Splendido At Rancho Vistoso

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 37% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 35.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.555 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility policies and the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as identified by the comprehensive care plan, resulting in the resident #1's fall with injury. The deficient practice could result in increased risk of injury to the resident. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, degenerative disease of nervous system and repeated falls. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a staff assessment for mental status indicating resident #1 had a memory problem with both short-term memory and long-term memory. It was also assessed that resident #1's cognitive skills for daily decision making to be moderately impaired. The same MDS assessment also indicated resident #1 was entirely dependent on staff for assistance or the assistance of 2 or more helpers required with sit to stand and bed-to-chair transfer. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff knocked prior to entering the rooms of 4 residents (#11, #3, #13 and #29). The deficient practice could impact the resident's level of privacy and their psychosocial well-being.Findings include:-Regarding Resident #29:Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder-recurrent, anxiety disorder, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, shortness of breath, atrial fibrillation, use of anticoagulants, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness.The annual MDS (minimum data set) dated May 22, 2026 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact.An observation was conducted on July 22, 2026 at 8:06 AM in conjunction with licensed practical nurse (LPN/ staff #314) during medication administration. It was observed that staff #339 prepared the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were updated, care plan conferences were conducted, and care plans were revised to reflect residents' current needs for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#11, #17, and #33). The deficient practice had the potential to result in residents and/or their representatives not participating in the development and review of the plan of care, not understanding the resident's current care needs and goals, and staff providing care that was not based on an accurate, current, and individualized care plan. Findings include: -Regarding resident #11 Resident #11 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included heart failure, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. A care plan revealed a focus area for recreational activities, and both her daughter and son are active in her care planning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to provide services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 38. The deficient practice could result in resident not provided with advanced care activities to meet their needs.Findings Include:The Facility Assessment with completion date of February 7, 2026 revealed an average daily census range of 28-35 for long-term care and 2-7 for short stay. Staffing plan included one FT (full-time) Director of Nursing (DON), 1-3 Licensed nurses providing direct care, and other nursing personnel with administrative duties that would include the lead nurse, minimum data set (MDS), assistant director of nursing (ADON), and Medical Records. Per the assessment, there should be at least one RN per 24-hour period; individual nursing staff assignments were based on patient care needs and individual staff needs/training; and nursing shifts are twelve hours with a goal of consistent assignments.Review of facility punch detail for registered nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired items readily available for resident use; failed to ensure that that medications were not left at bedside during medication administration; and, failed to provide for safe and secure storage for medication for two residents (#29, #1). The deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for medication errors, unauthorized access, and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including severe vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, difficulty swallowing (oropharyngeal dysphagia), a cognitive communication deficit, and generalized muscle weakness. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderately impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food was properly stored, dated and labeled. The deficient practice could result in a loss of freshness, freezer burn, taste, and loss of nutritive value.Findings include:During the initial tour of the kitchen conducted on July 20, 2026, at 10:04 a.m. with the Chef de Cuisine and Interim Food Service Director (Staff #43), the following observations were made of the refrigerators, freezer, and dry storage: The following observations were made of the refrigerators and freezer: sheet pan of arancini balls - prep date- 7/13- use by date-7/19 3 sheet pans of bread pudding- x3 prep date- sheet pan of biscotti no use by date- prep date 7/14 sheet pan of coffee cake no use by date - prep date 7/3 sheet pan of strawberry cake no use by date- prep date-5/12 expired sheet pan of chocolate cake. prep date-2/19-use by date-5/29 sheet pan of chocolate chunk cookie no use by date- prep date-7/15 sheet pan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were completed and maintained for one sampled resident (#17). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving proper care according to their preferences or in potential harm to residents' lives. Findings include:Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included a wedge compression fracture of the second lumbar vertebra, a wedge compression fracture of the third lumbar vertebra, and repeated falls. An active physician's order dated June 30, 2026, was written for DO NOT RESUSITATE -DNR without hold or end date.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A Care Plan date revised June 29, 2026, revealed a full code status. Interventions included Advanced Directives located in the medical record. Family and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, the facility failed to ensure the resident's signature and date on the NOMNC form was legibly signed and dated for one of three sampled residents (#44). The deficient practice could result in inaccurate NOMNC forms.Findings include:Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included tubulo-interstitial nephritis, depression, and lack of coordination.A care plan dated January 13, 2026 revealed a focus for discharge, with stay projected to be a short duration. Interventions included social services, which will involve appropriate community resources for follow-up to ensure resident safety.A physician's order dated January 29, 2026 revealed the resident to be discharged to home on January 30, 2026 with home health skilled nursing for medication management and safety evaluation, Physical and Occupational Therapy evaluation and treatment, and home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed one resident's (resident #1) current psychotropic medication regimen, including individualized interventions and monitoring. The deficient practice could result in inadequate monitoring and interventions, placing the resident at risk for adverse medication outcomes. The universe was 38, and the sample size was 5.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including severe vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, pneumonia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, history of falling, generalized muscle weakness, and anxietyA baseline Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated that the resident was receiving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, observations, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that X-ray treatment orders were faxed in a timely manner in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (#36) , and failed to implement resident-directed care consistent with physician orders related to a swallowing deficit and use of a straw when drinking from a cup for one resident ( #1). The deficient practice could result in the resident choking or aspirating fluids, pain or further injury. The universe was 38, and the sample size was 2. Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #36: Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on May 6, 2026 with diagnosis including Parkinson's disease, difficulty walking, orthostatic hypotension, pain in left hip, unspecified lack of coordination and muscle weakness. The MDS (minimum data set) dated April 22, 2026 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to protect the rights for one Resident (#6) out of the four sampled residents to be free from physical abuse by another resident (#10). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.Finding include--Regarding Resident #6Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included depression with psychotic symptoms, anxiety, and insomnia.A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The mood assessment revealed that the resident felt down, depressed, or hopeless in 2 -6 days of the assessment.A behavior progress note dated May 27, 2026, revealed that the Resident was involved in a resident to resident altercation involving slapping the arm of another resident. The note indicated no injuries were noted and that the resident admitted she had no intent to harm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-09-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MATHER SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ