Alameda Hospital D/P SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 181 beds and averages 170.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.46 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.29 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.58 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 86% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs when Resident 1's Active Order for skin care precautions indicating foot cradle (a supportive frame placed at the end or side of a mattress to elevate bed linens and to keep blankets/bedclothes away from the feet or legs of the user) use was not put in place. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the needed care, assistive device, and/or service as ordered.A review of Resident 1's Inpatient Information, printed on 5/19/26, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA, a stroke), and hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body, complete paralysis). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 12/24/25, indicated Resident 1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1), from physical and emotional abuse when Resident 2 punched Resident 1 in the face twice with his fist and put him in a choke hold.This failure resulted in Resident 1 having a contusion (an area of skin discoloration caused by broken blood vessels under the skin, which happens when soft tissue is damaged by an impact), on Resident 1's face requiring transfer to an acute care hospital. Resident 1 stated he was fearful of Resident 2 and did not feel safe at the facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed on 11/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of anxiety (excessive worry, racing thoughts and feeling of impending danger that is uncontrollable and interferes with daily life) and dementia (a loss of brain function that occurs with certain diseases, affecting one or more brain functions such as memory,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) were free from sexual abuse when Resident 2 sexually abused Resident 1 who had severe intellectual disability and was unable to provide consent. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s elbow pain from being held down during the sexual abuse and had the potential for serious physical and psychosocial injury. Findings: A record review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted with severe intellectual disability, weakness, schizophrenia (psychiatric disease which causes distrust of information and other people) and developmental delay. The record further indicated Resident 1 ' s family had conservatorship over them. During a record review of Resident 1 ' s minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool to guide resident care), dated 11/12/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1 used a wheelchair for mobility and required supervision for bed mobility and had a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications were discarded when they were kept with ready to use medications in medication refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving the medication erroneously, which could lead to new health problems or adverse reactions. Findings: During an observation and interview on 09/18/24, at 11:47 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, in the Nursing Station, the medication refrigerator was observed to have the following discontinued medications: -Admelog 100 unit (u)/milliliter (ml) (medication used for high blood sugar) for Resident 29. -Lantus 100 u/ml (medication used for high blood sugar) for Resident 100. -Lantus 100 u/ml (medication used for high blood sugar) for Resident 147. -Basaglar 100 u/ml Kwikpen (3 pens) (medication used for high blood sugar) for Resident 18. RN 1 stated she remembered Residents 100, 29 and 18 had not received insulin for some time and had either transitioned to oral medications to control their blood sugar or the medication was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had 11 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) with multiple beds that provide less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident who occupy these rooms. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents in each room or for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During observations of care and services from 9/16/24 through 9/19/24, the following rooms and corresponding square footage per bed were identified: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two beds, total sq. ft. is 154 and 77 sq. ft. per bed. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two beds, total sq. ft. is 154 and 77 sq. ft. per bed. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two beds, total sq. ft. is 154 and 77 sq. ft. per bed. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two beds, total sq. ft. is 154 and 77 sq. ft. per bed. 5. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four beds, total sq. ft. is 287 and 71.75 sq. ft. per bed. 6. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four beds, total sq. ft. is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when one of four residents, Resident 21's bedside commode (a portable toilet) was visibly soiled. This failure placed the facility's residents at risk for healthcare-associated infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, dated 9/18/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS- An assessment tool to guide care), dated 7/24/24, MDS indicated Resident 21 required supervision when walking from room to room and when performing toilet hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 21 had an active diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (memory loss). During an observation on 9/16/24, at 12:41 p.m., in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was sitting on the side of her bed eating lunch with her lunch tray on top of her bedside table. Resident 21's bedside table was positioned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards of food and safety when: 1. The food preparation area was adjacent to the hand wash station/sink with inadequate protection from potential splashes of contaminated water and soap from handwashing. 2. The ready-to-use pans stored above the food preparation area were wet. 3. Dietary Clerk (DC) did not cover hair completely while in the kitchen and during tray-line. These failures had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on 8/22/22 at 10 a.m., with Assistant Director of Food and Nutrition (ADFN), in the kitchen, the food preparation area had a tray of chopped raw vegetables being prepared for lunch service. The chopped vegetable tray was approximately five inches away from a splash guard which separated the food preparation area from a handwashing sink. The length of the chopped vegetable tray extended beyond the edge of the splash guard for over six inches. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one (Resident 3) of three sampled discharged residents, the facility failed to complete and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) within 14 days of discharge from the facility. The failure to complete and transmit the Discharge Assessment for five months and 25 days after Resident 3 transferred to the acute care hospital and did not return, resulted in lack of tracking of residents leaving the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 3's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 3 had been in the facility for more than three years with a current diagnosis of respiratory failure (impaired breathing function). A review of Resident 3's progress notes dated 4/21/22, indicated Resident 3 was unresponsive, pulseless, and was transferred to the hospital. During an interview and concurrent record review on 8/25/22 at 10:51 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 3's MDS records were reviewed. The DON stated the annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 2 and CNA 3) demonstrated competency in skills and techniques for provision of resident care according to resident care plans. The failure to ensure CNA 2 and CNA 3 completed annual performance and competency appraisals had the potential to result in inadequate or improper care for the CNAs assigned residents. Findings: During a record review and concurrent interview on 8/24/22 at 11:47 a.m., with the Supervisor for HR Service and Compliance (SHRSC) the personnel files of CNA 2 and CNA 3 were reviewed. SHRSC stated CNA 3 had a hire date in January of 2019 and should have had an annual performance review in January of 2022, but CNA had not had a performance review this year. SHRSC stated CNA 2 had a hire date in August of 2008 but had not a performance evaluation completed since 2020. A review of the policy titled, Performance Appraisal, revised date 5/2020, the policy indicated the purpose of the performance appraisal was: To establish communication, focused on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews the facility failed to be free of medication error rates of five percent or greater when three medication errors were observed out of 28 opportunities. The medication error rate was calculated as follows: three divided by 28 then multiplied by 100, which was equal to 10 percent. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective medication regimen for the effected residents (Residents 104, 117, and 125). Findings: 1. A review on 8/23/22 of the manufacturers insert for Advair HFA (fluticasone/salmeterol-medication used for Asthma) indicated, INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE ADVAIR HFA .How to use your ADVAIR HFA inhaler Follow these steps every time you use ADVAIR HFA .Step 3. Breathe out through your mouth and push as much air from your lungs as you can .Step 7. Rinse your mouth with water after breathing in the medicine. Spit out the water. Do not swallow it . During an observation on 8/23/22 at 8:15 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not instruct Resident 104 to breathe out as much air as possible prior to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA