Greene Acres Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 18.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough self-assessment of the facility staffing required for day/evening/night coverage, the competencies and training of the staff, formulate a plan for staff recruitment and retention, conduct community-based risk analysis identifying the potential natural disasters, to meet the needs of the residents when completing their facility assessment. The findings include: A review of the undated Facility Assessment revealed on 01/05/2026, a spreadsheet with Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident information, which contained admission and discharge data, resident identified diagnoses, resident activities of daily living assistance level, and medication and the services required to treat those diagnoses. Below each section were instructions on how to apply the data when the facility developed their Facility Assessment. The Facility Assessment did not address: staffing needs required to care for the residents on a day-to-day basis including; day/evening/nights and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that food was labelled correctly, and hand hygiene was performed in the kitchen to prevent cross contamination. The findings are: On 07/15/2024 at 10:45 AM, during an observation of the walk-in refrigerator, the surveyor noted two cardboard boxes containing a full sheet of strawberry shortcake to be used for lunch the following day, neither were labeled with a date. The Dietary Manager confirmed the findings. On 07/15/2024 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor observed 5 full bags of lettuce, and 1/4 of a bag of lettuce with no date, the lettuce in the open bag was turning brown with liquid at the bottom. The Dietary Manager confirmed the findings and stated that they were throwing away the open bag as it looked old. On 07/15/2024 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor observed a full container of cream cheese not sealed on the top left shelf of the refrigerator, with a received date of 06/26/2024. The Dietary Manager confirmed that it was not sealed. On 07/15/2024 at 10:52 AM, during observation in the dry storage area was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to promote safety while smoking for one (Resident #78) of one sampled resident. Findings include: 1. Review of the Diagnosis Report revealed Resident #78 had diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and major depressive disorder. 2. Review of the 5 day Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/22/2024 noted Resident #78 scored 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the resident was cognitively intact. 3. Review of the Smoking Assessment dated 07/10/2024 indicated Resident #78 was safe to smoke without supervision but does require smoke apron. 4. Review of Resident #78's Care Plan initiated 07/09/2024 stated, .The resident can smoke UNSUPERVISED.The resident requires a smoking apron while smoking .The resident's smoking supplies are stored in the med [medication] room. NO LONGER SAFE TO KEEP CIGARETTES WITH [resident] . 4. On 07/15/2024 at 2:56 PM, Resident #78 was observed in the smoking room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene before applying and taking off gloves, before, during and after perineal care for 1 (Resident #63) sampled resident observed during incontinent care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure dirty wipes were not placed on clean wipes to prevent cross contamination during incontinent care for Resident #63. The findings are: On 07/15/2024 at 1:14 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 and CNA #5 were observed assisting Resident #63 from a wheelchair with a lift into the resident's bed. After getting the resident into bed, the CNAs proceeded to perform incontinent care on Resident #63 without performing hand hygiene before putting on gloves. The CNAs rolled Resident #63 onto the resident's left side, then CNA #4 performed incontinent care on the resident by handing a soiled perineal wipe across the resident to CNA #5 to dispose of in a trash bag placed on the resident's nightstand. CNA #5 put the soiled wipe in the trash bag,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accommodation of needs were met by not ensuring the call light was within reach for one (Resident #23) of one resident The findings are: Resident #23 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia as listed on the Medical Diagnosis sheet. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/18/2023 revealed the resident received a score of three on a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS), indicating Resident #23 was moderately cognitively impaired. a. On 07/15/2024 at 3:10 PM, Resident #23 was observed to be lying in bed. The call light was observed to be at the very top of the bed behind the curtain and out of reach of the resident. Registered Nurse (RN) #2 entered the room. The surveyor asked where the resident's call light should be located. RN #2 stated it should be next to the resident's hand so it would be within the resident's reach. b. On 07/16/2024 at 9:39 AM, Resident #23 was in bed. The call light was noted to be lying on the other bed and well out of reach of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was properly stored in a plastic bag or container when not in use to prevent potential cross contamination for 1 (Resident #20) of 3 (Residents #19, #20, and #67) sampled residents who had a Physician Orders for Oxygen (O2) and failed to ensure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) mask were stored in a plastic bag or container when not in use to prevent cross contamination for 2 (Residents # 15 and #41) of 3 (Residents #14, #20 and #41) sampled residents who had Physician Orders for CPAP/BiPAP therapy as documented on lists provided by the Administrator on 06/09/23 at 9:00 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #15 had diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Unspecified and Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. a. A Physicians Order with a start date of 11/17/22 documented, BI-PAP with basic settings turn on, attach O2 and place on resident, document use/refusals . b. A Physicians Order with a start date of 03/06/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2023-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility developed and implemented a comprehensive care plan for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) for 1 (Resident #41) of 21 (Residents #6, #10, #11, #15, #16, #19, #20, #26, #30, #41, #59, #67, #71, #73, #75, #77, #79, #83, #85, #86 and #138) sampled residents according to a list provided by the Administrator on 06/05/23 at 11:15 AM. The findings are: a. Resident #41 had diagnoses of COPD. b. A Physicians Order dated 04/12/23 documented, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure . every night shift for sleep apnea on at bedtime off in am. c. The Care Plan with an initiated date and revision date of 03/17/23 did not address COPD, respiratory therapy, or CPAP therapy. d. On 06/06/23 at 2:20 PM, the Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 the process for reviewing Care Plans, and if they had Closet Care Plans. CNA #3 said, We do not use Closet Care Plans. The Surveyor asked how Care Plan changes were implemented and passed on to staff.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2023-06-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician followed up on the Pharmacy Consultant recommendations to assess the correct diagnoses for 1 (Resident #67) of 3 (Residents #15, #67 and #73) sampled residents who were receiving antipsychotic medications according to a list provided by the Administrator on 06/09/23 at 9:00 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #67 diagnosis Metabolic Encephalopathy, Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified, Depression, Unspecified, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. a. A Medication Regimen Review (MMR) from 12/14/22 to 05/23/23 provided by the Administrator on 06/07/23 at 9:05 AM revealed that on 12/31/22, the Pharmacist recommended Risperidone 0.5mg (milligrams) three times daily be reduced to twice a day, and to clarify the diagnosis of Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances diagnosis. Anxiety is not a valid diagnosis. From 12/14/23-05/23/23 the pharmacist requested risperidone diagnosis clarification. b. On 06/07/23 at 2:14 PM, during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR