No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Coast Care Convalescent Center

14518 E. Los Angeles St., Baldwin Park, CA 91706 · For profit - Corporation · 48 certified beds · (626) 337-7229 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 337-7229 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
4318 Maine Ave · (626) 962-5141 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4318 Maine Ave Ste C · (626) 851-8108 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4390 Maine Ave · (626) 883-3317 · Call to confirm hours
Park
BALDWIN PARK BLVD · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.8%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.6%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission7.4%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.372.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.341.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.7%CMS range 30.1–58.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.2–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.2–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
21.7%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 42.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-02)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures (P&P) on Advance Directive (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) were implemented for three of three sampled residents (Residents 5, 8, and 41) by failing to:a. Ensure Resident 8's POLST was updated to reflect the resident did not have an AD.b. Ensure Resident 41's AD was in the medical record.c. Ensure Resident 5's Advance Directive Acknowledgement Form (ADAF) was updated to reflect the resident did not have an AD. These failures had the potential for the facility staff to provide medical treatment and services against the will of the residents.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 8 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, comprehensive plan of care for three of three sampled residents (Residents 34, 40 and 41). These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving individualized care, affecting their quality of life. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 40 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (mental health conditions causing intense, excessive, and persistent fear affecting daily life) and major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness and loss of interest affecting daily life). During a review of Resident 40's History & Physical (H&P) dated 5/15/25, the H&P indicated Resident 40 did not have the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/25/25, the MDS indicated Resident 40 had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) for one of one facility kitchen, as evidenced by:1. Four boxes of expired donuts were observed in the refrigerator with use by date of 12/16/25.2. One pack of expired sliced ham was observed in the freezer, with sell by date of 11/10/25.3. Two packs of expired roast beef were observed in the freezer, with sell by date of 10/30/25.4. One container of whole egg mayonnaise was observed in the refrigerator with incomplete open date.5. A sliced watermelon was observed in the refrigerator dated 12/18/25.6. Multiple and undated, brown-colored lettuce heads were observed in the refrigerator. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses to the residents.Findings: During a concurrent observation of the facility's kitchen Refrigerator 1 and interview on 12/30/25, at 9:03 a.m., with the Dietary/Environmental Supervisor (DS), four expired boxes of variety pack donuts were observed with used by date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures (P&P) on Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV, a common respiratory virus that infects the nose, throat, respiratory tract, and lungs) were implemented for two of five sampled residents (Residents 5 and 6) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 5 was administered the RSV vaccination after it was consented for by Resident 5's responsible party on 7/28/2025.b. Ensure the RSV vaccination was offered to Resident 6 nor Resident 6's responsible party. These failures had the potential to result in respiratory infections that could lead to severe illness and hospitalization. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure), Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control ) and immunodeficiency (a weakened immune…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light (a device used by residents to call for assistance from facility staff) was within reach (an arm's length) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 43). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed provision of services, delays in care and Resident 43 not receiving assistance with activities of daily living (ADL- activities related to personal care including bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating). Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sequela cerebral infarction (type of ischemic [deficient supply of blood] stroke [sudden death of brain cells in a localized area due to inadequate blood flow] resulting from a blockage in the blood vessels supplying blood to the brain) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment was conducted for one of two sampled residents (Resident 34) who smoked. Resident 34 did not have a smoking assessment completed. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 34's safety and plan of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation (COPD- a lung condition restricting breathing due to damaged lung), muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and a reduced ability to function in daily life) and paranoid schizophrenia (a type of schizophrenia [mental disorder] associated with feelings of being persecuted or plotted against). During a review of Resident 34's admission Checklist (AC) dated 10/24/25, the AC did not indicate a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the Comprehensive Care Plan following the discontinuation of an antidepressant medication (treats depression [mood disorder causing persistent sadness and loss of interest affecting daily life]) Remeron 7.5 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement), for one of one sampled resident (Resident 40). This failure had the potential to result in a delay in care and services in response to a change in Resident 40's needs and goals.Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 40 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (mental health conditions causing intense, excessive, and persistent fear affecting daily life) and major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness and loss of interest affecting daily life). During a review of Resident 40's History & Physical (H&P) dated 5/15/25, the H&P indicated Resident 40 did not have the capacity to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 8), who was immobile (unable to move) and had limited range of motion (ROM - the extent of movement of a joint) received restorative nursing (a program that helps residents maintain any progress they've made during therapy treatments, enabling them to function at a high capacity) care and the RNA (Restorative Nursing Assistant- an aid who provides restorative and rehabilitation care to residents) documented the services provided five times a week as indicated in the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 8 at risk for further decline in ROM and further contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop specific and resident-centered care plans (CP) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 1, 2, and 3 to not receive appropriate care, treatment, and/or services related to their needs.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease (high blood pressure [HTN] damaged the heart over time) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 12/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive (ability to understand) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision from staff with eating and oral hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required maximal assistance (helper did more than half the effort) from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the licensed nurse did not take Resident 1's heart rate prior to administration of losartan (medication for high blood pressure) as ordered, from 12/13/2025 to 12/22/2025. These violations had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and safety.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease (high blood pressure [HTN] damaged the heart over time) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 12/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive (ability to understand) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision from staff with eating and oral hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy regarding advance directive's (AD, a written document that indicates to health care providers (HCP) who should speak on resident's behalf and what medical decisions to make if resident is unable to speak for self) and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST, written medical order from a medical doctor (MD) that indicate specific medical treatment the resident would want to receive during a medical emergency or if the resident is unable to speak for self) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 19, 37, and 43) by failing to: a. Ensure an Advance Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement form (AHCD) was filled out correctly and the POLST was signed by Resident 43's legal representative upon admission. b. Complete an AHCD for Resident 19 upon admission. c. Ensure the AHCD was filled out and the POLST was signed for Resident 37. These failures had the potential to result in conflict with Residents 19, 37, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for posting nurse staffing data for one of two sampled locations (lobby) by failing to: a. Post accurate hours for Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) on 10/15/2024, 10/16/2024, 10/17/2024, 10/18/2024, 10/19/2024, and 10/23/2024. b. Post nurse staffing information at the beginning of the shift on 10/23/2024 in the lobby, an area readily accessible by everyone. These failures had the potential to result in posting inaccurate nursing hours and nurse staffing information that could affect the quality of care given to the residents. Findings: a. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/25/2024 at 9:51 AM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's Staffing and Nursing Hours (SNH) and Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-in Sheet (NSASS) dated 10/15/2024, 10/16/2024, 10/17/2024, 10/18/2024, 10/19/2024, and 10/23/2024 were reviewed. The DSD stated the DSD is responsible for posting the SNH in the nursing station and lobby. The DSD stated the number of CNAs who worked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 38 and 43) on psychotherapeutic drugs (any drug capable of affecting mood, emotions, and behavior) were free from unnecessary medication by failing to: a. Identify specific target symptoms for Resident 43 on Seroquel (medication used to treat schizophrenia [a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally]) 50 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) for schizophrenia manifested by hearing voices and responding to internal stimuli and attempted to perform gradual dose reduction (GDR-stepwise tapering of a dose) for the use of Paroxetine HCL (Paxil, medication used to treat depression [persistent low mood or loss of interest]) 30 mg daily for depression. b. Ensure Resident 38 had GDR for Lexapro (antidepressant drug) 10 mg since 2021, and Zyprexa (antipsychotic drug) 5 mg every 12 hours since 2023 and the target symptom for Zyprexa was specific. These failures had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner for one of one sampled ice machine (IM) by failing to: a. Follow the manufacturer's recommendations for interior cleaning and sanitizing of the Manitowoc IM when moderate amounts of black and yellow substances were observed in the internal components of the Manitowoc IM around the sides of the ice dicer and on the water outlet. The contaminated ice was distributed to 40 residents before breakfast on 10/22/2024. b. Ensure the Manitowoc was deeply cleaned weekly and cleaned monthly as indicated by the cleaning log. These failures had the potential to result in residents to develop water borne illnesses from contaminated ice. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/22/2024 at 9:30 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) in the kitchen, the Manitowoc IM was observed to have yellow liquid when a napkin test was performed on the IM. Upon closer inspection, black substances were observed on the sides of the ice dicer and in the water outlet. The DS stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14). Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) was standing over the resident while assisting with lunch. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 14's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (disturbance of brain function) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 14's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/2/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 14 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 14's Nutritional Assessment (NA), dated 4/4/2024, the NA indicated Resident 14's eating ability was categorized as a feeder (a person who is fed by an assistant during meals) and Resident 14 needed assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30) by failing to ensure the resident's call light was within reach and appropriate to the resident's physical ability. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 30 not to receive necessary care or services and placed the resident at high risk for fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (includes all disorders in which an area of the brain is temporarily or permanently affected by bleeding or lack of blood flow) affecting right dominant side. During a review of Resident 30's untitled Care Plan (CP), revised on 4/29/2024, the CP indicated Resident 30 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II recommended specialized add-on services that were appropriate to resident's condition were included into Resident 38's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 38). This deficient practice placed Resident 38 at risk of not getting the appropriate specialized care needed for the well- being of the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted Resident 38 on 9/12/24, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive lung disease that makes it hard to breathe) and schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors). During a review of Resident 38's PASRR Level II individualized determination report dated 9/20/24, the report indicated mental health rehabilitation activities and psychotherapy /counselling were recommended specialized add-on services needed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a care plan (CP) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25) when Resident 25 had a 10% weight loss within three months. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 25 to develop further weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 25 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included major depressive disorder (MDD, a mental health condition that causes persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities). During a review of Resident 25's history and physical (H&P, formal document of a medical provider's examination of a patient) dated 9/30/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 25 had the ability to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 25's Weekly Weights Monitoring (WWM) dated 10/4/2024, the WWM indicated Resident 25 weighed 116 lbs. on 10/4/2024, 113 lbs. on 10/11/2024, 113 lbs. on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a communication board and/or other functional communication system to a non English speaking resident (Resident 24) for one of one sampled resident. This deficient practice placed Resident 24 at risk for miscommunication and delayed care. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 8/9/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) and dementia (a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 24's Care Plan (CP) titled, Communication Deficit related to Language Barrier dated 8/9/24, the CP indicated Resident 24 would be able to communicate needs daily using a communication device (unspecified). During an observation and concurrent interview on 10/22/24 at 4:10 p.m., Resident 24 was lying on her back in bed and awake. Resident 24 only speaks and understand Vietnamese language. The Director of Staff Development (DSD) was present in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternative interventions prior to the installation of side rails for one of one sampled resident (Resident 13). This failure had the potential for Resident 13 to be at risk for entrapment (when a resident can get caught by the head, neck, chest, or other body parts in the tight spaces around the bedrail) and physical injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 13 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity (having too much body fat), schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), and major depressive disorder (MDD, a mental health condition that causes persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities). During a review of Resident 13's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 9/4/2024, the OSR indicated an order for bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of one sampled resident (Resident 23). Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not explain the medication and its purpose to Resident 23 during a medication pass, in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on Medication and Treatment Administration This failure resulted in Resident 23 being uninformed about the resident's medication and had the potential for medication error. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 23 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (disease that affects the brain that produces symptoms that include muscle rigidity, tremors, and changes in speech and balance) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/15/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 23 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and stored in the medication cart in Station One for one of one sampled resident (Resident 34). This failure had the potential to result in missing medications or medication diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of medications for purposes not intended by the prescriber) for Resident 34. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (MDD, a mental health condition that causes persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities), attention and concentration deficit, and anxiety. During a review of Resident 34's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/14/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 34 had the ability to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 34's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 3/13/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 34 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt the use of alternatives to bed rails before its installation, for three of four sampled residents (Residents 11, 33 and 37). These deficient practices placed Residents 11, 33 and 37 at risk for entrapment and injury from the use of bed rails. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the pancreas [an organ located in the abdomen] does not produce enough insulin [hormone that regulates blood sugar] or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ([COPD] a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 11 on 11/7/23 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 11 was lying on her back in bed with half- length bed rails up on both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (Residents 11,17 and 42) on psychotropic drugs (any drug capable of affecting the mood, emotions, and behavior) were free from unnecessary medication by failing to: 1. Attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR- tapering of a dose) of Aripiprazole ([antipsychotic drug] drug use to treat psychosis [severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions]) 30 milligrams (mg-unit of measurement) for Resident 17. 2. Attempt GDR of Temazepam 15 mg ([sedative-hypnotic drug] a class of drugs used to induce and/or maintain sleep) for Resident 11. 3. Ensure Ativan was ordered to treat a specific condition documented in the clinical record for Resident 42. 4. Ensure Ativan was administered to treat a specific behavior for Resident 42. These deficient practices placed Residents 11, 17 and 42 at risk for adverse drug reaction. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall preventive measures were implemented for one of four sampled residents (Resident 37). Resident 37's bed was not positioned at the lowest position. This deficient practice had the potential for injury, accidents or fall to Resident 37. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility readmitted the resident in 2/6/23, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (type of ischemic [deficient supply of blood] stroke [sudden death of brain cells in a localized area due to inadequate blood flow] resulting from a blockage in the blood vessels supplying blood to the brain). During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 8/25/23, the MDS indicated the resident had moderate impaired cognition (ability to understand). The MDS indicated Resident 37 required extensive assistance (resident involved in activity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy (a tube inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach used for feeding or drainage) tube feeding was provided in accordance with the physician's order, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 41). This deficient practice had the potential to result in weight loss for Resident 41. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 4/8/22, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) and gastrostomy. During a review of Resident 41's care plan titled, Gastrostomy Tube Feeding dated 4/8/22, the care plan interventions included to provide gastrostomy feeding as ordered. During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 10/13/23, the MDS indicated the resident was not able to express ideas and sometimes understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 41 was dependent in all activities of daily living including eating, oral hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct staff competency for three of three facility staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident care. Findings: During a review of the facility's staff competency on 11/9/23 at 3:55 p.m., the facility's staff competency indicated the following: a. Certified Nursing Assistant 3 had no annual competency skills assessment. b. Restorative Nursing Assistant 1 had competency assessment completed on 9/14/23. c. Certified Nursing Assistant 4 had no annual competency assessment. During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 11/9/23 at 4:02 p.m., the DSD confirmed the above finding and stated competency assessments were to be completed upon hire, annually and as needed when there were reports of the staff not being competent with job specific skills. During a review of the facility's undated Policy and Procedure titled Performance Evaluation, the P&P indicated employees shall be evaluated initially at the end of their 90-day probationary period, and once in every year and as necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct and document one of one facility-wide assessment of staffing resources, necessary to care for the residents. This deficient practice had the potential to not meet the staffing needs of the facility. Findings: During a concurrent review of the facility's document titled Facility Assessment dated 10/26/23 and interview with the facility's Administrator (ADM) on 11/9/23 at 9:20 a.m., the facility assessment did not indicate that the staffing resources was completed. The ADM stated the facility assessment on staffing resources was not completed. The ADM stated the facility assessment needed to be complete to be able to ensure the resources necessary to provide the care and services for the residents residing at the facility. During a review of the facility's document titled Facility Assessment dated 10/26/2023, indicated the facility will identify the type of staff members or other health care professionals, and health care professionals that are needed to provide support and care for the residents.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure 19 of 21 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to have enough space for activities of daily living and hinder staff from providing nursing care to the residents, affecting the overall quality of life of the residents.Findings: During a review of the facility's request for room waiver letter dated 1/2/2026, the request for room waiver letter indicated there was ample room to accommodate wheelchairs and other medical equipment as well as space for mobility and movement of ambulatory residents for Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22. The request for room waiver indicated there was adequate space for nursing care and that the health and safety of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 21 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to have enough space for activities of daily living and hinder staff from providing nursing care to the residents, affecting the overall quality of life of the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's request for room waiver letter dated 10/22/2024, the request for room waiver letter indicated there was ample room to accommodate wheelchairs and other medical equipment as well as space for mobility and movement of ambulatory residents. The request for room waiver letter indicated there was an adequate space for nursing care and that the health and safety of the residents occupying these rooms were not in jeopardy. The request for room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 21 resident bedrooms met the minimum requirement measurement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multi-bed occupancy resident bedrooms. Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 22 measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident in multi-bed occupancy bedrooms as indicated in the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis (square footage measurement of the residents' rooms), signed and dated by the administrator (ADM) on 11/9/23. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space needed to provide nursing care to the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis form, dated 11/9/23, the form indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms: Room No. No. of Beds Room Square Footage # 1 4 301.11 sq ft # 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 22 2 154.0 sq ft # 4 2 156.75 sq ft # 6 4 299.98 sq ft # 8,11, 12, 14, 17 2 155.87 sq ft # 18, 19, 20 2 155.87 sq ft #15 4 312.62 sq…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GR8 CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/16/2004
RAQUEL, EDWINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/16/2004
RAQUEL, LEILANIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/16/2004
PEREZ, CYRILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
GARCIA, GILDITAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2004

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 6%Medicare 37%Other / private 57%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$503per resident / day
operating cost
$15,293per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$513per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555199. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next