Pilgrim Place Health Services Center
721 Harrison Ave, Claremont, CA 91711 · Non profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (909) 399-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 158 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 65% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.3%CMS range 60.5–72.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.5–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 84.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.4–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.546 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents' (Resident 11, Resident 59 and Resident 73) had consistent and accurate records and information regarding Advance Directives (AD - legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) filed in the resident's medical records (chart).This failure had the potential to cause confusion among staff and Resident 11, Resident 59 and Resident 73 to receive inappropriate or medically unnecessary care and/or treatment or services regarding life-sustaining treatment.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unspecified psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and abnormalities of gait and mobility (when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders for PRN (on as-needed basis) psychotropic drugs (a substance that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for Lorazepam (a commonly used drug to reduce anxiety and agitation) included the required 14-day stop-date for two of five sampled residents (Residents 98 and 101).This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary or prolonged exposure to psychotropic medications, risk of adverse drug reactions, oversedation, increased fall risk, and diminished ability to evaluate the resident's ongoing need for the medication.Findings:During a review of Resident 101's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 101 on 6/28/2024, and re-admitted the resident on 11/19/2025, with diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and anxiety (a natural feeling of worry, fear, or unease about future events) disorder. During a review of Resident 101's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 11/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 101's cognition (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 54 and Resident 87), who were at risk for skin breakdown and pressure injuries (PI, localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue, usually occurring over a bony prominence or related to medical devices) to prevent skin breakdown. The facility failed to:A. Ensure Resident 54's low air loss mattress (LALM, air-filled mattress used to relieve pressure) was replaced after it was removed due to an air leak.B. Ensure Resident 87's LALM had the correct therapeutic settings.This failure had the potential to compromise pressure redistribution and increased the risk for skin breakdown and pressure injury development for Resident 54 and 87. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 54 on 10/29/2025, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the prostate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 36), were provided an environment free of accident (refers to any unexpected or unintentional incident, which results or may result in injury or illness to a resident) hazards by failing to, A. Ensure Resident 7's bed was in a low position required to prevent a fall (refers to unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force). B. Ensure a sit-to-stand lift (a mobility device that helps people who can bear some weight but can't stand up on their own, smoothly moving them from sitting to standing [or vice-versa] to go from a bed to a chair or toilet, preventing falls and caregiver strain) was not stored in Resident 36's restroom's doorway and did not block the entry to the bathroom on 12/2/2025. These deficient practices compromised Resident 7 and 36's safety and had the potential to result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for two of three sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 48) who had indwelling catheters (a medical device that drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body) by failing to assess and monitor Resident 3 and Resident 48's indwelling catheter closely for changes in condition and recognizing such changes.This deficient practice could potentially result in serious complications due to the development of urinary tract infections (UTI - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) to Resident 3 and Resident 48.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device and retention of urine, unspecified.During a review of Resident 3's Care Plan (CP), titled, The resident has suprapubic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow safe and proper food storage practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to:1. label/date and store food items properly in the kitchen.2. ensure cold foods were held at 41 degrees or lower during tray line in the kitchen.3. label/date food items inside the unit refrigerator. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a risk for serious complications from food-borne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverage) and/or affect the quality and palatability of food and adversely affect the health of the residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/2025 at 8:53 AM with the [NAME] (CK), during the initial brief tour of the kitchen, the following was observed inside the Storage Room: 1. A Cambro storage container of uncooked brown rice with a facility generated label Use By: 4-6-26 at 5:17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to ensure:1. Twelve out of twelve facility staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 [LVN 4], Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 6, CNA 7, CNA 8, CNA 9, Occupational Therapist 1, Physical Therapist 1, the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), Treatment Nurse (TN), Housekeeper 1, and Activity Staff) wore mask during periods of higher levels of community respiratory virus transmission.2. Three out of Twelve facility staff (CNA 6, OT 1, and PT 1) influenza vaccinations were tracked, and the staff were provided education regarding influenza vaccination. 3. CNA 3 and CNA 4 used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - Personal Protective Equipment - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure for Antibiotic Stewardship (offer providers and facilities a set of key principles to guide efforts to improve antibiotic use to effectively treat infections, protect patients from harms caused by unnecessary antibiotic use, and combat antimicrobial resistance) for 4 out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 13, 12, 51 and Resident 100). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate use of antibiotics that could lead to antibiotic resistance (occurs when bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites no longer respond to antibiotics. As a result of drug resistance, antibiotics and other antimicrobial medicines become ineffective and infections become difficult or impossible to treat, increasing the risk of disease spread, severe illness, disability and death).During a concurrent review and interview on 12/5/2025 at 10:08 AM to 12:23 PM with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN). The IPN stated the facility was using McGeer's criteria (which defines the resident symptoms and other clinical criteria that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility offer influenza (FLU - is a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses. It can cause mild to severe illness, and at times can lead to death) vaccine to two of five sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 20). This deficient practice had the potential to result in illness and physical declines to Resident 11 and Resident 20.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 11 on 7/3/23 and readmitted the resident on 11/26/25, with diagnoses that included methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA - is a type of bacteria that many antibiotics don't work on), sepsis (infection of the bloodstream). During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 12/3/25, the MDS indicated Resident 11 had severe cognitive (ability to think and make decisions) impairment, the MDS indicated Resident 11 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan (CP) included administration of Lorazepam (a medication used to reduce anxiety [a feeling of worry, fear, or unease about future events] and agitation. A psychotropic drug [a substance that affects the mind, emotions, and behavior]), and Eliquis (anticoagulant, medication used to thin the blood and for clot prevention) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 98). This failure had the potential to result in uncoordinated care, no monitoring for adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a resident may have due to a medication) such as oversedation, increased fall risk, and bleeding complications. The absence of this information in the baseline CP could have led to delays in recognizing changes in condition, ineffective communication among the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a team of health care professionals who work together to establish plans of care for residents), and the potential to compromise Resident 98's safety.Findings:During a review of Resident 98's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized, person-centered comprehensive care plan (CP) that included measurable objectives, defined time frames, and specific interventions that addressed a diagnosis of dementia (a group of conditions, progressive state of decline in mental ability that interfere with daily activities) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 9).This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 9's cognitive (ability to understand and process information), behavioral, and safety needs not being properly identified, monitored, or addressed, which could lead to inadequate treatment, unmet needs, and a decline in Resident 9's overall well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 9 on 9/4/2024, with diagnoses including dementia, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (a natural feeling of worry, fear, or unease about future events) disorder. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide education of a new prescribed pain medication for one of five sampled residents (Resident 99) during medication administration on 12/4/2025.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 99 being uninformed regarding Resident 99's pain treatment and had the potential to result in medication errors to Resident 99.Findings:During a review of Resident 99's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 99 on 4/22/2021, with diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture of the second lumbar vertebrae (a break in the lower back bone), wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 (a break in the upper back bone).During a review of Resident 99's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/5/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 99 had capacity to make decisions.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/2025 at 8:33 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 and with Resident 99, LVN 2 administered Tramadol (medication used for the relieve moderate to severe pain) to Resident 99, LVN 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 11) received treatment and care in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Intravenous Therapy, by failing to ensure Resident 11's need for a peripheral saline lock (S/L - a type of catheter placed intravenously [IV - within a vein] to administer medication or fluid into the bloodstream) access was assessed on 12/2/2025 and when Resident 11 had a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter - a long thin tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded to a large central vein near the heart, used for long term IV fluids, medications, nutrition, blood transfusion and drawing blood avoiding repeated needle sticks). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident 11's S/L site remained clean and Resident 11's PICC was dated.This deficient practice resulted in redness in Resident 11's S/L site on Resident 11's right wrist and Resident 11 complaining of pain in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to treat the skin and itching for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2) in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Wound Assessment and Treatment and Skin Assessment by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 2 was given diphenhydramine (medication used to treat allergies, sneezing, runny nose, and itching) for itching according to the physician's orders. Resident 2 had multiple open skin scratches all over the body from itching. 2. Resident 2's Medical Doctor/Primary Care Provider (MD) 1 was notified on 10/6/2025 that Resident 2 continued to have itching and had multiple open scratches all over the body even after being treated with hydrocortisone cream (medication used to relieve inflammation, itching, and redness caused by various skin conditions) from 8/7/2025 to 8/21/2025 and from 9/22/2025 to 10/6/2025. 3. Licensed Nurses assessed Resident 2's skin weekly to monitor Resident 2's wounds for signs of infection and to evaluate how Resident 2 responded to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses accurately assessed and documented one of five sampled resident's (Resident 2's) skin condition weekly in Resident 2's medical record between 8/30/2025 and 10/15/2025. Resident 2 had multiple open skin scratches all over the body from itching. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to receive inappropriate treatment for itching and put Resident 2 at risk for delayed treatment of infection when Resident 2's multiple skin scratches were not assessed and monitored. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 7/3/2023 with diagnoses that included unspecified psychosis (severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality), unspecified abnormalities of gait and other mobility (inability to walk normally due to injuries or underlying conditions), and muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (Resident 3) received the correct medications at discharge. The discharge nurse provided Resident 3 with blister packs containing medications belonging to two other residents.This failure resulted in Resident 3 ingesting one of the incorrect medications, experiencing nausea, headache, and requiring hospital evaluation.During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the facility admitted Resident 3 on 7/17/2025, with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM: long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently elevated).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/18/2025 indicated Resident 3 had the mental capacity to make medical decisions.During a telephone interview on 9/12/2025 at 11:12 AM with Resident 3, Resident 3 stated she took one of the medications provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure by not documenting physician's communications, not documenting a Change of Condition (COC), and not documenting a reassessment after pain medication was given for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to delay care, reduce clinical oversight, and negatively affect Resident 1's health and comfort.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 6/9/2025 , with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM: long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin), and hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently elevated).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 6/10/2025, the MDS indicated the cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decision making was intact,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of one resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice violated Resident 1's right and had the potential for delay in abuse investigation. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/14/24, with diagnoses that included myocardial infarction (heart attack), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (total paralysis and weakness of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 9/16/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was able to express ideas and wants and was able to understand verbal content. The MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with bed mobility including rolling left and right, sit to lying and lying to sitting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) did not develop pressure ulcers-injury [PU/PI, localized injury to the skin and or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as result of pressure or pressure in combination with shear [mechanical force that cause the skin to break off] and/or friction [movement of one surface of the skin against the others]) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, by failing to ensure: 1.A comprehensive care plan (CP) was developed to address the risk for PIs after Resident 1's readmission to the facility on [DATE]. 2.A pressure injury wound risk assessment was conducted for Resident 1 upon readmission on [DATE]. 3. Resident 1's physician order that indicated the use of a low air loss (LAL, a mattress designed to distribute body weight and prevent and treat pressure wounds) mattress for Resident 1 included a mattress setting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 47) and/or their legal representative (RP) were informed and/or provided written information about Advance Directives (AD, legal document, which specifies the health-related actions in accordance with the resident's wishes, that is actuated when the resident is no longer able to make decisions for himself/herself due to illness or incapacity). These failures violated Resident 9 and Resident 47's right to formulate an AD and had the potential to receive inappropriate or medically unnecessary care and/or treatment or services regarding life-sustaining treatment. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (complete paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke, result of disruptive blood flow to the brain) affecting left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise/update the care plan for two of two sampled residents (Residents 2 and 39) who were assessed as at risk for fall (coming to rest on the ground or lower-level surface). These deficient practices had the potential for the residents not to receive care specific to their needs and placed the residents at risk for further falls and complications. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions), metabolic encephalopathy (impaired brain function) and abnormal gait and mobility (abnormal walking pattern). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/18/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 was cognitively impaired and needed moderate (helper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow safe food storage and food handling practices for one of one kitchen (Kitchen 1) and one of one snack/nourishment refrigerator (Refrigerator 1) in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) by failing to: 1. Label/date food items in the kitchen and in the snack/nourishment refrigerator on the unit. 2. Maintain acceptable chemical sanitizing solution (used to sanitize food contact surfaces) concentration in the kitchen. 3. Maintain proper temperatures of the snack/nourishment refrigerator on the unit. 4. Discard expired foods in the snack/nourishment refrigerator on the unit and Resident 8's food that was brought from home. These deficient practices put the residents in the facility at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverage), contamination of food and/or affect the palatability of the food for the residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain its infection prevention and control program for five of five sampled residents (Residents 14, 159, 208, 209 and 214) by failing to: a. Ensure the blood pressure (BP, the force of the blood pushing against the walls of the arteries) monitor was cleaned and disinfected (remove dirt or stains and apply a chemical to a surface in order to destroy germs) after using it with Resident 209 and before using it for Resident 214. b. Ensure Resident 208's urinal was properly labeled with initials, room number, and bed number. c. Ensure a used 8 oz (ounce) [NAME] (brand name) Perineal & Skin Cleanser Rinse-Free (a gentle, specially formulated product that cleans the perineum [area between the anus and genitals] and removes skin irritants) was not kept on top of the toilet tank cover in Resident 14 and Resident 159's restroom. d. Ensure food items and personal belongings from staff were not kept in the clean Linen Closet open shelving cabinet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 43) was completed accurately in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to receive inappropriate care and services based on Resident 43's preferences, goals of care, functional and health status, strengths, and needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 43 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), oropharyngeal (middle part of the throat behind the mouth) phase, encounter for attention to gastrostomy (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube, often referred to as a G-tube through the abdomen and into the stomach) and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment in a timely manner for two of two sampled residents (Residents 28 and Resident 30) as indicated in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS - a federal agency that manages health care programs in the United States) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a tool used by nursing homes to assess the needs, strengths, and preferences of residents) manual. a. For Resident 28, the MDS was not transmitted within 14 days after discharge from the facility. b. For Resident 30, the MDS was not transmitted within 14 days after admission and discharge. These deficient practices resulted to a late completion and transmission of MDS assessment to CMS Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system. This had the potential to affect the facility's quality monitoring data. Findings: a. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 42) who was admitted with a suprapubic catheter (a type of medical device tube that helps drain urine from your bladder) had a baseline care plan (CP provides direction on the type of nursing care an individual needs that include goals of treatment, specific nursing interventions [actions, treatments, procedures, or activities designed to meet an objective] and an evaluation plan]) developed and implemented within forty eight (48) hours of admission in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for Resident 42 not receiving continuity of care and the lack of communication among staff which could lead to decrease in Resident 42's safety and safeguard against adverse events. Findings: During a review of Resident 42 admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 42 was originally admitted on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE] with multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop or implement an individualized person-centered care plan for one of one sampled resident(Resident 2) who was at risk for elopement (run away without permission) and had a history of elopement. This failure had the potential to result in unmet individual needs and the potential to affect the resident's safety and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions), metabolic encephalopathy (impaired brain function) and abnormal gait and mobility (abnormal walking pattern). During a review of Resident 2's Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review (RE/WR) dated 3/15/2024, and 6/17/2024, the RE/WR indicated the resident was at risk for elopement and had a history of leaving the facility without need of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 48), who was assessed as a high risk to develop pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear) and was admitted without pressure ulcers, received the necessary care and services to prevent a development of a pressure ulcer. As a result, on 10/1/2024, Resident 48 was identified with a stage 2 pressure injury (an open wound that occurs when the skin breaks, wears away, or forms an ulcer) to the left buttock. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including but not limited to, end stage renal disease (ESRD, a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis), endocarditis (a life-threatening inflammation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 35) receiving oxygen therapy was provided respiratory care and resident safety in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Oxygen Administration, and professional standards of practice. There was no sign posted on the resident's door indicating oxygen in use. This deficient practice placed Resident 35's safety at risk regarding oxygen usage. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/22/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 35 had impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a full time Director of Nursing (DON) five (5) days a week, 8 hours a day beginning 3/6/24 up to the present (10/17/24). This deficient practice had the potential to significantly impact the quality of care, overall patient experience and nursing workforce operations in the facility. Findings: During the entrance conference on 10/15/24 at 8:20 am, the Administrator (ADM) stated the facility had an interim/acting Director of Nursing (DON) and was actively looking to hire a fulltime DON. During a review of the facility's medical leave letter of the previous Director of Nursing (DON 1) dated 3/18/24, the medical leave letter indicated DON 1 would be on leave starting 3/6/24. During a review of DON 1's resignation letter, the letter indicated DON 1's last date of employment was on 8/23/24. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 2:53 PM, with the acting (ADON), the ADON stated there had not been an active fulltime DON for approximately 8 months. The ADON stated as the ADON she was responsible for the oversight of the unit and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of a medication error rate of 5 percent (%) or greater during the medication pass observation for one of four sampled residents (Resident 109). The facility had 26 opportunities of medication administration (the act of giving a treatment) observed and three of the 26 medications administered were not in accordance with the physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.54%. The medication errors consisted of: a. Resident 109's Eliquis (blood thinner) and Multiple Vitamin were not administered as ordered by the physician. b. Resident 109's tear duct was not held with gentle pressure for one minute after administration of Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% (eye drops to lower pressure in the eye) These deficient practices placed Resident 109 at risk for adverse consequences and complications. Cross Reference with F760 Findings: During a review of Resident 109's admission Record (AR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 109) observed during medication pass was free of significant medication errors by failing to ensure Resident 109's medication Eliquis (blood thinner) was administered as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of blood clot for Resident 109 that may cause embolism (a block in an artery caused by blood clot) leading to serious medical complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 109's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included long term use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner), repeated falls, and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (a broken right hip). During a review of Resident 109's care plan titled Anticoagulant (medication that prevents or reduces clotting of the blood) dated 10/12/2024, the care plan indicated to administer medications as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device used by a resident to signal the need for assistance) system was within reach for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25), as indicated on Resident 25's care plans (CP [provides direction on the type of nursing care an individual needs that include goals of treatment, specific nursing interventions [actions, treatments, procedures, or activities designed to meet an objective] and an evaluation plan]) and in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 25 not having Resident 25's needs met in a timely manner and/or Resident 25 to experience harm if Resident 25 was unable to alert staff during an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty in walking, not elsewhere…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two facility staff (the Director of Nursing [DON] and the Registered Nurse Supervisor [RNS]) had Infection Prevention (IP) certificates and had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control while covering the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) role. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infections throughout the facility. Findings: On 8/2/24 a visit was made to the facility to investigate a facility reported incident regarding a Covid-19 (minor to severe respiratory illness caused by a new virus and spread from person to person) outbreak (a higher-than-expected number of occurrences of a disease in a specific location and time). During an interview with the Administrator (ADM), on 8/2/24 at 11:12 am, the ADM stated the facility's ICP was on medical leave and the acting ICP role was shared between the DON and the RNS. During an interview with the DON, on 8/2/24 at 3:07 pm, the DON stated the DON was the acting ICP at the facility for several months (did not remember…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a home like environment for 53 of 53 residents by failing to ensure residents meal trays were in good condition. This failure had the potential to result in a non-home like environment for the residents which could affect the residents' quality of life. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/3/2024 at 11:30 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) and Kitchen Supervisor (KS) in the kitchen area, there were ten trays observed with cracks and peeling materials. The DON stated the trays were not appropriate and safe for residents to be served meals. The KS stated the broken trays were not appropriate for residents, and the facility should not be using broken, cracked, and/or peeling trays. The KS stated the trays needed to be disposed. The KS stated the facility's policy indicated the facility would provide a homelike environment, and serving meals in broken trays was not a homelike environment. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safe and Homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat six of six sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 22, Resident 28, and Resident 155) with respect and dignity when: a - d. Resident 6, Resident 18, Resident 22, and Resident 19's call lights (a visual cue that a patient needs assistance) were not answered in a timely manner. e. - f. Resident 28 and Resident 155's urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) bags were left exposed. These deficient practices resulted in Resident's 6, 18, and 19 to feel bad, terrible, and panicky. For Resident's 28 and 155, the deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of humiliation and embarrassment due to urine being visible to staff and other residents. Findings: a.During a review of a Record of Admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated Resident 6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia (infection that inflames the air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services were provided for two of two sampled residents (Resident 55, and Resident 12) when: a. For resident 53, the facility failed to notify the physician Resident 53's arteriovenous fistula (AVF, a connection that's made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access) was clotted (blocked) and that Resident 53 was not hemodialyzed (dialysis [treatment to remove extra fluid and waste products from the body when the kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally]) on 7/27/23. b. Resident 12 did not wear heel protectors while lying in bed. These failures had the potential to result in physical harm and decline for Resident 53 due to Resident 53 not receiving scheduled hemodialysis. For Resident 12, the failure had the potential to result in pressure injuries (PIs, localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue, primarily caused by prolonged pressure on the skin, shear (mechanical force that causes skin to break…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of six sampled residents (Residents 4, 5, 17, 18, 28, and 36) received necessary restorative nursing program (RNP, nursing interventions to promote resident's mobility and functioning as safely as possible) care and services to improve mobility, maintain and prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) by failing to: a. Provide RNP services for ambulation and active-assisted ROM (AAROM, joint receives partial assistance from an outside force) exercises for both shoulders to Resident 4 five times per week from 9/1/2023 to 9/30/2023 as ordered by the physician. b. Provide RNP services for Nu-Step exercise (low-impact, full workout of arms and legs with the use of an equipment) to Resident 5 from 9/1/2023 to 9/30/2023 as ordered by the physician. c. Provide RNP services for AAROM exercises to Resident 17's right lower extremity (RLE) from 9/1/2023 to 9/30/2023 as ordered by the physician. d. Provide RNP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and Restorative Nursing Aides (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) were assigned to provide care to all the residents in accordance with the facility's Facility Assessment Tool for four of 10 randomly selected dates for the months of September and October 2023 (9/7/2023, 9/8/2023, 9/10/2023, and 9/11/2023). This failure had the potential to result in compromised quality of care, contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and tightness of the joints) to the residents who had orders for RNA and did not receive such services, and a decline in the residents' overall physical and psychosocial well-being. Cross Reference with F688 Findings: During an interview on 10/4/2023 at 10:14 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the facility has a shortage of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff. The ADON stated the facility has utilized Registry staff, but the quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. label wheat rolls with a use by date and to label prepared food in the refrigerator. b. store resident's food at a temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F, unit of measurement) in the Nourishment Room refrigerator. These failures had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages). Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/3/23 at 10:27 a.m. with the Executive Chef (EC) in the facility's kitchen Walk in Cooler #2, a clear container of tofu (a soy-based food) was unlabeled. The EC stated the tofu should be labeled to indicate what it is and when it was opened. The EC stated the tofu should be labeled to ensure it is used before it expired. The EC stated if the tofu was given past expiration date, then residents could experience food borne illnesses. The EC stated the tofu should be labeled indicating what it is, so residents who have allergies to soy are not given the tofu. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent and control the spread of infections in the facility, when two of two staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1 and CNA 2) entered resident rooms without wearing proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, protective clothing or equipment, designed to protect the wearer from the spread of infection or illness), as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) and national health guidelines. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infections throughout the facility and illness to the residents and staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated Resident 18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident screening and care-planning tool), dated 8/28/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 18's active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of five sampled residents (Resident 33) or Resident 33's family member/representative with information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive (AD, a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 33 and Resident 33's family member/representative to receive inaccurate or unnecessary care and/or treatment services regarding life-sustaining treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated, Resident 33 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 33's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 9/22/23, the H&P indicated, Resident 33 had multiple diagnoses including pulmonary embolism (a blood clot from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff notified the primary care physician regarding a change in condition, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17), in August 2023. This failure had the potential to result in physical or psychosocial well-being decline for Resident 17 due to a possible delay in obtaining physician orders necessary for Resident 17's treatments and/or services. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's Record of admission (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 6/20/2019 with multiple diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (damaged heart blood vessels due to fat deposits), type 2 diabetes mellitus (long standing condition where the body does not produce enough or resists insulin [hormone that helps the body use sugar for energy]), and major depressive disorder (mental health disorder, a persistent low mood with symptoms like lack of energy, sleep disturbances, or appetite changes). During a review of Resident 17's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 8/18/2022, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) within 14 days after a resident was discharged from the facility for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30). Resident 30's MDS exceeded 120 days due for transmission. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate assessments of the facility's quality indicators and/or care area concerns for Resident 30. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), dated 10/5/23, the AR indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Urinary Tract Infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system), difficulty in walking, and metabolic encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure). Resident 30's Record of Admission indicated Resident 30 was discharged from the facility on 6/5/2023. During an interview on 10/4/23 at 2:53 p.m. with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) was accurate for one of one sampled resident (Residents 39). Resident 39's MDS incorrectly indicated she had physical restraints (any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 39 not to receive appropriate treatment and/or services. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), dated 7/25/23, the AR indicated Resident 39 was admitted to facility on 5/27/23 with diagnoses including multiple falls, presence of left artificial hip joint, and syncope (fainting or passing out) and collapse. During a review of Resident 39's MDS, dated 8/29/23, the MDS indicated Resident 39 had no impairment in cognitive skills (the ability to make daily decisions). Resident 39 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17) that addressed Resident 17's sleeping patterns and the level of assistance required for Resident 17's activities of daily living (ADL, term used in healthcare that refers to self-care activities) in accordance with Resident 17's preferences and needs. This failure had the potential to result in diminished quality of life and a decline in Resident 17's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 6/20/2019 with multiple diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (damaged heart blood vessels due to fat deposits), type 2 diabetes mellitus (long standing condition where the body does not produce enough or resists insulin [hormone that helps the body use sugar for energy]), and major depressive disorder (mental health disorder, a persistent low mood with symptoms like lack of energy, sleep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the intravenous (IV, administered into veins) site promptly and ensure the site was secured and free of any complications for one of one sampled resident (Resident 18) in accordance with Resident 18's care plan, the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P), and standards of practice. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 18's physical and psychosocial well-being due to complications of IV therapy. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated Resident 18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident screening and care-planning tool), dated 8/28/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 18's active diagnoses included coronary artery disease (CAD, buildup of fat deposits in the wall of the arteries supplying blood to the heart), diabetes mellitus (metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 12 sampled residents (Residents 28, 33 and 155) received assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) including nail grooming. Residents 28, 33, and 155's fingernails were long and jagged. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 28, 33 and 155 to hurt themselves and dirt and germs to get under the fingernails. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 28's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated, Resident 28 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 28's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 8/23/23, the H&P indicated, Resident 28 had multiple diagnoses including subdural hemorrhage (SDH, a type of bleed inside your head) and prostate cancer. The H&P indicated, Resident 28 had the capacity to make own decisions. During a review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess one of one sampled resident (Resident 19) for risks for falling upon admission to the facility on 9/5/23 and implement care and services to prevent falls in according to the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P). Resident 19, who had a history of falls (to move downwards from higher to a lower level), sustained a fall on 9/7/23, two days after being admitted to the facility. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 19 to develop injury and/or harm to herself. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), dated 9/5/23, the AR indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 19's Client Diagnosis Report, dated 9/14/23, the Client Diagnosis Report indicated, Resident 19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system), acute respiratory failure (when the lungs can't get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 36) was provided appropriate treatment and services for care of a clinically-justified indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube which is inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Resident 36's indwelling catheter was not kept anchored and secured. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as excessive tension on the catheter, which can lead to urethral (urethra, part of the body that is a tube that carries urine from the bladder to outside the body) tears and/or discomfort, dislodging the catheter, impeding flow of urine, and kinking of the catheter tubing. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated, Resident 36 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 36's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 5/24/23, the H&P indicated, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 48) received the necessary oxygen (O2) care as ordered. a. Resident 48 had an order of O2 at 2 liters (L, unit of measurement) per minute and was observed with 2.5 liters per minute via (through) nasal cannula (N/C, a tube used to deliver oxygen to help with breathing) on 10/3/23 at 12:54 p.m. b. Resident 48 had only one prong of the N/C in one of Resident 48's nostrils on 10/3/23 at 12:54 p.m. These deficient practices had the potential to result in untoward reaction to Resident 48. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's Record of admission (admission Record, AR), the AR indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of right femur (broken bone of the leg), repeated falls, and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). During a review of Resident 48's Physician Orders, dated 9/15/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report the results of an investigation of an allegation of abuse to two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) within five working days of the incident to the State Survey Agency for a resident to resident abuse allegation, for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential that the facility would not do a thorough investigation and take appropriate corrective actions to prevent further abuse between Resident 1 and 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Record of admission indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/9/23. Resident 1 ' s medical diagnoses included type 2 diabetes [a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin (hormone regulates the amount of glucose/sugar in the blood) was impaired], urinary tract infection (UTI- is an infection in any part of the urinary system), and high blood pressure. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and screening tool) dated 8/15/23, indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PILGRIM PLACE IN CLAREMONT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/1980 |
| CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 11/30/2016 |
| BOLDING, RONALD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/05/2019 |
| MORABITO, AUDREY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/28/2016 |
| RODAS, RICHARD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/25/2016 |
| BLAY, KRIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| DAWES, MAISIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| DWYRE, JILL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| HELD, KAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| MCPHERSON-VENTURA, DARLENE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| SHAPIRO, DIANE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| WALKER, ELAINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| BUTLER, JIM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| DUNCAN, STEVE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| GRIESINGER, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055261. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.