Desert Haven Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one (#5) of three sampled residents to be free from abuse by another resident (#19). This failure resulted in Resident #5 sustaining facial trauma, including bilateral nasal bone fractures and a laceration to the left ear after being repeatedly struck by Resident #19. The deficient practice could result in further abuse of residents.Findings include:-Resident #5 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbance, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with agitation, essential (primary) hypertension, major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features, unsteadiness on feet, history of falling, weakness, brief psychotic disorder, and hearing loss.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #5 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed regarding blood glucose monitoring; and, failed to ensure a healthcare provider was notified of abnormal blood glucose reading for one of 3 sampled resident (#44). The deficient practice led to the resident being admitted to the intensive care unit of a hospital with hyperglycemia and treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis.Findings Include: Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, long term use of insulin, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis, and other sequelae of cerebral infarction.A care plan dated June 7, 2024, revealed Resident #44 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included: diabetic medication and fasting serum blood sugar as ordered by physician; to educate resident regarding medications and importance of compliance and have resident verbally state an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to one resident (#1) to prevent elopement. The deficient practice could result in injury or harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder, aphasia following cerebral infarction, mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition with behavioral disturbance, anoxic brain damage, vascular dementia, mild, with agitation, dysphagia, epilepsy, intractable without status epilepticus. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment was currently in progress for new admission to facility and had not been completed. The elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 14 indicating the resident was a high risk to wander. Review of the care plan dated August 21, 2024 revealed the resident has a history of eloping. Interventions included to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of two residents (#87, and #37) to be free from physical abuse from each other. The deficient practice could result in further abuse of residents and appropriate action not taken. Findings include: -Resident #87 (alleged victim, AV) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia, social pragmatic communication disorder, anxiety disorder, autistic disorder, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, generalized muscle weakness and other comorbid conditions. A behavioral care plan revised April 21, 2026 indicated that the resident #87 has a behavioral problem as evidenced by being intrusive to others, and verbally aggressive toward others. Interventions include discussing the behaviors with the resident and explaining and/or reinforce why behavior is unacceptable. Also included in the interventions is to approach calmly, divert…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one (#16) of three sampled residents to be free from physical abuse by another resident (#22). The deficient practice could result in further abuse of residents.Findings include:-Regarding Resident #16:Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, reduced mobility, weakness, homicidal ideations, personal history of traumatic brain injury, drug-induced subacute dyskinesia, and depression.The care plan for Resident #16 revealed a focus initiated on June 26, 2025, for a behavior problem related to physical aggression, hallucinations, and intrusive behaviors. Interventions included to protect the rights and safety of others, diverting attention, and removal of Resident #16 from situations and taking him to another location as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#78) was free from abuse by another resident (#89). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally harmed.Findings Include:-Regarding Resident #89:Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included mild neurocognitive disorder, major depressive disorder, iron deficiency anemia, adjustment disorder, chronic kidney disease, anemia, dysphagia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.A care plan focus initiated on May 29, 2024, revealed the resident having a behavior problem related to psychosis as evidenced by delusions, refusing care, being verbally aggressive/abusive, demanding, intrusive, wandering at times, and inappropriate sexual advances to females, with an intervention to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others.A care plan focus initiated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the abuse policy was implemented following an incident involving resident-to-resident abuse between two residents (#89 and #78). The deficient practice could result in continued abuse of residents and physical or emotional harm to residents. Findings Include:-Regarding Resident #89:Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included mild neurocognitive disorder, major depressive disorder, iron deficiency anemia, adjustment disorder, chronic kidney disease, anemia, dysphagia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.A care plan focus initiated on May 29, 2024, revealed the resident having a behavior problem related to psychosis as evidenced by delusions, refusing care, being verbally aggressive/abusive, demanding, intrusive, wandering at times, and inappropriate sexual advances to females, with an intervention to intervene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an incident involving resident-to-resident abuse between two residents (#89 and #78) was reported. The deficient practice could result in continued abuse and physical or emotional harm to residents.-Regarding Resident #89Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included mild neurocognitive disorder, major depressive disorder, iron deficiency anemia, adjustment disorder, chronic kidney disease, anemia, dysphagia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.A care plan focus initiated on May 29, 2024, revealed the resident having a behavior problem related to psychosis as evidenced by delusions, refusing care, being verbally aggressive/abusive, demanding, intrusive, wandering at times, and inappropriate sexual advances to females, with an intervention to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an incident involving resident-to-resident abuse between two residents (#89 and #78) was investigated. The deficient practice could result in continued abuse and physical or emotional harm to residents.Findings Include:-Regarding Resident #89:Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included mild neurocognitive disorder, major depressive disorder, iron deficiency anemia, adjustment disorder, chronic kidney disease, anemia, dysphagia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.A care plan focus initiated on May 29, 2024, revealed the resident having a behavior problem related to psychosis as evidenced by delusions, refusing care, being verbally aggressive/abusive, demanding, intrusive, wandering at times, and inappropriate sexual advances to females, with an intervention to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate regarding blood glucose monitoring for one resident (#44). The deficient practice could lead to incomplete and inaccurate medical record.-Findings Include:Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, long term use of insulin, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis, and other sequelae of cerebral infarction.A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #44 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section I revealed Resident #44 had active diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and psychotic disorder.A care plan dated June 7, 2024, revealed Resident #44 had diabetes mellitus, with interventions that included:-Diabetic medication as ordered by physician-Fasting serum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#3) was provided wound care in accordance with physician orders and professional standards. The deficient practice could result in wounds worsening or becoming infected. Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with mood disturbance, muscle weakness, and type two diabetes mellitus.Review of the care plan focus, initiated December 12, 2024, revealed that Resident #3 had pressure ulcers. The entry listed an unstageable right ischium wound with a date of November 25, 2024, and an unstageable sacral wound with a date of July 14, 2025. Interventions in place included to provide wound care as ordered by the physician.Review of physician orders revealed the following active wound care orders:Right Ischium: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin prep to surrounding wound, pack with Dakin's soaked gauze, cover…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff were maintaining proper sanitary conditions by not wearing hair nets and facial hair guards during food preparation. The deficient practice could result in infection and or contamination of food.Findings include:A kitchen observation was conducted on September 02, 2025 at 8:10 a.m. Staff #107, cook, was observed in the kitchen without a hair net. Further, Staff #51, cook, was observed in the kitchen without a hair net and with facial hair present without wearing a beard guard/net. A small pot of a green substance resembling vegetables was observed to be boiling on the stove during this time.An interview was conducted on September 02, 2025 at 2:32 p.m. with Staff #125 (Food Service Director). Staff #125 stated that while working in the kitchen staff were required to wear hair nets and facial hair guards. Staff # 125 stated that failure to wear hair nets and facial guards can cause a risk of hair in the food. Regarding staff not wearing hair nets or facial hair guards during food preparation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for one resident (#27). The deficient practice could result in a preventable accident and resident not able to meet the resident's needs. Findings include: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility May 17, 2024 with two discharges to the hospital on July 22, 2024 and October 21, 24. Resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, encephalopathy, unspecified, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 06 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident has both upper and lower impairment on both sides. A care plan dated May 29, 2024 revealed resident had activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit and needed assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$75,868 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $23,000 — penalty dated 2026-04-15
• $44,850 — penalty dated 2025-12-17
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in AZ