St John Kronstadt Convalescent Center
4432 James Avenue, Castro Valley, CA 94546 · Non profit - Corporation · 49 certified beds · (510) 889-7000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (12% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.9–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 82.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 42.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 12% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-02-17 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to comply with Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time dietitian and the requirements were not met as specified in established standards (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4) for food service managers which required, employment of a full-time dietetic supervisor when the dietitian was not full time. The lack of a full-time, competent supervisor resulted in Food and Nutrition Services staff not having adequate training and knowledge to carry out Food and Nutrition Services in a safe and sanitary manner. In addition, when the dietitian was not full-time, frequent consultation was not provided from the dietitian to ensure Food and Nutrition Services was carried out in a safe and sanitary manner, when the dietitian went into the kitchen 1 hour a month. The lack of full-time, competent oversight of food and nutrition staff placed 34 residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for food borne…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: Ensure three of three sampled residents' (Residents 5, 6 and 9) Medication Regimen Review ([MRR]- a review of medications to identify problems/errors) was completed monthly. This deficient practice placed Residents 5, 6 and 9 at risk of not having medication irregularities identified.1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record printed on 11/20/25, admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/19/25, indicated Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) Score of 10/15. Meaning Resident 5's mental cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS revealed Resident 5 had multiple diagnoses that included Depression (feeling of worry, fear, or dread), Bipolar Disorder (sometimes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 out t of 2 residents did not have prefilled medication cups with ointment left at the bedside, expired medications were not available for use, best by date was printed on a medication box, internal and external medications were separated when in the same drawer, compromised medication bubble packs were returned to the pharmacy, and glucose monitoring device was separated from internal medications. The deficient practice had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date or best by date and medications with different routes of administration were not separated in accordance with facility policy and procedure (P&P). 9. A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care), dated 10/7/25, indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 2020, had diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss), and had severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions when:1. (a) a stainless-steel pasta tong was dirty and was in poor condition. (b) two handheld can opener had rust and metal fragments on the blade and surrounding parts.2. water pitcher with thickened liquid was left at Resident 25's bedside for more than 24 hours.These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food borne illness. 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen and concurrent interview on 11 at 9/18/25 at 9:44 a.m. with the Food and Nutrition Services Manager (FNSM), the following items were stored in the clean kitchenware storage drawer: (a) a stainless-steel tong had sticky white debris and rubber tip that holds food was ripped in half; (b) two handheld can openers with red-orange debris and metal fragments on its blades. The DM acknowledged the tong was dirty and two can openers were rusty. DM, stated these utensils should have not been stored because rusty and dirty utensils can contaminate food served to residents and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 7) had a completed Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to screen individuals for mental illness, intellectual disability, or related conditions to determine if the resident required specialized services) assessment when resident was newly diagnosed with schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly).This failure resulted in the facility to not notify the State Mental Health Authority and caused Resident 7 to not receive an in-depth mental health evaluation and care appropriate to his needs. A review of Resident 7's admission Record, printed on 11/24/25, indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss), schizophrenia, and depression.A review of Resident 7's PASRR Screening, dated 11/1/21, indicated resident had a Level I Screening conducted in the facility on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25) with right hand contracture and use of palm protector.This failure resulted in the lack of information regarding care and had potential to result in unmet care needs for Resident 25. A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss) and dysthymic disorder (chronic depression).A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care), dated 10/7/25, indicated Resident 25 was rarely/never able to make self-understood, rarely/never had the ability to understand others, and had severely impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 25 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on all activities of daily living (ADLs), with two or more-person assistance.A review of Resident 25's Physician Order Report, dated 11/01/25-11/30/25, indicated an order date 9/2/25, for Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) to apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified that one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) had been refusing his medications for two weeks. The failure to notify the physician had the potential to delay effective treatment for the resident, allow the physician to prescribe alternative pain management and adjust the plan of care.During an observation on 11/20/25 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 1 was awake, alert, oriented and sitting on the side of his bed. RN 1 asked Resident 1 if he wanted the 4% Lidocaine patch, (a type of topical anesthetic used for temporary pain relief by numbing the area where they are applied). The resident stated the Lidocaine patch was being refused.During a review of Resident 1's Resident admission sheet, the Residents admission Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), acute bronchitis (inflammation of the bronchial tubes)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Resident 27, 39, 5 and 9), received care when following was noted:1. Resident 27 had overgrown and dirty fingernails in both hands.2. Resident 39 had overgrown and dirty fingernails in both hands.3. Resident 5 had long and dirty fingernails in both hands.4. Resident 9 had long and overgrown dirty fingernails in both hands. 1. During a review of Resident 27's face sheet, undated, indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included, Parkinson's disease (progressive brain disorder that affects movement and balance) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM -when body does not use insulin properly, which can weaken immune system placing a person at high risk for respiratory infections like pneumonia). During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated, 10/27/25, indicated Resident 27 had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the census and direct care service hours per patient day (DHPPD) posting was complete and was not missing information. This failure resulted in the actual direct care service hours and DHPPD not readily available to residents and visitors at any given time. During an interview and observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/21/25 at 12 noon of the posted DHPPD. The DON stated the DHPPD forms are posted daily outside of nursing station 1. The information is posted by the night shift nurse in charge and updated by the dayshift DON or charge nurse. It was noted the 11/21/25 actual direct care service hours and DHPPD were not completed. The DHPPD form dated 11/21/25 did not show the daily census changes for 8:00 a.m., actual care service hours, average patient census, the actual DHPPD, the actual total Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) direct, care services hours and actual CNA DHPPD. The Director of Nursing had signed the form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 11), Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) failed to implement infection prevention and control practice when CNA 1 did not perform hand hygiene in between feeding residents in the Community Room (back dining room). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of infection. A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care), dated 10/7/25, indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss) and had severely impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 25 was totally dependent (helper does all the effort) on all activities of daily living (ADLs), including eating (the ability to use suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and swallow food and/or liquid once the meal is placed before the resident).A review of Resident 11's MDS assessment, dated 9/30/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal immunization for one of five sampled residents, when Resident 27 was not offered the pneumococcal immunization.This failure had the potential to not protect Resident 27 against serious illnesses like pneumonia (lung infection).During a review of Resident 27's face sheet, printed on 11/18/25, revealed Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included, Parkinson's disease (progressive brain disorder that affects movement and balance) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM -when body does not use insulin properly, which can weaken immune system placing a person at high risk for respiratory infections like pneumonia).During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/18/25 at 2:10 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 27's vaccination record revealed, Resident 27 was administered pneumococcal vaccine on 11/9/17. IP stated, Resident 27 was due for revaccination in 2022, but she forgot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 1's alleged abuse incident was reported within the prescribed timeframes. This failure placed the Resident 1 at risk for further possible abuse incidents, mental anguish or emotional distress. This failure also resulted in the delay in the abuse investigation. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Facesheet (information containing contact details, brief medical history at-a-glance) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss and impaired decision-making capacity) and major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood and loss of pleasure and interest in life). During an interview on 4/16/25 at 12:57 p.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated on 4/14/25 at approximately 7:30 a.m., Resident 1 was complaining of left arm pain and stated that the night shift Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was mean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation ,interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) who required supervision due to physical and verbal aggression. This resulted in an altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2, and this also had the potential to result in Resident 1 in having more altercations with other residents which can result to a serious injury. Findings: Review of Resident 2's Facesheet (information containing contact details, brief medical history at-a-glance) indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment of unknown etiology (unknown cause). During an interview with Resident 2 on 12/13/24 at 12:58 p.m., stated on 11/21/24 at around 8:30 p.m., she was ready to go to bed and asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 to turn off the light. Stated a few minutes later after CNA 1 left the room, her roommate Resident 1 went inside their room in a wheelchair and went to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide gender specific bathrooms to five of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 30, 32, 33 and 41). A female resident (Resident 32) shared a [NAME] and [NAME] bathroom (a bathroom that has two doors and is accessible from two bedrooms) with two male residents (Resident 30 and Resident 33) in the adjacent room. A female resident (Resident 1) shared [NAME] and [NAME] bathroom set up with a male resident (Resident 41). This failure placed Residents 1, 30, 32, 33 and 41 at risk for humiliation and discomfort. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/24 at 11:00 a.m., in Resident 41's room, Resident 41 was sitting in wheelchair. Resident 41 stated he shared the bathroom with a female resident (Resident 1) residing in the adjacent room. Resident 41 stated sharing the bathroom with a female resident was unacceptable. Resident 41 stated it was concerning for him as he would look bad if he happened to enter the bathroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 16, Resident 23, and Resident 11) received proper grooming including nailcare when: 1) Resident 16 had long sharp fingernails. 2) Resident 23 had long sharp fingernails. 3) Resident 16 had long, thick fingernails. This failure placed residents at risk for getting infections from lack of proper hygiene and injuring themselves with long fingernails and compromise physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's Resident Face Sheet, printed on 6/5/24, the Face Sheet showed Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 and had multiple medical diagnoses including glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that damage the optic nerve and can cause blindness) and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system that affects movement). During a record review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and label mediations in accordance with manufacturer specifications and currently accepted professional principles when: 1. The medication refrigerator temperature was below recommended temperature range for storage of refrigerated medications. 2. The medication refrigerator temperature was not consistently monitored and recorded twice daily for seven out of seven months, from [DATE] to [DATE]. 3. The temperature log had an incorrect temperature range for monitoring. 4. Nursing staff failed to notify the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) when the medication refrigerator temperature was out of range. 5. Six (6) bottles of eyedrops and one (1) insulin pen were not correctly labeled. These failures had the potential to result in 44 residents receiving medications or vaccines of unknown effectiveness and seven (7) residents potentially receiving an incorrect or expired medication. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective medication administration and accurate accountability of a controlled substance (medications that can be easily abused and are under strict government control) when: 1. Nursing staff did not correctly prime the pen needle during the administration of insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 27) receiving an insulin injection. This had the potential to result in Resident 27 to not receive a full dose of insulin. 2. One of 31 sampled residents (Resident 19) received calcium and iron at the same time. This had the potential for an interaction leading to the decreased absorption of iron, and the resident not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication. 3. During a random controlled medication use audit, one of two randomly sampled residents (Resident 7) did not have all administered medications correctly documented on the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medication) and on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed when: 1. Cake was not served to 10 of 10 Controlled Carbohydrate diets (CCHO; a diet to control the amount of carbohydrate or sugar a person receives at each meal); 2. A smaller portion of vegetables and potatoes than what was indicated on the menu were served to 9 of 9 residents on regular portion/regular textured diets; 3. A smaller portion of meat, a larger portion of vegetable, and a larger portion of cake than what was indicated on the menu were served to 7 of 7 residents on regular pureed diets; 4. A larger portion of meat and a larger portion of potatoes than what was indicated on the menu and traycard was served to Random Resident 1 (RR1) 5. A smaller portion of meat than what was indicated on the menu and traycard was served to Resident 6. This failure had the potential for residents to not receive the nutrients intended by the physician's order and the planned menu for 29 residents out of a facility census of 35. Findings: Review of the policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable when the food was bland (lacking flavor) and the food was not maintained at a warm temperature. This failure had the potential for 34 residents to consume less food resulting in the consumption of fewer calories and nutrients provided by the planned menu, out of a facility census of 34. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled Meal Service Subject: Cultural Dining dated 2023, showed a possible problem during food service is maintaining food temperatures at the dining table. The procedures showed a solution for this problem is food should be 120 degrees or above upon arrival to the dining room. Review of the Daily Spreadsheet dated Tuesday - Day 3 and used for lunch on 2/14/23, showed the regular consistency food included Braised Pork Shoulder, Sauteed Broccoli Florets, and Hawaiian Rice. The pureed food included Braised Pork Shoulder Puree, Pureed Sauteed Broccoli Florets, and Seasoned [NAME] Puree. Review of the undated recipe titled Braised Pork Shoulder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute in a safe and sanitary manner when: 1. Perishable and time/temperature control for safety (TCS) food (Time/Temperature for safety food means a food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit pathogenic microorganism [an organism which can cause disease] growth or toxin [a naturally occurring organic poison] was not stored at a safe temperature (Cross-reference F801); 2. Sanitizer strength for a low temperature dish machine was not monitored and the dish machine water temperature was below the recommended temperature (Cross-reference F801); 3. Surface sanitizer was not used on appropriately for kitchen and equipment surfaces, such as countertops and food processors, to ensure surfaces sanitized (Cross-reference F801); 4. The ice machine was not clean; 5. The juice machine was not clean; 6. A reach-in food refrigerator was not clean; 7. A wall in a food preparation area was not clean and the area above the stove was not clean; 8. A fresh air intake vent in a dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices, when following was noted: 1. Oxygen (O2) tubing for Resident 20 was unlabeled/ undated and was touching the floor. 2. Resident 24's nebulizer (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) mask and tubing was left uncovered on the nightstand. The tubing was not labeled and or dated with yellowish tinged discoloration. 3. Facility did not create and maintain an active water management plan. The above failures placed Residents 20 and 24 at risk for respiratory and skin infections, not having a water management plan placed all 34 residents at risk for gastrointestinal infection (gut inflammation caused by consuming contaminated water or food, characterized with stomach pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever etc.) Findings. 1. During a review of Resident 20's Resident Face Sheet printed on 02/13/23, the record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified and certified Infection Preventionist (IP) (a professionally trained individual responsible for facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program) staff for over two years. This failure resulted in facility not having a qualified staff responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring, and managing facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program and placed 34 residents at risk for infections. Findings A review of the Resident Census dated February 13, 2023, showed the facility had a total number of 34 residents in the facility. During an interview and record review on 02/14/23, at 10:43 a.m., DON's training certificate titled Module 1- Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 5/8/20 was reviewed. The DON stated, she had completed only Module 1 out of a total 24 required Modules for the completion of IP course. The DON stated, she had been performing IP duties since 2021 without a certification. The DON stated, she did not complete the IP certification course since 2020, as she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the 2-compartment sink for manual warewashing when there were no stoppers available to allow the sinks to be filled. This failure did not allow the kitchen staff to follow the appropriate procedures for cleaning equipment and utensils used for food preparation when the dish machine was not working which led to the potential for food borne illness for 34 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 34. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled Sanitation and Infection Control Subject: Warewashing (Hand Washing Method) dated 2023, showed when a two-compartment sink is used, compartment one is for washing and compartment 2 is for rinsing and sanitizing. For sanitizing, items are to be: immersed or at least 30 seconds if hot water of 171 degrees F or more is used, immersed for at least 30 seconds in a chlorine solution of 100 parts per million (ppm), immersed for at least 1 minute in an iodine solution of 25 ppm, or immersed for at least 1 minute in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain working clocks for 10 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 7, 8B, 12, 16, 22, 23, 26 and 36) in their rooms. This failure placed Resident 1, 2, 7, 8B, 12, 16, 22, 23, 26 and 36 at risk for confusion and disorientation. Findings. During an observation and interview on 02/14/23, at 10:24 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), the wall clock in shared room for Resident 23 and Resident 26, indicated the time was 6:20. During an observation and interview on 2/14/23, at 10:29 a.m., in Resident 12 and 22's shared room, LVN 3 stated, the wall clock indicated time was 2:48. During an observation and interview on 2/14/23, at 10:31 a.m., with LVN 3, wall clock in Resident 36's room showed time was 11:45; and the wall clock in Resident 2 and 16's room indicated time was 11:30. During another observation and interview on 2/14/23, at 10:32 a.m., in shared room for Resident 1,7 and 8B, LVN 3 stated, wall clock indicated time was 5:15. During an interview on 2/14/23, at 10:33 a.m., LVN 3 stated, Resident 23, 26, 12, 22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an easily accessible bathroom to three of three sampled residents (Resident 5, 32 and 29). Resident 5 and 32 shared a bathroom with two female residents, that they could not use. Resident 29 did not have a bathroom in the room. This failure resulted in Resident 5, Resident 32 and Resident 29 to not have a homelike environment, having to wait for extended periods of time to use the bathroom, and an increased number of incontinent (unable to voluntarily control their bladder and/or bowels) episodes. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/14/23, at 8:08 a.m., in Resident 32 and 5's shared room, a sign was posted on the bathroom door indicating, BATHROOM CLOSED USE HALLWAY BATHROOM. During an interview with Resdent 32 on 2/14/23 at 8:08 a.m., Resident 32 stated, Resident 5 and himself shared the bathroom with two female residents (Resident 19 and 33) residing in the adjacent room. Resident 32 stated, he used the hallway bathroom and it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review for four of five CNA's (Certified Nurse Assistant) at least once every 12 months. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate care and services provided to residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 2/15/23, at 1:00 p.m., with the Director Of Nursing (DON), a review of the following CNA record indicated: a. CNA 4 was hired on 4/15/85, no performance review on file for 2022. b. CNA 5 was hired on 6/16/09, no performance review on file for2022. c. CNA 3 was hired on 4/15/10, last performance review on file was 12/20/21. d. CNA 6 was hired on 7/29/17, last performance review on file was 11/2019. The Director of nursing (DON) stated, she was the previous Director of Staff Development (DSD) until January 2023. DON stated, she did not perform performance review for the unlicensed nurses in 2022 because she did not have time to do it. DON further added, resident safety is at risk when performance review of direct care staff was not done. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications below five percent (5%) error rate when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) did not administer Loratadine( drug used for relief of nasal and non-nasal symptoms of seasonal allergies) 10 mg medication to Resident 29. 2. LVN 2 crushed Metoprolol (a medication used to lower the blood pressure) Extended Release (a medication released slowly in the bloodstream) 25 milligrams (mg) tablet without a physician's order. LVN 2 did not administer two eye drops, Alphagan 0.1% and Dorzolamide-timolol 2-0.5%, to Resident 34. 3. LVN 3 documented she gave Metformin (a medication used for diabetes) 500 mg to Resident 8B, but did not give the medication as prescribed. These significant medication errors resulted in Residents 29, 34 and 8B receiving medications that were not prescribed by their physicians. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 2/14/23, at 8:44 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) prepared the following seven medications for Resident 29: Loratadine was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications per physician order or manufacturer's specifications to three of seven sampled residents when the following was noted: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) did not administer Loratadine (drug used for relief of nasal and non-nasal symptoms of seasonal allergies. ) 10 mg medication to Resident 29. 2. LVN 2 crushed Metoprolol (a medication used to lower the blood pressure) Extended Release (a medication released slowly in the bloodstream) 25 milligrams (mg) tablet without a physician's order. LVN 2 did not administer two eye drops, Alphagan (eye drops for glaucoma) 0.1% and Dorzolamide-timolol(eye drops for glaucoma and intraocular/eye pressure) 2-0.5%, to Resident 34. 3. LVN 3 documented Metformin (a medication used for diabetes) 500 mg as given to Resident 8B, but did not give at the documented time. These significant medication errors resulted in Residents 29, 34 and 8B not receiving medications as ordered by their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a cook was competent in the task of following a recipe to puree food. The failure had the potential to affect the nutrient content and or palatability of the food and result in decreased nutrient intake by nine residents on a physician prescribed pureed diet out of a facility census of 35. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled Food Preparation Subject: Portion Control dated 2023, showed portion control assures correct quantities are served to residents to meet the nutritional specifications as determined by the menu. Standard portions are necessary to control quality, attractiveness and appeal of food. Standard tools are utilized to assure portion control including recipes. Review of the Job Description titled Cook and signed by [NAME] 1 on 8/13/2017, showed duties and responsibilities included preparing food in accordance with standardized recipes. Review of the undated recipe tiled Pot Roast - 3 oz [ounce], showed directions on how to prepare the pot roast. Under the sections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared in a consistency to meet resident needs. This failure placed eight (8) residents who received a pureed diet at risk for choking and/or aspirating (inhaling food into the lungs) out of a facility census of 34. Findings: Review of the Diet Manual Rehabilitation, Residential, and Long-Term Care Facilities dated 2018, foods for the pureed diet should be smooth and pureed to the consistency of pudding and holds its shape on a plate. Blendarized foods that are liquid may need to be thickened. Review of the Daily Spreadsheet dated Tuesday - Day 3 and used for lunch on 2/14/23, showed the Pureed food included Braised Pork Shoulder Puree, Pureed Sauteed Broccoli Florets, and Seasoned [NAME] Puree. Review of the undated recipe titled Braised Pork Shoulder showed for the pureed diet, to refer to the Pureed Meat recipe. Review of the undated recipe titled Sauteed Broccoli Florets (Fresh), for the puree diet, to refer to the Pureed Vegetables Recipe. On 2/14/23 at 11:34 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the required room size of at least 80 square feet per resident for one of 23 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide necessary and safe nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: During an interview on 2/13/23, at 8:20 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), ADM stated, room [ROOM NUMBER] had less than 80 sq ft per resident and had four resident beds. ADM also stated, there was no room waiver for room [ROOM NUMBER]. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/14/23, at 12:35 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had four resident beds. The privacy of residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] were not impacted by shortage of space. Storage spaces were sufficient to accommodate the needs of residents. Resident 7 was sitting up in her wheelchair watching television. Resident 7 stated, she had no issues with maneuvering her wheelchair inside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident 8B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet for each resident for one of 23 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide necessary and safe nursing care and privacy for the residents.During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/25 at 10:33 a.m. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 and CNA 1 was seen transferring Resident 39 from bed to wheelchair using a Hoyer Lift (a mechanical device used to lift and/or transfer a person from place to place). CNA 3 stated, there was plenty of space in Resident 16's room even when using Hoyer lift for transfer. There was no negative outcome in the delivery of nursing care and services. During a record review on 11/21/25 of the Client Accommodations Analysis (undated), the following Resident room was identified having below the required 80 square feet requirement per resident: room [ROOM NUMBER] had 4 beds and 77 sq.ft./bed
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had one resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq.ft) per resident who occupied the room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide necessary and safe nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: During an interview on 6/3/24 at 9:35 a.m. with Administrator (ADM), ADM stated the facility had a room waiver for room [ROOM NUMBER]. ADM stated room [ROOM NUMBER] had less than 80 sq ft per resident and had four resident beds. During an interview on 6/5/24 at 12:35 p.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated room [ROOM NUMBER] was the only room that had four residents. The following rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft) per bed were identified: Room Activity Room Size Floor Area 16 Resident room 308 sq. ft 77 sq.ft/bed During an observation on 6/3/24 at 9:40 a.m., Residents 2, 6, 7 and 42 were observed in their bed. The privacy of residents in room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST JOHN KRONSTADT HOME FOR AGED RUSSIAN AMERICANS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/15/1971 |
| KOLOBOFF, CONSTANTINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2007 |
| LOUKIANOFF, ALEXANDER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2007 |
| MAXIMOW, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| PAVLENKO, STEFAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2000 |
| SERENITY 4 MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| DANBY, CRAIG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2014 |
| GARCIA, FABIOLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/25/2023 |
| GONZALEZ, EDWARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2014 |
| GRIMES, JEREMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2011 |
| HUYNH, UYEN-CHI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555016. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.