Artesia Christian Home Inc.
11614 E. 183rd St, Artesia, CA 90701 · Non profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (562) 865-5210 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $98,079 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.49 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.39 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.9%CMS range 31.8–58.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.3–17.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.5–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 47.6 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.69 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — widespreadImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility's consulting pharmacist (PH) conducted monthly and as needed Drug Regiment Reviews ([DRR]thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication) of psychotropic medications (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) and made recommendations for gradual dose reduction ([GDR] - tapering mediation dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication can be discontinued altogether) or medication dosage adjustments to control behavioral symptoms for two of two residents with dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 51) and for 23 residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, 9, 10, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 35,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-15 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the psychiatrist's (medical practitioner specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness) services were provided to residents who were receiving psychotropic (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medication for four out of six sampled residents (Residents 2, 17, 19, and 51). Resident 2 had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Residents 17, 19, and 51 had diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Residents 2, 17, 19, and 51, who were being treated with psychotropic medications including Cymbalta (a drug used to treat depression), Ativan (drug that is used to treat anxiety [feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness]), Seroquel an antipsychotic (a class of drugs used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Scabies Identification, Treatment and Environmental Cleaning, and Infection Control Program, for five of 23 residents (Residents 5, 18, 19, 21, and 31) who had a suspicious skin rashes ( the skin that has changes in texture or color and may be inflamed or irritated) by failing to: 1.Ensure Residents 5, 18, 19, 21 and 21, who had red scattered inflamed red spots with bumps and itching, were placed on isolation (separation of residents with an infection from residents without an infection). 2.Initiate and conduct infection surveillance (close observation or monitoring) by completing a line listing (a table that contains key information about each case in an outbreak) of residents with a suspicious rash in the Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) Unit (a secure environment that provides specialized care for people with dementia). 3.Ensure precautionary measures were implemented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure injury (skin breakdown from prolonged pressure on the skin and tissue underneath) on the inferior (lower) fold of the left buttock area for one of five sampled residents (Resident 50) by failing to: a.Ensure Resident 50 was repositioned every two hours, as indicated in the care plan titled Skin Condition, to relieve the pressure off the left buttocks area. b.Ensure the Registered Dietician (RD) assessed Resident 50's nutritional status on 6/5/2024, when Resident 50 developed a Stage 1 pressure injury (intact skin with a localized area of redness and/or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness), on 6/10/2024 when the pressure injury progressed to a Stage 3, (full-thickness loss of skin, dead and black tissue may be visible), and again on 6/18/2024 when the pressure injury advanced to a stage 4 pressure injury (full thickness skin and tissue damage, where the wound exposes underlying structures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1.Inform the physician (MD) of the abnormally low urine output (a measurement of how much urine a person produces) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 58), when Resident 58's urine output was 50 Cubic Centimeter (cc- a unit of measure of volume), (Reference Range of 280-560 cc for 8 hour) on 8/26/2024 during 7:00 a.m.- 3p.m. shift. 2. Initiate a change of condition (COC-tool used by health care professionals when a patient's condition suddenly changes) when Resident 58's urine output was observed to be 50 Cubic Centimeter on 8/26/2024 during 7:00 a.m.- 3p.m. shift. 2. Monitor Resident 58's urine output from 8/27/2024 to 9/13/2024 These deficient practices resulted in Resident 58 having signs and symptoms (S/S) of dehydration including sunken eyeballs, and dry lips was transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for evaluation and diagnosed with acute kidney injury likely due to prerenal azotemia (a high concentration of waste products in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the storage of food was done under sanitary conditions affecting 46 out of 46 residents by not labeling a salad with the date it was prepared and by not labeling raw meats with the date it was placed in the refrigerator.These deficient practices placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) had the potential to cause nausea, vomiting and diarrhea .Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/20/2026 at 8:16 a.m., with [NAME] (CK)1, a tray of opened bag of raw chicken was observed without a date in the facility kitchen refrigerator. CK 1 stated the tray of raw chicken should have a date on it.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/20/2026 at 8:20 a.m., with CK 2, trays of raw ground beef, pork loin, pork, and chicken were observed unlabeled without a date in the facility kitchen refrigerator. There was an observation on another shelf, with a packaged container of green salad without a date on it. CK 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: Ensure staff performed hand hygiene prior to entering Resident 16 and Resident 30's room. Ensure Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA nursing aide program that helps residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) 2 wore an isolation gown (protective apparel used to protect the wearer from the transfer of microorganisms and body fluids) while assisting with range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) exercises to Resident 8's both arms and both legs which required direct contact with Resident 8 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms).Ensure Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant 1 (COTA 1) used the appropriate cleaning agent to effectively clean and disinfect a cloth gait belt after providing occupational therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of four residents' (Resident 16 and 31) oral medications were not crushed and administered together during medication pass.This deficient practice placed Resident 16 and Resident 31 at risk for dangerous chemical interactions and had the potential for altered drug effects, and incorrect dosage. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Alzheimer's disease (a type of disease that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), and atherosclerotic heart disease (caused by fat buildup in arterial walls that blocks blood flow). During a review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 16 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 16's MDS ([MDS], A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to improve or maintain range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for three (3) of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 8) with ROM concerns by failing to: 1.Objectively measure and identify the location of Resident 1's ROM limitations of both legs during the Physical Therapy (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) Evaluation, dated 12/23/2025. 2.Objectively measure Resident 2's ROM limitations of both shoulders and both hands during the Occupational Therapy (OT, profession that provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) Evaluation, dated 10/3/2025. 3.Provide ROM exercises to Resident 8's both arms and both legs during a Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nursing Aides (RNA, trained nursing staff who help residents gain an improved quality of life by increasing their level of strength and mobility) were competent to provide RNA services to one of six sampled residents (Resident 8) by failing to: 1.Ensure Restorative Nursing Aide 2 (RNA 2) was competent to perform active assistive range of motion (AAROM, use of muscles surrounding the joint to perform the exercise but required some help from a person or equipment) exercises to Resident 8's both arms and both legs in accordance with physician orders. 2.Ensure RNA 1 and RNA 2 were competent and knowledgeable of left posterior hip precautions (specific movements and positions that must be followed after having surgery to prevent a hip dislocation [disruption of the normal position of the ends of two or more bones where they meet at the joint] or injury which includes no bending of the hip past 90 degrees, no rotation of the operated leg inwards, and no crossing of the operated leg past the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer psychotropic medications (chemical substance that treat mental illnesses that affect the brain that modifies mood, thought, emotions, and behavior) in a timely manner for one of four sampled residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice had the potential to cause delay in treatment and exacerbate Resident 39's condition. During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) with agitation and psychotic (seeing, hearing and believing that is not based on reality) disturbance, anxiety disorder, and Parkinsonism (group of movement disorders that includes symptoms such as tremors, stiffness, slow movements, and balance problems). During a review of Resident 39's History and Physical (H&P), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records for two of six sampled residents (Residents 2 and 8) were accurate by failing to: Ensure Restorative Nursing Aides (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) accurately documented RNA services provided for Resident 2 in December 2025 and January 2026.Ensure Resident 8's left posterior (toward the back) hip precautions (specific movements and positions that must be followed after having hip surgery to prevent a hip dislocation [disruption of the normal position of the ends of two or more bones where they meet at the joint] or injury which includes no bending of the hip past 90 degrees, no rotation of the operated leg inwards, and no crossing of the operated leg past the midline of the body) were discontinued on the RNA order when Resident 8's left hip precautions were discontinued by the physician.These deficient practices had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of COVID-19 (contagious infectious disease) education and vaccination (medications used to prevent diseases) status for four of four sampled employee records (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1, CNA2), Food Service Worker (FSW) and Laundry Staff (LS).This failure had the potential to place staff and residents at risk for Covid 19.During an interview and record review on 1/22/2026 at 11:03 a.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the facility's employee records of COVID-19 status were reviewed, four of four sampled facility employee records of COVID-19 immunization, the ADON stated status was unknown.During an interview and record review on 1/22/2026 at 11:03 a.m., with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health order of the Health Officer, Annual Influenza and Covid-19 immunization or Masking Requirement for Healthcare Personnel during Respiratory Virus Season, issued 8/26/2024, was reviewed. The order indicated healthcare provider who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 45) was treated with respect and dignity when the trash bag was placed on Resident 45's bed during a treatment. This failure had the potential affect resident's sense of dignity and self-worth.Findings:During an observation on 1/22/2026 at 9:33 a.m., the Treatment Nurse (TXN) was observed placing a clear bag on Resident 45's bed. The TXN was observed disposing gauze, gloves, and a medicine cup into the clear plastic bag during Resident 45's wound treatment.During a review of Resident 45's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - an enlargement of the prostate gland causing difficult urination and incomplete bladder emptying), and a urinary device-supra pubic catheter (a hollow tube inserted through the lower abdomen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Advance Directive (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) was formulated for one (1) out of the four (4) sampled residents (Resident 26).This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict with Resident 26's wishes regarding health care and end of life wishes.Findings:During a review of Resident 26's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily functioning), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hypertrophic lichen planus (chronic inflammatory condition).During a review of Resident 26's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/3/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 26 does not have the capacity to make healthcare decisions.During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when one of three sampled residents (Resident 45's) wound progressed from a pressure injury (PI- localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) stage 1 (intact skin with a localized area of redness and/or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness) to a PI Stage 2 (partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound). This failure had the potential to delay care in treating and preventing Resident 45's PI from getting worse.Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - an enlargement of the prostate gland causing difficult urination and incomplete bladder emptying), and a urinary device-supra pubic catheter (a hollow tube inserted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to verify the dose of Vitamin B-12 (supplement) order for one of two sample residents (Resident 35). This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication errors. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and osteopenia (condition characterized by lower-than-normal bone mineral density).During a review of Resident 35's Minimum Data set ([MDS] A resident assessment tool), dated 10/16/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 35's cognitive skills (functions your brain uses to think, pay attention, process information, and remember things) for daily decision-making was intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an opened Tuberculin, Purified Protein Derivative ([PPD] medication used to do a skin test to help detect tuberculosis serious lung infection) for one of two medication rooms was labeled with the date opened. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the loss of viability (ability to work) of the PPD if used beyond recommended date. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/20/2026 at 8:41 a.m. with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 1, in the North station medication room, the PPD vial was previously opened, and the vial was not labeled with the date it was opened. RNS 1 stated the vial should have had the open date on it. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/20/2026 at 8:41 a.m. with RNS 1, the PPD vial carton was reviewed. RNS 1 stated the package indicated once opened vial should be discarded after 30 days. During an interview on 1/22/2026 at 3:30 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated PPD vials should be discarded in 30 days once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0826 — isolatedProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physical Therapy (PT, licensed professional aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) Evaluation, dated 12/23/2025, and Occupational Therapy (OT, profession that provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) Evaluation, dated 12/23/2025, were completed under the written order of a physician for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices had the potential to result in inaccurate care planning, harm, inaccurate provision of care and services, and lack of physician verification and coordination of skilled needs and care.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 1 on 9/1/2025 and re-admitted Resident 1 on 12/22/2025 with diagnoses including cellulitis (skin infection) of both legs, muscle weakness, and sepsis (illness caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they reported a suspected scabies (a contagious skin condition caused by tiny insects called microscopic mites which infest and irritate the skin causing intense itching, red patches and inflammation outbreak (two or more clinically suspect or confirmed cases identified in patients/residents, healthcare workers, volunteers and/ or visitors) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for three of fourteen sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3). This deficient practice resulted in CDPH being unaware that a possible scabies outbreak existed and a delay in their investigation, placing placed residents, staff and visitors at risk of acquiring and spreading scabies. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by excessive worrying).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) belongings were safe.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 jewelry being lost.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder most often causes a burning and sometimes squeezing sensation in the mid-chest), and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 10/2/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition (how we think, learn and remember). The MDS indicated Resident 1 needed set-up assistance when eating.During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/26/2025 at 1:17 p.m., with the Associate Director of Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve requested menu items to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice had the potential to result in loss of appetite and cause unplanned weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder most often causes a burning and sometimes squeezing sensation in the mid-chest), and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 10/2/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition (how we think, learn and remember). The MDS indicated Resident 1 needed set-up assistance when eating.During a review of Resident 1's General Order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) left arm bruise was assessed and reported as a change of condition after being reported to a licensed nurse. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of care for Resident 1 and had the potential to cause pain, infection and lead to hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 1’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident was 1 admitted to the facility to the facility on 6/2/2025 with a diagnosis including unspecified dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere in daily life) , unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, hypertension (high blood pressure) and anxiety (having constant worry and fear). During a review of Resident 1’s MDS a resident assessment tool) dated 6/12/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1’s cognitive skills (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and senses) were severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident was assessed and evaluated after an unwitnessed fall on 12/7/2024 for one out of 2 high risks for falls (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 falling in bed sustaining multiple skin tears to the left forearm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet dated 12/30/24, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including mild cognitive impairment (changes in thinking and memory), Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rate), foley catheter use(thin flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag), glaucoma (chronic eye disease), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass) and difficulty walking, history of falls. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/8/24 indicated Resident 1 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ({MDS}- a resident assessment tool) dated 11/18/24 the MDS indicated Resident 1 has severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Quality Assessment Assurance ([QAA] to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies)Committee and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] designated to bring about constant and measurable improvement in the services provided at the facility for continual improvement of quality care) failed to identify: 1.The Licensed Pharmacist (LP) was not conducting Drug Regiment Reviews (DRR thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication) of psychotropic medications (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) monthly and as needed and made recommendations for gradual dose reduction (GDR - involves the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication can be discontinued altogether) or the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the use of pressure pad alarms (pressure sensitive devices that sound if a resident's position changes) and either the residents or their representatives were given the choice to give informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 27 and 2). This deficient practice resulted in a violation of resident rights to be free from restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is adjacent to the resident's body, cannot be removed easily by the resident, and restricts the resident's freedom of movement). Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia (a progressive state of decline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of 10 hours of continued education in the field of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) for the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing ADON), and Director of Staff Development (DSD). This failure had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for the staff and residents of the facility. Findings: During an interview on 11/10/2024 at 3:23 p.m., with DON, ADON, and DSD, the DON, ADON, and DSD stated they do not have annual 10 hours of continuing education in the field of Infection Prevention and Control after the initial training was completed in 2019. During an interview and record review on 11/10/2024 at 3:23 p.m., with the ADON, the California Department of Public Health All Facilities Letter (AFL) 20-84, titled, Infection Prevention Recommendations and Incorporation into the Quality and Accountability Supplemental Payment (QASP) Program, 11/4/2020, was reviewed. The ADON confirmed that the AFL indicated it was important that each facility's Infection Preventionist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for antibiotic stewardship program (coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics at the right dose, for the right duration, and only when needed by clinicians) by not monitoring and addressing triple antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infection) ointment use for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and 60). This failure had the potential for the Resident 1 and 60 to receive an inappropriate antibiotic. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange in the body), generalized muscle weakness. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a gastrotomy tube (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of all employees screening, education offering, and current Corona virus (COVID-19 a highly contagious infectious disease) disease, vaccination (medications used to prevent diseases usually given by injection or by mouth) status. This failure had the potential to place staff and residents at risk for negative outcomes such as being hospitalized and dying due to COVID-19. Findings: During an interview and record review on 11/11/2024 at 9:14 a.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the facility's employee records of COVID-19 status was reviewed, and 128 facility staff COVID-19 immunization status was unknown. During an interview and record review on 11/11/2024 at 9:14 a.m., with the ADON, the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health order of the Health Officer, Annual Influenza and Covid-19 immunization or Masking Requirement for Healthcare Personnel during Respiratory Virus Season, issued 8/26/2024, was reviewed and the order indicated by November 1 of each respiratory virus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of one sampled resident (Resident 210), when Resident 210 was found to have a 1.5 centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) by 1.5 cm small bluish bump on the left side of her forehead, which staff and resident could not provide an explanation of its origin. This deficient resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and had potential for an ongoing unknown injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 210's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 210 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs) and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 210's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 9/3/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 210's cognition (the mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things) was moderately impaired and Resident 210 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown origin for one of one sampled resident (Resident 210). Resident 210 had a 1.5 centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) by 1.5 cm small bluish bump on the left side of her forehead, which staff and resident could not provide an explanation of its origin. This deficient practice had the potential for undetected abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 210's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 210 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs) and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 210's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 9/3/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 210's cognition (the mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things) was moderately impaired and Resident 210 required set up or clean up assistance (helper sets up and resident completes the activity) from facility staff when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan addressing the resident's noncompliance for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the delay of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange in the body), generalized muscle weakness, and a gastrotomy tube (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 10/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 needed set up assistance with oral hygiene, moderate assistance (helper does less than half the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY CROSS REFERENCE F686 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised when the resident developed a pressure injury (PI- skin injury from prolonged pressure on the skin and tissue underneath) on the inferior fold left buttocks area for one of five sampled residents (Resident 50). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in developing a person- centered care plan that could prevent a Stage 1 (intact skin with a localized area of redness and/or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness) pressure injury from progressing to a Stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) pressure injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat, or arrhythmia), and unspecified dementia with other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 41) with limited range of motion (ROM - the extent of movement of a joint) and/or limited mobility, received appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM, prevent decline in ROM, prevent further decline in ROM, and maintain mobility and/or improve mobility by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 41 received ROM exercises on his upper bilateral (both) extremities as indicated in the facility's policy. Resident 41 was receiving ROM only on his lower bilateral extremities. 2. Ensure a physician's order for the application of a left-hand splint (a device that stabilizes a body part to protect it from further injury and help it heal) was followed as ordered. Resident 41 was observed to have a towel roll in the left hand. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 41 at risk for further ROM decline and contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 210) was free of accidents when facility staff continued to use the stand-up lift (mobility equipment used to help a person transfer from a seated position to a standing position) to transfer Resident 210 to and from the bed despite Resident 210 exhibiting agitation and combativeness during use of the stand-up lift upon transfer. The deficient practice resulted in Resident 210 suffering a 1.5 centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) by 1.5 cm small bluish bump on the left side of her forehead sustained during the use of a stand-up lift. Findings: During a review of Resident 210's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 210 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs) and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 210's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 9/3/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 210's cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) resident (Resident 6) had equipment and supplies necessary to manage dialysis emergencies such as bleeding. at the bedside. The deficient practice has the potential to result in complications from dialysis and bleeding. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, and end stage renal disease (ESRD -irreversible kidney failure), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and dependence on renal dialysis. During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 8/21/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 6's cognition was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 6 needed partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the controlled medications (Controlled Medications are substances that have an accepted medical use (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II-V), have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) was stored and kept with double locked and was not accessible for non- nursing staff. This deficient practice has the potential to have drug diversion or drug misuse. Findings: During an initial tour on 11/8/2024 at 7:45 p.m. at the North and South Station it was observed that emergency kit with Ativan (belongs to a drug class called benzodiazepines) stored in the refrigerator with no lock. During an interview on 11/8/2024 at 7:47 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3(LVN 3), LVN 3 stated that the refrigerator was never locked. LVN 3 stated that emergency kit was kept inside the refrigerator with Ativan inside the Emergency- kit(E-Kit) box. During an interview on 11/132024 at 2:16 p.m. with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one resident ' s (Resident 1) Minimum data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/14/2024, indicated Resident 1 had broken teeth. This deficient practice resulted an inaccurate depiction of Resident 1 ' s current health status. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 23 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including seizures(a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness) , dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), age related osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent (helper does all the effort) with all activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to: a.Ensure an open box of red bean ice bar was labeled with open date and use by date in the freezer. b.Ensure an open bag of fresh peeled garlic was labeled with open date and expiry date in the refrigerator. c.Ensure a bag of Panko Breadcrumbs was not laying directly on the floor of the dry storage area. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for food borne illness (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses or parasites). Findings: a.During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/2023, at 8:30 a.m. with the Director of Dining Services (DDS), observed an open box of red bean ice bar was not labeled with open date and use by date. The DDS stated the red bean ice bar belonged to a resident in the assisted living area and it should be labeled with the resident's name, open date and use by date. DDS asked one of the dietary staff members to label the open box of red bean ice bar.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 47 and Resident 20) received restorative nurse aid (RNA, certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) (restorative nurse aid) services and treatment to prevent the further decrease in range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] and contractures (chronic joint stiffness associated with joint deformities and pain). This failure resulted in Resident 47 and Resident 20 not receiving the needed RNA services placing them at risk for further decline in the range of motion and at risk to acquire contractures. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 47's Face Sheet the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but limited to dementia (a decline in cognitive abilities that impact a person's ability to perform everyday activities), cerebral atrophy (a condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure handwashing or hand hygiene was performed before and after contact with a resident, before using gloves and after removing gloves during medication administration for 4 of 15 sampled residents, (Resident 16, Resident 43, Resident 4, and Resident 35.) This failure had the potential to result in the transmission of and exposure to infectious microorganisms, contaminants and increased the risk of the spread of infection to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 11/16/2023 at 8:33 am with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) on the South Covenant, during medication pass, LVN 1, placed medication in a medicine cup then went to get a blood pressure machine, put on a pair of gloves, removed one of the gloves and placed it in the trash can and then grabbed another pair of gloves and while holding the pair of gloves in his hand, grabbed another blood pressure machine because the first blood pressure machine was not working put on the second pair of gloves and closed the curtains, took Resident 16's blood pressure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 51) right to refuse care was honored when two nursing staff transferred Resident 51 to the bathroom after Resident 51 refused. This failure resulted in Resident 51 crying causing distress, discomfort and resisting care. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (Face Sheet),the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to dementia (a decline in cognitive abilities that impact a person's ability to perform everyday activities), Alzheimer's (a common and devastating form of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), anxiety 9an intense , excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situation), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function that occurs over a period of months to years), and osteoporosis ( a disease that weakens the bones and makes the bones more fragile and weaker than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and address the use of antibiotics (a drug to treat infection) on one of two sampled residents (Resident 53) by prescribing an antibiotic that did not meet the clinical criteria (relevant signs and symptoms of the disease) of urinary tract infection( [UTI] infection in any part of the urinary system). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 53 developing multi-drug resistance (antibiotic will not be effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: During a review of resident 53's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia ( a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities that can interfere with daily life) with other behavioral disturbance, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), difficulty in walking and atrial fibrillation (quivering or irregular heartbeat). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functional call light for one of five sampled residents (Resident 21). This failure had the potential to result in a delay in meeting Resident 21's needs for assistance and could lead to falls and accidents. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record(Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia( loss of cognitive functioning like remembering, thinking and reasoning that can interfere with daily life), congestive heart failure (heart capacity to pump blood cannot keep up with the body's needs), difficulty in walking, muscle weakness and encounter for palliative care ( specialized medical care for people living with serious illness, such as cancer or heart failure). During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] standardized screening tool) dated 10/10/20223, the MDS indicated Resident 21 had moderately impaired cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedrooms measure at least 80 square (sq) foot (ft) per resident for six of twelve resident rooms.This failure had the potential to result in compromised resident safety due to limited bedroom space.During an interview with the Administrator (ADMIN) on 1/23/2026 at 2:49 p.m., the ADMIN stated the residents in the affected rooms were not negatively impacted. The ADMIN stated there was sufficient room for the provision of nursing services for these group of residents, the rooms were approved during ( Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) inspection.During a review of the letter provided by the ADMIN dated 1/20/2026 , the ADMIN requested a room waiver for the residents' room sizes less than 80 sq ft per resident for six of 18 rooms.The following resident rooms measured as follows:Room, Number of beds, and Square Footageroom [ROOM NUMBER] 4 beds 305.5 sq ftroom [ROOM NUMBER] 4 beds 305.5 sq ftroom [ROOM NUMBER] 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor(MS) on 11/09/2024 at 1043 AM, the MS stated the residents in the affected rooms were not negatively impacted. The MS stated there is sufficient room for the provision of nursing services for these group of residents. the rooms were approved during OSHPD inspection. During a review of the letter provided by the DON dated 11/09/2024 , the DON requested a room waiver for the residents' room sizes less than 80 sq ft per resident for six of 18 rooms. The following resident rooms measured as followed: Room Number of beds Square Footage 34 4 305.5 35 4 305.5 36 2 151 37 2 152 38 2 152 39 2 151 During observations in these rooms throughout the survey period 11/8/2024 through 11/14/2024, there were no issues observed with the residents having access in and out of the rooms, the space for their furniture, and no problems with staff being able to administer or assist with care.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
During an interview with the Administrator (ADMIN) on 11/17/2023 at 1040 AM, the ADM stated the residents in the affected rooms were not negatively impacted. The ADM stated there is sufficient room for the provision of nursing services for these group of residents. the rooms were approved during OSHPD inspection. During a review of the letter provided by the ADMIN dated 1/12/2023 , the ADMIN requested a room waiver for the residents' room sizes less than 80 sq ft per resident for six of 18 rooms. The following resident rooms measured as followed: Room Number of beds Square Footage 34 4 305.5 35 4 305.5 36 2 151 37 2 152 38 2 152 39 2 151 During observations in these rooms throughout the survey period 11/14/2023 through 11/17/2023, there were no issues observed with the residents having access in and out of the rooms, the space for their furniture, and no problems with staff being able to administer or assist with care.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$98,079 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $98,079 — penalty dated 2024-10-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-17 for 36 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROUWER, ROBIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| CHUNG, WINSTON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2021 |
| HAAGSMA, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| HENRY, PATRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/06/2024 |
| HULTGRIEN, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| KIM, SHARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2007 |
| ORNEE, STEVE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| ROBISON, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2018 |
| SOLOMON, KEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| STRUIKSMA, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| VANDER LEY, ELROY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/10/1996 |
| VANDYK, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| VANESSEN, RANDY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| VANLANT, SANDY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| VERHOEVEN, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| ZONDERVAN, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/26/2024 |
| DEGROOT, BERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2013 |
| DEVRIES, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2010 |
| GREENE, MATHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2012 |
| HIBMA, JUDITH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2014 |
| MATSON, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2014 |
| ORNEE, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2012 |
| ORNEE, SANDRA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2010 |
| TANIS, MERWYN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2013 |
| VELDHUIZEN, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $5K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055539. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.