Caring House

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and follow its elopement policy for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for supervision. This failure resulted in R1 remaining alone outdoors for approximately 4 hours in extreme heat conditions (100 Fahrenheit (F) - 111 F, with a heat index of up to 114 F). (Heat index is defined as a measurement that combines air temperature and relative humidity to determine how hot the air actually feels to the human body.) The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for heat exhaustion, heat stroke, and/or death and resulted in a situation of immediate jeopardy.On [DATE] at 5:30 PM the Administrator and Assistant Administrator were notified of an Immediate Jeopardy determination for [DATE] for 42 CFR S483.25 (F689) related to the failed supervision and monitoring of one resident, leaving her outdoors in temperatures which reached 114 degrees Fahrenheit for 4 or more hours, placing her at risk for potentially…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to protect one resident's (R4) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R3) for one resident-to-resident altercation reviewed when R3 hit R4.The deficient practice resulted in a violation of R4's right to be free from resident-to resident abuse.Findings include:For R4:Review of the Admissions Record revealed R4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance (a stage of vascular dementia where cognitive decline significantly impacts daily life, requiring substantial assistance and exhibiting problematic behaviors like agitation, aggression, or mood changes) and displaced mid-cervical fracture of the left femur (fracture in the bone connecting the thigh bone to the hip joint), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing.The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, records, and review of the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual, the facility failed to ensure that the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accurately reflected the status of 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for falls (R12) and failed to reflect the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) status for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR requirements (R8). Specifically, R12's MDS did not reflect a fall with major injury and R8's MDS did not reflect her PASARR Level II status for 3 consecutive years. The deficient practice may result in residents not receiving care appropriate to their individual needs.Findings include:For R12:Review of the admission Record revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included repeated falls and Parkinson's Disease with dyskinesia (involuntary, uncontrollable movements that can develop as a side effect of long-term levodopa (dopamine agonists) treatment for Parkinson's disease), without mention of fluctuations.An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screenings were coordinated and/or referred for Level II evaluations as required for newly evident Serious Mental Illness (SMI) diagnoses for two of two residents (Resident (R) 9 and R12) reviewed for PASARR requirements out of a total sample of 19 residents. The deficient practice may result in residents with Mental Disorders (MD) and/or Intellectual Disabilities (ID) not receiving specialized services to meet their needs. Findings: For R9: Review of R9's “admission Record, dated 07/25/25 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the “Profile” tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Adjustment Disorder and Other Specified Mental Disorders Due to Known Physiological Condition. Review of R9's “Psychiatric Provider Encounter Progress Note,” dated 11/08/24 and found in the EMR under the “Documents”…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of Resident (R) 2, one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary meds, when Staff held R2's long acting insulin 3 times in July unnecessarily, without an order or notifying the physician. This had the potential to cause R2 to experience hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar). Hyperglycemia can lead to various short-term and long-term complications. Short-term effects include ketoacidosis (A complication of diabetes in which acids build up in the blood to levels that can be life-threatening), dehydration, and confusion. Long-term complications include diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, and increased risk of infections. Findings: Review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted R2 most recently on 05/02/2025. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complications, and hypertensive end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis. Review of physician orders revealed orders for both a long acting insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 residents sampled (R35), was able to call for assistance when their call bell was not within reach and R35 was not capable of retrieving and using it. As a result, R35 was not able to call for help until the surveyor alerted the staff. This had the potential for R35's needs to be unmet. FindingsReview of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted R35 most recently on 04/12/2023 with a primary diagnosis of acute posthemorrhagic anemia (a condition where the body experiences a sudden and significant drop in red blood cells and hemoglobin due to a rapid loss of blood). Other diagnoses included disorders of bone density, cerebral infarction (the death of brain tissue due to a prolonged decrease in blood flow, also known as stoke) with left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body), hearing loss, aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 38, one of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices was provided a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), and Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) when the facility identified R38's Part A benefit last covered day was due to end. This had the potential for R38 and/or their representative to be unaware of their appeal rights or how to activate an appeal. Findings: Review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted R38 on 02/25/2025. R38 was their own responsible party. R38's spouse was listed as Emergency Contact #1 Review of the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review worksheet provided by the facility indicated R38's Medicare Part A benefit started on 02/25/2025 and the last covered day was 03/26/2025. The Beneficiary Notice worksheet indicated R38 remained in the facility after their last Medicare A covered day. Review of the NOMOC filed in R38's medical record revealed the form included that coverage for physical/occupational/speech therapy, and nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident [R] 1) received adequate assistance during transfer when transfer equipment was not utilized based on resident's plan of care. The deficient practice resulted R1 experienced right knee and left shoulder pain after the assisted fall during transfer on 05/07/24 at 10:52 AM. Findings: R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including obesity, cerebrovascular disease (also known as stroke), hemiparesis and hemiplegia (partial paralysis of one side of the body). Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/29/24 indicated R1's cognition was moderately impaired. R1's functional limitation in range of motion was impaired on one side of his lower and upper extremities. Review of the FRI detail reported by the facility on 05/13/24 indicated, [R1] had a fall on May 7th . Two CNA failed to follow the care planned assistance to transfer with Hoyer lift [a lift used to safely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident-centered care and treatment were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and resident's comprehensive care plan when facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (R)(R78) reviewed for pressure injuries/skin conditions had documented evidence of weekly wound measurements to ensure the wound was objectively monitored and evaluated. In addition, R78 was observed with incorrect weight settings on their pressure relieving low air loss mattresses (LAL). These failures increased the resident's risks for pressure injuries, delayed care and less than optimal treatment. Findings include: Resident 78 Review of R78's medical record documented R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, repair of left femur fracture, past left knee surgery with delayed wound healing resulting in left above the knee amputation with readmission on [DATE] after amputation. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was free of accident hazards for one (Resident (R)36) of three residents reviewed for accidents when staff failed to gather all necessary equipment prior to preparing the resident for a transfer from the bed to the wheelchair which resulted in R36 standing up on her own without the assistance of the CNA. Findings include: Review of R36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 04/11/23, located in the MDS tab of the electronic medication record (EMR), revealed an admission date of 03/23/23, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R36's cognition was intact, diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation of left leg above the knee, and that R36 required extensive assistance for transfers with two person physical assist and activity did not occur for walk in room and corridor. Review of R36's 04/03/23 Fall Risk Evaluation, located in the EMR under the Assessment tab, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (R) 42 reviewed for bladder incontinence was comprehensively assessed for the type of urinary incontinence to ensure the development of individualized interventions to restore or maintain continence to the extent possible. This failure increased the resident's risk for ongoing and increased urinary incontinence. Findings include: Review of Resident 42's (R42) medical record documented resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual effects (stroke, blood flow to the brain is blocked or there is sudden bleeding in the brain) and encephalopathy (decrease in blood flow or oxygen to the brain). R42's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) dated 7/25/23 documented resident had some moderate cognitive impairment with brief mental status interview score of 10 out of 15. R42 required supervision for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,695 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $13,260 — penalty dated 2025-09-18
• $15,435 — penalty dated 2024-11-08
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-12 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ