. 2. On 04/16/2024 at 08:39 AM, Resident #1's left lower leg was wrapped in a bandage. Resident #1 stated, I'll get it changed today in the shower room. The Surveyor was unable to see the date. 3. On 04/16/2024 at 09:56 AM, Resident #1 was entering the shower room for a shower. Resident #1's left lower leg was wrapped in an ace bandage with exposed with yellow and red drainage on it. The Treatment Nurse entered the shower room to wrap Resident #1's leg with plastic to prevent the bandage from getting wet and the resident told the Treatment Nurse that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review (there is a policy) the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered, sealed, and dated, and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 60 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 62), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 2/22/23. The findings are: 1. On 02/20/23 at 10:54 AM., Dietary Employee (DE) #1 picked up the water hose with his bare hands and sprayed off the leftover food items from the blender bowl and blade, contaminating his hands. He placed them in a dish rack and pushed it into the dish washing machine to be washed. After the dishes stopped washing, he moved to the clean side and without washing his hands, picked up the clean blade from the dish rack and attached it to the base of the blender to be used in pureeing food items to be served to the residents on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $728K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR