Height Street Skilled Care
1611 Height Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (661) 748-1300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,735 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-28)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 24.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.62 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.5%CMS range 32.1–53.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.9–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 5.7–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.47 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
70 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure (P&P) on Psychotherapeutic Drug (medication used to treat mental health disorders) Management for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1:1. Was not provided non-pharmacological (without using medications) interventions when Resident 1 verbalized increased sadness.2. Was not monitored every shift for 72 hours after his Lexapro (antidepressant [medication that treat depression [persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]-Lexapro black box warning, which is the U.S. [United States] Food and Drug Administration [FDA] most serious warning for prescription drugs. The warning states that anti-depressants can increase the risk of suicidal thoughts [thoughts of ending one's own life] .) dosage was increased.These failures resulted in Resident 1 being found with several layers of clear tape (plastic) over his mouth, cloth (cotton fabric) around his neck and ankles, hands were tied together, a white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1) received quality care when the facility failed to: 1. Implement their policy and procedure on a change of condition (an important change in a resident ' s baseline condition which includes physical, mental, emotional or functional changes that require a change in treatment to address) for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Ensure the MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) was accurate for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1) when contractures (when your skin, muscles, tendons [tough, ropelike cords that connect muscles to bones, enabling movement], or ligaments [tough tissues that act like ropes or bands connecting bones to other bones providing stability and allowing for movement] get permanently stiff or shortened, making it hard to move the affected area) were not inputted into the assessment. 3. Ensure Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA - a person that provides therapy to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-01 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and accurately document physical therapy (PT - branch of healthcare for the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment, and exercise), occupational therapy (OT -branch of healthcare that helps people adapt to challenges in their daily lives, like getting dressed, eating, or working, by improving their ability to perform those activities) services and speech therapy (branch of healthcare that helps people with difficulties talking, understanding language, or swallowing) services, when the facility therapy staff inaccurately documented the time spent providing therapy to 11 of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11). This failure resulted in Resident 1's right hand contracture (when one or more fingers get stuck in a bent position and can't be straightened) to worsen and had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan (comprehensive documents outlining the care and services to be provided by the facility to residents) intervention of providing supervision during toilet transfers for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had generalized muscle weakness, a history of falls, was at risk for falls, and had Alzheimer's Disease (memory loss), when Resident 1 got up unsupervised to use the toilet and fell in her room. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall with fracture (broken bone), requiring admission, and surgical intervention at the acute care hospital. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 1/23/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Schizoaffective Disorder (false perception of reality with mood symptoms), Cognitive Communication Deficits (inability to communicate), Spondylosis (degeneration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Maintain an environment free of accident hazards for four of 41 sampled residents (Resident 86, Resident 110, Resident 111, Resident 85) when Resident 86, Resident 110, Resident 111, Resident 85 were allowed to keep cigarette lighters in their rooms unsecured. This failure had the potential for residents who wandered to access the cigarette lighters and potentially start fires in the facility and jeopardizing the safety of all residents, visitors and staff members. 2. Follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Elopement [when a resident leaves the facility premises without staff knowledge or permission] and Wandering [when a resident walks around aimlessly, unsupervised] when:a. The facility did not ensure wander guards (wearable device used to detect the resident's proximity to exit points) were checked weekly for placement, testing, and expiration dates for two of two sampled residents (Resident 92 and Resident 96). This failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and accurately complete the annual Pre-admission Screening Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR-federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not incorrectly placed in nursing homes or long-term care instead of a psychiatric setting) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 38). This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to be placed in an inappropriate setting and not receive required services.Findings:During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR), dated 5/10/25, the AR indicated, Resident 38 has diagnosis of Dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, caused by physical changes in the brain), Schizophrenia (a chronic, severe brain disorder that causes individuals to interpret reality abnormally, characterized by disruptions in thought, perception, and emotion), and Auditory Hallucinations (the perception of hearing sounds-such as voices, music, or buzzing-in the absence of any external physical stimulus).During a concurrent interview and record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate with methadone (medication used to help people reduce or quit opiates [pain medication]) outside clinic when one of one sampled resident (Resident 86) was admitted to the hospital for overdose. This failure had the potential not to meet resident needs.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/22/26 at 9:31 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) Resident 86's Transfer Form, dated 11/22/26 was reviewed. The Transfer Form indicated Resident 86 was transferred to hospital for low oxygen saturation (level of oxygen in blood), and oversedation. DON stated resident was transferred to hospital and Resident 86 had order for Narcan (to rapidly reverse an opioid overdose) and it was not administered.During a review of Resident 86's hospital discharge paperwork (HDP) dated 11/23/25, the HDP indicated, Diagnosis: 1. Accidental methadone overdose.During an interview on 4/23/26 at 1:20 p.m. with DON, DON stated there was no documentation indicating that the Methadone clinic was notified about Resident 86's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective communication for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) with a hearing deficit, when a communication board was not utilized. This failure resulted in Resident 3's inability to understand the information conveyed.Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Diagnosis Report (DR), dated [DATE], the DR indicated, Resident 3 had a diagnosis of Conductive Hearing Loss [sound is unable to reach the inner ear due to blockages or structural deformities], Bilateral [both ears].During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Resident 3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, 13 to 15 indicates intact cognition [thinking/memory], 8-12 indicates moderate impairment, 0-7 indicated severe impairment) score of 14.During an interview on [DATE] at 8:46 a.m. the surveyor utilized a whiteboard to communicate with Resident 3 due to Resident 3's hearing impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL - tasks required for self care such as bathing, eating. dressing, transferring, toileting and continence) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 4) when nail care and shaving was not provided to a dependent resident. Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), dated 2/24/26, the AR indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (dysfunction of the brain that alters brain function).During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident assessment tool), dated 2/27/26, the MDS Section GG - Functional Abilities indicated, Resident 4 was dependent on staff assistance to complete personal hygiene (shaving, washing hands, fingernail trimming).During a review of Resident 4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - cognitive assessment), dated 4/20/26, the BIMS score indicated, Resident 4's score was 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were administered as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 6 developing skin breakdown.Findings:During a review of Resident 6's Nursing Quarterly Assessment (NQA), dated 2/26/26, the NQA indicated, Resident 6 had a Braden Skin Risk Score (used to assess a resident's risk for developing a pressure ulcer [damage to the skin usually over bony areas caused by prolonged pressure]) of 13 (score of 13-14 means at moderate risk for skin breakdown).During a review of Resident 6's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 4/23/26, the OSR indicated, Resident 6 had a physician order for Calmoseptine ointment (used to protect and heal irritated skin) to be applied on his left and right buttocks, and perineum (area between the genitals and the anus) every two hours for skin maintenance.During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/26 at 11:59 a.m. with Treatment Nurse (TN), Resident 6's Treatment Administration Record (TAR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a physician order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 10) when a Registered Dietician (RD) consult was not completed. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on Resident 10's nutritional status and overall health.Findings:During a review of Resident 10's Electronic Health Record (EHR), (undated), the EHR indicated, Resident 10 had a significant weight loss (more than 5 percent of body weight) within one month. On 3/1/26 Resident 10's weight was 184 pounds and on 4/3/26 Resident 10's weight was 166 pounds.During a review of Resident 10's Physician Progress Note (PPN), dated 4/6/26, the PPN indicated, The resident has experienced a 2-pound weight loss over the past month and a total of 17 pounds over the past six months.the degree of unintentional weight loss is clinically significant.Assessment and Plan.Order dietary Consult for comprehensive nutritional assessment.During a review of Resident 10's Order Summary (OS), dated 4/6/26, the OS indicated, there was a telephone physician order for an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 6) head of bed was elevated to prevent aspiration (when food or liquid enters the airway or lungs instead of going into the stomach) while receiving enteral tube feeding (liquid nutrition is given directly into the stomach through a tube). This failure had the potential to result in serious harm, including aspiration pneumonia (lung infection that occurs when food or liquid enters the lungs), respiratory compromise (lungs unable to work well enough and can make breathing difficult) and death.Findings:During an observation on 4/21/26 at 3:37 p.m. in Resident 6's room, Resident 6 was lying in bed, with the head of bed (HOB) elevated at a 15-degree angle. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 was at bedside. LVN 2 connected Resident 6 to his enteral feeding. LVN 2 set the feeding pump rate to administer 60 milliliters (ml) per hour. LVN 2 left Resident 6's room after starting Resident 6's enteral feeding.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/21/26 at 3:39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician orders for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 had an order for the administration of one inhalation (drawing the medication into the lungs) of Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder (a medication to treat inflammation of the lungs) 200-25 MCG (micrograms-unit of measurement)/ACT (actuation - refers to a single spray, puff, or activation of an inhaler) and Resident 2 inhaled two doses of the medication. This failure resulted in Resident 2 receiving twice ordered the dose of Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder 200-25 MCG/ACT and placed Resident 2 at risk of medication overdose. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/21/26 at 9:05 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2 in Resident 2's room, RN 2 stated she was going to administer the Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder 200-25 MCG/ACT to Resident 2. RN 2 removed the Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder 200-25 MCG/ACT inhaler from the box and handed it to Resident 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. One of 41 sampled residents (Resident 86)'s medication was securely stored. This failure had the potential for medication to be accessed by unauthorized staff and residents.2. Medications were labeled for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 64) when Resident 64's insulin pen (a multi-use vial of medication to treat high blood sugar in the format of a pen which uses a needle for administration of the medication) was not labeled with Resident 64's identification. This failure had the potential for Resident 64 to use another resident's insulin pen or vice versa, placing Resident 64 and other residents at risk of the spread of blood/borne diseases (diseases spread through the blood). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/20/26 at 9:08 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 in Resident 86's room, Resident 86 had methadone (controlled medication [high risk of abuse] used to treat opioid use disorder) 90 mg (milligram) found on the bedside table. There was a label on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. The licensed nurses notified the physician in a timely manner when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) had a change of condition.2. The licensed nurses failed to administer a medication as ordered by the physician for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).These failures resulted in Resident 1 having abdominal pain and going to the hospital due to delay in care.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 2/11/26, the MDS indicated, Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 (score of 8-12 means moderately impaired cognition).During a review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation (CCE), dated 2/21/26, the CCE indicated, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) informed CN (charge nurse) resident (1) has had 3 BMs (bowel movements) with diarrhea (passing loose, watery, or unformed stool three or more times in a single day) . Date and time of clinician notification: 02/21/2026 08:10. Recommendation of Primary Clinician(s):…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) within 24 hours. This failure resulted in delayed investigation of abuse and had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 3/4/26, the AR indicated, DIAGNOSIS. UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA (decline in mental ability such as memory, thinking or behavior that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) . ANXIETY (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) . ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE (progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroy memory, thinking skills, and eventually the ability to perform simple tasks) . DEPRESSION (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in activities) . COGNITIVE COMMUNICATION DEFICIT (difficulty with speaking, listening, reading, or writing caused by disrupted thinking skills) . NEED FOR ASSISTANCE WITH PERSONAL CARE.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 12/4/25, the MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) were able to receive phone calls and outside confidential communication from services outside of the facility. This failure had the potential to violate Resident 2 and Resident 3's rights.Findings:During an interview on 12/18/25 at 3:45 p.m. with the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO), LTCO stated he has a hard time contacting residents at the facility by phone. LTCO stated at times the calls go unanswered and other times they will be sent to voicemail, he stated he cannot leave voicemail due to the nature of his work, he must keep communication confidential. LTCO stated on 10/31/25 he called the facility; the receptionist answered the call and then transferred the call to the nurses' station; the call went unanswered at the nurses' station and was delivered to voicemail. LTCO stated on 11/17/25 he called the facility three times, each time the receptionist would answer the call and then transferred the call to the nurses' station, the calls went unanswered at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) received all their personal belongings upon discharge. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to have missing items upon discharge.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, (AR) the AR indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/1/25. During a review of Resident 2's Inventory List, (IL) dated 11/6/2, the IL indicated Resident 2 had two grey t-shirts and one white sheet upon admission. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/12/26 at 3:38 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 2's IL, dated 11/6/25 was reviewed. DON stated there was no evidence that Resident 2 received his belongings upon discharge on [DATE]. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Theft Prevention, revised 11/1/17, the P&P indicated, The facility is committed to preventing the misappropriation of resident property. The facility will exercise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a home medication list for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to understand how and when to take his needed home medications. Findings: During an interview on 1/12/26 at 3:17 with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated upon discharge residents were provided with their medications, with a list of home medications with instruction on how to take the medication. LVN 1 stated the nurses educated the resident on the home medication list and instructions, once the education is completed, she has the resident sign the home medication list to prove the education was completed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/12/26 at 3:38 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Discharge Instruction Form, (DIF) dated 12/8/25, was reviewed. The DIF, indicated, Resident 1's medications were provided at discharge, none were listed on Resident 1's DIF. The DIF, indicated See Attachment. DON confirmed no evidence Resident 1 received home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:Resident 1's bathroom had a foul smell. The bathroom tiles in three of four shower rooms used by Resident 2 and other residents were not cleaned.These failures had the potential for unpleasant experience for Resident 1 and Resident 2.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/3/25 at 10:40 a.m. with Resident 1 in his room, Resident 1 was in his bed facing the bathroom. Resident 1 stated the bathroom had a strong foul and unpleasant smell. The bathroom smelled of urine and bleach like smell.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/3/25 at 10:55 a.m. with Housekeeping Staff (HS), HS entered Resident 1's bathroom and stated the smell was not pleasant. HS stated another resident used to urinate on the floor in that bathroom and housekeeping was having a difficult time removing the urine odor.2. During an interview on 9/3/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely develop a baseline care plan with fall prevention interventions for two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 4) who were high risk for falls. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 and Resident 4 at risk for falls and injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 1s admission Record (AD), undated, the AD indicated, Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility.During a review of Resident 1's Assessment Outcomes Record (AOR), dated [DATE], the AOR indicated, Resident 1's fall risk assessment score of 60 (scores of 45 or higher indicate high fall risk).During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report (CPR), undated, the CRP indicated a fall prevention care plan was first created for Resident 1 on [DATE], 26 days after his admission.During a review of Resident 4's AD, undated, the AD indicated, Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the fall prevention intervention of keeping the bed in the low position for one of three residents (Resident 4) who was high risk for falls. This failure had the potential to place Resident 4 at the risk for falls and injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AD), undated, the AD indicated, Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and pain.During a review of Resident 4's Assessment Outcomes Record (AOR), dated [DATE], the AOR indicated, Resident 4 had a fall risk assessment score of 50 (scores of 45 or higher indicate high fall risk).During a review of Resident 4's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CRP indicated, The resident needs a safe environment with. the bed in the low position.During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:15 a.m. in Resident 4's room, with Family Member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to manage the pain of one of three residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4 reported pain to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and CNA B but did not inform the Licensed Nurse (LN) C. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 suffering in pain.Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AD), undated, the AD indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and pain.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/3/25 at 10:15 a.m. in Resident 4's room, Resident 4 was lying in bed with Family Member (FM) 4 at bedside. FM 4 stated Resident 4 had dementia (memory loss) but was able make needs known.During an observation on 9/3/25 at 11:40 a.m. in Resident 4's room, CNA A and CNA B were providing care to Resident 4. During care, Resident 4 reported to CNA A and CNA B that he had pain in his arms. CNA A and CNA B left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to answer the call light timely for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential for delay in care and needs not addressed promptly.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/29/25, the OSR indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (complete loss of muscle function) affecting left non-dominant side (weaker side of the body), Muscle Weakness, other abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility.During an interview on 8/28/25 at 1:20 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the night nurses were not supportive, they (night staff) didn't answer the call light. Resident 1 stated he felt ridiculed and helpless because the nurse had taken hours to answer his call light. Resident 1 stated he wanted his brief to be changed.During a review of Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- cognitive assessment tool used to evaluate a resident's mental status), dated 7/25/25, the BIMS indicated Summary Score of 15 (score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan (is a comprehensive, personalized document that outlines the specific needs of an individual requiring care, detailing the type of support, how it will be provided, and the goals of the care) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1.Resident 1 was not repositioned every two hours. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to develop pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence). 2.Resident 2 was not supervised during a meal. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 not to consume the proper nutrition and had the potential for choking. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 6/28/25, the CP indicated, [Resident 1] has altered skin integrity related to pressure injury/wound (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) Contributory factors: admitted with pressure injury Re-opened pressure injury to sacrococcyx [end of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition and administer medication according to the physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was having continuous loose stools/diarrhea. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 losing three lbs. (pounds-weight measurement) weight in one week and potential for adverse health outcomes.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Plan of Care (PC-is a comprehensive, personalized document that outlines the specific needs of an individual requiring care, detailing the type of support, how it will be provided, and the goals of the care), dated 6/13/25, the PC indicated, [Resident1] has dehydration or potential fluid deficit r/t (related to) new GT (gastrostomy tube feeding- where nutrition and/or fluids are delivered directly into the stomach through a tube inserted into the abdomen) feeding and GI infection (gastrointestinal infection - is an inflammation or irritation of the digestive tract, often caused by bacteria, viruses, or parasites.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for three of six sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure had to potential to negatively impact Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3, physical and psychosocial health.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 7/18/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 1' s BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the mental processes that allow individuals to think, learn, and remember) score was 13 (13 to 15 points indicated the resident had cognitive intactness).During a concurrent observation and interview, on 7/30/25 at 12:01 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the best call light wait time was five minutes and the worst was 45 minutes. Resident 1 stated some staff will just walk by and not look at her. Resident 1 stated she calculates the wait time by looking at the clock observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 ad Resident 3) were treated with respect and dignity when Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1) entered Resident 2 and Resident 3's room singing at 4 a.m. This failure resulted in Resident 2 and Resident 3 being woken up and not to be treated with dignity and respect.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 6/11/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 1' s BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the mental processes that allow individuals to think, learn, and remember) score was 14 (13 to 15 points indicated the resident had cognitive intactness). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Resident 3's BIMS score was 15. During a concurrent interview on 7/30/25 at 12:29 p.m. with Resident 2 and Resident 3, Resident 2 stated a female CNA comes in at 4 in the morning singing [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on Assessment and Management of Resident Weights for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when the registered dietitian (RD)'s recommendations were not communicated to the physician. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/15/25, the AR indicated, Diagnosis. MILD PROTEIN-CALORIE MALNUTRITION (body has insufficient protein and energy to meet its basic needs).During a review of Resident 1's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), dated 7/15/25, the WVS indicated, Resident 1 weighed 126 lbs (pounds - unit of mass) on 6/24/25 and 119 lbs on 7/4/25 (lost seven lbs).During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/27/25, the OSR indicated, Resident 1's diet was no added salt.During a review of Resident 1's OSR, dated 6/11/25, the OSR indicated, Boost (nutritional supplement) . two times a day for Supplement.During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/15/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on Controlled Medication Storage when:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, LVN 5, and LVN 6 did not immediately report the missing controlled narcotic medications (medications that are highly addictive and have a significant potential for abuse, classified as a controlled substance under the law, meaning its manufacture, distribution, and possession are regulated). 2. LVN 1 did not keep the discontinued 15 tablets of controlled narcotic medications in the medication cart to be counted every change of shift (changing from one work shift to another, e.g., from day shift to night shift).These failures resulted in missing narcotic medications, potential for narcotic diversion (getting legally prescribed narcotics into the wrong hands or using them for the wrong reasons), and had the potential to negatively impact resident's safety.Findings: 1.During an interview on 7/8/25 at 5:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated on 6/18/25 it was discovered that four oxycodone (narcotic pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on Unusual Occurrence Reporting when missing narcotic controlled medications (medications that are highly addictive and has a significant potential for abuse, classified as a controlled substance under the law, meaning its manufacture, distribution, and possession are regulated) was not reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure had the potential for narcotic diversion (the use and/or distribution not intended to) and had the potential for medication errors affecting residents' safety.During an interview on 7/8/25 at 5:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated on 6/18/25 it was discovered that four oxycodone (narcotic pain medication), four Percocet (narcotic pain medication), and four Norco (narcotic pain medication) were missing from the E-kit ( (emergency kit, containing a pre-determined supply of medications, especially controlled substances, for immediate patient needs during emergencies or when standard pharmacy services are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Administer narcotic (a strong pain medication) medication according to the physician's orders for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Reassess and re-evaluate the effectiveness of narcotic medication given for pain for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1).These failures had the potential for Resident 1 suffering from uncontrolled pain and/or result in adverse health outcomes. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD (AR), dated 7/9/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had diagnoses of Osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone), Complete traumatic amputation (complete removal of a body part due to accident or injury) of the left lower leg, Pain unspecified, Inguinal hernia (a bulge in the groin, area of the body located between the abdomen and the thigh, an area that can be painful). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 6/2025, the OSR indicated, Norco (strong narcotic pain medication) 5-325 MG (milligram - a unit of measurement) Give one tablet by mouth every 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Three of three resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) were clean and sanitary. This failure had the potential to spread infectious diseases to residents, staff, and visitors. 2. Environment had comfortable noise levels for two of two sampled residents (Resident 134 and Resident 31). This failure resulted in residents not getting rest and sleep. 3. One of 44 sampled resident (Resident 81) personal property was protected from theft and loss. This failure resulted in Resident 81's personal property not to be accounted for. Findings: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 9:08 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor under the beds had thick debris and dusts like white particles. The room was occupied by two residents. Resident 24 was lying in bed with thick debris under his bed on the floor. The sliding door frame had thick dark colored debris. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:09 a.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe administration of medication for six of 16 sampled residents (Resident 46, Resident 183, Resident 23, Resident 47, Resident 7, and Resident 282) when medications were found at resident's bed side table. This failure had the potential for medications to be accessed by unauthorized staff and residents. Findings: a) During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 8:43 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 in Resident 46's room, Resident 46 had zinc oxide (ointment used to treat and prevent diaper rash) 1 pouch of 8 ounces (oz) on bedside table. LVN 4 stated medication should not be left at bedside table. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/10/25 at 2:38 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Resident 46's Self-Medication Administration Form (SMAF), dated 5/7/25 was reviewed. The SMAF indicated, Did the resident requested to self administer medication? indicated No Comments indicated Resident did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure of one of 26 sampled milk glasses were at appropriate temperature. This failure had the potential to result in the residents having foodborne illness. Findings: During an observation on 6/11/25 at 11:15 a.m. in the kitchen, the milk temperature was at 46 degrees. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/24 at 12:43 p.m. with Dietary Manager (DM) in the conference room, the test tray was delivered. DM tested the milk temperature and stated the milk was at 46 degrees. DM stated milk temperature should be below 41 degrees. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Temperatures, dated 1/31/19, the P&P indicated, Acceptable Serving Temperatures Food Item Milk, juice < [less than] 41 [degree]. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Food & Nutrition Services Policy and Procedure, Dated 12/1/21, the P&P indicated, 4. Milk may be poured into glass from the original container, covered, and returned to refrigeration. 5. Milk will not remain out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Dish Machine Temperature Recording, when dish machine's wash water was not at required temperature. This failure had the potential to result in unsanitary conditions of food utensils for foodservice safety and potential to place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/24 at 8:33 a.m. with Dietary Aid (DA) 1 in the kitchen, the dishwasher was in use with dishes currently in the rack. The dishwasher already had a few cycles when the temperature of the dishwasher was reviewed. DA 1 stated the temperature was at 110 degrees. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/24 at 11:31 a.m. with DA 2 in the kitchen, the dishwasher was in use with dishes currently on the rack. DA 2 stated the temperature was at 110 degrees. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Dish Machine Temperature Recording, dated 6/1/17, the P&P indicated, Procedure II. Allow the dish machine to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was answered timely for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 134). This failure resulted in Resident 134 waiting for two hours with soiled brief which had the potential for skin breakdown and left Resident 134 feeling frustrated and depressed. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 9:34 a.m. in Resident 134's room, with Resident 134, Resident 134 was lying in her bed with head of bed elevated. Resident 134 was alert and oriented. Resident 134 stated her call light was not answered and she had number two (pooped) waited two hours to be changed sometime last week in the night shift. Resident 134 stated she felt frustrated and depressed. Resident 134 stated she looked at her cell phone for time of how long her call light was not answered. During a review of Resident 134's Minimum Data Set (MDS-comprehensive assessment tool), dated 5/22/25, the MDS indicated Resident 134 was dependent (Helper does all of the effort) on toileting hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Room or Roommate Change for one of one sampled resident (Resident 56) when Resident 56 was not notified before he was moved to a different room. This failure resulted in disruption, confusion and making Resident 56 upset. Findings: During an interview on 6/11/25 at 3:56 p.m. with Resident 56, Resident 56 stated when he was admitted to the facility, he was put in a private room. Resident 56 stated a week later when he returned from a shower, staff were collecting his belongings and told him, We [staff] are moving you [Resident 56] to another room. Resident 56 stated he was not notified prior to this decision and didn't sign any type of acknowledgement. Resident 56 stated this (room change) made him upset. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/12/25 at 8:58 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD reviewed Resident 56's clinical record. SSD was unable to find documentation of Resident 56 was notified in writing of a room change. SSD stated he should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN - a form that provides information to the beneficiary so that he/she can decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for by the Medicare and assume financial responsibility) was completed for two of three sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 183). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 66 and Resident 183's finances. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/25 at 12:18 p.m. with Business Office Manager (BOM), Resident 66's ABN, dated 4/22/25 was reviewed. The ABN indicated, Options: Check only one box. Option 1, Option 2, Option 3 the boxes were left blank. BOM stated the ABN was incomplete. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/25 at 12:20 p.m. with BOM, Resident 183's ABN, dated 3/26/25 was reviewed. The ABN indicated, Options: Check only one box. Option 1, Option 2, Option 3 the boxes were left blank. BOM stated the ABN was incomplete. During a review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Elder Abuse Prohibition and Prevention, when: 1. A thorough investigation of the resident-to-resident physical and verbal altercation for two of 44 sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 17) was completed. This failure had the potential for Resident 16 and Resident 17 not to be protected from further abuse. 2. A 5-day investigation report of the resident-to-resident physical and verbal altercation for two of 44 sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 17) was not submitted to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the long-term care (LTC) ombudsman (advocate for the rights and well-being of residents in long-term care facilities). This failure had the potential for an incomplete investigation for Resident 16 and Resident 17. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 6/10/25 at 2:32 p.m. with the Administrator, the Administrator stated the investigation was on the SOC 341 (Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P & P) titled, Discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA), for one of one sampled resident (Resident 79). This failure had the potential to result in being discharged to unsafe conditions. Findings: During a review of Resident 79's Discharge Summary, (DS) dated 3/17/25, the DS indicated, Resident 79 was discharged AMA the next day. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 10:23 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 9), LVN 9 stated he had just given Resident 79 her medication when he last seen her at the facility. LVN 9 stated when he was done with the medication pass, he had noticed Resident 79 was not in her room. LVN 9 stated when he asked a staff member if they had seen her, the staff member stated she was in the lobby and had walked out the facility. LVN 9 stated Resident 79 did not inform him that she was unhappy with the care and did not mention anything about leaving the facility. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 11:06 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman (advocate for the rights and well-being of residents in long-term care facilities) of transfer to hospital for one of one sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure had the potential for unsafe resident transfer and discharge. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/25 at 9:42 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 7's Discharge Summary dated 2/26/25 and 7/31/24, were reviewed. The Discharge Summary indicated Resident 7 was transferred to the hospital on 2/26/25 and 7/31/24. DON stated there is no fax confirmation to prove that ombudsman notifications were completed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer and Discharge, dated 9/1/23, the P&P indicated, A temporary transfer to an acute care facility is considered a Facility-intiated discharge and notice must be provided to the resident/resident representative as soon as practicable before the transfer. The Ombudsman must also be notified as soon as practicable.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 29). This failure had a potential for unintended weight loss for Resident 29. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 10:18 a.m. with Resident 29 in Resident 29's room, Resident 29 stated all of his teeth were recently been extracted and was waiting for dentures. Resident 29 stated he had no teeth and was concerned about his weight loss. During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MD'S-comprehensive assessment tool), dated 4/2/25, the MD'S indicated Resident 29's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - cognition assessment tool, 15-point scale: 13-15 cognitively intact) score was 13. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 3:47 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 9, LVN 9 stated Resident 29 is not on the weekly weights for month of May or June, and his meal percentage is between the 50-75%. Resident 29 has lost one pound since the care plan was revised with no goal weight to see if he is really…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medication was administered according to physician's order for one of five sampled residents (Resident 337). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 337 having adverse health outcomes. 2. Complete vital signs (temperature, heart rate, breathing rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation [amount of oxygen in the blood], pain, and mental status) after seizure (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain that can cause temporary changes in movement, awareness, or behavior) episodes for one of five sampled residents (Resident 85). This failure had the potential for Resident 85 to experience a delay in care due to an incomplete assessment. 3. Follow physician orders to have foot cradle (a device used to prevent blankets from touching the legs/feet) for one of eight sampled Residents (Resident 11). This failure had the potential for Resident 11 having worsening wound. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/25 at 8:30 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care to one of six sampled residents (Resident 28). This failure had the potential to result in oral and dental issues. Findings: During an observation on 6/9/25 at 2:40 p.m. in Resident 28's room, Resident 28 was in bed smiling. Resident 28 had food particles in between teeth, teeth had brownish discoloration, and had few missing teeth. During an interview on 6/9/25 at 2:45 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated, It [Resident 28's teeth] looks like her teeth was not brushed for days. Resident 28 had contractures (hardening of joints and has limited movement) on both of her hands. During a review of Resident 28's Care Plan (CP) dated 1/29/25, the CP indicated, Oral Care: Provide setup with oral care and assist as indicated. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 10:32 a.m. with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated Resident 28 was sleeping and so teeth was not brushed. CNA stated, I did not go back to brush her teeth. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Grooming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pressure Ulcer Prevention, to prevent a pressure injury (skin damage that result of prolonged pressure or friction such as hips, buttocks, and heels) from occurring for one of five sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure resulted in Resident 7 developing a pressure injury on coccyx area (buttocks). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/25 at 10:11 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Weekly Summary (WS), dated 2/21/25 was reviewed. The WS indicated skin assessment section was blank. DON stated the WS had no skin assessment completed. DON stated skin assessment should be completed when weekly summary is being done. DON stated Resident 7 should be repositioned every two hours when resident is at risk for developing pressure wound. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 2:29 p.m. with Resident 7, Resident 7 stated, I went to the hospital because of the pressure sore in February 2025. Resident 7 stated she is not aware how pressure injuries occur.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to failed to follow the physician's order to provide RNA (Restorative Nursing Assistant program-provide specialized care that helps residents regain or maintain their physical abilities and independence) program to one of six sampled residents (Resident 28). This failure had the potential for Resident 28 experiencing worsening immobility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 2:55 p.m. in Resident 28's room, Resident 28 was in bed, her both hands had contractures (hardening of joints, limited mobility). Resident 28 stated she has not been getting exercises and not has been out of bed in a while. During a review of resident 28's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/12/25, the OSR indicated, RNA to perform AAROM [Active Assisted Range of Motion - type of exercise where a person moves a joint with the help of another person or a device, helps to build strength and flexibility in a recovering body part] Gentle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 338) when smoking articles were left with the Resident 338 unattended. This failure had the potential to cause injury to residents residing in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/25 at 9:18 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 12, a pack of cigarettes and a lighter were on Resident 338's bedside table. CNA 12 stated these smoking items are supposed to be locked up at the nurses' station and residents should not have access to them. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 9:30 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) and Resident 338, Resident 338 stated her cigarettes and lighter were in the purse sitting in her lap. DON stated to Resident 338 our policy that smoking articles are supposed to be locked up. During a review of Resident 338's Smoking Assessment (SA), dated 5/27/25, the SA indicated, Resident is a smoker and requires supervision. During a review of policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Smoking, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nephrostomy catheter (a tube placed through the skin into the kidney to drain urine when there's a blockage or other problem preventing normal drainage) collection bag was placed below the bladder for one of one sampled resident (Resident 28). This failure had the potential for bladder infection or leakage of the catheter bag. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 3 p.m. in Resident 28's room, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7, Resident 28 was lying in bed on an upright position. Resident 28 had a nephrostomy catheter collection bag on the bed. The catheter bag had yellowish urine like liquid, placed beside her head, and higher than the level of her bladder. Resident 28 had contractures (hardening and deformity of joints, unable to move) on both of her hands, unable to lift or move objects. LVN 7 stated the catheter bag should be placed lower than the bladder. During a review of Resident's Care Plan (CP), dated 5/5/25, the CP indicated, [Resident 28] has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to ensure one of five sampled resident's (Resident 337) pain medications were given according to the pain rate parameter. This failure had the potential for Resident 337 experiencing unrelieved pain. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/25 at 8:30 a.m. with Resident 337 and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6, in Resident 337's room. Resident 337 was moaning and stated she is having a pain rate of over 10 (pain rate of 10 means the worst possible pain). LVN 6 stated Resident 337 has an order for Tramadol (pain medication) for pain rate of 4-6 (for moderate pain). LVN 6 stated she will give the Tramadol. During a review of Resident 337's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated June 2025, the MAR indicated, Tramadol Oral tablet 50 mg (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for pain - moderate (4-6). The MAR indicated Resident 337 was given Tramadol: a) On 6/5/25, with a pain rate of 7 (rate of 7-9 means severe pain). b) On 6/7/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that discharge summary was completed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7) when a discharge summary was missing skin assessment. This failure resulted in Resident 7's discharge summary incomplete documentation. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/25 at 3:25 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, Resident 7's Discharge Summary (DS), dated 2/26/25, was reviewed. The DS indicated skin assessment was blank. LVN 5 stated no skin assessment was completed on discharge summary. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer and Discharge, dated 9/1/23, the P&P indicated, Prior to discharging the resident, the Facility will prepare a Discharge Summary and will document the summary in the resident's medical record. At a minimum, the Discharge Summary will contain a summary of the resident's status, including a description of the resident's: i. Medically defined condition(s) and prior medical history.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 72) when staff didn't wear the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-specialized equipment worn by staff to minimize exposure to infections or illness) when providing care. This failure had the potential to spread infectious diseases. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/10/25 at 9:38 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 in Resident 72's room, LVN 5 was providing wound care to Resident 72. LVN 5 did not wear a gown during the wound care. Resident 72 had signage above his bed indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions- must wear a gown and gloves during any wound care requiring a dressing. LVN 5 stated, I realized it right afterwards, that I should had a gown on. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Personal Protective Equipment, dated 7/1/23, the P&P indicated, I. Facility staff required to perform tasks that may involve exposure to blood/body fluids are provided with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents' rooms (Resident 24)'s was in good repair. This failure had the potential for affecting residents quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 6/9/25 at 9:08 a.m. in Resident 24's room, Resident 24 was lying in bed. There were three deep scrapes on the wall by the head of the bed. The scrapes were approximately 14 inches in diameter and half inch deep, 10 inches in diameter half inch deep scrape, and eight inches in diameter half inch deep scrape. There were thick debris on the floor. During an interview on 6/9/25 at 9:10 a.m. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated the bed was hitting the wall. MS stated he was aware of the scrapes. MS stated, We do not fix it until there is penetration, meaning a hole to the next room. During a review of the facility's list of Maintenance Concerns (MC), dated 4/1/25 to 6/11/25, the MC indicated there was no report and no repair done on the scraped walls. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete an elopement risk evaluation to identify risk for elopement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping and potential for sustaining injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendations - incident report), dated 3/24/25, the SBAR indicated, [at 1:50 p.m.] Resident [1] was found across the street from facility. Resident [1] repeatedly keeps stating, I need to get home. During a review of Resident 1's Elopement Evaluation (EE - elopement risk evaluation), dated 2/27/25, the EE indicated, 4. Has the Resident [1] verbally expressed the desire to go home, packed belongings to go home or stayed near an exit door was not marked with yes or no. The EE was incomplete and there was no indication of level of elopement risk of Resident 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/27/25 at 3:51 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Resident 1's EE dated 2/27/25 was reviewed. Resident 1's EE indicated the question…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan to ensure call lights was within reach for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with a cognitive communication deficit (someone who has trouble communicating because of difficulties with thinking processes), when Resident 1 was left in the facility dining/activity room by herself without supervision and without the ability to call staff for help/assistance. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s injury to her left eye due to unknown causes and had the potential for negative health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission RECORD (AR), dated 3/7/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had a diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), muscle wasting/atrophy (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle), cognitive communication deficit lack of coordination, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis (The cartilage [strong tissue that protects joints [the point where two things come together] and bones],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure (P&P) when three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) were not provided cigarettes during the scheduled smoking time. This resulted in Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 not being able to smoke and violated Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3's rights. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/25 at 12:30 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 was in her room sitting in a wheelchair. Resident 1 stated all residents cigarettes were kept locked up and during smoking schedule, a designated staff member would go outside smoking area and hand out each resident's cigarette. Resident 1 stated on 2/10/25 at 3 p.m., she had gone outside for a smoke with Resident 3. Resident 1 stated, we waited and waited, and nobody came out to give us our cigarette. We waited probably more than an hour. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/25 at 12:55 p.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 was in bed lying down. Resident 2 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident altercation to CDPH (California Department of Public Health [state agency]) within 24 hours between two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in CDPH being unaware of the allegation, and had the potential to result in continual physical and psychosocial harm for both Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's MD/NP Progress Notes (MPN), dated 11/26/24, the MPN indicated, Writer was alerted to possible resident to resident altercation. Resident nurse stated that resident (Resident 1) had come to her and made an excited utterance stating that another resident had ' ran over' her foot and ' punched' her in the face twice. However, resident later denied that the other resident had made physical contact. Resident also indicated that they each started yelling at each other and commented that she had 4 brothers growing up so she ' knows how to swear like them.' During a review of Resident 2's MPN, dated 11/26/24, the MPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure for Neurological Assessment (a series of tests and questions that assess the function of the brain, spinal cord, and nerves also known as neuro checks) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/20/24 at 12:15 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 11/9/24 was reviewed. The EMR indicated Resident 1 was involved in a physical altercation with Resident 2. DON stated Resident 2 struck Resident 1 on her head resulting in Resident 1 obtaining a swollen lip and discoloration to the left side of her face from the head injury. DON reviewed the EMR for Resident 1 and stated neuro checks were not done. DON stated, Yes we missed that one (neuro checks for Resident 1). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for refusal of care for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 refused care for multiple times. This failure had the potential for the facility staff not addressing Resident 1 ' s needs and potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Resident Daily Care Flowsheet (RDCF), the following were reviewed: a. On 3/7/23, the RDCF indicated, Refused to be change brief. b. On 3/16/23, the RDCF indicated, Resident [1] refused to changed. c. On 3/17/23, the RDCF indicated, Resident [1] refused to be brief change. d. On 3/21/23, the RDCF indicated, The resident [1] refused to be changed the diaper. e. On 3/23/23, the RDCF indicated, The resident [1] refused to take shower or bed bath. f. On 3/23/23, the RDCF indicated, The resident [1] refused to diaper change. g. On 4/09/23, the RDCF indicated, Resident [1] refused to change. h. On 4/10/23, the RDCF indicated, Resident [1] refused to be changed. i. On 4/13/23, the RDCF indicated, Resident [1]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, the facility failed to address a change in condition for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a foul-smelling discharge and there was no documentation of change in condition, notification to physician of abnormal findings, and no documentation was provided by nurse. This failure had the potential for the facility staff not addressing Resident 1 ' s health care needs and potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Resident Daily Care Flowsheet (RDCF), dated February 12, 2023, the RDCF indicated Resident [1] had foul smelling discharge from the front to the back of perineal [area between the vagina and anus in females] area. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/19/24 at 8:35am with DON, DON reviewed Resident 1 ' s clinical record and was unable to find documentation or notification of the physician of Resident 1 ' s change in condition. DON stated, There is no document or progress/nursing notes on 2/12/23. I am not sure what happened on that day with the resident [1].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) on discharge of resident was followed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not make a follow up call to the acute hospital to determine the general status and condition of Resident 1. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 ' s suffering further injuries due to delay of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations), dated 8/13/24, the SBAR indicated, Resident (1) slid from the shower chair while putting soap bar and shampoo away. Recommendations: Transfer to (acute hospital) s/p fall for further eval (evaluation) and tx (treatment). During an interview on 8/26/24 at 11:26 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I pivoted myself over to the right close to the bed and I fell. I called for help and the nurse came in. They sent me to the hospital. I had a head injury and a tailbone injury. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/29/24 at 3:30 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the fall care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after a fall incident. This had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for injury and harm. Findings: During an interview on 8/13/24 at 11:30 a.m. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON stated Resident 1 had three falls since being admitted on [DATE]. DON stated Resident 1 had fall incidents on 6/9/24, 7/31/24, and 8/7/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/13/24 at 12:35 p.m. with DON, Resident 1 ' s fall care plan dated 7/31/24 was reviewed. DON confirmed Resident 1 ' s fall care plan dated 7/31/24 was not revised. DON stated there was no changes between 6/9/24 and 7/31/24 fall care plan. DON stated it was the facility practice to revised care plan after each fall incident. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled Falls, dated 10/15, the P&P indicated, C. IDT will: 1. Create or revise care plan.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) had fresh water available at bedside. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive the necessary hydration. Findings: During an observation on 7/31/24 at 9:29 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's bedside table had two unopened straws and a white wrapper (no fluids or cup). During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/31/24 at 10:29 a.m. in Resident 1's room with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated she is responsible for Resident 1 care today. CNA 1 confirmed there was no fluids at Resident 1's bedside table and stated Resident 1 gets thickened liquids (liquids made to move slower than thin liquids give the body more time to protect the air way, liquids can be thickened with powders or gels). During an interview on 7/31/24 at 11:26 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated residents with physician orders for thicken liquids were compiled on a list. During a review of the facility provide list titled, Breakfast Thickened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) had call light within easy reach. These failures had the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 3 not to be able to call for assistance and potential for unmet care needs. Findings: During an observation on 7/31/24 at 9:32 a.m. in Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was lying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 2's call light was observed on the floor (out of easy reach of resident). During a review of Resident 2' s Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 7/27/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 12 (a score of 8 to 12 suggests the resident has moderately impaired cognition). The MDS indicated Resident 2 needed setup and clean up assistance (helper sets up or cleans up; residents complete activity, helper assists only prior to or following the activity) for eating, substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for toileting hygiene (the ability to maintain perineal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for pressure ulcer treatment for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 10/14/2015, specified, 2. Medications and treatments shall be administered as prescribed. The policy further specified, 16. Before administering medication or treatment, check every medication/treatment against physician's order and transcription in the Medication Administration or Treatment Record. Information on the label of each medication /treatment should match physician's order. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #4 on 02/15/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of Stage IV pressure ulcer of the sacral region (base of the spine). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/2024, revealed Resident #4 had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were provided for 1 (Resident #4) of 2 residents observed for infection control practices. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Standard and Enhanced Precautions revealed, V. Enhanced Standard Precautions A. Enhanced standard precautions will be implemented for residents with a known MDRO [multidrug-resistant organism] and who are at high-risk for colonization and transmission. B. Resident characteristics that are associated with a high-risk of MDRO colonization and transmission include: ii. Wounds or presence of pressure ulcer (unhealed). An undated facility document from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions revealed Providers and Staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities, which included Wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 02/15/2022.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician ' s orders for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 having adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report (OSR), dated April 2024, the OSR indicated, Lasix [medication for fluid retention] Oral Tablet 20 MG [milligram] Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY) HYPERTENSION [high blood pressure] hold if SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure-measures the pressure in arteries when heart beats] <110 [below 110] and DBP [Diastolic Blood Pressure-measures the pressure in arteries when heart rests] <60 [below 60]. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2024, the MAR indicated on 4/1/24, Lasix was administered with an SBP of 107. During a review of Resident 1 ' s OSR, dated April 2024, the OSR indicated, Metoprolol Tartrate [medication to treat high blood pressure] Tablet 25 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement their neurological assessment (an assessment that evaluates the brain and nervous system function) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for any abnormality of the brain and/or nervous system to go unnoticed, delayed appropriate treatment, and lead to negative consequences up to and including death. Findings: During an interview on 11/7/23 at 11:33 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 1 had a seizure (a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain) on 10/24/23 which caused her to fall and fracture (break) her nose. DON stated Resident 1 had a secondary seizure attack on 11/1/23 that caused her to fall and lacerate (a deep cut or tear) on her forehead. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/23 at 11:49 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed watching T.V. Resident 1 has a large gauze dressing to her forehead, mottled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy on abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for abuse to continue and for other residents to potentially be abused. Findings: During an interview on 9/26/23 at 1:41 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated he had issues with the way the facility Administrator in Training (AIT) had been treating him. Resident 1 stated a recent issue was when the AIT entered his room, removed a bag of items from atop of his closet and threw it on the floor. Resident 1 stated he made an official grievance to the facility regarding the AIT and had met with facility leadership. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/27/23 at 11:35 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD) , Resident 1 ' s INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM CONFERENCE RECORD (IDTCR), dated 8/30/23 was reviewed. The IDTCR indicated, Meeting held to discuss concerns of the resident . Arrogance for violating the rights and privacy of the residents: Entering without knocking first and doing whatever he [AIT] wants…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents' (Resident 2) call light button was within reach. This failure has the potential for Resident 2's needs not being attended to when she requires assistance. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/3/23 at 2:45 p.m. in Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was sitting on her wheelchair and the call light button was on the other side of the bed. Resident 2 stated, she cannot reach her call light button and she would not know what to do if she needed assistance. During an interview on 8/3/23 at 2:48 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated, the call light needs to be always within reach of Resident 2. DSD verified the finding. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 2:35 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), CNA stated, she last checked on the resident (2) at around 1:30 p.m. CNA stated she forgot to place the call light button close to the resident [1]. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Sets (MDS- comprehensive assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,735 — penalty dated 2025-02-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDEN STATE HEALTH CENTERS, INC. | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| HELENE MAYER 2007 IRREVOCABLE EXEMPT TRUST FBO ABRAHAM MAYER DATED DEC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 07/16/2007 |
| HELENE MAYER 2007 IRREVOCABLE EXEMPT TRUST FBO AKIVA MAYER DATED DECEM | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| HELENE MAYER 2007 IRREVOCABLE EXEMPT TRUST FBO AVIVA MAYER DATED DECEM | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| HELENE MAYER 2007 IRREVOCABLE EXEMPT TRUST FBO TALIA MAYER DATED DECEM | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| HELENE MAYER 2007 IRREVOCABLE EXEMPT TRUST FBO ZACHARY MAYER DATED DEC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| THE CHANI LEVITIN GST NON-EXEMPT TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2024 |
| LEVITIN MARASOW, FRUMI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2024 |
| LEVITIN, ALTER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 07/16/2007 |
| MAYER, HELENE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| WEISS, HOWARD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| SHEINBERGER, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2024 |
| GOLDEN STATE PALMS INC | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/16/2007 |
| HEIGHT STREET HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2024 |
| HELENE MAYER 2007 IRREVOCABLE EXEMPT TRUST FBO AARON MAYER DATED DECEM | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 07/16/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555902. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.