Corona Health Care Center
1400 Circle City Drive, Corona, CA 92879 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (951) 735-0252 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.28 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.85 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.9%CMS range 37.8–59.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.5–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.5–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 88.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one or three residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 24 and 57):1.Two person-assistance was provided during incontinent care (cleaning the resident while in bed after periods of urination or bowel elimination) in accordance with the plan of care, for Resident 24. This failure resulted to Resident 24 fell from the bed, complaint of pain and swelling at the right thigh, which indicated fracture (broken bone) to the right thigh, and subsequently was sent out to the acute care hospital for further management; 2. The smoking paraphernalia (cigarette and lighter) were stored in a secured container according to facility policy and procedure, for Resident 57. This failure has the potential to place Resident 57 at risk for smoking related accidents Findings:1.On July 21, 2025, at 3 p.m., Resident 24 was observed inside the room, awake and lying on an air loss mattress (designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2):1.Ongoing monitoring and assessment were provided, when there was a change of condition of injuries sustained from resident's fall to the posterior (back) head and right arm on February 5, 2026;2. There was no physician order to address the skin tear on the right arm; and3. There was no care plan developed to address the fall incident with injuries on February 5, 2026.These failures had the potential for injuries sustained from a fall incident not to monitored for any complications related to the fall and injuries. Findings:On February 24, 2026, at 9:55 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint involving quality of care and treatment. On February 24, 2026, at 2:25 p.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 was observed in bed, alert, and conversant. Resident 2 stated she had some pain in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the food and nutrition services and food were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1.Outside food items were not stored past the store by date and properly labeled according to the facility's policy and procedure; and2.The [NAME] did not disinfect the food thermometer in between use.These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness and food poisoning within their resident population.Findings:1.On July 24, 2025, at 3:50 p.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). The designated shared residents' refrigerator located in the conference room was inspected. The DS stated residents were allowed to store personal food in the designated shared refrigerator. The DS stated food was allowed to stay for three days in the refrigerator and the food item should be dated and labeled with the resident's name and room number upon storage.Signage was observed posted on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of safe and effective pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents when:1. For Resident 39, cholestyramine (medication used to lower cholesterol and treat itching or diarrhea caused by a buildup of bile acids [substances made by the liver that help digest fats]) was administered without appropriate separation from other oral medications, not in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and the facility's consultant pharmacist's recommendation to separate administrations.This failure had the potential to result in reduced drug absorption, and inadequate medication treatment, compromising the effectiveness of other administered medications; and 2. The documentation on Controlled Drug Record (CDR, accountability records, an inventory sheet that keeps records of the usage of controlled medications) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not reconcile for two randomly selected residents (Residents 78 and 106).These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures and/or manufacturer's instructions when:1. One discontinued and expired medication for Resident 107 was stored in Medication Refrigerator in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] along with other active medications available for use;2. A total of four IV (intravenous, into a vein) Mini-Bag Plus containers, removed from manufacturer's overwrap, were stored without beyond use dates (BUD, date or time after which the product may not be used) in IV Emergency Kit (E-kit, a sealed container with various medications for use in emergencies) in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]; and3. One expired inhaler for Resident 71 was stored in Medication Cart 1.These failures had the potential for residents to receive discontinued, expired, or ineffective medications, leading to medication errors and compromised treatment outcomes.Findings:1. On July 22, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cook (Cook 1) followed the recipe for pureed (blend food into soft consistency) vegetables.This failure has the potential to affect the consistency, taste, and nutritive value of the pureed menu items, and further affect the resident's overall health condition.Findings:On July 23, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., a kitchen observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 stated there were 18 residents on a puree diet and that she had already prepared the pureed foods at 10:00 a.m.Cook 1 stated she followed the recipe book for pureed foods. [NAME] 1 stated when she prepared the pureed vegetables, she added two cups of water. Observed [NAME] 1 stirring the pureed vegetables, and noted the consistency of the pureed vegetables was more liquid than pudding consistency. [NAME] 1 was then observed pouring powder directly from a plastic clear container to the pureed vegetables without measuring. [NAME] 1 stated that she put 1.5 cups of thickener in the pureed vegetables (used to change the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were upheld when:1. One licensed nurse was observed wearing long, acrylic nails while providing direct patient care;2. One licensed nurse was observed not to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- a type of isolation precaution) while providing direct patient care to Resident 45; and3. For Resident 44, the nebulizer tubing and mask, as well as the Yankauer suction tip (type of suction tip), were not stored appropriately when not in use.These failures had the potential to spread infection among the vulnerable residents of the facility. Findings: 1. On July 23, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., the medication cart was observed in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 was observed coming out of the room after a few minutes. In a concurrent interview, LVN 3 stated she finished with her medication pass (administration) and the task entailed checking blood sugars and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure written information to formulate an Advance Directive (AD - written instruction for the provision of care and services when unable to make decisions for oneself) was provided to the resident or the resident representative, according to the facility's policy and procedure, for two of two residents (Resident 49 and Resident 88). This failure had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary care/treatment and services.Findings: 1. On July 21, 2025, at 10:18 a.m., Resident 49’s record was reviewed. Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer’s dementia (memory loss). A review of Resident 49’s “Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a document that outlines a seriously ill or frail patient's preferences for medical treatment, particularly at the end of life), dated July 4, 2025, indicated Resident 49 had no AD, with the checkbox for legally assigned decision maker marked with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure on discharging a resident without a physician's approval was implemented, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 102).This failure has the potential to place Resident 102 at risk for unsafe discharge.Findings:On July 24, 2025, Resident 102's record was reviewed. Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, abnormality of gait and mobility, and local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. A review of Resident 102's History and Physical, dated March 31, 2025, indicated Resident 102 had the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 102's Progress Notes, indicated the following :-On May 21, 2025, at 11:16 p.m., completed by licensed nurse, .Resident went out on pass during the AM shift to move his belongings from apartment to storage with movers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 85 and 10):1. For Resident 85, had a follow-up appointment with neurology (study of the brain after hospital discharge) as ordered on the general acute hospital (GACH) discharge summary; and2. For Resident 10, the facility identified, monitored, and notified the physician in a timely manner, multiple skin discolorations on both hands and the left upper extremity.These failures had the potential for Residents 85 and 10 to have a delay in the care and treatment and placed the resident at high risk for complications.Findings: 1.On July 23, 2025, Resident 85’s record was reviewed. Resident 85’s “admission Record,” indicated Resident 85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included seizures (abnormal electrical activity in the brain), narcolepsy (brain’s inability to regulate sleep-wake cycle). The “History and Physical,” completed by the physician, dated February 24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately conduct pain assessment, for one of one resident (Resident 24).This failure had the potential for Resident 24's pain to be unmanaged appropriately.Findings:On July 23, 2025 at 12:24 p.m., during a concurrent observation of Resident 24 and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 in Resident 24's room, Resident 24 was assessed for pain in English and Spanish by LVN 6. Resident 24 did not verbally respond and did not gesture with any head nodding up and down or side to side. LVN 6 stated Resident 24 was in pain if she would grimace or moan.A review of Resident 24's admission Record, indicated Resident 24 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bilateral osteoarthritis (a chronic joint disease characterized by the breakdown of cartilage, the protective tissue that cushions the ends of bones in joints) of knee, right knee contracture (a permanent shortening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues that restricts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of one resident (Resident 7):- Post dialysis (a medical procedure that acts as an artificial kidney, used when a person's kidneys fail to remove waste and excess fluid from the blood) complications were appropriately monitored on July 21, 2025;- The physician was notified of Resident 7's low blood pressure after dialysis treatment; and- Resident 7 's low blood pressure was not monitored. These failures had the potential to result in the untimely reporting of adverse effects and symptoms post dialysis, which could also result in a decline in health condition.Findings: On July 22, 2025, at 1:45 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2). LVN 2 stated a progress note were to be written when a resident would go out for dialysis treatment and another progress note to be documented when the resident would get back from the dialysis treatment. LVN 2 further stated upon a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of five residents (Resident 69), when the nursing staff failed to clarify Resident 69's physician's order for lidocaine (medication for pain) 4% (percent, a unit of measurement for concentration) transdermal (topical) patches that directed application twice daily and failed to apply and remove the patch in accordance with both the physician's order and the manufacturer's instructions.This deficient practice had the potential to result in ineffective pain management, medication administration errors and compromised treatment outcomes as well as excessive lidocaine exposure and avoidable side effects such as skin irritation.Findings:On July 23, 2025, during a review of Resident 69's medical record, the admission Record indicated Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory), major depressive disorder (depression), anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three resident (Resident 1) was free from misappropriation of property when the Social Service Designee (SSD) used Resident 1's bank card to purchase items for her personal use, without consent from Resident 1. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's psychosocial wellbeing. Findings:On June 19, 2025, at 1:45 p.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to conduct two complaints and one Facility Reported Incident regarding allegation of abuse.On June 19, 2025, at 2 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the ADM (Administrator), the DON stated the following information gathered through their investigation:-A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) notified him that Resident 1 had a concern regarding his Social Security Income (SSI);-Resident 1 reported he checked his bank account and noticed that there was not much money as he expected to be in there;-Resident 1 informed the SSD about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine and its components were properly cleaned and sanitized, for 87 of 90 residents who received ice from the the facility's ice machine. This failure had the potential to result in contamination of the ice being served to all residents and could lead to waterborne illness. Findings: On April 18, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility, for the investigation of a complaint regarding dietary services. On April 18, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., an observation and inspection of the facility's Food Service's ice machine was conducted. A dry and clean paper towels were swiped along the top inside bin of the ice machine. The paper towels were noted to have multiple black and brown flakes present on them. The outside, top and sides of the ice machine, were noted to have a layer of dust, brown stain marks, and various pest legs, accumulating on the equipment. A dry clean paper towel was run along the top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure devices used for the residents, were sanitary, clean, and disinfected properly, when: 1. The pill crusher was observed with brown sticky substance, for 15 of 27 residents which required medications to be crushed; and 2. The stand lift machine (a non-electric standing aid designed to assist seniors in safely rising from a seated position in chairs, couches, or recliners) was observed to be dirty, for one of one resident who uses the stand lift machine. These failures had the potential to result in the residents being exposed to unsanitary shared devices which could lead to spread of infections. Findings: On April 18, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of a complaint. On April 18, 2025, at 11:10 a.m., an observation of Nurse Station 3 (three) and hallway 300 was conducted. The Medication Cart 3 (three) was noted to have a pill crusher on top of the cart and was coated in a brown, semi soft, sticky substance, covering the area the pills were being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment, for two of two residents who independently uses the smoking patio (Resident A and Resident B), when the fire door closed was dismantled. In addition, the ceiling above the fire door closer was observed to have water damage. These failures had the potential to cause injury to Residents A and B while entering or exiting through the fire door. In addition, the stained ceiling had the potential for it to collapse and could injure residents and staff. Findings: On April 18, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of a complaint. On April 18, 2025, at 11:50 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident A. Resident A was observed to wheel himself to the smoking area. Resident A was observed to go outside through the exit door, at the end of hallway 100. The fire door closer was observed to be dismantled, and the door did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the system of identifying and monitoring fall risk residents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure has the potential for the staff not to provide interventions to residents, resulting to recurrent falls. Findings: On August 12, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., during observation with Resident 1 sitting in a wheelchair in the activity room. He was observed wearing a neck brace (neck support), with black purplish discoloration on the right periorbital (surrounding the eye) area and a band aid on the right eyebrow. Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to facility on July 7, 2024, with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, dementia (forgetful). A review of the History and Physical Examination, dated July 9, 2024, indicated, Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Fall Risk Assessment, dated July 7, 2024, indicated a score of 70 (score of 45 and higher indicates resident as high risk for fall)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a consistent and accurate reconciliation of controlled medications (drugs or medications that possess the potential for being misused) for two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in loss of medications and the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 2 to experience preventable suffering and inadequate pain management. In addition, this failure increased the risk for drug diversion (unauthorized/illicit use). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s clinical records, the face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, difficulty walking, and idiopathic peripheral neuropathy. A review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s orders, dated February 1, 2024, indicated a physician order for, Norco 5/325 mg (Hydrocodone acetaminophen) 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for three of eight residents reviewed for Advance Directive (AD - written instruction related to the provision of health care when the resident is no longer able to make decisions), the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident 38 and 76, a copy of their formulated AD was available for review in the resident's medical records. This failure had the potential for Residents 38 and 76's treatment wishes to not be honored; and 2. For Resident 37, the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment - a portable medical order form that records the resident's treatment wishes for emergency personnel reference) was completed by the resident's representative to indicate the resident's care treatment. This failure had the potential for the facility staff to be not aware of Resident 37's treatment wishes and unable to implement the plan of care for the resident's medical condition. Findings: 1a. On June 27, 2024, Resident 38's record was reviewed. Resident 38 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (narcotic medications - used to treat moderate to severe pain) were accounted for, for five of five residents reviewed (Residents 26, 32, 21, 6, and 39) when the narcotic medications were not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) as administered to the residents. In addition, Resident 26 and 39's narcotic pain medication was not given as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to result in possible diversion of controlled medications. Findings: On June 28, 2024, at 11:43 a.m., during a concurrent inspection the narcotic box of medication cart 3, interview, and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, the following were observed: 1. Resident 26's narcotic count sheet indicated Norco (narcotic pain medication) 10/325 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) one tablet for moderate pain (pain rate scale of 4 to 6) every four (4) hours as needed and two (2) tabs every four (4) hours as needed for severe pain (pain rate scale of 7 to 10).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled according to the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Multiple over the counter and treatment medications were not identifiable to be discarded or disposed of, were readily available for use in medication storage room at Station 1; 2. Three (3) Luer Lock (brand of syringe) IV (intravenous - through the vein) kits were found expired in the IV Cart; 3. Two (2) bags of 250 ml (milliliter - unit of measurement) normal saline IV were unlabeled and readily available for use in the IV cart; 4. For Residents 68 and 49, multiple medications of different forms and route were stored together in an area in the med cart of station three (3); 5. For Residents 85, 58, and 53, the discontinued meds were found stored in the med cart station three (3) readily available for use; and 6. For Resident 68, the label on the medication bottle found in the narcotic box containing 10 pills in station three (3) was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, sanitary food preparation and storage practices were followed in the kitchen when: 1. Food preparation and cooking pans (19 sheet pans, 3 baking pans, 1 steamer pan, 4 small deep container pans, 5 small shallow containers) were stacked wet one on top of another; 2. Dust was observed in several kitchen storage shelves, equipment, and ventilation vents; 3. Observed rust on the metal storage shelves, back stove hood, and fire suppression water pipes; 4. Wooden shelves in storage room were found with chipped paint and dust; 5. Dietary Aide (DA) 3 was observed not removing gloves and washing hands, after handling trash; 6. Observed broken and missing floor tiles in the walk-in-refrigerator, walk-in-freezer, back stove area, and dishwashing machine area; and 7. There was water pooling and unable to drain into the floor drain in the dishwasher area. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population. Findings: On June 25, 2024, starting at 9:05…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their own policy and procedure to provide an environment free of pests, when black flies were observed flying and landing in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to lead to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) in the facility residents who eat food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: On June 25, 2024, at 10:16 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the back stove area of the kitchen. One black fly was observed flying over the back stove area several times. The DSS confirmed the fly was present and it should not have been there, as could cause cross-contamination of the residents' food. On June 25, 2024, at 2:55 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review with the Registered Dietitian (RD). The RD confirmed this facility had a pest control issue with house flies. The RD stated her expectation was that the kitchen was not supposed to have any pests as they could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eligible residents were provided with a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN- a notice a provider gives after receiving services based on Medicare, federal funded program that covers skilled nursing facility in writing), for two of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notice (Residents 75 and 52). This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to be informed of services should they decide to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. Findings: 1. On June 28, 2024, at 09:45 a.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Business Office Manager (BOM). The BOM stated Resident 75 was readmitted from the general acute hospital (GACH) on February 28, 2024. The BOM stated Resident 75 was provided skilled services under Medicare Part A from February 28, 2024, to April 12, 2024. The BOM stated Resident 75 was transferred from skilled care to custodial care effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a resident assessment instrument), for one of one resident reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 88). This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Resident 88's care and support needs, and cause delay in these needs being met. Findings: On June 27, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., during a concurrent interview and record review with the MDS Coordinator, she stated the Resident 88's Discharge MDS Section A - Identification Information, dated March 29, 2024, indicated the resident was entered as discharged to short term general hospital. She stated Resident 88 was discharged to home. The MDS coordinator stated Resident 88's MDS was not coded accurately. A review of CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, indicated, .this item documents the location to which the resident is being discharged at the time of discharge. Knowing the setting to which individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the physician's order and the facility's policy and procedure, for two of two residents reviewed during medication storage inspection (Residents 192 and 51). This failure had the potential for Residents 192 and 51 to not receive the full efficacy of the medication and had the potential to place Residents 192 and 51 at risk to affect their health condition. Findings: 1. On June 27, 2024, at 10:50 a.m., Station 3 medication cart was inspected with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2. The following bubble pack medications for Resident 192 were observed to contain medications/pills on the following bubble number (#): - Levothyroxin (medication to treat hypothyroidism [a condition in which the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone which could disrupt heart rate, body temperature, and all aspects of metabolism.]) 75MCG (microgram - unit of measurement) take half tablet = 37.5 mcg once daily, give on an empty stomach; bubble # 26 and 27 contained one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided, for one of five residents reviewed for oxygen (Resident 77), when a humidifier bottle (a medical device used to increase moisture and decrease dryness from oxygen) was found undated. This failure had the potential to place Resident 77 at risk for infection and respiratory failure. Findings: On June 26, 2024, at 11:16 a.m., Resident 77 was observed sitting upright in her bed, the resident had an oxygen concentrator next to her bed with a tubing connected to the oxygen concentrator with the flow of oxygen at the rate of 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula (a device that give you additional oxygen). An undated humidifier bottle was connected to the oxygen concentrator. On June 26, 2024, at 11:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated the humidifier bottle was not dated on the oxygen concentrator for Resident 77. The IP further stated the humidifier bottle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (medication to manage mental and mood disorders) were necessary in managing mental illness, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 55), when there was no evaluation or assessment by the IDT (Interdisciplinary team - a group of healthcare professionals) and psychiatrist prior to the use of risperidone (medication to treat mental illness). This failure had the potential for Resident 55 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication and placed the resident at risk for adverse reactions. Findings: On June 27, 2024, Resident 55's record was reviewed. Resident 55 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and initial admission date of September 1, 2022, with diagnoses which included depression (feeling of sadness) and schizophrenia (a mental illness). A review of Resident 55's physician orders, dated November 19, 2023, included an order for risperidone 1 (one) mg (milligram - unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory order for hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C - blood test that shows what your average blood sugar (glucose) level was over the past two to three months) was completed as ordered, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 53). This failure had the potential for Resident 53's blood sugar level to be uncontrolled and not be managed. Findings: On June 28, 2024, Resident 53's record was reviewed. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM - abnormal blood sugar). A review of Resident 53's physician order included the following medications to treat DM: - Humalog injection (insulin medication) per sliding scale (amount of units to be given according to the blood sugar level) before meals and at bedtime; and - Insulin Detemir solution (insulin medication) give 40 units twice a day. A review of Resident 53's physician order included the following laboratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to ensure infection control measures were implemented according to the facility's policy and procedure, when: 1. The facility staff did not assess and change Resident 85's intravenous (IV- soft flexible tube placed inside a vein to give fluids or medicine) site when re-admitted to the facility. This failure had the potential to cause a life threatening infection for the resident; and 2. The facility did not report in a timely manner to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) when the facility had a COVID-19 (coronavirus - a contagious respiratory infection) outbreak on June 8, 2024. This failure had the potential to prevent effective outbreak management that could have potentially prevented further Covid cases. Findings: 1. On June 25, 2024, at 12:36 p.m., Resident 85 was observed with an IV dressing placed to the top of right hand, undated, and unlabeled with transparent dressing lifting. In a concurrent interview with Resident 85, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were developed and implemented to address high risk for fractures (broken bones) secondary to osteoporosis (brittle bones) and history of fracture, for one of three residents (Resident A), when: 1. Further assessment and evaluation were not conducted to determine if Resident A was still a candidate for transfer using Hoyer lift (is a mobility tool for a person to be transferred between a bed and a chair or other similar resting places, by the use of electrical or hydraulic power) after Resident A sustained a leg fracture on September 8, 2023 during transfer to the gerichair (a large, padded chair that is designed to help someone with limited mobility) using the Hoyer lift; and 2. An individualized care plan to prevent fracture of the right leg using the use of Hoyer lift during transfer was not developed for Resident A. These failures had the resulted in Resident A to sustain a second fracture on February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to include hip precautions following a right hip arthroplasty (hip replacement surgery, a type of joint replacement surgery), for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the staff to not be aware of the interventions to be implemented to prevent complications related to the hip surgery of Resident 1. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience post hip surgery complications (i.e. dislocation of the right hip, fracture [broken bone]). Findings: On November 30, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a facility reported incident and a complaint intake. On November 30, 2023, at 2:28 p.m., Resident 1' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (bone infection in regions of the bone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent incident of altercation between residents when the facility failed to provide one-on-one (1:1) monitoring (staff always remain with resident), for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further incidents of altercation with other residents involving Resident 1. Findings: On November 8, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of a facility reported incident. On November 8, 2023, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory), bipolar disorder (mood disorder), and major depressive disorder (decreased interest in activities). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), dated September 18, 2023, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices were implemented in the kitchen when: 1. Food items were stored in the refrigerator past the used-by date and were readily available for use; 2. One container of sugar stored in inside a plastic bag stored in the dry storage area was left open; and 3. The air gap (space between the water outlet and the flood level of a fixture) had a thick build-up of a dark black substance from the drain to the refrigerator. These failures had the potential for the growth of harmful bacteria and cross contamination that could lead to food borne illnesses for a medically compromised population of 62 residents who ate orally and received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 65 residents. Findings: 1. On March 7, 2022, at 9:21 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). One container of vanilla yogurt was observed stored in the refrigerator with an open date of February 27, 2022. One container of tomato juice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and treatment services were provided, for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 54 and 12), when the uncontrolled blood sugar levels were not evaluated and referred to the physician for appropriate management. This failure had the potential for Residents 54 and Resident 12 to be at risk for complications related to diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar). Findings: 1. On March 7, 2022, Resident 54's record was reviewed. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. The Order Summary Report, for February 2022, included a physician's order, dated February 5, 2022, which indicated, .Novolog Solution 100 UNIT/ML (milliliter - unit of measurement) (Insulin Aspart - type of insulin to treat diabetes mellitus) Inject as per sliding scale .BS (blood sugar) < (less than) 70 give juice and notify MD (physician) .before meals ., The plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional care and services were provided, for one of seven residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 56), when, there was no assessment and further interventions to address Resident 56's continued poor food intake, including referral to the Registered Dietician (RD) and the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 56 to have a weight loss of 23 pounds (lbs)/14.02 % (percent) from February 5, 2022, to March 6, 2022 (29 days), which could subsequently cause further decline in the overall health status of Resident 56. Findings: On March 7, 2022, at 12:45 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 56 was conducted. Resident 56 was observed sitting in the wheelchair and refused his lunch meal. In a concurrent interview with Resident 56, he stated I don't want the food. On March 7, 2022, at 1:02 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was interviewed. CNA 1 stated Resident 56 had been refusing his meals. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRIKS, AHARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2015 |
| ROWLES, EDDIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055255. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.