Chaparral House

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 47.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Resident 1 of her Medicaid 'share of cost' in a timely manner and did not explain it in a way the resident could easily understand (Medicaid is a government-funded health insurance. Medicaid 'share of cost' is the specific dollar amount the insured resident is required to pay out-of-pocket for medical bills each month before Medicaid kicks in to cover the rest of the charges).This deficient practice compromised Resident 1's ability to make an informed decision, potentially leading to financial hardship and psychosocial issues. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a one-page summary containing a resident's most critical demographic, financial, and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes a person to have repeated, unprovoked seizures), insomnia (sleep disorder), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. During a review of Resident 2's MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting and thorough investigation of an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Specifically, the facility did not notify law enforcement as required and document or maintain required lost-and-found logs.This failure resulted in the facility's inability to investigate the reported loss of $5,000, placing Resident 1 at risk for unreported financial exploitation.During a record review of facility's document titled, admission Record, printed 6/2/26, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol in blood), and acute on chronic diastolic heart failure (a condition where the heart does not pump enough blood to meet the needs of the body).During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to evaluate a resident's functional capabilities, health needs,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment when Resident 1's bedside table had scratched marks on top and had chipped edges. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling angry. On 12/26/25 at 10:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was made at the facility to investigate a complaint allegation. During a phone interview on 12/26/25 at 2:03 p.m., Resident 1 stated when she was living at the facility, her bedside table had scratch marks on top and peeled edges. Further stated she felt angry about this. During a review of Resident 1's Facesheet, it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently sad mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) and was discharged from the facility on 9/9/25. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 8/11/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication errors when Resident 1 received the medication Percocet instead of Norco (Percocet is the brand name for oxycodone/acetaminophen and Norco is the brand name for hydrocodone/acetaminophen for pain. Both medications are for pain but have different opioid ingredients. Opioids are very powerful type of drugs used for pain relief). This failure exposed Resident 1 to the risk of adverse medication effects and discomfort. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, it indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right femur fracture (broken bone in right thigh bone). A review of Physician's orders dated 8/5/25, indicated an order of Norco or Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablet 10-325 milligrams (mg., a form of measurement), give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for severe pain. During an interview on 12/26/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat three of three sampled residents (Resident 21, 22, and 29) with dignity and respect when Residents 21, 22, and 29, who needed full assistance with meals, were not offered or fed their bread rolls during lunch. This failure had the potential to affect Residents 21, 22 and 29's psychosocial well-being and nutritional needs. Findings: During a dining observation on 9/23/24 at 12:53 p.m., in the dining room, Residents 21, 22, and 29 were being assisted by staff during lunch. Registered Nurse (RN) 3 asked Resident 29 if she wanted her bread roll to which Resident 29 replied, yes. RN 3 did not have gloves available to feed the bread roll and RN 3 offered water to Resident 29 instead. Residents 21, 22, and 29 did not receive their bread rolls from the staff who assisted them during feeding. During an interview on 9/25/24 at 3:07 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated RN 3 should have accommodated and assisted Resident 29 when Resident 29 wanted to eat the bread roll. DSD further stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (medications that can affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for three of 38 sampled residents (Residents 8,7 and 10) when: 1. Resident 8 did not have the appropriate indications for the use of Seroquel (Seroquel is an antipsychotic medication; Antipsychotic medications are medications that are used to treat symptoms of psychotic mental disorder such as delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, or confused thoughts), 2. Resident 7 had no rationale for continued use of PRN Ativan beyond 14 days (PRN is short for pro re nata [a Latin phrase], meaning as needed, or as necessary; Ativan is a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety; psychotropic medications are used to treat mental health disorders), and 3. Resident 10 was administered Trazadone (an antidepressant medication to treat major depressive disorder, some anxiety disorders and chronic pain conditions) for insomnia (difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for the soft and bite-sized (foods that are soft, moist, and easy to swallow) and easy to chew diet (soft, tender foods that are easy to chew) for 12 out of 12 residents (Residents 13, 23, 8, 6, 190, 29, 7, 12, 34, 18, 15 and 22) when Residents 13, 23, 8, 6, 190, 29, 7, 12, 34, 18, 15 and 22 did not receive two ounces of gravy for lunch with their chicken on 9/23/24. This failure had the potential for Residents 13, 23, 8, 6, 190, 29, 7, 12, 34, 18, 15 and 22 to have problems chewing and swallowing the food when the established menu was not followed accordingly and had the potential for poor nutrition and to further compromise the medical status of the residents. Findings: During the tray line (an assembly line preparation of meal trays in the kitchen to be delivered to residents) observation on 9/23/24, at 12:17 p.m., in the kitchen, the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) did not serve gravy to residents who were on the soft and bite-sized and easy to chew diet. During a record review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices when: 1. Can opener had red discoloration on the blade that pierced the can, 2. Under the stove and steam tray line, the floors had a build-up of food crumbs, trash, dust, and grime, 3. The oven had build-up of black grime inside, 4. Dry storage floors had build-up of food crumbs, trash, and dead ants, and 5. Diet Aide 1 (DA 1) did not wear a bear net during meal preparation and service. These failures had the potential to expose 38 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen to foodborne illness due to cross-contaminations (the transfer for harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food). Findings: 1. During an initial tour observation of the kitchen and interview on 9/23/24 at 9:32 a.m. with Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the can opener had red discoloration on the blade. DSS stated the can opener should have been cleaned. During a phone interview on 9/25/24 at 1:10 p.m. with the Registered Dietician 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 8's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care). PASARR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for a serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability; 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting; and 3) receive the services they need in those settings.) completed when Resident 8 had diagnosis of brief psychotic disorder (mental disorder that can cause abnormal thinking and perception). This failure resulted in Resident 8 not being properly evaluated if he was receiving appropriate mental health services. (Cross Reference F758) Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, dated 9/25/24, the record indicated Resident 8 had diagnosis of brief psychotic disorder. During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for two (Resident 10 and Resident 11) of thirteen sampled residents, the facility failed to implement its Care Plan, Comprehensive Person Centered policy and procedure when: 1. Facility did not develop care plan to address Resident 10's medical diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life ) and Insomnia (persistent problems falling and staying asleep), and there was no care plan to address Resident 10's use of Amitriptyline and Trazadone (antidepressant medications, antidepressants are medications used to treat major depressive disorder, some anxiety disorders and chronic pain conditions), and 2. Facility did not identify and address Resident 11's hairy mole on chin with a care plan and appropriate interventions. (Hairy moles are skin lesions that have both hair and pigmentation. They are usually present at birth.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA