Belmont Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 73.3 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food were stored and prepared in a sanitary manner when these were observed during kitchen tour:There was a dirty window screen next to an interior air conditioning (A/C) unit.There was a water collection tray under an interior A/C unit.There was a dirty filter screen on an interior A/C unit.Floors were not cleaned when: A. Two packets of creamers and four packets of sugar were found on the floor under a storage shelve; B. a small container of sherbet (frozen desert) and a used paper towel were found on the floor under a freezer.These failures had the likelihood for food items to be stored and prepared in an unsanitary environment.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 6/16/2026 at 9:53 AM, there were observed during initial kitchen tour:There was a dirty window screen next to an interior air conditioning (A/C) unit.There was a water collection tray under an interior A/C unit.There was a dirty filter screen on an interior A/C unit.Floors were not cleaned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident representative (RR) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) were notified of a significant change in condition when Resident 1 experienced an unwitnessed fall with head injury. The RR was not notified until approximately more than seven hours after the incident, despite Resident 1 having impaired cognition and sustaining a documented head injury. This failure resulted in delayed awareness of Resident 1's condition by the RR, which hindered RR's timely involvement in care decisions.During a review of Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 01/26/2026 at 9:04 AM, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicates Resident 1 has a BIMS score of 3, which means Resident 1 has severely impaired cognitive function. The BIMS score stands for Brief Interview for Mental Status, which is a short test used in nursing homes to see how well a resident's memory and thinking skills are working. A BIMS score of 3 means a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when: 1. For Resident 1, the number of Pressure Injury (PI, a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure, or pressure in combination with shear), Stage 1 (intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence), was inaccurately coded as two (2) instead of one (1) on the MDS, section M. 2. For Resident 2, the number of PI, Stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat maybe visible but bone, tender or muscle is not exposed. Slough maybe present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss) was inaccurately coded as four (4) instead of three (3) on MDS, section M. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the care and services rendered to the residents.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care for 1 (Resident #25) of 2 residents reviewed for tube feedings. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 11/14/2024, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. 'Enhanced barrier precautions' (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. The policy indicated, 2. Initiation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: included b. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: i. Wounds (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example] chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall care plans for two of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when there was no evidence of frequent monitoring. This failure had the potential to delay the identification of needs, functional and health status for Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was [AGE] year-old female, and admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (high blood sugar), hyperlipidemia (an excess of lipids or fats in your blood). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 6/10/22, indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively moderately impaired. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/13/24 at 1:39 PM with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 1's Resident Incident Report dated 6/25/22, and fall care plans were reviewed. The Resident Incident Report indicated, . After few minutes of taking her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. A Physical Therapist (PT) reported she saw a nurse (RN 1) slapped Resident 4's hand and was yelling at him to wake him up. Failure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse did not ensure residents were protected from abuse. Findings: During an interview on 06/14/2024 at 2:39 PM, the PT was asked what happened to Resident 4 on 03/20/2022. The PT stated .This happened at the end of my workday. I was walking down the hallway and I see . (Resident 4), he's sitting and there was this nurse (RN1), and she was trying to wake him up to give him his medication. She didn't gently shake his shoulder. She was slapping his hand and yelling at him to wake up. According to the .(residents) I worked with (the residents said) she (RN1) was disagreeable pushy, mean, and aggressive. When I saw this, .I called my supervisor and reported it and left a message. On 06/13/2024 at 10:00 AM during a concurrent interview and record review of the facility's abuse/neglect paperwork/folder with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the fall care plan for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) when there was no evidence that the fall care plan was updated after her fall on [DATE]. This failure had the potential to put the resident at risk of not receiving appropriate care. Findings: Review of Resident 3's clinical record indicated, Resident 3 was [AGE] year-old female, and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure (sudden loss of the ability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine, conserve electrolytes, and maintain fluid balance, with a mortality rate of between 50% and 80%), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart does not pump enough blood for your body's needs), and diabetes (high blood sugar). Review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated [DATE] indicated, she was cognitively intact. But her MDS also indicated, Resident 3 had dementia (memory loss) and failure to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0801 — isolated
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Dietitian (RD) working full-time or part-time at the facility from January to April 2024. Failure to have a RD working at the facility did not ensure residents were assessed appropriately to maintain the residents' weight and other nutritional parameters. Findings: During an interview on 06/12/2024 at 2:34 PM, the RD stated he had been contracted to work at the facility since 2022. The RD stated his employment at the facility .was not continuous. (I stopped working in) January (and) started back up in early April. During an interview on 06/12/2024 2:58 PM, the Administrator was asked if there was another RD covering the facility between January and April 2024. The Administrator stated .I don't want to answer those questions . Review of the facility's policy titled Nutritional Management (not dated) indicated . Facility Registered Dietitian is a registered member of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, (AND) and is a staff member employed full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis, depending on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications and biologicals (biologicals are made from variety of natural sources- human, animal or microorganisms, may include a wide range of products such as vaccine, blood and blood components) in a safe condition when the temperature of two of two sampled medication refrigerators were out of range in accordance with Federal, State, and CDC vaccine storage and handling guidelines. This failure had the potential to compromise the integrity and effectiveness of medications and biologicals and could potentially cause harm to the residents. Findings: During an observation of the Medication Refrigerator 1 (MR 1) in the Medication Storage Room Area 1 (MSRA 1), on 11/16/21, at 1:45 PM, with the Registered Nurse (RN) 4, the temperature reading of MR 1 indicated, 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Inside MR I, a Novolin N FlexPen (a single-dose packet of medication to which a needle has been fixed by manufacturer) of NPH insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of blood sugar) for Resident # 59, the manufacturer ' s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-11-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competency of one dietary aide (DA) when: 1. Standardized recipes for pureed foods were not followed for three lunch menu items on 11/16/21. 2. Scoop sizes for pureed foods were not followed during lunch tray line service on 11/16/21. Failure to ensure staff competency in kitchen related duties could negatively impact provision of prescribed diets and preferences for 13 residents who received pureed food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility document titled, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH MENUS . November 15-21, 2021 - Week 3, the lunch menu indicated, .TUESDAY November 16 . Fish Fillet with Garlic Butter, [NAME] Pilaf, Ginger Carrots, Wheat Roll, Peanut Butter Cake . During an observation of food production activities in the kitchen on 11/16/21, that began at 10:30 AM, with the Assistant Dietary Supervisor (ADS) present, Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was observed to prepare pureed ginger carrots recipe. After proper hand hygiene and clean gloves worn, DA 1 used a slotted spoon to scoop and drain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $331K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA