Archie Hendricks Senior Skilled Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.41 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program in accordance with internal policies and procedures, nationally recognized infection control guidelines and regulations when:a. Glucometers (a device used to check the blood sugar) were not cleaned and disinfected after use.b. Staff did not perform hand hygiene before putting on gloves. Failure to implement infection prevention practices may contribute to cross contamination of infection that can jeopardize the health and safety of residents and staff. Findings:In an observation on 07/23/2025, at 11:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 entered the room of R7. LPN1 don on gloves without performing hand hygiene and proceed to check R7's blood sugar. After checking the blood sugar, LPN stored the glucometer in the black casing and did not clean and disinfect the equipment.In another observation on 07/23/2025 at 12:08 PM, LPN1 don on gloves without performing hand hygiene and checked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview, record review, manufacturer's manual review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) orders were in place for one of three sampled residents (Resident (R)32). In addition, maintain O2 concentrators filters free of dust and nasal cannulas were placed in bags while not in use for two of three sample residents (R32 and R33).This deficient practice had the potential to allow an increased chance of unnecessary respiratory treatment and infection. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, revised 04/25/25 revealed, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders. Recording Orders. 3. Oxygen orders- When recording orders for oxygen, specify the rate of flow, route, and rationale.Review of the undated user manual for the concentrator page 23, revealed Cleaning the Cabinet Filter: Caution: DO NOT operate the concentrator without the filter installed. 1. Remove the filter and clean at least once a week depending on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that meet the needs of one of ten residents (Resident [R]5) observed for medication pass when Omeprazole (used to treat heartburn and indigestion) was administered after meal instead of before meal as ordered for R5.These failures could lead to decreased medication effectiveness and potential adverse health outcomes for R5.Findings:On 07/24/2025, at 08:51 AM, a medication administration observation to R5 was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 administered medications to R5 including 1 tablet of Omeprazole 20 mg.Review of R5's physician's order dated 07/10/2025 indicated an order for Omeprazole Oral Tablet Delayed Release 20 milligram to give one tablet by mouth in the morning for GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease) to Administer 30-60 minutes prior to meals.In an interview on 07/24/2025, at 10:29 AM, R5 stated that he had eaten breakfast at 7 AM before R1 administer the medication. In an interview on 07/24/2025, at 10:31 AM, RN1 acknowledged that Omeprazole should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-27 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the hospital failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian (RD) or qualified nutrition professional provided frequent oversight of food and nutrition services which resulted in deficient practices related to the competency of foodservice staff for the safe storage of refrigerated foods and ensuring sanitary condition of walk-in refrigerator (Refer to F812). These failures had the potential to lead to foodborne illness in a highly susceptible population of 45 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings: In an interview on 09/24/24 at 10:00 AM, Acting Dietary Manager (ADM) explained that she assumed the position of Dietary Manager four months ago and the previous Dietary Manager (DM) is now assigned at the Assisted Living. ADM added, she is in the process of completing the required training for Dietary Manager certification (also known as CDM). The Dietary Manger Consultant stated that she is responsible to oversee (ADM) while she's in training.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure food safety standards when 1) there was lack of consistent labeling of preparation date and use-by date for foods capable of foodborne illness 2) storage of food items outside the shelf life and 3) food storage practices that may promote cross contamination as evidence by presence of molds in the walk-in refrigerator. Failure to provide a food production environment that is safe and sanitary may result in foodborne illness, cross contamination of food and equipment and use of expired ingredients that may affect flavor and/or texture of food. Foodborne illness and cross contamination may result in gastrointestinal distress and in severe instances may result in death. The use of expired ingredients may result in a food product that is unpalatable, resulting in decreased meal intake. This had the potential to affect 45 residents who received meals from the facility. Findings: 1a.During initial tour of the kitchen on 09/24/24 at 10:04 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 sampled residents (R42) was provided assistance in formulating an advance healthcare directive when they expressed a desire to create one. This failure put the resident at risk for not having their wishes for treatment known and had the potential for the resident's decision regarding his healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) with assessment reference date of 06/19/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R42 had no cognitive impairment. Review of the advance healthcare directive acknowledgment form signed by R42 upon admission indicated that R42 wished to complete a healthcare power of attorney. Review of the EMR failed to show a copy of R42's advance healthcare directive. On 09/26/24 at 10:57 AM, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of three residents (R31) reviewed for hospitalization, or their representatives in writing and send a copy of the notice to the ombudsman of the reason for the transfer. This had the potential for the resident and/or their representative to be unaware of their rights and posed the risk of the ombudsman not being aware of the circumstances should appeals be filed by the resident or their representative regarding the transfer/discharge. Findings: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R31 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) with assessment reference date of 03/02/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R31 had no cognitive impairment. Review of a physician's order dated 02/17/24 revealed an order to send R31 to the acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of the Progress Notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R31), reviewed for hospitalization, and/or their representative were provided with written information regarding the facility's bed-hold policy when the resident was transferred to the acute care hospital. This failure had the potential for R31 or their representative to be unaware of their right to request a bed-hold and their right to return to the first available bed should the resident's hospital stay exceed the seven-day bed-hold period. Findings: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R31 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) with assessment reference date of 03/02/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R31 had no cognitive impairment. Review of a physician's order dated 02/17/24 revealed an order to send R31 to the acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two of 12 sampled residents (R23 and R29) accurately reflected the residents' status. *R29's weight loss and anticoagulant use were coded incorrectly. *R23's active diagnosis of depression was not coded in the MDS. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive an individualized plan of care based on their specific care needs. Findings: For R29: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension and coronary artery disease. Review of the MDS with assessment reference date of 07/26/24 revealed Section K, which addresses weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or 10% or more in the last 6 months, was marked as Yes, indicating R29 was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. However, a review of R29's weights showed that R29 did not experience a weight loss of 5% in the last month or 10% in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when Midodrine HCL (used to treat low blood pressure) was administered outside the parameters for one of one sampled resident (Resident [R] 41). This failure resulted R41 receiving unnecessary medication that could negatively affect his health and well-being. Findings: R41 was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (chronic and progressive movement disorder), muscle weakness, and orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure [BP] that happens when standing after sitting or lying down). Review of R41's physician order, dated 07/29/24, indicated an order for Midodrine HCl 10 milligram 1 tablet three times a day for Orthostatic Hypotension to Hold for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) less than 110. SBP is the measure of pressure within the arteries while the heart beats. Review of R41's August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR), indicated a Midodrine HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG was administered outside the parameters on the following dates:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ