No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rancho Mesa Care Center

9333 La Mesa Dr, Alta Loma, CA 91701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (909) 987-2501 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (909) 987-2501 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 30 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Cong Phan0.2 mi
9333 Base Line Rd · (909) 941-4777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9713 Base Line Rd · (909) 989-8688 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9255 Base Line Rd Ste F · (909) 945-5600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Cucamonga Canyon · (909) 477-2700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
9350 Base Line Rd · (909) 641-7534

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.2%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.5%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.852.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.721.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 80% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.1–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.4–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-18)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours for 15 sampled days during the fiscal year Quarter 4 of 2024 (July 1 - September 30) and Quarter 3 of 2025 (April 1 - June 30).This failure had the potential for all residents living in the facility to not receive services and advanced care activities specifically performed by a registered nurse including resident assessments, administration of intravenous medications, and general oversight of the residents' clinical needs either directly by the RN or indirectly by the Licensed Vocational Nurses or Certified Nursing Assistants for whom the RN was responsible for overseeing resident care.During a review of the facility's report titled, Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report (PBJ report- a reporting system for staffing data), dated Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 4, 2024 (July 1 - September 30), the PBJ report indicated the facility had no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on six days (August 4, 10, 11, 31 of 2024; September 21, and 22 of 2024).During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissues that develops as a result of prolonged pressure, shear, or friction) had a low air loss mattress (LAL mattress - a specialized mattress which is air filled and is designed to help prevent and treat pressure ulcers) which was programmed for Resident 10's weight. Additionally, documentation regarding verification for the settings the low air loss mattress was incomplete in Resident 10's clinical record.These failures resulted in the low air loss mattress to not have the most therapeutic effect for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers and for Resident 10 to have increased risk for the development of new pressure ulcers and a delay in wound healing.During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information) indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for accidents had a fall mat (a cushioned mat which may aid in lessening the severity of injury during a fall) on both sides of her bed as was specified in the resident's care plan (an individualized plan for the medical care of a resident), and physician's orders. In addition, documentation verifying the placement of the fall mats was inconsistent in Resident 6's clinical record.This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to sustain a serious injury during a fall in which the severity of the injury may have been lessened if the fall mat had been in place.During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a brain disorder that causes a progressive decline in memory, thinking, and social abilities), hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) administered medications within 1 hour of their scheduled administration time for one of twelve (12) sampled residents (Resident 57) reviewed for medication administration when Resident 57 received two medications (omeprazole - a medication used to decrease the amount of acid in the stomach, and empagliflozin - a medication used to treat diabetes [condition characterized by high blood sugar] or heart failure) one hour and twenty five minutes before they were scheduled to be administered on September 16, 2025.This failure resulted in the medications to not be administered in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and for the omeprazole to not be administered as specified by the physician's orders (30 minutes prior to a meal). This had the potential for the omeprazole medication to have a diminished effect in preventing acid reflux.A review of Resident 57's admission Record (contains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% when the medication error rate was 7.69%, with two errors in 26 opportunities, when Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) administered two medications (Omeprazole - a medication used to help prevent acid reflux [condition where stomach contents flow back up to the esophagus causing irritation and inflammation] and Jardiance - a medication used to treat people with heart failure or diabetes [condition characterized by high blood sugar] to one of 12 sampled residents observed for medication administration (Resident 57).This failure resulted in the medications to not be administered in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and for the omeprazole to not be administered as specified by the physicians' orders (30 minutes prior to a meal). This had the potential for the omeprazole medication to have a diminished effect in preventing acid reflux.A review of Resident 57's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one discontinued medication was removed from the Intravenous (IV) medication cart when one box of Bio Patches (specialized disc dressings that are used to prevent insertion site infections) were expired and available for use.This failure had the potential for the medication to be administered incorrectly which may cause harm to 56 residentsFindings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 2:20 PM, with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), the LVN inspected a box of Bio Patches from the IV medication cart. The box contained 10 patches, and the label indicated an expiration date of [DATE]. The LVN stated, Yes they are expired. During a concurrent interview and observation on [DATE], at 3:15PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON inspected and acknowledged the expiration date of the Bio Patches. The DON further stated the expired box should not have been in the IV cart.During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control policies and procedures when:1) Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 did not perform hand hygiene (hand washing or the use of alcohol-based hand rub [ABHR]) between the administration of medications to two Residents (Residents 53 and 47). In addition, Resident 47 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - a set of infection control practices designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. They focus on using personal protective equipment (PPE) like gowns and gloves during specific high-contact resident care activities for residents at increased risk of acquiring or known to be colonized or infected with an MDRO).2) Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) only had one glove on when checking Resident 47's blood sugar (measurement of the amount of blood glucose [sugar] by pricking the finger and obtaining a drop of blood for sampling). Additionally, LVN 2 also only wore one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for activities of daily living (ADL) to provide care and services for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently for one of four sampled residents. This failure has the potential to put clinically compromised resident (Resident 1) health and safety at risk when Resident 1 ' s request for a diaper change was approximately delayed for 3 hours. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that hemiplegia ( is a condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1 ' s the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool to identify and monitor cognitive decline),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu on Monday August 5, 2024, for lunch for 45 residents when: 1. The cook served 1/2 cup of mashed potatoes instead of 1/3 cup as indicated on the menu for the CCHO (carbohydrate controlled- diet involves eating the same number of carbohydrates every day, and the purpose is to help people manage their blood sugar levels) diets. 2. Facility did not have a way to ensure 4 oz (ounce - unit of measure) of meat was served for residents on the CCHO and regular diets, for lunch on August 5, 2024, as indicated on the menu. These failures have the potential for 45 of 52 highly vulnerable residents to have altered nutrition intake and weight loss. Findings: 1. During an observation of the kitchen's meal preparation and tray line (process where the cook serves food on plates for each resident) for lunch on August 5, 2024, at 11:45 AM with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS) and [NAME] (Cook), [NAME] served residents on a CCHO diet, mashed potatoes using a #8 scoop (4 oz). During a review of the Cooks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored/prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1. Shelf under coffee maker had crumbs and dust and this had the potential to attract pests and for microorganism (bacteria) growth. 2. Floor under shelves in the dry storage had a build-up of food crumbs, white crumbs under one shelf and a liquid spill which can attract pests and cause microorganism growth. 3. Old food and dust under the fridges stored in the staff lounge and this had the potential to attract pests and microorganism growth. 4. Ice machine had some black and yellow discoloration in the area where ice is formed which can potentially contaminate the ice. These failures had the potential to contaminate resident's food and cause food illness to 52 out of 52 vulnerable residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation on August 5, 2024, at 9:40 AM in the kitchen, there was crumbs and dust in the bottom shelf where the coffee maker is stored. During an interview on August 8, 2024, at 2:15 PM with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs when the regular diet (no modifications) meatloaf was not served to 26 residents who are on a medically prescribed mechanical soft diet (designed for people who have trouble chewing and swallowing) instead of meatloaf that is mashable and topped with gravy. This failure had the result to increase the risks of choking and aspiration (process when swallowing food enters the lungs) for 26 out of 52 highly vulnerable residents. Findings: During an observation in the kitchen on August 5, 2024, at 11:46 AM, the [NAME] (Cook) prepared a plate for a resident on a mechanical soft diet. She served the resident the regular diet meatloaf. During a review of the facility document titled, Cooks Spreadsheet - Summer Menus, [undated], indicated that mechanical soft diet meatloaf should be served mashable & moist with gravy. During an interview on August 5, 2024, at 3:37 PM with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), DSS stated the cook should follow the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Discharge Assessment was completed and transmitted in accordance with federal guidelines for one of three residents (Resident 53) reviewed for residents assessment. This failure resulted in Resident 53's assessment not completed upon discharge on [DATE]. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), the admission Record indicated, Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hyperlipidemia (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a concurrent interview and record review, on August 9, 2024, at 9:15 AM, with the License Vocational Nurse/Minimum Data Set Nurse (LVN/MDS Nurse), the LVN/MDS Nurse reviewed Resident 53's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of 55 sampled residents (Resident 58) when tube feeding (process where food is delivered into the stomach by a machine) was not administered based on physician order. This failure had the potential to result in decline in function and unplanned weight change to Resident 58. Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 58 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (disruption of blood supply to the brain), aphasia (difficulty in talking), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and debility (physical weakness). During an observation on August 6, 2024, at 9:45 AM, Resident 58 was laying in his bed. He was not able to answer questions and he appeared frail. His tube feeding was not connected and the machine was off. There was no tube feeding bag hanging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills set to provide nursing services to Resident 58 when he only received 940 ml (milliliters - unit of measure) of tube feeding (supply of food delivered via tube to the stomach) but should have received 1200 ml (millimeters) of medically prescribed enteral tube feeding formula as ordered by his physician on August 6, 2024. This failure had the potential to result in altered nutrition status for one of 55 medically compromised residents. Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 58 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (disruption of blood supply to the brain), aphasia (difficulty in talking), and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2024, at 10:00AM with Licensed Vocational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 42) observed for medication administration, was administered according to the physician's orders, when Resident 42 received Omeprazole [medication prescribe to minimize the acid reflex] after breakfast, on August 7, 2024. This failure has the potential to cause less effective management of Resident 42's condition, as the medication may not work as intended when taken after meal. Findings: During a record Review of Resident 42's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) the admission record indicated, Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis which included hepatic encephalopathy (a condition that affects the brain and occurs when the liver isn't working properly), morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (the person has an extremely high amount of bodyfat), and phantom limb syndrome with pain (a condition where a person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications under proper temperature control, as specified by the manufacturer when two vaccine solutions were found inside the medication cart (used to transport medication between patients' rooms), instead of the refrigerator. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of residents receiving vaccine medications with decreased efficacy. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on August 6, 2024, at 12:10 PM, while inspecting the 30's hall medication cart with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) 1 unopened vial of Covid Spikevax 23-24 (an updated COVID-19 vaccine for the 2023-2024 year), was stored inside the medication cart, the vial was labeled Do not freeze. Keep Medicine in Refrigerator. In addition, 1 unopened syringe of medication Afluria Quad 2023-2024 (a flu vaccine for the 2023-2024 flu season), labeled Refrigerator, was stored inside the medication cart. LVN 1 stated the vaccines had been in the medication cart since the start of his shift at 7:00 AM. Furthermore, LVN 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a representative (ensures residents wishes are respected) was in place for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). Resident 1 and Resident 2 had impaired decision making abilities and did not have a representative in place to give consent for medical decisions. This failure resulted in two clinically compromised residents making medical decisions in which resident 1 and resident 2 were unable to understand or comprehend based on their History and Physical. Findings: An abbreviated survey was conducted on October 23, 2023, at 3:55 PM, to investigate a complaint related to Resident Rights. 1.A review of Resident 1's, face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: schizoaffective disorder (affects your thoughts, mood, and behavior), bipolar disorder (feelings of extreme happiness and sadness), psychosis (not in touch with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a repeated resident to resident altercation, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 had been placed on 1:1 (one-to-one) monitoring (one-to-one monitoring uses continuous staff observation to safeguard patients judged likely to harm themselves or others) and the monitor stepped away from Resident 2 leaving him unattended. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 2 to begin an altercation with another resident. Findings: An unannounced visit was made to the facility on September 19, 2023, at 10:28 AM, to investigate a facility reported incident regarding a resident-to-resident altercation. A review of Resident 2's face sheet (a document that gives a summary of resident information), undated, indicated an admission date of August 25, 2023, with diagnoses that included: psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to ensure the call lights were answered in a timely manner to provide care and services for two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2's care being prolonged and put them at risk for physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: joint replacement surgery, left artificial hip, left artificial knee and morbid obesity. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool to identify and monitor cognitive decline), dated July 3, 2023, indicated, Resident 1's score was a 15, which indicated that there was no mental impairment. In an interview with Resident 1, on August 24, 2023, at 3:41 PM, Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. Three oranges and seven onions with mold were found in the kitchen inside of a plastic box. 2. A box of 14 yellow squash was wet and leaking inside of the refrigerator, that was stored in the central supply room. 3. Thirty two ounces (unit of weight) of plain yogurt container found inside the refrigerator expired. 4. The ice machine was found dusty outside and inside with dark black stain seen on both sides of the ice maker tray. 5.A shelf storing clean water pitchers were stored in the Central Supply room, near the laundry room. These failures had the potential to contaminate resident's food and cause food -borne illness to a population 56 medically compromised residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on June 26, 2023, in the kitchen at 8:06 AM, there were three oranges with mold inside a plastic box inside at the bottom of a stainless steel shelf. Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their infection control practices were implemented in accordance with their policy and procedure when: 1. One of the kitchen sink air gaps (a form of backflow prevention device) had black, brown grime. 2. Two bar guns (a device used to serve types of carbonated drinks and non-cabonated drinks) were found to contain red residual fluid and were not clear. These failures had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasite) to 56 medically compromised residents and staff in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on June 27, 2023, at 12:55 PM, with the Dietary Aide (DA 3), the kitchen sink air gap had black, brown grime. The DA 3 verified the air gap and stated it was the Maintenance Supervisor responsibility to clean the air gap. During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on June 29, 2023, at 9:02 AM, the MS acknowledged the air gap and stated it is the responsibility of the kitchen staff to clean the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (Residents 10, 54, and 64) of five sampled residents received care in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. 1. For Resident 10 and 64, the facility failed to ensure their blood sugar levels were monitored and documented prior to administering insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) according to physician's order. 2. For Resident 54, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights monitoring were carried out per physician's order. These failures had the potential to result in harm or death of the resident from medical complications caused by elevated or decreased blood sugar levels and resident harm from complications of nutritional deficiencies. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet (a summary of medical and demographic data) dated June 27, 2023, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 10's admitting diagnosis on April 17, 2023 included; Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of personal information for five of five sampled residents (Resident's 40, 6, 42, 10, and 19) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) left the electronic health record (EHR) exposed to public view during medication administration. This failure had the potential to violate Resident 40, 6, 42, 10, and 19's right to privacy and confidentiality of medical information. Findings: During a medication administration observation on June 28, 2023, at 1:18 PM, the computer screen displayed the EHR for Resident 40. LVN 1 walked away from the medication cart, leaving the EHR exposed to public view. During an interview with LVN 1, on June 28, 2023, at 1:25 PM, LVN 1 stated, it's ok to leave the computer screen exposed with the resident's health information as long as it's facing the door to the resident's room. During a second observation on June 28, 2023, at 1:30 PM, LVN 1 walked away from the medication cart and walked into Resident 6's room leaving the EHR exposed to public view. During a third…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) assessments were completed accurately to reflect the residents' current health status, care, and services for one of eight residents' (Resident 4) reviewed for antibiotic therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 4's face sheet (a document containing resident's basic information and diagnoses) indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus, (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. (age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty with any combination of urinary symptoms). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 4 was receiving antibiotic therapy for five (5) days. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a screening done upon admission into a facility to determine if a resident with serious mental illness and/or intellectual/development disability require nursing facility services and/or specialized services) was completed accurately for one resident reviewed for PASSR (Resident 12). This failure had the potential to delay identification and treatment of Resident 12's mental disorder. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 12, on June 26, 2023, at 8:19 AM, in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was sitting on the edge of her bed eating breakfast. Resident 12 stated she was a survivor of satanic cult. During a review of Resident 12's Face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of schizophrenia (mental disorder in which a person interpret reality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medications when: 1. The central supply medication storage cabinet was found open and unattended on June 26, 2023, at 9:55 AM. 2. The medication storage room was found open and unattended on June 26, 2023, at 10:01 AM and June 27, 2023, at 12:42 PM. 3. The treatment cart #3 was left unlocked and unattended on June 26, 2023, at 11:30 AM. These failures had the potential for medications to be accessed and dispersed by an unauthorized person, in a vulnerable population of 56 residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on June 26, 2023, at 9:55 AM, in the Central Supply Room, with the Central Supply Supervisor (CSS), the central supply medication storage cabinet was found open and unattended. The CSS verified the finding and stated it should be not be unlocked and unattended. The CSS further stated she would put a lock on it right away. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Director of Food Services to provide oversight of the dietary department which includes, implementing menus, purchasing food, training of staff, and ensuring compliance with all state and federal regulations. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of effective oversight in the operations of the dietary department and supervision which could lead to poor quality of services in the dietary department. Findings: During an interview on June 28,2023, at 1:38 PM, the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) stated, she is waiting to take her exam to become a Certified Dietary Manager. During a review of facility's document titled FNS (Food and Nutrition Services) JOB DESCRIPTION dated, 2018, indicated, .for QUALIFICATIONS .3. Must meet the qualifications of FNS Director as stated under State & Federal Regulations. During an interview with the Administrator (Admin) on June 29, 2023, at 2:18 PM, the Admin acknowledged that the DSS did not meet one of the state qualifications for a dietary supervisor, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food that conserved flavor and appearance when: 1. Five packages of flour tortillas were found dry and had expired 10 days ago. This failure had the potential to cause food-borne illness (stomach issues from expired and contaminated food) and less palatable. Findings: 1.During an observation on June 26, 2023, at 8:35 AM with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the dry storage room area on the top shelf five packages of flour tortillas were found dry and had expired 10 days ago. During an interview with the DSS on June 26, 2023, at 8:35 AM, the DSS acknowledged that the flour tortillas were found expired and dry, and they should not be used. During a record review of facility's policy and procedure titled DRY GOODS STORAGE GUIDELINES dated, 2018, indicated Do check expiration dates on boxes of foods to be sure the length of time is correct.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program (a program to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and used by patients) was implemented in accordance with facility policy when the monitoring of antibiotic usage and resistance data (monitoring the effectiveness of the antibiotics) were not documented for two consecutive months (May and June 2023). This failure had the potential to inaccurately monitor the use of antibiotics for 56 residents. Findings: During a review of the Antibiotic Stewardship binder, undated, was conducted on June 28, 2023, at 3:50 PM, the binder forms Nursing Center Infection Control Summary Report (a monthly report of the infections and the facility's plan to address) and Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance Log (log of infections, the signs/symptoms, organism on culture, treatment and comments) were not filled out for the months of May and June 2023. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) and the Consultant Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained in safe operating condition when: One of three refrigerators observed, had condensation (water) dripping from the top of the refrigerator to the bottom area. This failure had the potential for the refrigerator to not function properly to cool the food and/or contamination of the food stored inside the refrigerator which could cause foodborne illnesses to a population of 56 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), on June 26, 2023, at 9:05 AM, one of the three refrigerators located inside of the Central Supply room area, had condensation dripping from the top of the refrigerator area to the bottom. The refrigerator was storing boxes of vegetables. An open box of yellow squash under the refrigerator was wet from the dripping water. DSS stated that the refrigerator should be fixed and remove the contaminated vegetables. During an interview on June 29,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MAHAN, MARYLYNNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER49%since 08/17/2023
WEINBERGER, PHILIPIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER51%since 08/17/2023
CHAVEZ, MONICAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
P & M MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2000
RENEW HEALTH CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/17/2023
AMURAO, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/27/2023
SHARMA, VATSALAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/17/2023
SINGH, JHUJHARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/17/2024
GATEWAYS REHABILITATION CENTER II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/17/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$409K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 14%Other / private 24%

This home reported $409K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$375per resident / day
operating cost
$11,389per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555521. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next