Immanuel Campus Of Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 228 beds and averages 172.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.92 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a non-prescribed medication overdose for one resident (#12). The deficient practice could result in an avoidable accidental overdose of residents. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #24: -Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included asthma, major depressive disorder, and opioid use with unspecified opioid induced disorder. A care plan-initiated [DATE] revealed no focus related to substance abuse or dependency. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated resident was cognitively intact. Review of a Nurse Practioner (NP) progress note dated [DATE] at 4:14 PM revealed that the resident reported recent methamphetamine abuse, and reported trying to refrain from use. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 1:29…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect the rights of 21 residents (#34, #183, 164, #104, #128, #156, #169, #144, #28, #184, #170, #77, #172, #182, #1, #47, #98, #196, #134, #142 and #86) to be free from abuse by another resident. The sample size was 77. The deficient practice could result in further abuse and resident(s) sustaining injury from resident to resident abuse. Findings include: Regarding residents #34 and #190 -Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, fracture of left radius, acute post hemorrhagic anemia, acute osteomyelitis left hand, psychosis, acquired absence of right upper limb below elbow, and open wound of right upper arm. The care plan dated March 29, 2023 included that the resident used anti-psychotic medication related to behavior Lewy bodies, violent behavior, psychosis, psychoactive substance abuse, stimulant abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the right to be free from physical abuse for two residents (Residents #170, #171). The deficient practice could lead to additional resident-to-resident altercations, creating an unsafe environment. Findings include:-Resident #170 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Borderline Personality Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Hereditary idiopathic nervous system, and degenerative disease of the nervous System.The care plan focus problem initiated on January 21, 2019, revealed that resident #170 has a behavior problem related to personality disorder like staff splitting, making false accusations toward staff, being verbally abusive toward staff, and using manipulation to get what she wants.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident has a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure one of thirty-three sampled residents (#36) was free from physical restraint related to bed rails. The universe was one hundred and seventy-eight. The deficient practice could cause a resident to suffer physical injury from entrapment or psychosocial harm related to restraint use. Findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also included that no form of restraints, including bed rails, and/or alarms were coded as in use. The MDS further indicated impairment on both sides for lower extremities, dependent for mobility, and is dependent for all self-care activities. The comprehensive care plan reviewed/revised on March…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan with interventions was developed, revised, and implemented related to safety and prevention for two of thirty-three sampled residents (#36 and #30) regarding use of bed rails, concave mattress and use of nicotine. The universe was one hundred and seventy-eight. The deficient practice could result in the resident's needs not being met. Findings include:Regarding resident #36-Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Morse Fall Scale dated November 11, 2025, completed post fall, revealed the resident was assessed as a high risk for falling with a score of 60.0. Further review of the assessment revealed the resident had a history of falls.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1The facility failed to protect resident right to make informed decisions and choices for one resident.Based on review of clinical and administrative records, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to protect one out of three resident's right (#20) to make informed decisions and choices. The deficient practice could lead to a vulnerable resident not understanding their legal rights.Findings include:Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, recurrent, anxiety disorder, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecifiedThe annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident has a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment.The care plan problem…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to protect the rights of one Resident (#6) out of the five sampled residents to be free from abuse by another resident (#10). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.The facility census was 168. Finding include--Regarding Resident #6 (Alleged Victim)Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, mood disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and speech disturbance.A care plan initiated on May 20, 2025, revealed that the Resident #6 had been screened for traumatic history and is positive for adult sexual abuse, child physical abuse, domestic violence, and other vehicular victimization. The intervention included Resident #6 will be encouraged to socialize with other residents that have a similar history as opportunity allows and staff members would seek to avoid re-traumatization by minimizing resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a closed record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, policy, and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative was notified of an injury for one resident (#222). The deficient practice could result in resident representatives not being informed of resident's injuries. Findings included:Resident #222 was re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Senile degeneration of brain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety.A review of the electronic health record progress notes dated from October 19, 2025 to October 24, 2025 revealed discoloration observed at multiple places on the resident's body, along with the Physician's orders for X-ray for the resident #222; however, the progress notes revealed no documentation that the family had been notified subsequent to the injury or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#16) to be free from abuse from another resident (#3). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically or emotionally harmed.Findings include:-Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, paraplegia, and obesity.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition.Review of the progress notes revealed a nurses' note, dated July 7, 2025 at 11:15AM, which revealed that Resident #16 was experiencing increased hallucinations, delusions, and false allegations towards staff and peers.Further review of the progress notes revealed a room change notice, dated July 7, 2025 at 1:57PM, which revealed that Resident #16 had his room moved to another hall. The reason listed was prevention.Review of the nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for documenting and reporting alleged violations involving abuse, in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The deficient practice resulted in an alleged violation concerning abuse (involving Resident #16 and Resident #3) not being investigated timely and reported within the mandatory two-hour timeframe to Adult Protective Services (APS) and the State Agency. This deficient practice could result in further allegations not being documented or reported in a timely manner, which could impact residents' quality of life and care.Findings include:Regarding Resident #16Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, paraplegia, and obesity.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse (involving Resident #16 and Resident #3) was reported to the State Agency and Adult Protective Services (APS) within the required timeframe of two hours. The deficient practice could cause a delay in response to potential abuse, putting residents at risk.Findings include:Regarding Resident #16Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, paraplegia, and obesity.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of the facility self-report investigation revealed that Resident #16 reported to his insurance case manager on July 7, 2025 that he was struck on the left side of his face by another resident. Resident #16 did not identify the resident at first, but later stated that it was Resident #3 who struck…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident #222 to be free from abuse by another resident #333. The deficient practice could result in further abuse.Findings include:-Resident #222 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness.An MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 04, which indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired.Progress note dated April 14, 2024 revealed that Resident #222 was observed sitting outside during a smoke break when Resident #333 stood up, turned around, hit Resident #222 in the face. Further, the progress note revealed that Resident #222 had been immediately separated from the location of the incident, and assessed for any pain and injuries. The progress note also revealed that mild redness was observed on Resident #222's face. The progress note also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,529 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-01-31
• $9,419 — penalty dated 2024-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ