Colusa Medical Center - SNF
199 E Webster Street, Colusa, CA 95932 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 6 certified beds · (530) 691-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- the CMS record shows $4,558 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-30)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.00 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when it failed to maintain facility temperature above 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2's decreased desire to ambulate out of bed, Resident 1's oxygen tubing became stiff, and every day-shift staff member wore a padded jacket or sweatshirt during their shift. Findings: During a record review of facility policies, Safety and Emergency Management (SEM) stated facility policies were moved to a digitalized form and could not be produced during the investigation. During a record review of Resident 1's admission record, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation (COPD - a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung), acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (an increase in arterial carbon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a Registered Nurse (RN) 8 hours a day, 7 days per week from 4/1/24 to 12/28/24. This failure had potential to affect the quality of care and quality of life of residents and put them at risk for injury by not having an RN to oversee their care. Findings: A review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, an electronic system for facilities to submit staffing information), for Fiscal Year Quarter 3: (April - December 2024), indicated the facility had no RN on duty for: 4/21/24, 4/27/24, 4/28/24, 5/4/24, 5/5/24, 5/11/24, 5/12/24, 5/18/24, 5/19/24, 5/25/24, 5/26/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/8/24, 6/9/24, 6/15/24, 6/16/24, 6/22/24, 6/23/24, 6/29/24, 6/30/24, 7/6/24, 7/7/24, 7/13/24, 7/14/24, 7/20/24, 7/21/24, 7/27/24, 7/28/24, 8/3/24, 8/4/24, 8/10/24, 8/11/24, 8/17/24, 8/18/24, 8/24/24, 8/25/24, 8/31/24, 9/1/24, 9/7/24, 9/8/24, 9/14/24, 9/15/24, 9/28/24, 9/29/24, 10/5/24, 10/6/24, 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 10/19/24, 10/20/24, 10/26/24, 10/27/24, 11/2/24, 11/3/24, 11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/16/24, 11/17/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, 11/30/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop personalized Activity care plans for four of five residents who were sampled for care plans. (Residents 4, 5, 59, and 110) This had the potential for the residents' activity interests to go unmet and cause them boredom and depression which could negatively impact their rehabilitation goals and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Activity Program revised 4/2024, indicated, The Skilled Nursing Program provides an ongoing program of meaningful activities appropriate to the needs and interests of residents and is an integral part of the resident's overall plan of care. The activities program is staffed and equipped to encourage the participation of each patient, to meet the needs and interest of each patient .2. Each Resident's activity program is implemented for each patient and shall be integrated with the individual interdisiciplinary [involving all care areas] patient care plan. A review of Resident 4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit the required Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The failure to submit the required data, staffing hours and census information, can prevent determining an adequate level of staff is working at a given time, leading to inadequate care of residents and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: On 03/19/24 at 8:30 AM, the PBJ reporting was reviewed with the Interim Facility Administrator (IFA). IFA stated, I am not sure who is doing it. I would have to check and see who it is here. On 3/19/24 at 9:30 AM, during an interview with the Director of Quality (DQ), the DQ sated, We had something come in about submitting PBJ Data and I looked it over and told them it wasn't something I do in quality. I don't know what they did with it from there. The DQ was asked who would be submitting the data and she replied, I don't know who they gave it to, possibly the DON? On 3/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) provided staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the medication room at nursing station B, when an overhead air intake duct vent cover was notably fuzzy and dark with dusty material and particulates. This failure had the potential to contaminate (contact with an unclean substance which renders something unusable), medications administered to residents with a potential for poor health outcomes. Findings: A concurrent observation and interview, was conducted on 3/19/24 at 1:45 pm, in the medication room at nursing station B with Charge Nurse (CN) 1. An overhead air intake duct vent cover was notably fuzzy and dark with dusty material and particulates, CN 1 stated, Oh, it needs to be cleaned. A concurrent interview and record review was conducted on 3/20/24 at 2:15 pm, with the Director of Pharmacy (DP) who confirmed that medications being pulled out from the automated medication dispenser could be contaminated by dirty air flow.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain temperature logs for the resident food/snack refrigerator. The failure to monitor refrigerator temperatures can lead to food borne illness by food that has unknowingly not been maintained at a safe temperature. Findings: On 03/19/24 at 2:24 PM, during a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, the Nurses Station B Resident/Patient refrigerator was observed. The refrigerator is a split, over under refrigerator/freezer unit with separate doors for each compartment. LVN 3 located and read the thermometer temperatures aloud. The refrigerator was 36 degrees Fahrenheit and 18 degrees Fahrenheit in the freezer. A log sheet was in a clear plastic sleeve affixed to the left side of the refrigerator. The sleeve contained monthly temperature log sheets upon which staff document daily refrigerator/freezer temperatures. LVN 3 confirmed the temperature sheets for the refrigerator/freezer were not filled out by staff for January, February and up to March 19, 2024. LVN 3 stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the attending pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were documented in five of five resident's (Resident 109, 4, 7, 2 and 3) medical record. This did not follow facility policy. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled: Psychotherapeutic Drug Management reviewed on September 2021, the policy indicated that The facility pharmacist shall note in the resident's medical record that the pharmacy medication review regimen was completed. The policy continues to indicate that all documentation shall be included in the medical record. During Resident medical record reviews on 11/2/2021, five resident's medical records were reviewed and there were no pharmacist medication review's recorded in their medical record. During an interview on 11/2/2021, at 12:30 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), she indicated that the medication review was done by the pharmacist. She indicated that the medication review records, by the Pharmacist, are kept on his computer and not in the resident's medical records. No one had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure five of five residents (Resident 2, 3, 4, 7, 109) had completed comprehensive care plans to meet the needs of the residents when: 1. Resident 4 did not have a bowel and bladder care plan; 2. Resident 2, 4, and 7's did not have discharge care plans; and 3. Resident 2, 3, 4, 7, and 109, did not have activity care plans. These failure had the potential to negatively effect the physical and psychosocial needs of these residents and prevent them from achieving their goals. During a review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans dated June 2019, the policy indicated, A comprehensive care plan is developed for the resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. 4. The care plan: a. addresses the resident's needs, strengths, and preferences identified in the comprehensive assessment; b. Addressees risk factors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to provide two of five Residents (Resident 7 and 4), the right to be treated with dignity and respect and provide privacy during their treatment and care of personal needs. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 and Resident 4 to feel a lack of self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated November 2017, indicated that patient rights were 12. To be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and in care of personal needs. During an observation on 11/01/21, at 10:49 AM, in the facility hallway, Resident 7 was in her wheel chair (w/c) being wheeled by the therapy staff. Resident 7 had a Foley catheter drainage bag, with urine in it, hanging on the w/c. The drainage bag was in full view of visitors and staff who were in the hallway. During an observation and interview on 11/02/21, at 9:40 AM , in the facility hallway, Resident 4 was being wheeled in a shower chair, to the shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe clean and comfortable homelike environment when it: 1. Did not maintain a resident room above 68 degrees as required by regulation and; 2. Maintain a kitchen drain that allowed water to puddle on the dishwashing room floor. These failures could lead to residents and visitors being uncomfortable, loss of body heat and slip and fall injuries. Findings: 1. On 11/03/2021 at 9:25 AM, during a concurrent observation and interview, Resident 109 was observed sitting on her bedside with a blanket wrapped around her shoulders and being held closed with her left hand. Resident 109 was asked about the room temperature and wearing the blanket. Resident 109 affirmed the room is cold and she was wearing the blanket to stay warm. The room temperature at Resident 109's bed was checked with a handheld thermometer. Resident 109 was asked to read the temperature and she replied, 67.5. The temperature was visually confirmed at 67.5 degrees Fahrenheit. It was observed there was no thermostat on the wall. Resident 109's roommate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater when there were 25 medication pass opportunities for error and two errors resulting in a medication error rate of eight percent. This failure resulted in the medication error for two of five residents (Resident 2 and Resident 109) when 1. Resident 2's medication were combined, and 2. The manufacture instructions were not followed when medication was given to Resident 109. These errors had the potential to cause altered therapeutic doses of medications. Findings: 1. During observations and interview on 11/01/2021, at 2:10 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 prepared medications, Buspirone 7.5 mg (milligrams) (anxiety medication) and Tylenol 325 mg two tablets (pain medication). She crushed the medications together and combined them in a medication cup and added water to dilute the medications. LVN 1 went to Resident 2's room to dispense the medications. Resident 2 had a gastrostomy tube (G-Tube, A tube placed through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not employ industry standards as required in the storage of dry goods. Not employing industry standards could lead to the spread of food borne illness to residents leading to illness and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: On 11/01/2021 at 11:51 AM the Kitchen was toured with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS). While observing the dry food storage area three items were found to be open and did not have expiration/discard dates as required by facility policy. The items were: Pancake Mix- received August 21, 2021; Pancake Mix- received October 21 (Not fully dated as to when received) and; Corn Starch- received August 8, 21. The three packages were opened however, staff did not write the date of opening on the package. Due to no opened date staff would not know when the items were stale, unusable or needing to be discarded because of age. The DSS acknowledged the dates were supposed to have been added by staff at the time of opening per policy and were not. The DSS also pointed out a document of expiration timeframes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-04 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility does not have the necessary membership attendance at the Quality Assurance/Performance improvement meetings as regulations require. The failure to have membership attendance as required reduces the exchange of information between disciplines decreasing the effectiveness of the provision of quality care leading to suboptimal care and outcomes. Findings: The Director of Quality Management (QM) was interviewed on 11/04/2021 at 10:15 AM regarding the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) at the facility. The QM provided and reviewed signed attendance sheets titled, Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) Confidentiality Statement. The Medical Director did not affirm his attendance by signing attendance sheets for May 14, 2021 and August 30, 2021. When discussing the attendance by the Medical Director the QM stated, I know it is required. I just can't get him to come. The QM was asked for a facility policy or procedure for attendance at the QIC meetings. The QM provided and reviewed the document titled, Quality Management Plan. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were adhered to when three of three staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1, Licensed vocational Nurse [LVN] 1, and LVN 2) provided patient care without following infection control policy and procedures. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infection and disease to the residents they cared for. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 11/1/2021, at 11:39 AM, CNA 1 was observed assisting Resident 4 with toileting. CNA 1 used a standing lift (a device that assists residents to stand) to stand Resident 4 up. With gloves on, CNA 1 removed the soiled brief. There was a moderate amount of stool and urine on Resident 4 and in the brief. CNA 1 cleaned the Resident from front to back with wipes. She threw away the soiled brief and wipes but kept her soiled gloves on. With those same soiled gloves, CNA 1 put a clean brief on Resident 4, removed the sling that was around his waist, touched Resident 4's bedside table and moved it in front of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$4,558 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $4,558 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLUSA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| RANDHAWA, GURPREET | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/2016 |
| THOMPSON, TAMMY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2017 |
| BHULLAR, SHAMSHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/2016 |
| NIJJAR, JAGRAJ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555909. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.