No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sharp Chula Vista Med Ctr SNF

751 Medical Center Court, Chula Vista, CA 91911 · Non profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (619) 502-3540 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 502-3540 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
765 Medical Center Ct · (619) 623-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
750 Medical Center Ct · (619) 373-9700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Ralphs0.3 mi
659 E Palomar St · (619) 397-0019 · Call to confirm hours
Park
785 E Palomar St · (619) 691-5260 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
610 Paseo del Rey

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.3%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.5%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.5%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%11.2%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 365 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
27.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.86U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.47hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.37hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 27.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 212 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.86 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.2%CMS range 65.1–75.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.8–12.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge27.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified71.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting75.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge62.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.7–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.07
RN hoursweekends
21.6%
Total nursing turnover
15.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 80.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.41 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.63 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.54 to 1.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-11-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and medical record reviews the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent the development of pressure injuries (skin damaged by lack of movement for staying in a position for too long) in accordance with the physician's order for one of six residents (Resident 51) reviewed for pressure ulcer. As a result, Resident 51 developed a new pressure injury on the sacral area (area below the lower back). Findings: Resident 51 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], per admission record, with diagnosis which included Coronary Artery disease (A major blood vessel [coronary arteries]) that supply the heart with blood, oxygen and nutrients to the heart muscle due poor circulation [the flow of blood]) and history of pressure ulcers to sacrum (area below the lower back) and upper back as documented per the progress note dated 08/22/23 written by a Nurse Practitioner (NP). A record review of Resident 51's document titled Braden Risk Assessment Flowsheet (An assessment tool used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document that residents were informed of their right to formulate advance directives and failed to document provision of advance-directive information in the medical record for 9 of 18 sampled residents reviewed. (Residents #17, 95, 11, 38, 6, 52, 60, and 42).Failure to ensure documentation of advance-directive education has the potential to affect residents' ability to exercise their right to make informed healthcare decisions. FindingsOn 2/24/26 at 8:43 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 11. LN11 reviewed the medical record for Resident #17 and stated there was no documentation regarding advance directive discussion or that advance directive information had been provided to the resident or resident's representative in the medical record and there should have been. LN11 reviewed the medical record for Resident #95 and stated there was no documentation regarding advance directive discussion or that advance directive information had been provided to the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's QAA/QAPI (Quality Assessment and Assurance/ Quality Assessment Program Improvement) committee failed to identify, develop, and implement action plans related to advance directives (cross reference F 578).This failure had the potential for residents not to be informed of their right to formulate advance directives and make informed decision regarding their medical care and treatment preferences. FINDINGSOn 2/26/26 at 2:05 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the admissions staff missed the opportunity to document advance directives information was provided to all residents. The DON stated his expectation was that the documentation should have been completed. The DON stated the facility's QAPI committee looked into facility issues that affected a high number of residents. The DON stated advance directives should have been identified as a project for the QAPI committee.A review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan and Adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of five sampled residents (Resident 52) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication when Resident 52 was prescribed a psychotropic medication as needed for more than 14 days. This failure had the potential for Resident 52 to receive an unnecessary psychotropic medication which can lead to side effects, such as sedation, falls, and headaches.Findings:A review of Resident 52's medical records indicated an active order for hydroxyzine (a medication used for various conditions, including anxiety, a condition characterized by excessive worrying), 25 milligram (mg, unit of measure) tablet every six hours prn (as needed) for anxiety, dated 1/10/26. The order was noted to have a duration of 54 days and was prescribed by a physician.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/26/26 at 1:25 P.M., the DON acknowledged hydroxyzine for anxiety meant that hydroxyzine was being used as a psychotropic medication.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for three of four sampled residents. (Resident #7, 89 and 91). This failure had the potential for the Ombudsmen to not be aware of the residents' transfers.FindingsOn 2/25/26 at 8:29 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3. LN3 reviewed the medical record for Resident #7 and stated that Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past history of DVT (deep vein thrombosis- a blood clot (thrombus) in one or more of the deep veins in the body, usually in the legs). LN3 stated on 12/10/25, Resident #7 was assessed to have dark discoloration to right foot with severe pain and was transferred to the hospital. LN3 stated a written notification to the Ombudsmen was not documented. Resident #7 returned to the facility on [DATE]. LN3 stated on 12/13/25, Resident #7 was assessed to have abdominal distension and pain and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care plan was developed for anticoagulant medications (medication to prevent blood clots) for 2 of 5 sampled residents.This failure had the potential to result in inadequate monitoring for complications of anticoagulant medications for residents (60, 95).Findings: 1. On 2/25/26 at 8:33 A.M., a concurrent interview and clinical record review was conducted with a Licensed Nurse (LN 11). Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] according to the facility Face Sheet. Physician order dated 2/19/26, Xarelto (anticoagulant) tablet 20 milligrams daily with evening meal. Resident 95's clinical record did not have a care plan in place to monitor for complications of anticoagulant medication. LN 11 stated a care plan should have been developed to monitor for complications of anticoagulant medication. On 2/26/26 at 9:43 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated care plans should have been developed for any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medication therapy in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Nurse (LN) 14 did not flush (push water through) Resident 1's feeding tube (a device used to administer food and medications to individuals with difficulty swallowing) in between medication administration.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to get the full therapeutic benefit of his medications or to experience complications from his medications clogging in the feeding tube.Findings:During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview on 2/23/26 at 12:04 P.M., LN 14 was observed preparing and administering a total of 11 medications for Resident 1.LN 14 flushed the feeding tube with 30 milliliters (mL, unit of measure) of water before starting the medication administration. LN 14 administered each medication separately. Flushing was not observed in between the administration of the 11 medications. After administering all the medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when:A bag containing three inhaler (a device used to deliver medications to the lungs) mouthpieces for Resident 85 was found in one of two sampled active Medication Carts with the top part of the label missing. This failure had the potential for residents to receive the wrong inhaler or wrong dose, which could result in adverse resident outcomes and medication errors.An expired inhaler mouthpiece for Resident 85 was found in one of two sampled Medication Carts, andAn expired tube of white petrolatum was found in one of two sampled Treatment Carts.These failures had the potential to negatively alter the drugs' stability, physical properties (such as consistency) and effectiveness, which could result in adverse resident outcomes.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:58 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 10, an inspection of East Wing Medication Cart 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 11.43% when four medication errors occurred out of 35 opportunities during the medication administration for three of six randomly observed residents (Residents 92, 94 and 1). These failures had the potential for the residents not to get the full therapeutic benefit of their medications or to experience negative health outcomes, such as harm from exposure to medication errors.Findings:During a medication administration observation on 2/23/25 at 8:28 A.M., Licensed Nurse (LN) 14 was observed preparing and administering 13 medications for Resident 92.The medications included the following:doxycycline (an antibiotic in the tetracycline class) 100 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) tablet,magnesium oxide (supplement for low magnesium levels) 400 mg tablet, andlevothyroxine (used to treat hypothyroidism, underactive thyroid) 50 microgram…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices when Licensed Nurse (LN) 14 did not perform hand hygiene after touching a potentially contaminated surface during medication administration through a feeding tube (a surgically placed tube used to administer food and medications in individuals who have trouble swallowing) for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to put residents, staff and visitors at risk for infections due to cross-contamination.Findings:During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview with LN 14 on 2/23/26 at 12:04 P.M., LN 14 was observed preparing and administering 11 medications through Resident 1's feeding tube. Resident 1 had a sign outside his door that read .Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP, infection control strategies used in nursing homes to prevent the spread of multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs, bacteria that cannot be killed by antibiotics].LN 14 wore a gown and gloves shortly before entering Resident 1's room for medication administration. LN 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activity preference per confidential group request timely. As a result, residents' needs and choices were not met and accommodated. The facility census was 82. Findings: On 10/8/24 at 10 A.M., a confidential group meeting was conducted. Six out of six residents in attendance indicated complaints regarding the facility outings. According to the confidential group, the facility had bus outings before but it was temporarily discontinued during the COVID (a highly infectious respiratory disease caused by a virus) pandemic (global infection outbreak). The facility bus and bus driver were no longer available. The bus outings before would include residents and staff member, volunteers or family members. The bus outings activity before would include places like going to stores to buy what they needed, watching movies, walking in the park, sightseeing or just going out. According to the confidential group, their respective doctors would allow and give them out on pass. Currently there was discussion of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to indicate the appropriate target behavior and monitor side effects for four of thirty residents (274, 35, 58, and 51) when: 1. Resident 274 was not being monitored for appropriate behaviors and side effects for two anti-depressants (medication used for feeling of sadness) and one anti-anxiety (medication used for worry and fear) medications. 2. Residents 35 and 58 did not have monitoring for behavior and side effects for anti-depressant medications. 3. Resident 51 did not have appropriate indications for the use of anti-depressant medications. These failures had the potential for unnecessary psychotropic (mind-altering medications) medication use and side effects to decrease therapeutic effects and a decline for residents psychological and mental well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 274's Medical Record indicated Resident 274 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when: 1. Food can items were dented. 2. Food items were expired. 3. Opened food items were not properly labeled and dated. 4. Grains and dust on the lids, loose and cracked lids of the clear plastic bins with food in it. 5. Food items with molds in it, and wilted produce. 6. Dirty rugs on the floor in the dry storage room, trash found in the dry food storage room and in the freezer room. 7. Ready to eat food item on top of the raw meat, and metal bin with ready to cook condensed soup on top of the food rack. 8. Food utensils such as ladles, slotted spoons and [NAME] kitchen utensil stored as clean with crusted food debris. 9. Boxes on top of the food rack past the red line/mark. 10. The following items were stored inappropriately in a food preparation area: an employee cup of coffee, a pump-up foam unit, employee drinks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to give one of three reviewed residents (Resident 282) the Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN/CMS 10055: a form which gave the choice to continue services under private pay if Medicare did not provide payment) for discontinued skilled (rehabilitation and nursing) services who remained in the facility for custodial (non-medical assistance with daily tasks, such as bathing, dressing, eating, and toileting) services. As a result, Resident 282 did not have the choice to appeal the decision or have knowledge of the costs to continue custodial care in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 282's Medical Record indicated Resident 282 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries). On 10/9/24 at 9:26 A.M., an interview and document review was conducted with AD 1. AD 1 stated that Resident 282 last coverage day for skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change of status assessment (SCSA) was completed within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition had been determined for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 42). This had the potential to delay necessary health services and updated plan of care based on the Resident 42's current health status. Findings: A review of Resident 42's Medical Record indicated Resident 42 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of stroke (when the blood flow to the brain is blocked that could lead to muscle weakness, paralysis, or death). A review of Resident 42's Minimum data set (MDS: nursing facility assessment tool) dated 8/4/24 indicated Resident 42 was able to participate with the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) interview and had a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 to indicate moderate cognitive (mental process involved in knowing, learning, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plans for three of seven sampled residents (1, 45 and 51) related to Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) range of motion (ROM- a measure of joint functionality and flexibility) exercises. This failure had the potential for residents to not meet their functional abilities. Cross Reference to F 688. Findings: a. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Medical Record. On 10/8/24, a review of Resident 1's history and physical (H & P) dated 6/18/24, indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury (TBI - a disruption in the normal function of the brain that can be caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head) and was in vegetative state (residents may look like they are awake but have no awareness of their surroundings). The H & P also indicated Resident 1 had contractures in both upper and lower extremities. On 10/8/24, a review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) for range of motion (ROM- a measure of joint functionality and flexibility) exercises per physician's order for three of seven residents (1, 45, and 51), reviewed for limited ROM. This had the potential to worsen Resident 1's contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and promote the development of contractures to Resident 45 and Resident 51. Cross Reference to F 656. Findings: a. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Medical Record. On 10/8/24, a review of Resident 1's history and physical (H & P) dated 6/18/24, indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury (TBI - a disruption in the normal function of the brain that can be caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head) and was in vegetative state (residents may look like they are awake…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store and label house supply/stock medications with open dates. As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were safely stored to ensure their integrity. Findings: On 10/9/24 at 3:31 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with LN 1, LN 21 and Pharm 1. During the medication storage observation, there were two boxes of insulin aspart (an injectable drug used to decrease blood sugar) stored in a tray inside a medication refrigerator. The two boxes contained one bottle each of insulin aspart. One box of insulin aspart was labeled with date open 9/21/24 and the bottle inside the box was not labeled with an open date. The other box of insulin aspart was labeled with expiration date 10/18/24 and the bottle inside the box was not labeled with an open date. The manufacturer's expiration date and lot numbers of the two insulin aspart in the tray were the same. LN 1 stated this had the potential for interchanging the bottles when returning to their boxes. On 10/10/24 at 3:26 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, the facility did not identify and address concerns that was in the residents council minutes meeting regarding transportation for the outdoor activities in quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI). This failure had the potential to effect all residents quality of life. Cross-Reference F558 Finding: On 10/10/24 at 3:49 P.M., an interview with the QAPI program members were conducted, in the conference room. The members of the QAPI team stated that they used information gathered from family, residents, pharmacy, national and state comparisons, best practices, clinical guidelines and CASPER report (a report for skilled nursing facilities used for quality improvement/assurance projects). The QAPI team further stated, these were used to track performance and to see what was not working to make changes with policies and procedures. On 10/10/24 at 3:51 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that the activities department participated in QAPI. The DON further stated, she and the AC discussed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices with two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 1) according to standards of practice and provide evidence of a tracking log of infections when: 1. A CNA did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-use of gown, gloves, mask to prevent spread of infection) prior to entering a contact precautions (intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents) room. Cross Reference F881 2. A LN did not wear a gown for Resident 1 with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP -involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents [example: residents with medical devices]). This failure had the potential to spread infection or outbreaks amongst all residents, staff, and visitors entering the facility. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 52's Medical Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure to establish an antibiotic stewardship program when the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not track and monitor appropriate use of antibiotics. This failure had the potential for lack of oversight and direction for staff. Cross reference F880 Findings. A concurrent interview and record review on 10/10/24 at 9:01 A.M., with IP was conducted. The IP stated the pharmacy helped with the antibiotics logging and tracking. The IP stated she did the urinary tract infection (UTI) tracking and the pharmacy helped with data collection and did the other infection tracking. The IP stated it was important to tracked antibiotic to make sure they are used appropriately and monitor patterns of infections and thus preventing outbreaks. An interview with the MDSC 1 on 10/10/24 at 9:12 A.M., was conducted. MDSC 1 stated a resident was coded for use of antibiotics on the MDS (a federally mandated resident assessment tool) but was not on the medication administration record (MAR) and resident was placed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 had an increased risk of abuse. Findings: Per the facility ' s untitled resident information sheet dated 9/26/24, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the facility ' s Social Work Interdisciplinary Note, dated 9/20/24 10:55 A.M., Resident 1 ' s Responsible Party (RP) notified the Social Worker (SW) of her concerns about Resident 1 ' s care, which included, .the patient stated that the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) pulled her arm and hurt her, and spoke to her in a hurtful way . On 9/26/24 at 10:20 A.M., an interview was conducted with the SW. The SW stated, she notified the facility ' s management of the RP ' s concerns, including the allegation of abuse. The SW further stated, that the abuse allegation was related to an incident that happened multiple months ago, but the RP did not notify the facility of the allegation of abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to ensure one of three sampled resident's safety (Resident 1). As a result, restricted persons were able to visit the resident in the facility. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included ill-defined liver mass concerning for malignancy per the facility's History and Physical. On 6/27/24 at 10:50 A.M., an observation of Resident 1's room was conducted. There was a sign next to the door to see the nurse prior to visiting the resident. On 6/27/24 at 11:15 A.M., an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 was conducted. LN 2 stated there was an Adult Protective Services (APS) case opened for Resident 1 because Resident 1's family member expressed concern that Resident 1's properties were transferred to the neighbors. LN 2 stated the family member informed the facility the name of the person who was not allowed to visit Resident 1. On 6/27/24 at 11:33 A.M., a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and document review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted dignity for 3 of 5 residents during mealtime when, all three residents were not served their meal trays the same time as the other residents, in the multi-purpose room. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' dining experience and quality of life. Findings: On 11/6/23 at 12:09 P.M., a meal observation was conducted in the facility's multi-purpose room. Five residents and a family member (FM) were in the multi-purpose room. Staff served the lunch tray of two of the five residents in the multi-purpose room. On 11/6/23 at 12:15 P.M., the following activities were observed in the multi-purpose room: - Two family members came to the multipurpose room with food and started eating. - Two of the five residents were eating, while the rest were waiting to be served their lunch tray. - Two staff brought their food in the east side of the multipurpose room that was open to the rest of the room, while the three residents were waiting to be served their lunch tray. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a nursing assessment tool) for four of 21 residents (Resident 51, Resident 32, Resident 29 and Resident 12). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents by delaying resident care needs and provided inaccurate information to the Federal database. Findings: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Cerebral Vascular Attacks (CVA, is a brain attack, that interrupts in the flow of blood to cells [basic living blocks of all living things] in the brain) per progress notes on 10/31/2023 by Medical Doctor (MD). Record review of resident 12's document titled, Physician's Orders dated 05/13/21 indicated, . Admit to [Hospice Name] on Routine Level of Care Terminal . Dx (diagnosis) Cerebrovascular Disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain) . Review of resident's care plan initiated 05/13/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Restorative Nursing services to 45 of 45 residents with orders for restorative nursing assistant (RNA) treatments, which included two residents (Resident 29 and Resident 44) reviewed for limited range motion (ROM, amount of joint's ability to move in any direction to its limits) when: 1. Resident 29 did not receive RNA services at the frequency ordered by the physician. 2. Resident 44 did not receive RNA services at the frequency ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could place all 45 residents with orders for RNA treatment at increased risk of further decline in range of motion ROM to resident's extremities (hands, arms, legs, and feet). Cross Reference F725 and F641 Findings: 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a gradual decline with memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities) per Medical Doctor (MD) notes dated 09/12/23. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient restorative nursing assistants (RNAs) were available to provide restorative treatments to the residents. There were a total of 45 residents in the facility receiving restorative treatment from the RNAs. This failure had the potential for residents on the RNA program to experience decline in their range of motions and affect their quality of life. Findings: On 11/7/23 at 10:04 A.M., a confidential interview was conducted with the Resident Council (an organized group of residents who meet regularly to discuss and address concerns about their rights and their care). Nine residents attended the Resident Council meeting. During the meeting, five of the nine attendees stated that they were not receiving RNA treatments in accordance to their physician's orders. One of the residents stated that the RNAs were being removed from their duties to cover the certified nursing assistants (CNAs). On 11/7/23 at 2:48 P.M., an interview with RNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation practices were maintained in the kitchen according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. Three walk-in refrigerators (Ref 1, 2 & 3) had TCS (time/temperature control for food safety foods - meats, produce, etc.) foods that were stored opened, unlabeled, and available for preparation beyond the use by date. 2. Multiple food items in the dry storage room were uncovered, mislabeled, and available for meal preparation beyond the use by date. 3. Holding temperatures for TCS foods were not recorded in the temperature log book. 4. Kitchen staff was observed working in the kitchen without a beard net. 5. A bag of expired enteral nutrition (EN, liquid nutrition placed directly into the stomach by a tube) was stored in the skilled nursing satellite kitchen and available for use. 6. Fruit cups in the trayline refrigerator (Ref 4) were stored and transported to the skilled nursing facility for lunch uncovered and undated. These deficient practices exposed the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient restorative nursing assistants (RNAs) were available to provide restorative treatments to the residents, as indicated in the facility's Facility Assessment Report. There were a total of 45 residents in the facility with orders to receive restorative treatments from the RNAs. This failure had the potential for residents on the RNA program to experience decline in their range of motions and affect their quality of life. (cross reference to F-tag 688 and F-tag 725) Findings: On 11/7/23 at 10:04 A.M., a confidential interview was conducted with the Resident Council (an organized group of residents who meet regularly to discuss and address concerns about their rights and their care). Nine residents attended the Resident Council meeting. During the meeting, five of the nine attendees stated that they were not receiving RNA treatments in accordance to their physician's orders. One of the residents stated that the RNAs were being removed from their duties to cover the certified nursing assistanst (CNAs).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance for the hygiene for one (Resident 365) of five residents. This failure resulted in the resident not being provided a shower or bed bath for four days. This includes two regularly scheduled shower days and a day the resident had an offsite appointment (on day four). This failure caused Resident 365 to feel unclean and embarrassed at the offsite appointment. Findings: Resident 365 was admitted on [DATE], for antibiotic therapy due to an ongoing infection per resident facesheet. Resident 365 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, an assessment tool to measure mental functioning and memory) score of 15. The resident was alert, oriented, and able to make needs known. An interview was conducted on 11/07/23 at 9:34 AM. Resident 365 was seated at bedside. Family was in Resident 365's room. Resident 365 stated she was offered a shower yesterday afternoon but had not received one since 11/3/23. Resident 365 stated she was going off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review for one of six sampled residents (Resident 29), the facility failed to document an appropriate indication for the use of Seroquel (a medication used for mental/mood conditions that help regulate mood, thoughts, and behaviors). This failure placed Resident 29 at unnecessary risk for adverse consequences related to the use of Seroquel. Findings: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a gradual decline with memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities) per Medical Doctor (MD) notes dated 9/12/23. A record review of Resident 29's physicians orders, Antipsychotic Medication Order, dated 9/12/23, indicated the use of Seroquel 12.5 mg (milligrams) PO (by mouth) q (every) HS (bedtime) for Behavioral Disturbance secondary to dementia. Episode monitoring to include monitoring for Agitation QS (every shift) AEB (as evidenced by) a. continuous yelling, b. inability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered correctly for 2 of 25 medication administration attempts, which resulted in an 8% medication error rate. This failure had the potential to cause harm to the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 26's medical records indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and had a gastrostomy tube (G-Tube, a tube inserted directly into the stomach to give medications, liquids and liquid food). On 11/08/23 at 9:33 A.M., a medication administration observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 21. LN 21 prepared Resident 26's medications which included: 1. Vitamin C 500 mg (milligram) 1 tablet; 2. Aspirin 81 mg (helps to prevent heart attacks) 1 tablet; 3. Calcium Carbonate 500 mg (dietary supplement) 1 tablet; 4. Vitamin D3 2000 u ([units] dietary supplement) 1 tablet; 5. Donepezil (for dementia [loss of cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure standardized recipes were used for preparing meals for skilled nursing home residents on regular and therapeutic diets. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the nutritional content of foods prepared for all skilled nursing facility residents. Findings: On 11/8/23 at 10:39 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with [NAME] (CK) 1 in the main kitchen. CK 1 used a clear plastic cup to scoop a white powder from a clear plastic bin, labeled thickener, into a stainless steel food blender. CK 1 stated he was pureeing chicken soup for residents who had orders for a modified texture diet. CK 1 stated he did not follow a standardized recipe to add powdered thickener to pureed foods. CK 1 stated he just eyeballs the amount of thickener to add to a puree until it was velvety. CK 1 stated he did not use a standardized recipe to make chicken soup because he had been making chicken soup for 20 years. CK 1 stated he did not know where instructions on how to use the thickener were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI - a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining, and improving safety and quality in nursing homes) failed to formally identify, investigate and act on staffing deficiencies in regard to the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) program. (Cross reference F-tag 688 and F-tag 725) This failure placed residents who were ordered to receive RNA treatment at risk for a decline in mobility. Findings: On 11/9/23 at 1:55 P.M., a concurrent interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Clinical Manager (CM). The DON stated the issues the facility planned to monitor for QAPI were identified in the facility document during the quarterly QAPI meeting. The CM stated facility management was aware that insufficient RNA staffing was a problem, but it had not been identified as a formal issue to measure and monitor in QAPI meetings. On 11/9/23 at 3:31 P.M., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ALVAREZ DE LOS COBOS, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2023
BERNSTEIN, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2022
BURGESS, JENIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2024
CASEY, SHARONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2021
GROSS, JEFFERYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2022
HALL, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2021
KELLER, MORAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
MOORE, CHRISTINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2021
MUNS, HARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2024
NORTON, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/20/2022
SMITH, ANDRESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
SUMMERS, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
WOHLSTEIN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2022
DISCAR-ESPE, DEBRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2016
EVANS, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2026
HOWARD, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/31/2019
MALAGON-MALDONADO, GABRIELLAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2020
MCCLAIN, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2020
VILLEGAS, SUSANAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/15/2019
SHARP HEALTHCAREOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/1989
AQUINO, MELENDREIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/19/1999
BENJALIL, FAHDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
CARDENAL CASTRO, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
MANLEY, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/07/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555216. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next