No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ashby Care Center

2270 Ashby Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94705 · For profit - Corporation · 31 certified beds · (510) 841-9494 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (510) 841-9494 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$66,134 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $66,134 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2927 Shattuck Ave · (510) 843-5683 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3033 Shattuck Ave · (510) 849-4201 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2948 Martin Luther King Jr Way · (510) 647-3672 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2828 Martin Luther King Jr Way · (510) 981-5150 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1933 Russell St · (510) 845-2403

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.7%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.2%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.2%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.2%98.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table41.5%12.0%17.1%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
21.7%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 22.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary pain medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) Resident 3 required wound dressing changes, three times per week, which were painful and required premedication. The licensed nursing staff did not administer the required pain medication before wound care. This caused unnecessary pain and distress for Resident 3. Findings: Review of the admission Record showed the facility admitted Resident 3 on 3/11/2023. The diagnoses included dementia (memory difficulty). Resident 3 received hospice services (end-of-life comfort care) while at the facility. During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 10:35 a.m., the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident 3's dressings were being changed three times per week and the hospice agency, Calls us ahead of time so we know when they are coming. DON stated licensed staff would then pre-medicate Resident 3 with pain medication prior to hospice's arrival so that Resident 3 felt minimal to no pain during the wound dressing changes. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to correctly identify one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents as a high fall risk and revise the fall care plan accordingly and as needed to maintain Resident 1's physical well-being. This failure resulted in an uwitnessed fall and Resident 1 sustained a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood in the top of the brain), left humeral head fracture (broken upper arm bone) and fracture of the pubic ramus (broken bone in the pelvis) requiring hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, cancer of the spine, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait (manner of walking), and mobility. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/26/23 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Furthermore, Resident 1 needed supervision when the resident moved between surfaces including to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident-centered activity program to support residents individualized activities needs for three of (Resident 1, 2 and 3 ) of three sampled residents when;Facility did not provide consistent resident-centered activities.Facility did not provide residents activities in the evening and on weekend.Facility did not address Resident 2's impaired cognition with individual activity care plan. Activities refers to any endeavor, in which a resident participates that is intended to enhance her/his sense of well-being and to promote or enhance physical, cognitive, and emotional health. These include, but are not limited to, activities that promote self-esteem, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity, success, and independence. This failure had the potential to cause residents emotional distress and decline in quality of life.During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/27/26, at 10:30 a.m., Resident 1 was seated up in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided the opportunity to participate in regular Resident Council meetings, as the facility did not hold scheduled or routine Resident Council meetings for a census of 27 residents.This failure had the potential to result in the inability of residents to voice their concerns or contribute to improving facility operations impacting their dignity and overall quality of life.During an interview on 3/4/26 at 2:13 p.m. with Administrator (ADM), ADM stated she was unaware of the location of resident council meeting minutes, provided a two-page list of resident names from the past two months and stated it was the attendance list for the past resident council meetings.During an interview on 3/5/26 at 10:51 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant/Activity Staff (CNA/AS), CNA/AS stated resident council meetings have not occurred since November 2025. CNA/AS stated the facility needs to consistently hold these monthly meetings. CNA/AS also stated there were no records of meeting minutes in the binder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for four of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4), the facility failed to ensure that activities were designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving individualized, meaningful activities that support their quality of life. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 10/29/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (serious common mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest that significantly impacts daily functioning).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 2/7/26, the MDS indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the hospital failed to ensure the accuracy of controlled drug records as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure the scheduled (narcotic) medication records (Controlled Drug Record, MAR) were accurate. For three (Residents 160, 165, 167) out of three residents sampled, the Controlled Drug Record (inventory of scheduled drug) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR, record of drug administration) were not accurate. This failure resulted in the potential for residents to be exposed to avoidable medication errors. In addition, this failure resulted in the potential for scheduled drug diversion. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist reviewed the scheduled (narcotic) medication records (Controlled Drug Record, MAR) for accuracy. For three (Residents 160, 165, 167) out of three residents sampled, the Controlled Drug Record (inventory of scheduled drug) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR, record of drug administration ) did not match. These inaccuracies were not identified by the Consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for six of six sampled residents (Residents 119, 118, 116, 112, 113 and 111), the facility failed to offer or ensure an advance directive (a written instruction for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) was on file, when the facility did not offer or help the residents/representatives to locate or complete the advance directive. This failure had the potential for Residents 119, 118, 116 112, 113 and 111's wishes regarding provision of health care to not be honored. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 119's admission record, dated 11/1/24, indicated, Resident 119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included epilepsy (neurological conditions characterized by sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain). During a review of Resident 119's clinical record titled, ADVANCE DIRECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT, dated 6/27/22, indicated Resident 119 have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for five (Residents 118, 112, 164, 3, and 117) of five sampled residents, the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS - Resident Assessment and care guide tool) according to the regulation. This failure had the potential to result in the delayed assessment of residents' needs, goals of care and inability to monitor each residents' progress over time. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/25, at 1:19 p.m., with the Administrator/Minimum Data Set Coordinator (ADM/MDSC), the following MDS record reviews were not completed every three months as follows: Review of Resident 118's MDS assessment indicated Resident 118 did not have quarterly MDS assessment. Review of Resident 112's MDS assessment indicated Resident 112 did not have quarterly MDS assessment. Review of Resident 164's MDS assessment indicated there was no quarterly assessment completed from 11/2/23 thru 5/2/25. Review of Resident 3's MDS assessment indicated the last quarterly assessment was completed on 12/18/24. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of all its nurse aide staff at least once every 12 months, not following its policy and procedures and standards of practice. This failure had the potential to have incompetent nurse aides caring for residents, poor quality of care and quality of life for residents, risk for injury, accidents, infection, hospitalization, and possibly death. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/22/2025, at 10:21 a.m., with Administrator/Minimum Data Set Coordinator (ADM/MDSC), the nurse aide staff personnel files were reviewed. There was no record of annual performance reviews in all nurse aide staff personnel files. ADM stated facility does not have record of annual performance review for their nurse aide staff. ADM stated the importance of completing performance review for all nurse aide staff is so facility can provide quality care to the residents and give staff feedback on how they are doing. ADM further stated the facility's process was to complete performance review for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a full time (working 35 or more hours a week) Certified Dietary Manager for food and nutrition services for 24 Residents residing in the facility, not following standards of practice. This failure had the potential of not meeting the resident's nutritional needs, and placing residents at risk of not receiving meals/diet in a safe and sanitary manner, with the potential for infection, pressure injury, and possibly hospitalization. Findings: During a brief kitchen observation task and an interview on 5/19/25, at 09:21 a.m., with the Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1, DC 1 was the only staff in the kitchen. The DC 1 stated the facility Dietary Manager (DM) was off for the day and he was the only assigned staff to the kitchen for the day. The DC 1 stated the DM only worked one or two days a week. During a telephone interview on 5/19/2025, at 09:28 a.m., with the DM, the DM stated he was off for the day, and he was employed by the facility for one or two days a week, on a part time basis. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and label food in the storage area (for the retention of food [before and after preparation] and associated dry goods), used for 13 out of 13 sampled residents' nourishment, not following their facility policy and procedure and professional standards of practice for food service safety. This failure has the potential for Residents not getting palatable food and nourishment, the potential for foodborne illnesses/outbreak, infection and potential for hospitalization. During a brief kitchen observation on 5/19/25, at 09:21 a.m., with the Dietary [NAME] (DC), Corn Flakes Cereal not in the original box, package labeled 6/9/2022. Bran Raisin package had been opened with no opened date labeled, and Oatmeal was still in its original manufacturer package and had no opened label on it. Opened food items stored in the one door freezer were not labeled with an opened date. The DC stated the food packaging had not been thoroughly checked for used by and opened date since he got employed with facility. The DC stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    6. During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview, on 5/20/25 at 7:45 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) identified residents to receive medication. LVN 1 administered medications to residents in the order of Resident 161, 117, 118, and 160. For each resident, LVN 1 used a portable blood pressure (BP, vital sign) machine. The resident's BP measurement included placing an inflatable cuff around the arm. In between each resident, LVN 1 returned to the medication cart (cart to store medications) to prepare medications. After using the machine on Residents 161 and 117, LVN 1 placed the BP cuff directly on the top of the medication cart. During medication administration to the four residents, LVN 1 did not clean the BP cuff or the top of the medication cart. During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview, on 5/21/25 at 8:20 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) identified residents to receive medication. LVN 2 administered medications to the residents in the order of Resident 1 and 114. For each resident, LVN 2 used a pole mounted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 13 sampled residents was free from physical restraints when the facility staff placed Resident 167 in a Geri chair with a hard table cover over the Geri chair (a large, padded chair that is designed to help seniors with limited mobility), preventing Resident 167's freedom of movement (change in place or position for the body or any part of the body that the person is physically able to control) and from getting in and out of the Geri chair at his own will. This failure placed Resident 167 at risk of self-injury, of not attaining and maintaining their highest practicable well-being or good quality of life. Findings: During a record review of Resident 167's Facesheet (FC), the FC indicated Resident 167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. FC also indicated Resident 167 had diagnoses of essential primary hypertension (a chronic condition of persistent high blood pressure with no identifiable cause), nontraumatic intracerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionists (infection control nurse or designee) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failure had the potential to contribute to the residents' development of contracting healthcare acquired infections (infections from receiving treatment at a facility). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/20/25, at 2:44 p.m., with the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (DON/IP), in the presence of Administrator/MDSC (ADM/MDSC), the DON/IP stated two staff members were designated Infection Preventionists, including DON and Administrator (ADM). DON/IP also stated she had not completed the specialized training in infection prevention. Furthermore, the ADM/MDSC revealed she also had not completed the specialized training in infection prevention.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure proper medication storage when: 1. Medication refrigerator was not padlocked 2. Medication room dry storage temperature log did not have entries for December 2 and 3, 2024 3. Medication room refrigerator had nutritional supplements along with food items that were not labeled with names and dates 4. The medication room had a staff's clothing item hanging on the door. This failure can potentially result in unsafe medication storage practices and impact the safety and well-being of all 29 residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/24, at 10:15 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, the medication refrigerator in the medication room was found not padlocked. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/24, at 11:10 a.m., with Administrator (ADM), ADM stated the medication refrigerator should have been padlocked. During an interview on 5/8/25, at 9:30 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the medication refrigerator should have been padlocked as it had E-kit (emergency kit containing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed when: 1. Outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was an open lid bin which contained a used yellow gown. Next to this open bin was a container of unused personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies 2. Inside the medication room, a bag of adult brief pads was found on the floor 3. Inside the medication room, under the sink was a half-full container of water and located next to two containers of chemical agents, one of which was perineal wash. 4. Biohazard door was unlocked. This failure can potentially result to cross contamination of clean product items and impact the physical health, safety and well-being of all 29 residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/24, at 10:15 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in the hallway was an open lid bin with used yellow gown was noted outside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Next to this open lid bin was a container with unused PPE supplies. LVN 1 stated the lid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to facilitate the resident's right to organize resident group (council) meetings. The group council meetings stopped during the COVID-19 (a respiratory virus that is easily spread causing mild, moderate, or serious illness) lockdown and were never resumed. There was no designated staff person approved by the residents to be responsible for assisting and responding to the resident's concerns or requests that result from group meetings. This failure had the potential to cause residents emotional distress and a decline in their quality of life. Findings: During an interview on 10/16/23 at 9:44 a.m., Resident 3 stated the resident council meeting was not held for a long time since the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 because there was no staff to assist with meeting arrangements. Resident 3 further stated he would like the residents 'council meetings restarted to discuss activities and concerns. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities. The facility did not have an active activity program or staff responsible for providing assistance with the activities program. This failure had the potential to cause residents emotional distress and decline in their quality of life. Findings: 1. Review of Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 4/21/23, indicated: Resident 3's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS- score was 14 meaning cognitively intact). Resident 3's activity preferences included listening to music, doing things with groups of people and participate in religious services or practices that were very important. Resident 3's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). Review of the activity care plan initiated on 7/1/21 indicated for staff to invite Resident 3 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of four of 14 sampled residents (Residents 63, 162, 163, and 170) when the facility failed to perform daily glucometer (small machine that measures blood glucose or sugar level) quality control checks to ensure accurate readings. This failure had the potential risk of adverse consequences associated with the glucometer used for Residents 163 and 170 whose insulin dosage (medication that lowers the blood glucose) were dependent on the accuracy of the glucometer readings. For Residents 63 and 162, this had the risk of incorrect blood glucose readings and inappropriate medical interventions for Residents 63 and 162. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE], at 11:50 a.m., with Administrator (Adm), the glucometer quality control log was reviewed. There was no record of the glucometer quality control checks being done since [DATE]. Adm confirmed the findings and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have Registered Dietitian (RD) oversight of the kitchen and clinical nutrition care (ensuring residents are consuming an adequate amount of nutrients for good health) since 7/28/23. There was no full-time Dietary Manager (DM) to manage kitchen operations when the menu was not being followed (cross-reference 803), unsanitary conditions in the kitchen (cross-reference 812), no pest control program (cross-reference 925), and the nutrition status of one (Resident 159) was not being maintained (cross-reference 692). These failures placed 26 of 26 residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for compromised nutritional status and had the potential for transmission of food borne illness. Findings: During an interview on 10/16/23 at 09:30 a.m., with the Dietary [NAME] (Cook), [NAME] stated the facility did not have a Dietary Manager (DM) for the past three years and the RD had not come into the facility for the past three months. [NAME] stated he was solely responsible for the cooking, cleaning, and ordering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed when the Cold [NAME] Bean Salad was substituted for Creamy Cucumber Celery Salad on Monday 10/16/23. The lunch menu for 10/16/23 had already included a hot green bean side dish. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs of the residents and compromising the nutritional status of the residents. Findings: During a review of the Fall Menu Week 3 Monday: 9/18/23, 10/16/23, 11/13/23: Therapeutic Spreadsheets and the Weekly Menu: October 16 - 22, 2023, undated showed Creamy Cucumber & Celery Salad was listed on the lunch menu for all diets. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 10:42 a.m., with Dietary [NAME] (Cook) of the Trayline food service in the kitchen, Cold [NAME] Bean Salad was substituted for Creamy Cucumber & Celery Salad on the lunch trays. [NAME] stated the Creamy Cucumber & Celery Salad was on the weekly menu and on the therapeutic spreadsheet and was not provided to the residents. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. A refrigerator in the kitchen was dirty, food was not labeled and dated, the door was dirty with smudges. The top freezer of the refrigerator had crusted food and food crumbs, and food was not labeled and dated. A reach-in freezer had food crumbs and the door had dark, brown build-up. This had the potential to contaminate the food or the hands of food workers, that could lead to food borne illness. 2. Dry food storage bins had yellow and brown stains and were not safe for storing food. This had the potential to contaminate the food stored inside. 3. Island shelves storing clean dishware and trays were sticky with grime and food crumbs in the corners. The utensil storage container, storing clean utensils had food crumbs. This had the potential to contaminate food and clean dishware. 4. All the upper cabinetry and lower cabinets in the kitchen were made of wood that was deteriorating. Chunks of the wood were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan (QAPI) that identified and addressed the following: - Lack of activity program for residents, - No designated staff person responsible for providing assistance with resident group meetings and activities program, - No resident group meetings since 2020, - Late completion and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS- Resident Assessment tool used to guide care). These failures had the potential to cause the residents emotional distress, and decline in residents quality of life and quality of care. Findings: During an interview on 10/19/23 at 12:15 p.m., Registered Nurse/Administrator (RN/Admin) stated the facility did not identify or address with QAPI, about the residents lack of an activity program, open position for activity staff, and no designated staff person responsible for providing assistance with resident council meetings. There were no resident group meetings since COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 and were never resumed, and had late completion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure for an active water management program to address prevention of Legionnaires (LD) and other opportunistic pathogens (disease causing) in water. The bacterium Legionella can cause a serious type of pneumonia called LD in persons at risk. Those at risk include persons who are at least [AGE] years old, smokers, or those with underlying medical conditions such as chronic lung disease or immunosuppression. This failure had the potential to cause spread of water borne pathogen growth in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 10/18/23 at 1:20 p.m., with Registered Nurse/Administrator (RN/Admin)accompanied by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), RN/Admin stated, facility had no water treatment program at this time. RN/ Admin could not provide documentation for facility's water treatment program to prevent Legionnaire and spread of water pathogen. RN/Admin stated facility was not aware of water management measures for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the following equipment was maintained in good repair as follows: 1. [NAME] refrigerator with top freezer: the bottom right side of the rubber gasket on the freezer door was torn and peeled away from the door. 2. Reach-in stainless steel freezer: the door frame was broken off the hinges, the rubber gasket was torn across the top of the lid and there was ice buildup on the inside walls. The Freezer had a crack with the insulation covered with masking tape. This failure had the potential for the refrigerator and freezers to not maintain appropriate temperatures and put the facility at risk for diminished quality of food stored in the freezer and/or affecting the safe storage of food leading to foodborne illness for 26 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 10:47 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, the rubber gaskets around the interior perimeter of the two reach-in refrigerators, and one reach-in freezer doors were torn.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light (communication system) for four of 26 sampled residents (Residents 8, 158, 159, and 160). The facility had no documented call light system tests since 6/9/22. This deficient practice resulted in Residents 8, 158, 159, and 160 not being able to summon staff for care and assistance in an emergency. For all residents, this had the potential for being unable to call for help if the call lights fail to work. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/23, at 10:54 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN)1, in room [ROOM NUMBER], Residents 159 and 160's call light strings were not within the resident's reach and were not alarming and lighting outside the resident's door when the strings were pulled. LVN 1 confirmed the call lights were not within residents' reach and were not working. LVN 1 further stated, the facility should have provided Residents 159 and 160 with call bells at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pest free environment when pest droppings and cobwebs were seen in the kitchen and inside the dry food storage. This failure had the potential to contaminate food and cause foodborne illness to 27 of 27 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 12:55 p.m., with Dietary [NAME] (Cook), there were droppings on the light switch by the handwashing station. There was also a hole extending behind the backsplash on the counter and potential entry point. room [ROOM NUMBER] dry storage area had cobwebs under the shelves and under the stainless-steel sink. [NAME] stated he was not aware of any Pest Control services performed in a few months. [NAME] further stated he was solely responsible for cleaning the kitchen and had not performed a cleaning in over a year. During an interview on 10/18/23 at 11:49 a.m., with Administrator (Admin), Admin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) for six of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 5, 58, 60, 61, 62 and 63) as required by the regulation. These failures had the potential to result in not planning and meeting the residents' needs, strengths, and goals of care. Findings: Review of Resident 5's MDS assessment indicated the last comprehensive assessment was completed on 1/21/2019. Review of Resident 58's MDS assessment indicated Resident 58 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 58's admission comprehensive assessment with ARD (Assessment Reference Date,is the last day of the observation period the assessment covers for the resident) of 7/13/2023 was not completed. Review of Resident 60's MDS assessment indicated the last comprehensive assessment was completed 10/01/2019. Review of Resident 61's MDS assessment indicated the last comprehensive assessment was completed 11/6/2021. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for six (Resident 4, 5, 60, 61, 63 and 159) of thirteen sampled residents, the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS - Resident Assessment and care guide tool) according to the regulation. This failure had the potential to result in the delayed assessment of residents' needs, goals of care and inability to monitor each residents' progress over time. Findings: The following MDS record reviews were not completed every three months as follows: Review of Resident 4' MDS assessment indicated the last quarterly MDS assessment was completed 12/22/22. Review of Resident 5's MDS assessment indicated the last quarterly assessment was completed on 4/24/23. Review of Resident 60's MDS assessment indicated the last quarterly assessment was completed on 1/1/2023. Review of Resident 61's MDS assessment indicated the last quarterly assessment was completed on 2/6/2023. Review of Resident 63's MDS assessment indicated the last quarterly assessment was completed on 5/2/2022. Review of Resident 159's MDS assessment indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for four (Resident 3, 59, 61, and 164) of 13 sampled residents , the facility failed to electronically transmit accurate and complete Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care), data to the CMS system within 14 days after the facility completes a resident's assessment. Definition: CMS - The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provides health coverage through Medicare and Medicaid-a government national health insurance program that provided health insurance for adults and children with limited income and resources. These failures had the potential to result in the delay of assessment of residents' needs, goals of care and inability to monitor each residents progress over time. Findings: Review of the MDS 3.0 Final Validation report dated 10/16/23 indicated Resident 3's quarterly assessments were completed on 7/22/2022 and the comprehensive assessment on 4/21/23 and was transmitted on 10/16/2023. Further review indicated Resident 3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition status for one ( (Resident 159) of three residents when Resident 159 lost 24% of her body weight in the last nine months. Resident 159 was not seen by a Registered Dietitian (RD) for a dietary evaluation since June 2023. This failure had the potential to cause additional weight loss and increase Resident 159's risk of morbidity (the condition of suffering from a disease or medical condition) and mortality (death). Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/16/23 at 12:20 PM, Resident 159 was in bed. She was not able to respond to questions with yes or no. Her food tray was on the side table and appeared untouched. The tray ticket (identifies patient name, their diet, and food likes and dislikes) indicated, Resident 159 was on a regular diet, mechanical soft texture, thin liquid diet. The tray had two items 1) a small bowl of porridge and 2) a 12 oz (ounce) can of soda. The resident was having trouble feeding herself and was spilling food on herself. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Resident 59 and 2 ) of five sampled residents were free from unnecessary drug when; 1. Resident 59 was administered Zyprexa (antipsychotic) drug without adequate clinical indication for its use. Antipsychotic medications are used to treat mental health conditions, capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior. 2. Resident 2's PRN (as needed) order for Haldol (antipsychotic) drug had no informed consent and stop date. Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Zyprexa can increase the risk of death in elderly people who have memory loss and is not approved for use in psychotic conditions related to dementia. [Reference: www.[NAME].comp]. These failures had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary drugs and suffer adverse medication side effects. Findings: Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 9/10/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications. These failures had the potential to result in the administration of expired medications to the residents and possible adverse (unwanted, undesirable) side effects or receiving medications that have become less effective for treatment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/17/23, at 10:51 a.m., with the Administrator (Adm), about the Medication Cart 1 ten tablets of expired famotidine (medication for excess stomach acid) 10 mg (milligram) were found inside Medication Cart 1's top drawer. Adm stated, the expired medications should not be in the cart and should have been disposed. During an interview on 10/19/23, at 11:06 a.m., with the Pharmacist Consultant (PC), PC stated, she was responsible for the disposal of expired medications from the medication cart. PC stated, expired medications should not be in the medication cart because of the possibility of giving the residents the expired medications. PC further stated, the residents could suffer the adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records and account of discontinued controlled medications (medications which fall under United States Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Scheduled II-V (2 through 5) which have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychosocial dependency) medications for two (Resident 153, and Resident 159) of three sampled residents. This failure had the potential for the diversion of the antianxiety medication Ativan (lorazepam) and sedative temazepam (Restoril) for unauthorized use. Findings: During a review of Resident 153's face sheet, Resident 153 was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions, that interferes with doing everyday activities) with behavioral disturbances. During a review of Resident 159's face sheet, Resident 159 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 157), the facility failed to complete the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) as required. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 157 not receiving the appropriate care and services. Findings: During a review of the admission Face Sheet for Resident 157, Resident 157 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses that included cognitive (mental) deficits following a cerebral infarction (stroke). During an interview and concurrent record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), on 6/16/21 at 11:20 a.m., MDSC stated Resident 157's annual MDS dated [DATE], was not completed and should have been completed within 14 days of 9/19/20. MDSC further stated Resident 157's annual MDS assessment was comprehensive (full assessment) which identifies the resident's care needs. Review of Resident 157's annual MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the Assessment Reference Date was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff did not notify the physician to re-evaluate the resident's mental capability or capacity to be their own responsible party (RP) for medical decisions for one, (Resident 110) of six sampled residents. After hospitalization, Resident 110 became more aggressive and confused and was not able to give consent in the absence of a conservator (a judge appoints a RP to care for another adult who does not have the capacity to make decisions about their health and finances). This resulted in Resident 110 signing consents for antipsychotic (Seroquel) and anti-anxiety medications (Ativan) without full awareness and understanding of the medications and their potential side effects or have a conservator act on the resident's behalf. Definition: Antipsychotic medication: Used to alter the brain chemistry to decrease psychotic episodes such as hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that no one else can) and delusions (false beliefs). Findings: During the initial tour of the facility on 6/14/21 at 9:15 a.m., Resident 110 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had six resident rooms (Rooms 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents in each room, or for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During an observation on 5/19/25 at 9:30 a.m., the following Resident (Rt) rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft) were identified: Room Activity Room Size Floor Area 1 Rt Room 299.63 sq.ft 74.9 sq.ft/bed 3 Rt Room 293.25 sq.ft 73.32 sq.ft/bed 5 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed 7 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed 8 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed 9 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/19/25, at 9:35 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated, rooms with four Residents had enough space to provide resident care. CNA 1 also stated, there was enough space even for residents using wheelchairs. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had six residents (Rt) rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square foot (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents in each room or for storage of residents' belongings. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/23 and 8:00 a.m., in the presence of Registered Nurse/Administrator (RN/Admin), the following rooms and corresponding sq. ft per bed were identified: Room Activity/Room Size Floor Area 1 Rt room /299.63 sq. ft 74.9 sq. ft 3 Rt room / 293.25 sq. ft 73.32 sq. ft 5 Rt room / 299 sq. ft 74.75 sq. ft 7 Rt room / 299 sq. ft 74.75 sq. ft 8 Rt room / 299 sq. ft 74.75 sq. ft 9 Rt. room / 299 sq. ft 74.75 sq. ft During an interview on 10/17/23 at 8:22 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) stated there was enough space to provide care for residents. CNA 2 stated she had no problems going…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility had six resident rooms (Rooms 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents in each room, or for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During an observation on 6/14/21 at 9:30 a.m., the following Resident (Rt) rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft) were identified: Room Activity Room Size Floor Area 1 Rt Room 299.63 sq.ft 74.9 sq.ft/bed 3 Rt Room 293.25 sq.ft 73.32 sq.ft/bed 5 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed 7 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed 8 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed 9 Rt Room 299 sq.ft 74.75 sq.ft/bed During random observations of care and services from 6/14/21 to 6/16/21, there was sufficient space for the provision of care for the residents in all rooms. There was no heavy equipment kept in the rooms that might interfere with residents care and each resident had adequate personal space and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$66,134 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $66,134 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-01 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SANTIAGO, MARILYNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 10/01/2006
SANTIAGO, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2006
SANTIAGO-CADE, ADORA ROSEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2006
MMS QUALITY NURSING SERVICES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
SANTIAGO-SO, RUBY ANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2019
SNIPES, TYRONEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2012
WELDEN, ELNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2006

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555466. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next