Resolve Harmony Center, LLC
2211 East Southern Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85040 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (602) 305-7134 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.6% | 10.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.9% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 2.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.1% | 12.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.7% | 21.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.2% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.2% | 10.6% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 208% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#2) to be free from physical abuse by another resident (#3). The deficient practice could result in further physical abuse of residents when appropriate actions are not taken.Findings include:-Regarding Resident #2 (alleged victim):Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, bipolar disorder, cerebral infarction, fall, and epilepsy.The facility document titled Unsupervised List for residents who smoke revealed that Resident #2 was on the list.A review of the nursing progress notes dated May 14, 2026, at 8:30 PM revealed there was a witnessed Resident to Resident altercation that happened on the smoking patio. Per document, the Residents were separated immediately. The Residents were assessed. The physician, nursing management, administrator, the State Agency, police, families, and the ombudsman were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the right's of two of four sampled resident's (#1, #2) to be free from physical abuse by another resident. The deficient practice could result in the residents being in an unsafe environment. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #1Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included cirrhosis of the liver, Parkinsonism, hydrocephalus, bipolar disorder, and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain.A care plan initiated on October 31, 2025, included a focus for impaired cognitive function with interventions that included communicating with the resident/family/caregivers regarding the resident's capabilities and needs, using the resident's preferred name, providing the resident with necessary cues, and stopping and returning if agitated.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview forMental Status (BIMS) score of 05, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of the clinical records, staff interviews, and review of facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure PASARR (pre-admission screening and resident review) were updated appropriately and accurately submitted, when applicable, for six of 8 sampled residents (#17, #24, #26, #30, #40, and #42). The deficient practice could result in residents' medically related social and emotional needs not being met. The census was 50. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #17: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Congestive Heart Failure, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The care plan initiated on October 21, 2025, revealed that the Resident uses psychotic medications for Schizoaffective disorder. The intervention included to administer the medications as ordered by the provider and to monitor for side effects. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview, review of the clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident #37) was free from accidents and hazards, in regards to safe smoking. The deficient practice can lead to the possibility of burns, fires, smoke inhalation, serious injury, death, and potentially cause facility-wide danger. The sample size is 21. The census was 50. Regarding Resident #37:Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis that included encounter for immunization; multiple sclerosis, unspecified; encounter for therapeutic drug level monitoring; schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; mood disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified; generalized anxiety disorder; and other muscle spasm.A safe smoking assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #37 had not been able to smoke a cigarette or utilize a smoking device with safe technique, including lighting matches and/or lighter and disposing of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to implement its smoking policy for three residents (#12, #26, and #41). The deficient practice could result in inadequate smoking interventions due to the lack of an assessment and put residents at increased risk for smoking-related incidents. The sample size is 21. The census was 50. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #12 Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, nicotine dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, anxiety, and seizures. A safe smoking assessment dated [DATE], indicated that all smoking materials would be kept in a designated area for safety purposes. A smoking evaluation dated October 9, 2025, revealed that the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) would educate residents on proper storage of lighter and smoking materials per facility and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) data for one resident (# 16) within the regulatory timeframe of 14 days after admission. This deficient practice could result in delayed identification of potential risks and care needs. The sample size was one. The universe was 50. Findings Include:Resident # 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, and bipolar disorder. The admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the Assessment Reference Date (ARD/Observation end date) as October 26, 2025. The signature of the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator verified assessment completion on November 3, 2025. The assessment revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating he was cognitively intact.Review of the CMS QIES Third-Party Service Bureau User Request form, dated August 4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#2) received physician-ordered testosterone therapy per physician's order. This deficient practice could result in the worsening of a resident's underlying condition. The sample size was five. The universe was 50. Findings include:Resident # 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included testicular dysfunction.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated January 6, 2026, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. On March 7, 2026, a complaint was received through the Arizona Online Complaint Portal alleging that the resident, who had been prescribed testosterone injections every two weeks by a urologist for low testosterone levels, did not receive the medication as scheduled, against accordance with the provider's orders. An order for Testosterone Cypionate Intramuscular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #5), with a history of Substance Use Disorder (SUD), was not administered pain medications outside provider-ordered parameters. This deficient practice places residents at risk for adverse drug reactions and dependence. The sample size was 5. The universe was 50. Findings include:Resident # 5 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aftercare following surgical amputation, paraplegia, cirrhosis of the liver, and alcohol dependence. The opioid consent form, dated December 2, 2025, revealed dependence, and addiction as opioid therapy risks. A behavioral disturbance care plan, related to anxiety and alcohol abuse, revised on December 17, 2025, revealed the resident was to be administered medications as ordered. A paraplegic care plan, revised on January 8, 2026, revealed medications were to be given as ordered, and to provide pain management as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an observation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one medication cart was secured when left unattended. The deficient practice could result in residents, visitors and/or staff members having unrestricted access to medications.Findings include:An observation was conducted on March 10, 2026 at 09:32 a.m. for call light responses and revealed on the South Wing, a staff member was preparing medications at the medication cart, collected the medication cup with the medications prepared and walked around the cart and into a resident room that was next to the cart. The medication cart was left facing out into the hallway, was left unattended and unlocked. Evidenced by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff #35 leaving the medication cart unsecured and going into a resident room.An interview was conducted on March 10, 2026, at 09:33 a.m. with LPN (Staff #35) who verified that the medication cart was unlocked when she returned from passing medications to a resident. The LPN stated that the risk for leaving a medication cart unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one of three sampled residents (#38) to be free from abuse by another resident (#21). The deficient practice resulted in a resident-to-resident physical altercation with documented injuries and had the potential to result in ongoing abuse and further harm to other residents.Findings include:Regarding Resident #38:Resident #38 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included disorder of mineral metabolism, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, hypertensive urgency, fluid overload, end-stage renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, asthma, anemia in chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, heart failure, and dependence on renal dialysis.A hospital discharge, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#4) to be free from abuse by another resident (#6). The deficient practice could result in further resident abuse.Findings: -Regarding Resident #4Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included schizophrenia, unspecified, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified.A review of the Annual MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 07, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed no indicators for mood, no indicators for behaviors, but concerns with wandering daily.Review of Care Plan initiated on October 9, 2025, with reviewed/revised date of August 16, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the rights of residents to be free from abuse by another resident (#777, #222, #444). The deficient practice could result in residents being harmed physically and emotionally. -Regarding Resident to Resident altercation between Resident #1001 and #777: -Resident #1001 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on May 22, 2023. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder depressive type, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The care plan dated April 10, 2023 revealed that the resident was involved in an altercation with another resident. He rammed his chair into the resident's feet. The resident will not be involved in another altercation with another resident through the next review date. Interventions included that the wheelchair was revoked as directed and to monitor the resident's behavior as indicated. The MDS dated [DATE] included a brief a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure that one resident (#1000) was treated with dignity and respect by another resident.Based on documentation, staff and resident interviews, the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#1000) was treated with dignity and respect by another resident (#1001). The deficient practice could result in psychosocial harm. Findings included:Resident #1000 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on October 3, 2022. The diagnoses included post traumatic disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder.The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. It also included that the resident ambulated with a wheelchair.The care plan dated September 6, 2022 revealed that the will feel safe through the next review date. The resident reported being sexually assaulted by another resident that he touched and massaged her shoulder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to update the fall care plan for one resident.Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to update the fall care plan for one resident (#4). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the care needed to prevent further accidents.The findings included:The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included abnormality of gait, generalized muscle weakness, dorsalgia, usnspecified fall, and wedge compresision fracture of third lumbar vetebra, The resident expired on [DATE]. The MDS dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 8 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. It also included that the resident had a fall in the last month and had a fracture related fall in the last six months. The fall care plan dated [DATE] stated that the resident was at risk for falls. Review of the plan revealed that all the interventions on the care plan were implemented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#484) received services to meet professional standardsBased on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#4) received services that met professional standards. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the care needed in a timely manner. Findings included: Resident (#4) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included abnormality of gait, generalized muscle weakness, unspecified fall, and wedge compression fracture of third lumbar vertebra, The resident expired on [DATE]. The MDS dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 8 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. It also included that the resident had a fall in the last month and had a fracture related fall in the last six months. Review of a nurse's progress note dated [DATE] revealed that resident stated that he slid from his chair and onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to protect the rights of four out of the seven sample residents to be free from abuse by another resident. The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.Findings Include: - Regarding a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on June 20, 2025 involving Resident # 35, Resident #13, and Resident #72. -Regarding Resident #35Resident # 35 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety disorder, urinary tract infection, and heart failure. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated February 2, 2025, revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. -Regarding Resident #13Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, and hypothyroidism A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident #13 had a BIMS score of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to report alleged violations involving abuse for two residents (#35 and #13 ). The deficient practice resulted in allegations of abuse not being reported, not investigated, and residents not being protected from further abuse.Regarding a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on June 20, 2025 involving Resident # 35, Resident #13, and Resident #72. -Regarding Resident #35Resident # 35 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety disorder, urinary tract infection, and heart failure. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated February 2, 2025, revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition.A progress note for Resident #35 dated June 21, 2025, revealed that on June 20, 2025, Resident #35 and Resident #13 were relocating kittens across the courtyard to prevent them from being injured, and Resident #72…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#2) did not abuse another resident (#4). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically harmed. Findings Include: - Regarding Resident #2: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and major depressive disorder. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, which indicated the resident is cognitively intact. A progress noted dated February 16, 2023 at 03:10 a.m. revealed that Resident #2 was involved in an altercation with Resident #4 outside on the patio. Resident #4 named Resident #2 as the resident that knocked her tooth out and that Resident #4 hit Resident #2 with a stick. The Police were immediately notified and APS notified. A care plan focus initiated on [DATE] revealed a focus on the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation, policy, and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents (154), (145),(125) and (D1) were free from resident-to-resident abuse. The findings include: Resident (154) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that consisted of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the non-dominant side, paraplegia unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, morbid obesity, and adjustment disorder. The resident care plan consisted of the following: Resident involved an altercation with another resident. [NAME] states that she was hit a few times by resident and shirt ripped at neckline. was able to point to areas to the left forehead and to the base of the left eye. The left side of the frontal forehead was slightly raised and intact. There is no bruising present at this time. The area below the left eye appears to be puffy with skin intact. The same can be visualized to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#35 and #39), and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in 3 of 3 shower rooms. The deficient practice could result in spread of infection, pest infestation, and resident rooms not having a homelike environment. Findings Include: - Regarding the shower rooms: On December 13, 2024, at 12:49 PM, a walk-through was conducted in the facility's north shower room with a certified nursing assistant (CNA/ Staff #82), while all of the shower rooms were not in use by residents. In the shower stall area, on the caulk line between the shower wall and shower basin area underneath the water spout, a black and brown to orange appearing residue substance was noted. It was noted that an area where the shower wall separated from the shower basin underneath the shower head, where the caulk had separated, leaving unsealed access for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy documentation the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing information posted were accurate for actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed direct care nursing staff. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors not being informed of accurate and current staffing information. Findings include: A review of seven randomly chosen days of staff postings compared with the staff assignment sheets revealed that none of the staff postings matched the actual number of staffs that worked. Daily Staffing report vs punch detail August 29, 2024 - September 4, 2024. Review of the Daily Staffing reports revealed evidence that they were inaccurate: The daily staffing report dated August 29, 2024 revealed that the actual hours worked by licensed direct care staff and certified nursing assistants were '0' for the day shift, the evening shift, and, for the night shift. The daily staffing report dated August 30, 2024 revealed that the actual hours worked by licensed direct care staff and certified nursing assistants…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Regarding Resident #39: Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, depression, repeated falls, and heart failure. A physician order dated December 05, 2024, indicated for Linezoid-0.9% sodium chloride parenteral solution; 600 mg/300 mL, to be given intravenously twice a day. There was no evidence of an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), or any other type of transmission-based precautions for Resident #39. A care plan revised December 04, 2024, for IV central line indicated that the resident will exhibit no signs of IV complications during period of intravenous requirements and post removal. There was no evidence of a care plan focus for EBP, or any other transmission-based precautions. A formal request was made to the facility to provide evidence of annual training on the topic of infection control for a licensed practical nurse (LPN / Staff #40). The facility provided an In-Service Sign-In Sheet, dated May 08, 2024, on the subjects of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation, staff interviews, and Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to execute an antibiotic stewardship program. The facility census was 59 residents. The deficient practice could result in improper antibiotic use and adverse outcomes to residents. Findings include: The Facility Infection Prevention and Control Program was approved by the governing body to improve antibiotic use February of 2024. The facility was unable to provide any documentation/evidence of the following components of their Antibiotic Stewardship Program: - Nursing home antibiograms for antibiotic selection. - Use of the Situation Background Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR) protocol for residents. - Antibiotic Use Tracking Sheets completed in entirety. - Reports of Negative Outcomes or events related to antibiotic use. Review of the Personal Improvement Plan (PIP) for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) QAPI dated February 10, 2024 revealed no evidence of any antibiotic trend/usage discussion. Education was provided regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, review of facility records and policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests. The deficient practice could result in ongoing pest problems and residents not having a homelike environment. -Findings include: A facility walkthrough was conducted on December 10, 2023, with the following observations: -8:30 AM: From the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that the resident was not currently in the room, a meal tray was on the bedside table with the lid on, and a fly was present flying around the room. The fly landed on the lid of the meal tray. -8:35 AM: In room [ROOM NUMBER], a fly was observed to be flying around the resident laying in the bed nearest to the window. -8:40 AM: In room [ROOM NUMBER], a fly was flying around the resident's room. It was also observed that several plastic containers of mostly-eaten food were stacked on the windowsill in the resident's room. The lids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review and policy, the facility failed to ensure that dignity was maintained for one resident (#28). The deficient practice has the potential for additional residents to be treated with a lack of dignity and respect. Findings include: Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included noninfective gastroenteritis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and colitis. Review of a behavioral care plan initiated on May 24, 2021 revealed that resident #28 has a history of making false allegations towards staff. Interventions included to assess for contributing factors for behavior, medications as ordered, provide supervision as required. A care plan with a start date of June 6, 2023 identified that the resident has feelings of anxiety, fear, delusional or social isolation and uses a baby doll for emotional support. The target goal indicated that the resident will demonstrate decreased feelings of anxiety, agitation, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Regarding Resident #43: Resident #43 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder due to known physiological conditions, schizophrenia, mood disorder and major depressive disorder. A care plan initiated on October 27, 2023 and revised November 11, 2024 revealed that the resident was at risk for self-harm related to feelings of helplessness, sadness, hopelessness, hearing voices, suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety secondary to psychiatric disorder schizophrenia. Interventions included encouraging follow-up with the community, and to notify providers for any issues. The antipsychotic drug therapy care plan initiated on October 27, 2023 revised November 10, 2024 included interventions that included to administer medications as ordered and monitor/document side effects, and monitor/document behaviors. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident ' s active diagnosis included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a medication not administered according to professional standards for one of one sampled resident (#19). The deficient practice could result in a resident not receiving medication to meet their needs and the physician not being aware of the resident's status. -Findings Include: Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia. A care plan dated April 16, 2024, indicated that Resident #19 has tardive dyskinesia (movement disorder), and will participate in self care activities at the highest level of independence. A physician order dated August 07, 2024, indicated for Austedo XR (deutetrabenazine) tablet extended release 24 hour, 6 mg, once a day. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure dental needs were met for one sampled resident (#46). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving necessary services for oral and dental care. Findings include: Resident #46 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, Atherosclerosis of aorta, adrenocortical insufficiency, pain, depression and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. Review of a nutrition care plan initiated on April 24, 2024 indicated that the resident is at risk for imbalanced nutrition. Interventions included to ensure dentures etc. are in place before meals and fit properly. A hospice care plan initiated on April 28, 2024 revealed that the resident was originally on hospice. However, the hospice care plan was resolved on November 8, 2024 when hospice was discontinued. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were not expired and the vent across from tray line was clean. The deficient practice could increase the risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: -Regarding sanitary kitchen and conditions: During the initial kitchen observation conducted on December 10, 2024 at 08:36 a.m., it was observed the vent across from tray line was coated with a layer of dust. The air vent grille was visibly layered with gray thick, fuzzy dust. The filter can be slightly seen and it was also layered with dust. A second observation was conducted on December 11, 2024 at 10:53 a.m. The kitchen vent across from tray line was still coated with a layer of dust. The air vent grille still had visible layers of gray, thick, fuzzy dust. During the third kitchen observation on December 12, 2024 at 12:07 p.m., the air vent across from the tray line was again noted to have a layer of gray, thick, fuzzy dust. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (staff #68) on December 12, 2024 at approximately 12:17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure three residents (#35, # 39, and #216) was provided a means to communicate with the staff by having a call light accessibility. The deficient practice could result in residents not having the means to communicate with staff. Findings include: - Regarding Resident #35: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility December 14, 2022, with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes, anticoagulant therapy, unspecified dementia, anxiety, and unsteadiness on feet. A care plan dated June 30, 2024 revealed the resident it at risk for falls, with four previous falls without injury at the facility. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. December 10, 2024, resident observed lying in bed during initial pool screening at approximately 9:22 a.m. Resident's push button for call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for three of ten sampled staff (#62, #75, and #82). The deficient practice could lead to a deficit in staff or volunteers' knowledge and/or skills which could affect resident care, leading to harm. Findings include: - Regarding the dietary staff (Staff #62): Review of personnel file for the dietary staff (Staff #62) revealed a hire date of January 03, 2023. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #62 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024. - Regarding the registered nurse (RN/Staff #75): The personnel file for the RN (Staff #75) revealed a hire date of August 01, 2016. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #75 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024 - Regarding the certified nursing assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of ten sampled staff sampled staff (#62, #75, and #82) received ongoing education on residents' rights. The deficient practice could lead to a deficit in staff or volunteers' knowledge and/or skills which could affect resident care, leading to harm. Findings include: - Regarding the dietary staff (Staff #62) Review of personnel file for the dietary staff (Staff #62) revealed a hire date of January 03, 2023. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #62 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024. - Regarding the registered nurse (RN/Staff #75) The personnel file for the RN (Staff #75) revealed a hire date of August 01, 2016. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #75 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024 - Regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of ten sampled staff sampled staff (#62 and #75) received ongoing education on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and providing care to those with Alzheimer's or other dementia. The deficient practice could lead to a deficit in staff or volunteers' knowledge and/or skills which could affect resident care, leading to harm. Findings include: - Regarding the dietary staff (Staff #62) Review of personnel file for the dietary staff (Staff #62) revealed a hire date of January 03, 2023. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #62 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024. - Regarding the registered nurse (RN/Staff #75) The personnel file for the RN (Staff #75) revealed a hire date of August 01, 2016. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #75 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of ten sampled staff sampled staff (#62, #75, and #82) received ongoing education infection control. The deficient practice could lead to a deficit in staff or volunteers' knowledge and/or skills which could affect resident care, leading to harm. Findings include: - Regarding the dietary staff (Staff #62) Review of personnel file for the dietary staff (Staff #62) revealed a hire date of January 03, 2023. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #62 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024. - Regarding the registered nurse (RN/Staff #75) The personnel file for the RN (Staff #75) revealed a hire date of August 01, 2016. Physical sign-in sheets provided by the facility revealed that Staff #75 did not complete required annual training for resident rights, dementia, abuse and neglect, and, infection control for the year of 2024. - Regarding the certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#3) was not neglected. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the care and services needed to improve and maintain health. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility April 9, 2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory disease, pneumonia due to corona virus disease, wheezing, and spinal stenosis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the order summary revealed an order dated May 17, 2024 for oxygen-apply O2 at 2 liters per nasal cannula as needed for O2 saturation below 90%. As needed: PRN 1, PRN 2, PRN 3. Review of the order summary revealed an order May 17, 2024 for Amlodipine tablet 5 mg oral for hypertension once a day 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Review of the care plan did not reveal a plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed for two residents (#166 and #30). The deficient practice could result in residents needs based on the comprehensive assessment not being met. Findings include: -Resident #166 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of infection following a procedure, multiple fractures of pelvis without disruption of pelvic ring and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. A nursing note dated June 1, 2022 included the resident was observed in the bathroom smoking a substance that smelled like an illicit drug. The note also included that the resident was alert but, appeared altered and giddy in appearance and had extinguished the smoking material Per the documentation, the resident was assessed and new orders were written to hold pain medications and pass privileges; and that, the staff would continue to monitor the resident. A nursing note dated June 1, 2022 included that staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy and hospital record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for one resident (#166) related to illicit drug use. The deficient practice could result in a decline in the resident's health condition or death. Findings include: -Resident #166 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of infection following a procedure, multiple fractures of pelvis, other muscle spasms and pain in unspecified hip. A physician order dated May 18, 2022 included for oxycodone (narcotic opioid) 5 mg (milligram) for pain level of 7-10 four times a day as needed. The physician order dated May 18, 2022 included to give Narcan (narcotic antagonist) nasal spray, 4 mg per actuation for signs and symptoms of a possible opioid overdose. A nursing note dated June 1, 2022 included the resident was observed in the bathroom smoking a substance that smelled like an illicit drug. The note also included that the resident was alert but, appeared altered and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility documentation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week; and, failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. The deficient practice could result in not meeting the critical needs of the residents. Findings include: -Regarding RN coverage: A review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 12/2022 revealed that the general staffing plan for nursing staff providing direct care was to provide an RN coverage in the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift. The daily staffing record for January 7, 2023 revealed that an RN (staff #65) worked on this day. However, there was no evidence found that staff #65 worked on January 7, 2023. There was also no evidence found that an RN worked for at least 8 consecutive hours on January 7, 2023. An interview was conducted with the acting DON on February 16, 2023 at 2:34 p.m. The acting DON stated that the expectation was to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide one resident (#40) a clean and homelike environment by not storing boxes for activities in the room. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, cerebral palsy, nicotine dependence, diabetes mellitus, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and anxiety disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated resident had intact cognition. Further, the assessment included resident had no behaviors exhibited. An observation of the resident's (#40) room was conducted on February 13, 2023 at 2:18 p.m. and revealed there were multiple boxes of food stacked on the floor and against the wall. There were also a table next to the wall with boxes stacked on top and underneath. An interview was conducted with Resident #40 on February 13 2023 at 2:18 p.m., who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility document and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#23) was not sexually abused by another resident (resident #30). The deficient practice could result in residents being inappropriately touched. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #23 (alleged victim) Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, quadripledia, hematuria, sleep terrors, cervicalgia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Furthermore, it revealed that the resident utilized a wheelchair to assist in her mobility. A care plan revision dated July 22, 2022 indicated that the resident had episodes of suggestive sexual behaviors and comments towards male staff. It noted that when they do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility documentation, State Agency Database, policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement their policy on reporting and investigation of an allegation of misappropriation of property for one resident (#14). The deficient practice could result in misappropriation of property to continue and not prevented. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, pseudobulbar affect, bipolar disorder, Hypothyroidism and Hyperlipidemia. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A nursing note dated September 5, 2022 at 1:41 am included that the Resident reported to this writer that someone went into his room, made up his bed and stole his money from his pillow case. The note included that the amount of money…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, review of the State Agency database, staff interviews and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one allegation of misappropriation of property for one resident (#14) was thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being investigated and abuse occurring in the facility. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, pseudobulbar affect, bipolar disorder, Hypothyroidism and Hyperlipidemia. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A Nursing note dated September 5, 2022 at 1:41 am included that the Resident reported to this writer that someone went into his room, made up his bed and stole his money from his pillow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing information posted were accurate for actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed direct care nursing staff. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors not being informed of accurate and current staffing information. Findings include: A review of four randomly chosen days of staff postings compared with the staff assignment sheets revealed that none of the staff postings matched the actual number of staffs that worked. Daily Staffing report vs punch detail 1/7/2023 - 1/10/2023. Review of the Daily Staffing reports revealed evidence that they were inaccurate: The daily staffing report dated January 7, 2023 revealed there were had three licensed practical nurses (LPNs) working 36 hours on the day shift; and, one RN coverage was noted. However, review of the punch detail for January 7, 2023 revealed that only 2 LPNs worked the day shift; and, there was no punch detail found for an RN who worked the shift. The daily staffing report dated January 8,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate indication for the use of antipsychotic medication for one resident (#23). The deficient practice could result in resident receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings include: Resident # 23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of sleep terrors, body dysmorphic disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. A behavior care plan initiated on January 24, 2022 included a goal that the resident would have fewer episodes. Interventions included to assess for contributing factors for behavior, encourage increased activity participation per preference, administer medication(s) as ordered, observe for effectiveness/side effects of psychotropic drug therapy and review medications as indicated. A provider order dated November 1, 2022 included for Abilify (antipsychotic) give one 30 mg (milligram) tablet orally twice a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBM SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 40% | since 10/01/2025 |
| REAL SG LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 10/01/2025 |
| ROTHNER, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 40% | since 05/13/2025 |
| HILDING, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9% | since 05/13/2025 |
| HILDING, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 05/13/2025 |
| SEIF, YEHOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 38% | since 05/13/2025 |
| COHEN, YAAKOV | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/13/2025 |
| RESOLVE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/12/2026 |
| CORLESS, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/17/2025 |
| EBEID, SADEK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/12/2026 |
| FUEL HEALTHCARE PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in AZ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035205. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.