El Encanto Healthcare Center
555 South El Encanto Road, City of Industry, CA 91745 · Non profit - Other · 185 certified beds · (626) 336-1274 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 47.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 42.9 residents a day — about 23% occupied, or roughly 142 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility (Skilled Nursing Facility [SNF] 1) failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was permitted for readmission to the first available bed in a semi-private room on [DATE] after Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on [DATE] and transferred to Long-Term Acute Care Hospital (LTACH) 1 on [DATE], in accordance with SNF 1's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, dated 10/2022.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining in LTACH 1 on [DATE] following an inquiry from LTACH 1 for Resident 1 to be transferred back to SNF 1 and had the potential to cause Resident 1 distress from not being able to return to Resident 1's previous living arrangement.(cross reference F628)Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the admission Record indicated SNF 1 originally admitted Resident 1 on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete transfer or discharge process for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when:1. A Notice of Transfer or Discharge (NTD) was not provided to Resident 1 and/or to Resident 1's representative (RP) when Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 1/3/2026.2. A copy of an NTD was not sent to the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) when Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 1/3/2026.These deficiencies had the potential to violate Resident 1's right to not be inappropriately transferred or discharged and had the potential for the Ombudsman to not be able to advocate for Resident 1 from being inappropriately transferred or discharged .(cross reference F627)Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the admission Record indicated SNF 1 originally admitted Resident 1 on 12/10/2024, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and were functioning properly for two of three sampled residents (Residents 30 and 18). This failure had the potential for Residents 30 and 18 not to receive necessary care or receive delayed services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis [complete or partial loss of muscle function] on one side of the body), blindness on the left eye, and dementia (a group of conditions, decline in mental ability, that interfere with daily activities). During a review of Resident 30's Care Plans (CPs), dated 9/26/2024, the CPs indicated Resident 30 was at risk for decline in activity of daily living (ADL, term used in healthcare that refers to self-care activities)/range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint), had impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing information of actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily for 6/10/25, 6/11/25, and 6/12/25 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers. This deficient practice of posting inaccurate nurse staffing information could mislead the residents and visitors regarding facility staffing and could affect the quality of nursing care provided to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/13/25, at 2:37 p.m., with the Case Manager (CM), the CM stated the purpose of staff posting was to communicate how many staff were providing care to the residents. The CM stated, the 11pm-7am (night) shift & 7 am -3pm (day) shift, posted dated 6/13/25 was not completed and the staff posting should be completed with staff actual work hours. The CM stated the CM would complete the actual hours on posting the next day. During the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow food storage handling practices in accordance with its Policy and Procedure (P&P) by failing to: 1. Remove expired food items from the refrigerator. 2. Label food items with food item name, use by or expired date. 3. Maintain a functional convection steamer (an oven that is designed to steam cook large quantities of food over multiple shelves). These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages) for the residents. Findings: 1.During initial kitchen observation on 6/10/2025 at 7:50 AM, the kitchen staff did not remove expired food items from the refrigerator. One container of prunes had a use by date of 6/3/25 and one container of puree food was dated 6/9/25 indicating to be used for sack lunch, 4 pieces of half sandwiches). During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview with Food Service Worker (FSW) on 6/10/2025 at 2:21 PM, FSW stated the container of prunes, the container of puree food and four pieces of half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident's (Resident 39) discharge destination was coded correctly in Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool). Resident 39 was discharge home but the MDS was coded as Resident 39 being discharged short term to the general hospital. This deficient practice resulted in reporting that was not accurate to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility 3/14/2025 with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats in the blood) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (a disease that results in elevated levels of glucose in the blood). During a review of Resident 39's Physicians Order (PO), dated 3/18/2025, the PO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 17) was provided adequate supervision during activities of daily living (ADL, activities such as bathing, dressing, and toileting a person performs daily) by using a two-person assist to prevent a fall occurrence. This failure resulted in a fall which had the potential to result in severe harm or injury to Resident 17. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 4/17/2025 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D), morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat), generalized muscle weakness (a decrease in muscle strength throughout the body), and lack of coordination (an inability to smoothly and precisely control body movements). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Foley catheter (FC, a thin, flexible, rubber or plastic tube used to drain urine from the bladder [hollow muscular organ that acts as a reservoir for urine]) was secured on the resident's thigh for one of two sampled residents (Resident 141). This failure had the potential to result in catheter-related complications like tissue trauma and a physical decline to Resident 141. Findings: During a review of Resident 141's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD, a progressive condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), urine retention (inability to fully or partially empty the bladder) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 141's Care Plan (CP), dated 6/3/2025, the CP indicated Resident 141 had alteration in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label the nasal cannula (NC, a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen [colorless, odorless gas]) tubing for one of one sampled resident (Resident 140). This failure had the potential for Resident 140 to result in infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 140's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF, long term condition that happens when the heart cannot pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply sometimes resulting in leg swelling), cirrhosis of liver (a condition where the liver is permanently scarred or damaged), and obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder characterized by repeated episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep). During a review of Resident 140's Physician Order (PO), dated 6/9/2025, the PO indicated, Resident 140 had an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order, and an informed consent was obtained before the installation of bilateral (both sides) one-fourth (1/4) siderails/bedrails (adjustable metal or plastic bars attached to the bed) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for entrapment (an event in which resident was caught, trapped, or entangled in the tight spaced around the bed) and injury from the use of siderails/bedrails. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis [complete or partial loss of muscle function] on one side of the body), hemiparesis (characterized by weakness on one side of the body), and diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bilateral (both sides) side rails pads were free from damaged, wear and tear, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3). This deficient practice had potential to place Resident 3 at risk for injury from the use of damaged side rail pads. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (a group of conditions, decline in mental ability, that interfere with daily activities)and senile degeneration of the brain (a decline in mental abilities, particularly memory and thinking skills, often associated with old age). During a review of Resident 3's Care Plan (CP), dated 9/26/2022, the CP indicated Resident 3 was on side rail management as enabler (assistive device that aids with mobility). The CP's intervention indicated for nursing staff to check the side rails periodically for safety/security, to refer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not give medications to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) without a current physician's order as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the unnecessary use of medication, medication errors, and adverse side effects for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/19/2020, with diagnoses that included non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (a type of fracture that occurs in the upper part of the thigh bone), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 1/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was usually understood by others and had the ability to usually understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was dependent (helper does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Charting and Documentation, by failing to document a complete assessment (the process of evaluating a patient's condition) for one of three sampled residents ' condition (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to not provide complete information regarding Resident 1 ' s condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/19/2020 with diagnoses that included non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (a type of fracture that occurs in the upper part of the thigh bone), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool), dated 1/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was usually understood by others and had the ability to usually understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was dependent (helper does all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's call light was within reach for two of two sampled residents (Residents 20 and 27). These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 20 and 27 not to receive necessary care or received delayed services to meet the residents' needs. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 20's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain condition caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood) and Parkinson's disease (disease that affects the nerve cells in the brain that produces symptoms that include muscle rigidity, tremors, and changes in speech and gait) During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 5/9/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 20 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand) and required maximal assistance (helper does more than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Advance Directive/Preferred Intensity of Care Documentation form (AD, a written instruction, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual becomes incapacitated [lacking the ability to meet essential requirements for physical health, safety, or self-care]) was in the resident's medical record for two of two sampled residents (Resident 35 and 2). These failures had the potential for staff to provide care and services against the resident's will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence of renal dialysis (treatment for kidney failure [loss of kidney function] that removes unwanted toxins, waste products and excess fluids by filtering the blood) and fracture (broken bone) of the lower leg. During a review of Resident 35's AD form dated [DATE], the AD form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a communication device in a language that the resident understood for two of three sampled residents (Residents 20 and 34). These deficient practices had the potential to affect Residents 20 and 34's communication with the staff and had the potential for the delay of the provision of care, treatment, and services to the residents. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 20's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain condition caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood) and Parkinson's disease (disease that affects the nerve cells in the brain that produces symptoms that include muscle rigidity, tremors, and changes in speech and gait) During a review of Resident 20's untitled Care Plan (CP), dated 8/2/2023, the CP indicated Resident 20 spoke another language/dialect. Resident 20 spoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on dating open food containers, refrigerated food storage labeling and dating and hair net policy, for one of one facility kitchen, by failing to: A. Label one bottle of salad dressing, one carton of milk, one canister of chopped onion seasoning, one canister of garlic herb cayenne pepper, and one canister of chicken flavor base, with the open date. B. Discard one tray of nourishments that contained yogurt, prunes, and cottage cheese from the refrigerator dated 6/12/2024. C. Wear a beard net for two staff members who had facial hair while working in the facility's kitchen area on 6/19/2024. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination and food borne illnesses (illness from ingesting contaminated food). Findings: During an observation on 6/18/2024 at 9:50 am in the kitchen, one bottle of salad dressing, one carton of milk, one canister of chopped onion seasoning, one canister of garlic herb cayenne pepper,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its binding arbitration agreements included selection of a venue convenient to both facility and resident/resident responsible party for three of three sampled residents (Residents 16, 20 and 35). These deficient practices placed Residents 16, 20 and 35 at risk for unjust arbitration and delayed arbitration hearing in an event of an arbitration dispute. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 5/6/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning), essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure without a known cause) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in elevated levels of glucose/sugar in the blood and urine). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool) was timely completed within the required time frame for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of necessary care for Resident 4. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 4 on 9/16/2022, with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and malnutrition. During a review of Resident 4's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the MDS was a quarterly MDS assessment and was not yet completed as of 6/8/2024. During a review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific and individualized person-centered care plan to meet the resident's needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 20) who was assessed with hearing difficulty. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 20 not to receive the necessary care, treatment, and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain condition caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood) and Parkinson's disease (disease that affects the nerve cells in the brain that produces symptoms that include muscle rigidity, tremors, and changes in speech and gait) During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 5/9/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 20 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand) and required maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date the Intravenous (IV- administered into a vein) site consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 93). This deficient practice had the potential to result in infection and worsen Resident 93's medical condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 93's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and malignant neoplasm of the lung (lung cancer). During a review of Resident 93's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 6/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 93 had moderately impaired cognition (ability to understand). The MDS indicated Resident 93 was dependent (helper does all of the effort, resident does none of the effort to complete the activity) for personal hygiene, toileting and rolling left and right. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the its Policy and Procedure (P&P) on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, precautions that include the use of a gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities for residents) to prevent the spread of infections for one of five sampled residents (Resident 35) for infection control when Licensed Vocational Nurse 7 (LVN 7) did not don (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards ) before taking the blood pressure of Resident 35 in an EBP room. This failure had the potential to result in transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO, bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics) to other residents in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/2024 at 9:41 am with LVN 7, an EBP sign was noted outside of Resident 35's door. LVN 7 entered Resident 35's EBP room without donning on PPE and took Resident 35's blood pressure. LVN 7 stated LVN 7 did not have a gown on when taking Resident 35's blood pressure and stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to the Ombudsman and local law enforcement. This deficient practice had the potential for delayed investigation of abuse for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/22/2016, with diagnoses that included dementia (a loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning that interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 11/23/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognitive (ability to understand) skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and safe temperature in one of two hallways in Station 2 and two of 34 resident's rooms, affecting three of 34 sampled residents (Residents 7, 19 and 33). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's safety and well being. Findings: During an observation on 7/11/23 at 10:48 am, Resident 7 was sitting in the wheelchair (w/c) in the hallway. The resident was fanning her face. During a concurrent interview, Resident 7 stated it was hot in the hallway and complained that the temperature gets very hot at the facility. During an interview on 7/11/23 at 3 pm, Resident 7 was in her room, lying in bed. Resident 7 complained the room felt too hot, and she was not comfortable. During an observation on 7/11/23 at 3:02 pm, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) entered Resident 7's room and informed Resident 7 that only the maintenance department could adjust the temperature in the resident's room. Resident 7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe serving of food. During a food tray line observation ( system of food preparation in which trays move along) on 7/12/23 , 20 hot food items during the 12 pm tray line were under 145 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of temperature measurement) for starch and vegetables, meat or entrees, and soup, according to the facility's Policy and Procedure for Resident Meal Service. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to be exposed to food-borne illness. Findings: During a tray line observation in the kitchen on 7/12/23 at 11:50 am, with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS checked the temperature of the hot food on the steam tables just before the 12 pm tray line for lunch with the following findings: 1. Regular texture ham: 104 degrees 2. Regular texture yams: 130 degrees F 3. Turkey breast: 130 degrees F 4. Chicken patty: 140 degrees F 5. Ground cauliflower: 140 degrees F 6. Four (4) individual porridge cups: 120 degrees F each 7. Ground chicken: 130 degrees F 8. Puree cauliflower: 140 degrees F 9.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary qualifications were met and in-services (education) were provided, for one of one kitchen staff (Dietary Supervisor, DS) when the DS was hired without having a California Food Handler (CFH, designated to ensure employees who handle food receive reasonable level of training in food safety practices to reduce the potential for food-borne illnesses [caused by contaminated food that can lead to food poisoning) card from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). In addition, the facility failed to ensure in-services (education) were provided to 14 of 14 kitchen staff and nursing staff, as indicated in the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) and DS job descriptions, when: These failures had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses throughout the facility and compromise the health and nutritional needs of the residents. Findings: During a kitchen tour and interview on 7/11/2023 at 8:36 AM, the DS introduced self and stated they were the Dietary Supervisor. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature for 10 of 10 residents who were served yam for lunch on 7/12/23. The temperature of the yam on the test tray from the tray line was 129.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of temperature measurement). This failure resulted in Resident 10 complaining about the temperature of food served in the facility. This deficient practice also placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness (illness caused by contaminated food). Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, dated 4/25/23, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stage 4 (severe) chronic kidney disease (damage to the kidneys so they cannot filter blood the way they should) and type II diabetes (DM2- a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report in a timely manner, a change of condition (COC, a change in the resident's normal physical, mental, or behavioral state) to the physician (MD, medical doctor), for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 11). Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA 1) reported Resident 11 was unable to walk and reported left hip pain when putting weight on the left leg on 7/5/23. A change of condition report and notification to the MD was not completed until 7/12/23 (7 days after the initial report). This failure had the potential for a delay in intervention and care and cause a decline in function and ambulation (walking) in Resident 11. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture (bone breaks, but stays in place) of left femur (thigh bone), subsequent encounter for closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) failed to indicate that an alleged resident abuse must be reported within two hours to the Department, Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement for one of one resident (Resident 10). This failure resulted in Resident 10 potential for further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, dated 4/24/23, the admission Record indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 6/2/23, the MDS indicated the resident did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse for one of one resident (Resident 10) to the Department, Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement, within two hours. This failure had the potential for Resident 10 to be at risk of further abuse. (Cross reference F607 and F943) Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, dated 4/24/23, the admission Record indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 6/2/23, the MDS indicated the resident did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for the use of splints (a device that safely stretches tight muscles and joints) to right elbow and left knee as ordered by the physician on 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident 20. This failure had the potential to cause further decline of Resident 20's contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joint to shorten and become very stiff) to the right elbow and the left knee. Findings: During an observation on 7/11/23 at 10:36 a.m., in Resident 20's room, the resident was lying in bed, asleep, with splints on the right elbow and the left knee. Resident 20 was not able to be interviewed. During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, dated 5/12/23 indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disease that causes a decline in memory, thinking, learning and organizing skills…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide functioning hearing aids for one of four sampled residents (Resident 7) . This deficient practice resulted in Resident 7 not being able to hear and feeling upset not able to hear her daughter during visitation. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/16/18 with diagnoses including sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss ( damage to the inner ear and is a permanent hearing loss), high blood pressure and osteoporosis ( a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool) dated 5/27/23, the MDS indicated Resident 7's hearing was highly impaired and the resident used hearing aids. Resident 7's cognitive ability (ability to understand and make decisions)was intact . Resident 7 required extensive assistance with one staff physical assist for bed mobility, extensive assistance with one-person physical assist with dressing and supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 10) was served the food preferences listed on Resident 10's lunch tray card. This deficient practice had the potential to result in resident 10's frequent meals refusal, decreased meal satisfaction and consumption and potentially negatively affect Resident 10 nutritional status. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission record, dated 5/23/22, indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 10 had the ability to express ideas and wants, and ability to understand verbal content. MDS indicated, Resident 10 needs supervision as in oversight, encouragement or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage, in one of one refrigerator freezer (Ice Cream Freezer 1). The facility failed to monitor and record daily temperatures and ensure Ice Cream Freezer 1's thermometer was in working condition, as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P). In addition, the Dietary Supervisor (DS) did not check refrigerator-freezer temperatures on 7/10/2023 and falsified the facility's Refrigerator-Freezer Temperature Log (RTL) to indicate the temperatures were checked. These failures had the potential to result in harmful organism growth that could lead to food-borne illnesses (caused by contaminated food that can lead to food poisoning) for the residents who had the ability to eat by mouth. Findings: During an interview and initial kitchen tour on 7/11/2023 at 8:50 AM, with the DS, the DS showed the temperature of Ice Cream Freezer 1's external and internal temperatures (external temperatures confirm internal temperatures). The external thermometer indicated a temperature of -14 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remain free of pests and did not having an effective pest control for one of four planters (Planter 1) by failing to: a. Eliminate harborage conditions (locations and conditions where the mosquito can live, thrive [grow strong], reproduce, and feed) for mosquitoes to live. b. Eradicate (destroy/kill) mosquitoes (small flying insects that can bite people and spread infectious diseases) observed inside the facility. This failure had the potential to result in vector-borne diseases (diseases that result from an infection transmitted to human by insects such as a mosquitoes) for all residents residing at the facility. Findings: a. During an observation on 7/12/23, at 9:10 am, in the East end of the main dining room, one live mosquito flew and landed on Surveyor 1's right back shoulder. The East end of the main dining room was partitioned off from the rest of the dining room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/12/23, at 10:01 am, with the Activities Director (AD), in the main dining room, four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to train staff to report all allegations of resident abuse to the Department, Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement, within 2 hours. Five of seven sampled staff did not know the correct timeframe (within 2 hours) of reporting any allegation of resident abuse. This failure had the potential for residents to be at risk of abuse. (Cross reference F607 and F609) Findings: During an interview on 7/13/23, at 2:07 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated, resident abuse needed to be report within two hours, if there is serious bodily injury, to the Department, Ombudsman, and law enforcement. ADON stated, if the abuse did not cause serious bodily injury, the abuse should be reported within 24 hours. ADON stated, verbal abuse should be reported within 24 hours. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/13/23 at 2:34 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post actual nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift daily for two of two sampled locations (lobby and nursing station) on 6/18/2024 and 6/20/2024. These failures had the potential to result in not providing nurse staffing information to residents and visitors and had the potential to affect the quality of care to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 6/18/2024 at 10:24 am in the lobby of the facility and nursing station, the Posted Nurse Staffing Information (PNSI) form did not have the actual number of nursing staff present for the morning shift of 6/18/2024. During an interview on 6/20/2024 at 11:32 am with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the PNSI form should be filled out at the beginning of each shift. The DON stated if the PNSI was not filled out, residents or visitors would not be able to know the actual number of staff who worked. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/20/2024 at 11:35 AM with Registered Nurse Supervisor 1 (RN Sup 1), the PNSI form for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRY CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/1983 |
| PEREZ, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| CALVO, KENNETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| HSIEH, XAVIER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555395. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.